[01:07] <wgrant> jml: Hi, how goes your QA?
[01:07] <wgrant> jml: QA delays block the whole team, so they should generally considered just about top priority.
[11:02] <jml> well, I'd reply to wgrant.
[11:02] <jml> but he's not heree
[11:02] <jml> the perils of IRC as a communication medium.
[11:12] <wgrant> jml: Ah, thanks.
[11:12] <wgrant> Apparently I managed to unknowingly suspend irssi a few hours ago...
[11:13] <wgrant> That bug is actually qa-ok -- it may not fix the bug, but it doesn't break existing functionality, so it can be deployed.
[11:13] <jml> wgrant: I was surprised that you weren't around. :)
[11:14] <jml> ok
[11:14] <jml> hmm.
[11:15] <jml> I'm kind of stuck in other things right now, but it would be good if the docs were updated to make that clearer.
[11:15] <wgrant> Indeed.
[11:16] <wgrant> It all sort of changed when nodowntime happened.
[11:17] <jml> yeah
[11:17] <jml> oh
[11:17] <jml> that reminds me
[11:17] <jml> james_w hacked up a prototype base on lpqateam that tracks QA based on revisions, not bugs.
[11:18] <wgrant> Yeah, I saw that.
[11:18] <wgrant> Makes a lot more sense.
[11:18] <StevenK> Does it publish anywhere?
[11:18] <StevenK> wgrant: How did you suspend irssi? I thought it trapped Ctrl-Z?
[11:19] <wgrant> StevenK: So did I.
[11:19] <wgrant> I have no idea how I did it.
[11:19] <StevenK> Hm, it doesn't trap it.
[11:19] <nigelb> Yeah, this has happened to me. Multiple times.
[11:21] <StevenK> I don't tend to hit Ctrl-Z by accident, though.
[11:21] <nigelb> I do. Instead of Ctrl + A.
[11:21] <nigelb> Btw, tracking qa based on revisions is what the deployment report does, right?
[11:21] <nigelb> Or is there something else that jono's talking about?
[11:22] <wgrant> It's similar.
[11:22] <wgrant> Our current one tracks on an awkward hybrid of revisions and bugs.
[11:22] <wgrant> Which has some pretty strange issues.
[11:22] <jml> StevenK: what do you mean "does it publish"?
[11:22] <jml> StevenK: it's a web service with a pretty looking web page
[11:22] <nigelb> oh? what kind of issues?
[11:23] <StevenK> jml: Which is what I meant. What URL is it at?
[11:23] <jml> StevenK: oh right, I can never remember, he hosts it on ec2 or canonistack or something.
[11:24] <jml> http://ec2-184-73-64-233.compute-1.amazonaws.com/
[11:24] <jml> http://ec2-184-73-64-233.compute-1.amazonaws.com/project/Launchpad
[11:25] <nigelb> bah. openid.
[11:25]  * nigelb hopes he has access.
[11:25] <nigelb> Not allowed here.
[11:25] <StevenK> Neither, I suspect I should have ticked the team checkbox
[11:26] <cjwatson> I didn't get a team checkbox.
[11:26] <cjwatson> Maybe it's restricted to ~launchpad or something.
[11:26] <wgrant> It asks for launchpad
[11:26] <wgrant> Not canonical or anything like that
[11:26] <cjwatson> Or anything that might let nigelb see it.
[11:27] <StevenK> Now I'm not sure how to actually tell SSO to let me see it.
[11:27] <nigelb> logout and log back in guess, with the team checked.
[11:31] <StevenK> Which doesn't help, sadly.
[11:31] <StevenK> Since the site itself still knows about me. Maybe I need to delete cookies.
[11:32] <nigelb> Oh by logout, I meant logout of the site.
[11:33] <nigelb> hrm, maybe deleting cookies is a good idea :D
[11:36] <StevenK> nigelb: How does that help, every page gives "Not allowed here."
[11:41] <G> StevenK: I love it when sites do that
[11:41] <G> *cough*
[11:43] <StevenK> Hey, that site does look pretty.
[11:43] <G> wgrant: btw, maybe instead of ^Z you did ^Q (XON Flow control) ;)
[12:24]  * nigelb waves to G 
[12:24] <nigelb> StevenK: I meant, flush the cookies, so it forgest your login, so you can re-login, giving it your team credentials.
[12:39] <G> nigelb: howdy