[00:02] Done. [00:03] :D [02:14] ScottK, ping [02:17] is there a tag for kde 4.8.2? [02:26] bulldog98_, there wasn't a branch for active untill some days ago, that's why i did not get the patches [03:16] rbelem: 4.8.2 is in precise. [03:22] ScottK, i forgot to mention git :-) [03:22] No idea. [03:22] ScottK, upstream git [03:22] I'd assume so. [03:23] * ScottK is Kubuntu guy, not upstream. [03:23] :-) [03:24] i updated a patch for kdelibs from plasma active [03:26] It's really too late. How critical is it? [03:26] We'll probably have to do it as a post-release update now. [03:27] (unless it's really critical) [03:29] ScottK, some apps are not behaving properly in plasma-active [03:29] ScottK, i think it is ok to release a fix later [03:29] Unless it prevents a successful install, that sounds like something we could do post-release. [03:29] Good. [03:29] :-) [03:30] We can ask to have the Kubuntu Active ISO redone at 12.04.1 if we have some good fixes and people to test it even though it's not LTS. [03:31] that would be really nice :-) [03:32] Excellent. [03:39] Shouldn't be a problem. [03:50] thanks ScottK [03:50] :-) === jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine [07:40] ScottK: I've added kubuntu-docs to the desktop CD, I recon they fit easily, how did you calculate that they don't? [08:30] Hi! Will it be asking too much if I ask to fix typos in Kubuntu own docs (last night package)? (Yes, I filed bug report (Bug 852519), but there was zero reaction on it. Does it really matter to file bug reports at all?) [08:30] Launchpad bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852519 [08:31] yurchor: it all depends if the person incharge of the package is crazy busy or not [08:32] alas most of us are crazy busy most of the time [08:32] fixing typos is of course welcome [08:32] although better would be to check if it still exists in 12.04 [08:34] Riddell: Ok. They stiil exist. And David added the new ones. So if Darkwing have no time to fix this, just mark it as WONTFIX and I will forget about it. ;) [10:43] Darkwing: that guy was a omg writer! http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/04/kubuntu-they-have-invested-millions-in-it/ [10:44] Darkwing: I haven't seen littlegirl on irc for a bit, is she still around? [10:49] Riddell: They fit now, but if they get translations again they may not fit for the point releases. [10:50] If you use the size of the docs in oneiric then the images are all at or over 702. [10:50] ScottK: mm yes, I wonder if it's an idea to split out the translations in that case [10:50] I'm OK either way if you decide not to worry about it, we can cross that bridge when we come to it. [10:51] Riddell: Did you see the ping from skaet about filling out the rest of the manifest? [11:07] ScottK: yes thanks [11:07] ScottK: the amd64+mac images I think we have no testers for and should not release [11:07] Agreed, but I'd wait and see for sure. We've had occasional testers. [11:07] I was wanting to give one more test to armhf+omap4 before I'm happy to say we expect to release that [11:08] shadeslayer has said he might do it if he didn't have exams. [11:08] * ScottK needs to go. Back in an hour or so. [11:08] kubuntu-active I've been testing this morning and does work but has a pesky 5 minute pause on startup (I think soprano to blame) [11:08] rbelem said he had a new active patch for kde4libs. We agreed it could go post-release. [11:09] I also talked to skaet about respinning active for 12.04.1 and she was fine with it as long as we had testers. [11:09] now really leaving === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch [11:49] Howdy all [11:56] Back. Sort of (really laggy connection). === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback [13:16] Riddell: Yeah, he pinged me last night about doing a writeup... [13:16] Riddell: and littlergirl hops on and off... I think she is waiting to be unleased on docs again. [13:21] I wonder if ubuntu is aware of this bug: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2771 [13:21] can we check taht in launchpad? launchpad connects to bugtracks,. right? [13:26] not to every bugtracker software [13:27] bug #965371 [13:27] Launchpad bug 965371 in openssl (Ubuntu Precise) "HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/965371 [13:31] i don't have a login for that rt.openssl.org site [13:31] jdstroud is the security guy for ubuntu and likely to know about that stuff [13:33] that lp bug has all the information [14:01] debfx: thansk! I did looked for the bug but it has many different names depending on the distro [14:01] it doesn't seems medium to me xD [14:02] anyway, I need to rebuild webaccounts but including the packags in this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~cyberspace/+archive/cyber-stuff [14:02] I klnow is not the first time I ask this, but, how can I add that ppa to the recipe? [14:02] I need libakonadi-dev to build webaccounts [14:05] ScottK: afaik the mac images don't have anything different than the standard images, I'll be able to test it though :) [14:06] They do. They boot differently. [14:06] Riddell: ^^^ Tester ahoy. [14:13] can somebody tell me what should I do to apply a patch to a package? [14:26] shadeslayer: are you able to do a smoketest today? [14:27] afiestas: I'm not sure what you mean, adding a dependency to the webaccounts's package is done by adding it to debian/control in the packaging bzr branch [14:27] apol: several ways depending on package but generally you put it in debian/patches and add the filename to debian/patches/series [14:28] Riddell: it's for muon in çcyberspace [14:28] ok [14:28] Riddell: ofcourse, I just need some time to download the ISO [14:29] my old laptop bit the dust after 4 years [14:29] just because nVidia cheaped out on the thermal paste *grumble* [14:29] ( Could have just as easily been Dell ) [14:29] Riddell: and it's a normal git patch... is that ok? [14:31] apol: unified diff format at -p1 level is what it needs [14:31] which is what git produces [14:31] ok [14:31] cool [14:31] apol: the patches are managed using a command called quilt [14:31] so if you want to test that it works you can run quilt push [14:31] (and quilt pop to undo) [14:32] ok thx [14:32] 9 [14:32] oops [14:37] Riddell, any truth to the rumours about the "Kubuntu" name being witheld by Canonical from use by Blue Systems? [14:39] BluesKaj: I suspect any rumors that anyone knows anything for sure are wrong. [14:41] ScottK, rumours were circulating yeserday and it would be nice if they were put to rest [14:41] Sure, but the only way to do that would be a definitive announcement. [14:41] I'd imagine if things were ready for that, it would have been announced. [14:42] In the meantime, rumors are rumors. [14:42] If you read the Ubuntu Trademark policy, it clearly says that commercial use requires permission from Canonical. [14:43] a debian derivative using kde is fine with me ..."a rose by any other name " [14:45] Canonical has plotted a different course for it's distro with unity etc , so kde is being left behind in the dust [14:47] that's a little unfair [14:48] BluesKaj: the trademark licence is available for all to see [14:50] I wouldn't go as far to say that it is unfair though... [14:50] Ubuntu and the related names is a Brand owned and paid for by Canonical. It would not be unfair of them to enforce something that they have paid for. That is buisness. [14:50] I mean the comment was unfair [14:51] ahhh yeah. [14:52] policy declarations ar fine , but a kubuntu sign on an OS , doesn't mean the ports are open :) [14:57] * ScottK isn't sure what that means. [15:03] oh i think you do..you just don't want to add fuel to the fire being an ubuntu member etc..it's understandable [15:04] anyway ...it's just rumours and ltes hope hey're baseless [15:04] lets [15:07] BluesKaj: No. Actually I don't. [15:07] I don't intend to contribute to the rumors either way though. [15:09] ScottK, understood [15:09] * Darkwing reads up [15:13] Riddell: Main only Lucid -> Precise works. [15:19] ScottK: great thanks === mck182 is now known as mck182|afk === mck182|afk is now known as mck182 === jalcine is now known as Guest31570 [20:02] anyone else notice that gstreamer0.10-plugins-good now causes the gnome-keyring to be installed? (it gets pulled in by the libsoup-gnome2.4-1 dependency) [20:21] cmagina: libsoup pulls in libgnome-keyring0 but not gnome-keyring === jalcine_ is now known as JackyAlcine