cnd | bregma, isn't that already handled by geis? | 00:07 |
---|---|---|
cnd | listening for device added events? | 00:07 |
bregma | yes and no | 00:08 |
bregma | some of the tests are assuming the device is already there, 'cos that's part of the test | 00:09 |
cnd | part of the test is the assumption that the device already exists? | 00:09 |
bregma | and, yes, a new bug was revealed | 00:09 |
cnd | heh | 00:09 |
bregma | most of the tests are constructed depending on the device already being there (ie. don't wait for a device-added event) | 00:11 |
cnd | bregma, so the tests need to be changed to wait for the device added event? | 00:11 |
bregma | or something, but it's nothing to do with xorg-gtest | 00:11 |
cnd | ok | 00:11 |
bregma | we already wait for a class-added event, so it;s no big thing | 00:12 |
bregma | and I'm really going to town refactoring these, so I'll see if I can do this elegantly | 00:12 |
cnd | heh | 00:12 |
cnd | cool | 00:12 |
bregma | btw, I've finally found a really good use case for C++ lambdas | 00:12 |
cnd | uh oh | 00:13 |
cnd | :) | 00:13 |
cnd | I hope you're having fun | 00:13 |
cnd | it's too late on a friday night to do non-fun stuff :) | 00:13 |
bregma | well, now that I have a handle on what's suddenly causing all these tests to randomly fail, I feel much happier | 00:13 |
cnd | :) | 00:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!