[00:07] <cnd> bregma, isn't that already handled by geis?
[00:07] <cnd> listening for device added events?
[00:08] <bregma> yes and no
[00:09] <bregma> some of the tests are assuming the device is already there, 'cos that's part of the test
[00:09] <cnd> part of the test is the assumption that the device already exists?
[00:09] <bregma> and, yes, a new bug was revealed
[00:09] <cnd> heh
[00:11] <bregma> most of the tests are constructed depending on the device already being there (ie. don't wait for a device-added event)
[00:11] <cnd> bregma, so the tests need to be changed to wait for the device added event?
[00:11] <bregma> or something, but it's nothing to do with xorg-gtest
[00:11] <cnd> ok
[00:12] <bregma> we already wait for a class-added event, so it;s no big thing
[00:12] <bregma> and I'm really going to town refactoring these, so I'll see if I can do this elegantly
[00:12] <cnd> heh
[00:12] <cnd> cool
[00:12] <bregma> btw, I've finally found a really good use case for C++ lambdas
[00:13] <cnd> uh oh
[00:13] <cnd> :)
[00:13] <cnd> I hope you're having fun
[00:13] <cnd> it's too late on a friday night to do non-fun stuff :)
[00:13] <bregma> well, now that I have a handle on what's suddenly causing all these tests to randomly fail, I feel much happier
[00:15] <cnd> :)