[00:17] :D [00:17] Linux gridcube-Intel-powered-classmate-PC 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:41:14 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [00:18] but i kind of forgot about deleting all the . starting folders on my /home and now everything looks wrong :D [00:21] oh... thunar bug stills there :( [00:21] Do you use gvfs? [00:21] (Remove file systems) [00:22] s/move/mote/ [00:23] no [00:23] i dont [00:23] sudo apt-get purge gvfs-backends [00:24] mmkay [00:50] :) [01:44] has something changed with apt-get? [01:44] i cant autocomplete with tab... [01:44] :/ [01:45] i cant autocomplete anything if i start with sudo or gksu [01:45] this is new... [08:23] will xubuntu 12.04 be supported for 3 or 5 years? [08:27] Saurabh_123: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xubuntu#Releases [08:31] does LTS release include only security updates? [08:32] or software updates also? [08:34] ? [08:36] Saurabh_123: No new feature releases, just important bugfixes. Some new features may be requested through backports, though. [08:37] ok [10:15] anybody know the status of "adopt an iso" for xubuntu? [10:19] I know I should be gone already, but I'll fill in a definitive 'no'. But I'll find out, I need to do some testing-related tasks when I get back. [10:19] ok, thanks [10:19] i just tweeted too [10:22] I'll ask balloons on -testing now, he had been contacted by a few Xubuntu testers. [10:22] k, great [10:23] why do i start to think about testing always when my neck/head hurts? :( [10:23] or does it go the other way aroung [10:23] *around [10:23] ...except he's not online, probably enjoying his weekend. Some people, only come in here when they get paid. *grin* [10:23] heh, yah [10:23] It's probably the other way around. [10:23] 'k, I'm gone for a bit now. [10:23] see you [11:53] knome: look here: http://imagebin.org/209051 [11:53] knome: my conclusion is that we can't improve the current situation by much, but what definitely makes sense is adding a shadow to the font [12:54] ochosi, really? what about doing a 60% alpha version with no shadow? [12:54] btw, nice comparison! [12:55] why would you do no textshadow? [12:55] thanks [12:55] i think that comparison clarifies a lot [12:55] i think it might improve the text readability on the rightmost items [12:55] it also silenced the people who shouted "alpha0%" the loudest on g+ [12:55] :P [12:56] not sure it would improve readability of the other ones though [12:56] but i could do another screenshot with it later [12:56] probably not, but isn't the lightest backgrounds where our problems are:) [12:58] we should check what the default alpha is [12:59] ok, this might be solvable after all, see all the hidden properties here: http://git.xfce.org/xfce/xfdesktop/tree/src/xfdesktop-icon-view.c#n475 [13:00] i'll have to test/investigate more i guess... [13:06] haha, i can combine two shadows :) [13:06] what a hack :D [13:07] >http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-04212012-030654pm.php [13:07] EWW! [13:07] since i can tweak the shadow-color freely this might actually work [13:08] this is already a lot better: http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-04212012-030759pm.php [13:08] my head still hurts [13:08] could you make the text bold? [13:08] i guess i could [13:09] that might work better than these weird experiments [13:09] this could work: http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-04212012-030918pm.php [13:09] yes, much better [13:09] then otoh... [13:09] how much does this improve the current situation [13:10] well we can then drop the label-alpha to 0 [13:10] can we? [13:10] :P [13:10] (meh) [13:10] yes: http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-04212012-031043pm.php [13:11] anyway, i'm off for now [13:11] mmh, that's not bad [13:11] i'll play with this later [13:11] maybe enable it for selected items [13:11] enable what? [13:11] the label alpha? [13:11] the box [13:11] yes, that's how it currently works [13:11] k [17:12] <|Chilled|> Will 12.10 be based on Debian? [17:14] <|Chilled|> Hello? [17:35] Is artwork still being accepted? For 12.10? [18:30] knome: Have you been pushing out misleading news as April Fools' again? [18:30] Those were some seriously confusing questions right ther. [18:30] +e [20:14] * astraljava awaits for the complaining to commence... [20:15] about? [20:16] You'll see it on the mailing lists. [20:17] astraljava: You little dirtbag! [20:17] im running prerealase now :D [20:18] I just figured I'd make the relationship a little more known, and thought here was a good spot for that. :) [20:18] astraljava, thats just testing protocols there [20:18] I know, I'll be flamed for it, but I think I can handle it. :) [20:19] don't see why [20:19] cross-posting is a huge no-no for some people. [20:20] oh [20:22] Yeah, but for me that's more with support questions on IRC. (And I hadn't seen the email yet, just figured that's my que) [20:25] Yep. And I believe in this case, it's not that bad. The projects are pretty intertwined in some cases. [20:28] No kidding, I've even thought about joining their channels, but... [20:28] Looks as if I'm already synced up, and good to go. [20:30] astraljava: Know what alt and desktop installs you want? [20:33] Unit193: No, not yet. I'll do a follow-up a little later, when some tests have been run already. For now, anything will do. Thanks!