[00:04] idnar: launchpad.net is E2:33:09:25:F1:E1:F0:3D:DF:18:E6:8C:E9:00:0F:D4:7B:01:47:3C, *.launchpad.net is A7:97:F3:0E:EB:C2:23:15:A5:50:28:B1:DD:3B:B5:A2:C1:91:1C:1F [00:05] (using ultra-secure, impossible to MITM IRC) [00:05] wgrant: ah, thanks [00:06] okay, that matches what I have; I think this is just a glitch then (Nightly reports "This website does not supply ownership information.", and it's doing it for other sites too) [00:08] or, actually, maybe I'm losing my marbles here [00:10] That works too. [00:10] okay I think I'm just super tired and Firefox changed something subtle about the SSL UI that confused me, but at least I'm not getting hacked or something [00:11] idnar: I think that's just its way of saying "not an EV cert" [00:12] right, and a wildcard cert can't be an EV cert (?) so that's not what changed [00:12] Because they can't use technical terms, that would just confuse people :P [00:12] No, they can be, AFAIK. We just don't have EV certs. [00:12] hmm, okay [00:13] well, at any rate, I'm guessing you didn't switch from EV to non-EV certs [00:13] Indeed. [00:14] I see the same message in Firefox 11, and I think it's been that way for a few releases. [00:14] I think they changed the icon / styling on the "lock" bit in the URL bar, and it's a different size or something [02:45] dobey: I passed out. ^^^ Yeah, bugs in sign the code of conduct. [02:46] Hello, I'm attempting to sign the CoC. There is 1 error.\n(7, 9, u'No public key')... [02:48] cheako: What does gpg say if you run it over the signed text? [02:49] wgrant: All good. [02:49] cheako: Are you perhaps signing with a new subkey that you haven't pushed to a keyserver? [02:49] wgrant: Yes, but how do I push a new subkery? [02:49] "All good" isn't sufficient [02:49] What's the key ID? [02:49] cheako: Same as pushing a new key. [02:49] wgrant ^^^ [02:49] wgrant: The key already exists :) [02:50] gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --send-key deadbeef [02:50] Hm? [02:50] subkeys dosn't have there own fingerprints. [02:50] No. [02:50] ahhh. [02:50] But the new subkey still has to be on the server. [02:50] Repush the master. [02:50] It will push the subkeys too. [02:50] wgrant: missing documentation on that :) [02:50] It's normal gpg stuff. [02:51] I'll try it and it will just work. [02:51] Few people manually create additional subkeys. [02:51] Hopefully. [02:51] Might take a while to sync the new subkey to our internal keyserver, though. [02:52] wgrant: You have to use a new subkey for every additional email address. Using a special address for each package repository is a good thing. [02:52] No. [02:52] Neither of those statements is true :) [02:53] You need a new UID for each email address. [02:53] But UIDs are separate from subkeys. [02:53] And it's very rare for people to use different email addresses for different repositories. [02:53] (except when the persona should be different, eg. a work repository vs a personal one) [02:55] I need to push my key every time I add a new UID, that makes sense. [02:56] I don't think that's the case. [02:56] You *should*, but it should also work without it. [02:56] Still there should be a UI to push a new key for ppl, it can provide the gpg command to use. [02:56] UIDs are mostly just used to identify the key given an email address. [02:56] Which signature verification doesn't require. [02:58] hmm, then I'm at a loss as to why it dosn't work. However http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=Mike+Mestnik&op=vindex shows my current key. [02:58] What is the output of gpg on the signature? [02:58] Erm [02:58] I guess it's probably singed with 8EDCAB8A, which wasn't on keyserver.ubuntu.com 5 minutes ago. [02:59] But you seem to have just pushed. [02:59] Ahh. [02:59] Then that's been my issue. [03:00] I had no idea how to push that, well I new about uploading keys but I didn't think that was needed for the web interface in launchpad, till you told me. [03:01] Well, it can hardly verify the signature against a key it doesn't have :) [03:01] Now, Launchpad uses an internal keyserver which syncs from Ubuntu's. [03:01] But it can sometimes take a while. [03:01] So I'd try now, but you might have to wait a while before it will accept it. [03:02] Yay :) that worked. [03:03] now I have to get all my source packages in a row and push em again. [03:09] Hmm, how can I upload wine1.5_1.5.2.orig.tar.bz2? It's part of another PPA. [03:24] ahh, -sa [03:26] Once it's part of my ppa I don't have to do that again? [03:26] no [03:26] cheako: Right. [03:26] cheako: PPA uploads look for orig.tar.* in the PPA, and in the Ubuntu primary archive. [03:26] So if it's in either of those you don't have to upload it yourself. [03:27] thx. [03:34] hmm, How can I get my pkg to be built for each release? It complains about "Version older than that in the archive" [03:35] Yay, I got one uploaded. === _thumper_ is now known as thumper [04:35] bug #464743 has a task against grub that shouldn't be there... but the minus icon to delete it isn't there in the lp interface, and I don't see a command to remove tasks via the email interface... how can I remove it? [04:35] Launchpad bug 464743 in grub "error: sparse file not allowed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/464743 [04:41] psusi: You can't delete tasks on projects that you have no privileges on. [04:41] * wgrant removes it. [04:44] wgrant, did you fix the workaround I discovered before of changing it to point to ubuntu, then removing it? ;) [04:44] wgrant, also, is there still no way to remove tasks via the email interface? [04:44] or do I just fail at doing so tonight? [04:44] No and no. [04:45] psusi: The restriction is mostly there to stop random people from clicking around and destroying everything. [04:45] If they are sufficiently unuseless that they can retarget to a project that they own, they're probably relatively sensible. [04:46] I wonder if there is a bug to add bugtask deletion to the mail interface. [06:17] dobey: wouldnt it make sense to offer some kind of project-follow-option to users? [06:18] like that it would be easier/faster to locate all "relevant" projects within launchpad pretty quickly === mthaddon` is now known as mthaddon === android is now known as jussi [07:52] How can I get my pkg to be built for each release? It complains about "Version older than that in the archive" [07:53] Do I just force an older version using ~ppa2,3,4,5? [07:54] cheako: You need to ensure it's a *newer* version. Note that '~' is less than everything, including the empty string. [07:54] So 1.2.3 > 1.2.3~ppa1 [07:54] 1.2.3~ppa2 > 1.2.3~ppa1? [07:56] Yes. [07:56] wgrant: Can I upload a ~ppa2 given ~oneiric1 VS ~precise1 to set another release? [07:56] cheako: The version check is only within a single release. [07:56] So you can upload ~oneiric1 to oneiric, even if precise already has ~precise1 [07:57] wgrant: Then I'm doing something wrong, because I get Version older than that in the archive. [07:58] http://pastebin.com/9yhtdE5p [07:58] cheako: You need to fix your changelog to point to oneiric instead of precise [07:58] ahh, k. [08:06] Yay! [08:06] Thanks a lot. === amithkk is now known as Andrew__ === Andrew__ is now known as AndrewStrong === AndrewStrong is now known as ubuntu__ === ubuntu__ is now known as xubuntu === xubuntu is now known as a === a is now known as b_ === b_ is now known as amithkk [10:59] I'm having PPA problems. Anyone know why this would happen? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/102896574/buildlog.txt.gz (the error is near the end) [11:03] benji: Your debian/control probably has a comment at the top [11:03] The old version of python-debian that the builders use doesn't like that very much. [11:04] hmm, let me look [11:05] wgrant: it does, I'll remove it and try again; thanks! === jamestunnicliff_ is now known as jamestunnicliffe [11:17] wgrant: it worked! thanks man [11:19] np === Pendulum_ is now known as Pendulum [13:37] hello, how do i change the way that launchpad displays bugs? google is a complete failure on this one [13:40] achiang: What do you want to change? [13:40] ok, getting closer. "launchpad customize bug views" gets me to the blog where they describe the feature is in beta [13:41] how do i get a an old package nuked from my ppa? new package fails building because old artifacts are still stuck [13:41] * Spads admits that the new bug listings always remind him of fark.com [13:41] wgrant: i just want to tweak what is displayed in my customized settings... either that or turn it off and go back to the old stylesheet if possible [13:41] [CRITICAL] [FLORDIA] [13:41] achiang: Click the gear icon at the top of the bug table. [13:42] Top left [13:42] wgrant: ah, thank you [13:42] till__: What's the error message? [13:44] wgrant: trying to pull up the build log [13:44] but my internet fails me [13:45] uploadlog it is [13:46] wgrant: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/98338175/upload_3273781_log.txt [13:46] i deleted that package a long time ago [13:46] till__: You can't ever upload the same version again. [13:46] You have to change the version number. [13:46] i delete it [13:46] It is remembered. [13:46] this is an annoyance =( [13:47] so i can't get this resolved unless i bump up the release and run through half a dozen steps? [13:47] You just have to increment the version [13:47] eg change lucid0 to lucid1 [13:48] i just copied it from another repo [13:48] till__: it's documented here. https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Deleting [13:50] well [13:50] to be totally honest [13:50] i deleted the other one more than 7 days ago [13:50] i'd say over 2 months ago [13:51] and it's still sitting there [13:51] i've seen that page before [13:51] The files will be deleted after a couple of weeks. [13:51] But the version number is remembered forever. [13:51] You can *never* upload the same version ever again. [13:51] well, it's been months [13:51] page doesn't say that this is the case [13:51] guess someone should add that to it :) [13:52] "You should not rely on deletion requests to re-upload the same source version with different contents." [13:52] And I believe the deletion form says similar things. [13:52] you should not rely is not the same as 'it will never work' [13:52] but ok [13:52] Also https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/990 [13:52] till__: wgrant has given you the correct information [13:55] i just wanted to copy this from another repo [13:55] i don't want to run through the entire process to build it [13:55] i guess i'll have to now [13:55] someone could link that faq on the help page [13:55] it doesn't seem obvious to me [13:56] till__: it says it right there. replace a broken source is always to upload a package with a higher version number [14:31] this failure looks like local corruption: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/102904364/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-armel.firefox_12.0%2Bbuild1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [14:31] not sure if anyone is interested in that ;) === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === nyuszika7h is now known as nyu|cadoth === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh === maco2 is now known as maco === shift__ is now known as ShiftPlusOne === lamont` is now known as lamont [20:53] Is there a way to browse list of older revisions on lp so I can see what branches lp thinks were merged in for a commit? [20:53] as I don't think codebrowse does that [20:54] cody-somerville: the code browser has a revisions view you can turn on [20:54] but will it link to branch on lp that I merged in? [20:56] ah, no [20:57] but it does show "mfrom:" in the revision header block if you view a specific revision, and that includes a branch nick which you can determine the lp URL with [21:02] cody-somerville: also, not entirely sure how that works on the short "Recent revisions" list on LP itself, but if you make a copy of that branch, that info gets lost in the copy [22:09] cody-somerville: https://code.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/+merges may be of interest [22:10] It's not exactly what you want, but it's the closest we have for old stuff. === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk