[07:27]  * XorA laughs at Kubuntu wiki, causality of universe casually thrown away
[07:28] <XorA> in fact it infects the whole of ubuntuguide.org
[08:38] <nimesh_accenture> The ubuntu-omap4-extras basically includes all the packages rite? so I dont have to install each one individually?
[08:39] <ogra_> for the releases where TI provides all packages yes
[08:39] <ogra_> else the extras package only depends on whats there
[08:40] <nimesh_accenture> so it includes everything from the following ppa: ppa:tiomap-dev/release ?
[08:41] <ogra_> everything that TI released for a specific ubuntu release, yes
[08:42] <ogra_> (for some ubuntu releases TI provides the multimedia codecs, for some they dont)
[08:54] <sveinse> Is it possible to specify conditional dependencies in debian/control for different archs? I have a package which required different set of libs when compiled for armel compared to intel.
[08:55] <sveinse> Is there any upstream Ubuntu packages that has this property?
[08:57] <sveinse> Oops. Wrong channel. Trying #ubuntu-devel instead...
[08:57] <ogra_> sure
[08:57] <ogra_> libfoo-dev [armhf]
[08:57] <ogra_> that would only use libfoo on armhf
[08:57] <ogra_> libfoo-dev [armhf armel]
[08:57] <ogra_> would also use it on armel
[08:58] <ogra_> libfoo-dev [armhf !i386]
[08:58] <sveinse> With "Architecture: any" then?
[08:58] <ogra_> that would use it on armhf and suppress it on x86
[08:58] <ogra_> yes
[08:58] <sveinse> excellent, thanks
[08:59] <sveinse> Is there a description of how to cross compile with multiarch somewhere?
[08:59]  * ogra_ doesnt know one
[09:00] <ogra_> but then i never cross compile anything ... i'm probably the wrong person :)
[09:03] <janimo> sveinse, https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/
[14:18] <cehh> GrueMaster: is us.releases.ubuntu.com the correct mirror?
[14:18] <cehh> Jan  1 00:23:36 choose-mirror[3067]: DEBUG: command: wget -q http://us.releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/precise
[14:18] <cehh> Jan  1 00:23:36 choose-mirror[3067]: WARNING **: mirror does not support the specified release (precise)
[14:44] <vanhoof> mythos: root fs is entirely on sd
[14:44] <vanhoof> 16gb sdhc
[14:45] <vanhoof> and it looks like it locked up again, no data :\ ... last bit I see is anacron firing off cron.daily at 625am
[14:45] <vanhoof> good place to begin investigating :)
[14:48] <mythos> vanhoof, hmm... maybe you should mount /var/log as nfs or setup a logserver
[14:49] <mythos> is nothing suspicious in the logs?
[14:52] <GrueMaster> cehh: Use http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports
[14:53] <vanhoof> mythos: http://ubuntuone.com/49ozVUpoBxVSwk7TrVVuor
[14:53] <vanhoof> mythos: thats about it, left it plugged in over serial through the night
[14:54] <vanhoof> all the board lights are silent except ethernet
[14:57] <mythos> vanhoof, in /var/log you should have syslog, kern.log, dmesg and daemon.log
[14:58] <vanhoof> mythos: yeah I was tail'ing over just syslog, just started this again tailing over each, and saving the capture file
[14:58] <mythos> is nothing suspicious in neither one of them
[14:58] <vanhoof> mythos: yeah nothing in any of them post failure :\
[14:59] <vanhoof> also just disabled mlocate from cron.daily just to see
[15:02] <mythos> vanhoof, could you upload them?
[15:02] <vanhoof> mythos: sure
[15:03] <mythos> maybe four eyes see more than two
[15:05] <smplman> ogra_: any updates on the TI omap3 packages, mainly SGX?
[15:06] <ogra_> smplman, nope, ask rsalveti, i think he talked to some TI guy at a conference about them
[15:07] <smplman> rsalveti: any updates on the TI omap3 packages, mainly SGX?
[15:07] <smplman> lol sry
[15:07] <smplman> ogra_: las night i noticed the net install didn't update the boot.scr on my xm
[15:08] <smplman> so i got no fb on boot
[15:08] <smplman> just copied the settings from another boot.script and ran mkimage
[15:08] <smplman> all is well
[15:08] <vanhoof> mythos: http://ouwish.com/~vanhoof/pickup/panda-es/logs-2012-04-25.tar.gz
[15:08] <vanhoof> mythos: since logrotate ran, I included .1 as well
[15:12] <mythos> i'm going to look into it
[15:12] <vanhoof> mythos: cool, was installed with a daily image ~1m ago, armhf server
[15:12] <vanhoof> mythos: and is fully updated
[15:12] <vanhoof> no real workload most days, just sits idle
[15:13] <vanhoof> mythos: and fwiw I just re-ran cron.daily with mlocate disabled, no problems
[15:13] <vanhoof> im going to re-enable it to see what happens
[15:13] <rsalveti> smplman: ogra_: not for armhf still :-(
[15:13] <smplman> ahh man
[15:13] <rsalveti> latest driver is not abi compatible with our x11 driver, and just armel
[15:13] <smplman> all in good time
[15:14] <vanhoof> mythos: worked as well :\, there goes that theory :)
[15:20] <mythos> vanhoof, you do have some warnings on startup and init killed a process near the end of the logs
[15:21] <vanhoof> mythos: [   29.701995] init: failsafe main process (509) killed by TERM signal ?
[15:21] <vanhoof> mythos: happens every boot
[15:22] <vanhoof> mythos: this is also a regular occurance: http://paste.ubuntu.com/945822/
[15:22] <vanhoof> on boot
[15:38] <mythos> vanhoof, i think, you have a kernelproblem. try to downgrade to an older one
[15:39] <vanhoof> mythos: I'm on the latest, any version you'd think would help, or just the last?
[15:40] <vanhoof> mythos: also is there anything I can add to the boot sequence where I could gather more data if possible?
[15:42] <mythos> vanhoof, any older kernel, which is able to boot the device is fine :O (i don't own a panda-board)
[15:47] <gildean> ogra_: btw. are the final images packaged with the same server/script that does the daily images?
[15:48] <ogra_> the images are the same, there is a publisher script that renames them and moves them around
[15:48] <gildean> so the release image is actually the last daily that's build?
[15:49] <ogra_> the release image is the last daily that was approved on the iso tracker
[15:49] <ogra_> (and blessed by the release manager)
[15:51] <gildean> ogra_: thanks for the ingo
[15:51] <gildean> *info
[15:51] <ogra_> respins (even for only one arch or only one image can happen at any time until final gets blessed)
[15:52] <gildean> but that should happen before release date?
[15:52] <ogra_> (follow #ubuntu-release to see any pending respins etc)
[15:53] <ogra_> right, note that release date is a moving target of a day that spans across many timezones though ;)
[15:53] <gildean> yeah, that gives some workingspace
[15:54] <gildean> but you must pick some point at the dailys which is the base for all the images, or is that per arch/image also?
[15:54] <ogra_> thats per arch/image/flavour
[15:55] <ogra_> usually its a set ... but it can happen that a single image gets respun the last minute to fix some bad image specific bug
[15:56] <gildean> hopefully now with an lts-release that's not the case ;)
[15:57] <ogra_> well, better hope we dont release with bad bugs :)
[15:57]  * ogra_ doesnt mind last minute respins/re-tests if it fixes some bad issue 
[15:58] <gildean> i'd prefer no bugs at all
[15:58] <ogra_> heh
[15:58] <ogra_> everyone would i guess ... but after all ist software ... it has bugs
[15:59] <gildean> tho' i'm using precise now my desktop and it feels a lot better than oneiric
[15:59] <ogra_> yeah, same here
[15:59] <gildean> i didn't like oneiric too much
[16:00] <gildean> almost seemed like a step backwards in some things
[17:32] <hrw> time to fetch omap4 image for tomorrow's ubuntu release party
[17:33] <hrw> lts is probably seen as good one cause it is mostly fixes + improvements
[17:33] <hrw> non-lts ones (especially lts+1) are more like 'lets add everything and check for bugs'
[17:34] <hrw> but its hard to tell for me cause I installed lucid 2y ago and moved to maverick on first week
[18:26] <scientes> meh, i wish ubuntu had moved (will move) to systemd
[18:32] <ogra_> luckily it wont follow that insanity
[19:28] <orated> Hello! What is the difference between ubuntu armel omap desktop and server image? Which one to chose for BB B4?
[20:17] <cehh> GrueMaster: Thanks for your help. I could not make it work. I updated bug #600789 with my observations
[20:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 600789 in choose-mirror ""d-i mirror/*" does not work on presseding" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600789
[20:18] <cehh> ubot2: I believe other people reported here that it worked fine for them.
[20:18] <ubot2> cehh: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[20:19] <cehh> ;)
[22:28] <mkopack> So, I hear the official release of 12.04 is tomorrow. Will that include the Pandaboard ES prebuilt images as well? Or still daily builds for that?