=== hamo is now known as hamo_working [07:27] * XorA laughs at Kubuntu wiki, causality of universe casually thrown away [07:28] in fact it infects the whole of ubuntuguide.org === hamo is now known as kk === kk is now known as Guest76772 === Guest76772 is now known as hamo [08:38] The ubuntu-omap4-extras basically includes all the packages rite? so I dont have to install each one individually? [08:39] for the releases where TI provides all packages yes [08:39] else the extras package only depends on whats there [08:40] so it includes everything from the following ppa: ppa:tiomap-dev/release ? [08:41] everything that TI released for a specific ubuntu release, yes [08:42] (for some ubuntu releases TI provides the multimedia codecs, for some they dont) [08:54] Is it possible to specify conditional dependencies in debian/control for different archs? I have a package which required different set of libs when compiled for armel compared to intel. [08:55] Is there any upstream Ubuntu packages that has this property? [08:57] Oops. Wrong channel. Trying #ubuntu-devel instead... [08:57] sure [08:57] libfoo-dev [armhf] [08:57] that would only use libfoo on armhf [08:57] libfoo-dev [armhf armel] [08:57] would also use it on armel [08:58] libfoo-dev [armhf !i386] [08:58] With "Architecture: any" then? [08:58] that would use it on armhf and suppress it on x86 [08:58] yes [08:58] excellent, thanks [08:59] Is there a description of how to cross compile with multiarch somewhere? [08:59] * ogra_ doesnt know one [09:00] but then i never cross compile anything ... i'm probably the wrong person :) [09:03] sveinse, https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/CrossCompile/ === doko_ is now known as doko [14:18] GrueMaster: is us.releases.ubuntu.com the correct mirror? [14:18] Jan 1 00:23:36 choose-mirror[3067]: DEBUG: command: wget -q http://us.releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/precise [14:18] Jan 1 00:23:36 choose-mirror[3067]: WARNING **: mirror does not support the specified release (precise) [14:44] mythos: root fs is entirely on sd [14:44] 16gb sdhc [14:45] and it looks like it locked up again, no data :\ ... last bit I see is anacron firing off cron.daily at 625am [14:45] good place to begin investigating :) [14:48] vanhoof, hmm... maybe you should mount /var/log as nfs or setup a logserver [14:49] is nothing suspicious in the logs? [14:52] cehh: Use http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports [14:53] mythos: http://ubuntuone.com/49ozVUpoBxVSwk7TrVVuor [14:53] mythos: thats about it, left it plugged in over serial through the night [14:54] all the board lights are silent except ethernet [14:57] vanhoof, in /var/log you should have syslog, kern.log, dmesg and daemon.log [14:58] mythos: yeah I was tail'ing over just syslog, just started this again tailing over each, and saving the capture file [14:58] is nothing suspicious in neither one of them [14:58] mythos: yeah nothing in any of them post failure :\ [14:59] also just disabled mlocate from cron.daily just to see [15:02] vanhoof, could you upload them? [15:02] mythos: sure [15:03] maybe four eyes see more than two [15:05] ogra_: any updates on the TI omap3 packages, mainly SGX? [15:06] smplman, nope, ask rsalveti, i think he talked to some TI guy at a conference about them [15:07] rsalveti: any updates on the TI omap3 packages, mainly SGX? [15:07] lol sry [15:07] ogra_: las night i noticed the net install didn't update the boot.scr on my xm [15:08] so i got no fb on boot [15:08] just copied the settings from another boot.script and ran mkimage [15:08] all is well [15:08] mythos: http://ouwish.com/~vanhoof/pickup/panda-es/logs-2012-04-25.tar.gz [15:08] mythos: since logrotate ran, I included .1 as well [15:12] i'm going to look into it [15:12] mythos: cool, was installed with a daily image ~1m ago, armhf server [15:12] mythos: and is fully updated [15:12] no real workload most days, just sits idle [15:13] mythos: and fwiw I just re-ran cron.daily with mlocate disabled, no problems [15:13] im going to re-enable it to see what happens [15:13] smplman: ogra_: not for armhf still :-( [15:13] ahh man [15:13] latest driver is not abi compatible with our x11 driver, and just armel [15:13] all in good time [15:14] mythos: worked as well :\, there goes that theory :) [15:20] vanhoof, you do have some warnings on startup and init killed a process near the end of the logs [15:21] mythos: [ 29.701995] init: failsafe main process (509) killed by TERM signal ? [15:21] mythos: happens every boot [15:22] mythos: this is also a regular occurance: http://paste.ubuntu.com/945822/ [15:22] on boot === prpplague^2 is now known as prpplague [15:38] vanhoof, i think, you have a kernelproblem. try to downgrade to an older one [15:39] mythos: I'm on the latest, any version you'd think would help, or just the last? [15:40] mythos: also is there anything I can add to the boot sequence where I could gather more data if possible? [15:42] vanhoof, any older kernel, which is able to boot the device is fine :O (i don't own a panda-board) [15:47] ogra_: btw. are the final images packaged with the same server/script that does the daily images? [15:48] the images are the same, there is a publisher script that renames them and moves them around [15:48] so the release image is actually the last daily that's build? [15:49] the release image is the last daily that was approved on the iso tracker [15:49] (and blessed by the release manager) [15:51] ogra_: thanks for the ingo [15:51] *info [15:51] respins (even for only one arch or only one image can happen at any time until final gets blessed) [15:52] but that should happen before release date? [15:52] (follow #ubuntu-release to see any pending respins etc) [15:53] right, note that release date is a moving target of a day that spans across many timezones though ;) [15:53] yeah, that gives some workingspace [15:54] but you must pick some point at the dailys which is the base for all the images, or is that per arch/image also? [15:54] thats per arch/image/flavour [15:55] usually its a set ... but it can happen that a single image gets respun the last minute to fix some bad image specific bug [15:56] hopefully now with an lts-release that's not the case ;) [15:57] well, better hope we dont release with bad bugs :) [15:57] * ogra_ doesnt mind last minute respins/re-tests if it fixes some bad issue [15:58] i'd prefer no bugs at all [15:58] heh [15:58] everyone would i guess ... but after all ist software ... it has bugs [15:59] tho' i'm using precise now my desktop and it feels a lot better than oneiric [15:59] yeah, same here [15:59] i didn't like oneiric too much [16:00] almost seemed like a step backwards in some things === plars_ is now known as plars [17:32] time to fetch omap4 image for tomorrow's ubuntu release party [17:33] lts is probably seen as good one cause it is mostly fixes + improvements [17:33] non-lts ones (especially lts+1) are more like 'lets add everything and check for bugs' [17:34] but its hard to tell for me cause I installed lucid 2y ago and moved to maverick on first week [18:26] meh, i wish ubuntu had moved (will move) to systemd [18:32] luckily it wont follow that insanity [19:28] Hello! What is the difference between ubuntu armel omap desktop and server image? Which one to chose for BB B4? [20:17] GrueMaster: Thanks for your help. I could not make it work. I updated bug #600789 with my observations [20:17] Launchpad bug 600789 in choose-mirror ""d-i mirror/*" does not work on presseding" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600789 [20:18] ubot2: I believe other people reported here that it worked fine for them. [20:18] cehh: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [20:19] ;) [22:28] So, I hear the official release of 12.04 is tomorrow. Will that include the Pandaboard ES prebuilt images as well? Or still daily builds for that?