| soren | Where is "in-target" defined? | 08:21 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | soren: debian-installer-utils | 08:24 |
| soren | cjwatson: Ah. Thanks! | 08:28 |
| soren | Hm... That's weird. I'm setting a proxy in my preseed, but for a particular request in my late_command, I need to not use the proxy. I'm doing this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/945349/ | 08:30 |
| soren | So, running: http_proxy= https_proxy= in-target wget -O /home/localadmin/.ssh/authorized_keys http://172.20.231.32/jenkins.pub | 08:30 |
| soren | ..but somehow wget still uses the proxy. | 08:31 |
| soren | I was expecting in-target would reveal why that would be, but I'm a bit lost. | 08:31 |
| soren | Oh! | 08:32 |
| soren | chroot-setup.sh helpfully ensures that http_proxy is set. | 08:32 |
| soren | (and in-target sources chroot-setup.sh) | 08:32 |
| cjwatson | in-target env -u http_proxy -u https_proxy ... | 08:35 |
| soren | in-target http_proxy= https_proxy= [...] won't do? | 08:36 |
| soren | I guess I'll know in about 6 minutes. | 08:37 |
| soren | :) | 08:37 |
| cjwatson | no | 08:40 |
| cjwatson | shell doesn't chain that way | 08:40 |
| cjwatson | IOW $ sudo chroot /chroot/sid http_proxy= env | 08:41 |
| cjwatson | chroot: failed to run command `http_proxy=': No such file or directory | 08:41 |
| cjwatson | for basically that reason - you can't pass variable assignments direct to execvp, the shell has to translate | 08:41 |
| soren | I just wasn't sure if chroot execvp'd or ran a shell. | 08:43 |
| soren | I guess such smarts (execvp'ing if passed a pathname, calling a shell if not) don't belong in chroot. | 08:44 |
| soren | Yup. Just failed. | 08:45 |
| jibel | ev, the selection of the users in m-a behaves very strangely | 09:01 |
| ev | oh? | 09:02 |
| jibel | ev, here is a sequence of selection/deselection of the 2 users http://paste.ubuntu.com/945380/ | 09:02 |
| jibel | ev, 0=jibel, 1 =ubuntu | 09:02 |
| jibel | for the 1rst user in the list selected state and state of the checkbox are inverted but the list of items to sync is always correct (empty or all) | 09:07 |
| jibel | for the second user it is different | 09:07 |
| jibel | first click on the user, selected state and items are correctly set | 09:07 |
| jibel | but on second click (uncheck) the selected state is still True while items to sync are emptied | 09:08 |
| jibel | and then next clicks, checkbox state and selected are inverted | 09:09 |
| ev | I'll have a look in a bit | 09:15 |
| ev | cheers for the investigation | 09:15 |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: is there enough information in bug 987956 to understand what happened? | 17:03 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 987956 in ubiquity "Installer Deletes Contents from Separate HOME partition without WARNING!" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/987956 | 17:03 |
| cjwatson | I'm afraid I'm not sure | 17:07 |
| cjwatson | It has the usual logs | 17:07 |
| cjwatson | Has anyone tested the scenario he describes? | 17:07 |
| cjwatson | i.e. choosing to mount home but not format it | 17:08 |
| * cjwatson starts off test installs to see | 17:10 | |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: I haven't tested his exact setup yet | 17:12 |
| cjwatson | clear_partitions *looks* right in this situation to me | 17:16 |
| tasslehoff | Will any of the Ubuntu installers let me unlock and install to an already encrypted LVM volume? | 17:27 |
| tasslehoff | I know the fedora installer handles it, but haven't seen it in any earlier Ubuntu installers. | 19:04 |
| cjwatson | One moment | 19:05 |
| cjwatson | The alternate or server install CD in Ubuntu >= 11.10 should allow it, via "Configure encrypted volumes" -> "Activate existing encrypted volumes" | 19:06 |
| cjwatson | See bug 420080 | 19:06 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 420080 in partman-crypto "Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/420080 | 19:06 |
| tasslehoff | cjwatson: great. thanks. | 19:06 |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: Well, I tried a straightforward test install of 11.10 with separate /home (/ and /home both ext4), created an empty file /home/cjwatson/x, then installed 12.04 over the top asking it to reuse the existing /home without formatting (using manual partitioning); /home/cjwatson/x was still there after the installation | 19:13 |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: So whatever it is, it isn't universal ... I'll try to think of how we could narrow this down | 19:14 |
| cjwatson | It's not encrypted home | 19:14 |
| cjwatson | At least judging from ubiquity removing ecryptfs-utils in th elog | 19:14 |
| cjwatson | *the log | 19:14 |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: I read that he'd chosen a side by side install | 19:14 |
| cjwatson | Doesn't look like it | 19:15 |
| cjwatson | There are the same number of partitions at the start and end of the partman log, with the same sizes | 19:15 |
| cjwatson | Pretty certain he used manual partitioning and asked it to reformat the previous / | 19:15 |
| bdmurray | ah, I see | 19:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!