[04:27] <Hobbsee> wow, either I can't read the ISO tracker properly, or not many people are testing images
[04:27] <Hobbsee> What most needs testing?
[04:28] <Hobbsee> or should I wait for a later daily image?
[04:38] <astraljava> balloons: Yes of course. And it seems my scare letter worked, while I was sleeping, everything got tested. Except wubi, but it's hard to do anything about when you don't have access to Windows.
=== Jacky is now known as [Jacky]
=== [Jacky] is now known as Jacky
[07:02] <astraljava> balloons: Call for help; Xubuntu needs someone to help with Wubi testing. Can you assist in this in any way?
=== jalcine- is now known as Jacky
[09:16] <apw> hggdh, yo ... pete asked me to spin some day-0 equivalte test kernels for you to get some early testing : http://people.canonical.com/~apw/day-0-precise/
[09:16] <apw> hggdh, these are updated to match what leann uploaded
=== greyback is now known as greyback|lunch
[11:53] <rbasak> gema: is ARM testing unification on the cards for Q? Wondering if we need a blueprint on that. We need to sync, anyway.
[11:54] <gema> rbasak: let me talk to you in an hour or so
[11:54] <gema> it should be the uath blueprint
[11:54] <gema> the right one for that
[11:54] <rbasak> ok, np
=== greyback|lunch is now known as greyback
[12:07] <hggdh> apw k, will run them, thank you
=== _salem is now known as salem_
[12:28] <phillw> skaet: / balloons a quick ping :)
[12:29] <skaet> phillw, pong?
[12:29] <phillw> hi skaet could you please check that http://thesii.org/precise-alternate-amd64.iso actually starts the download for me please?
[12:30] <skaet> yup,  its starts.
[12:30] <skaet> downloading now.
[12:30] <phillw> I need to ensure permissions and soft-links on the server are correct :)
[12:30] <phillw> excellent :D
[12:30] <skaet> np
[12:30] <phillw> I'll get the rest installed, then it's just a quick zsync at release :)
[13:15] <jibel> stgraber, bug 988303 is it the same then with the French layout ?
[13:16] <stgraber> jibel: that description is barely readable and it's on Kubuntu, so no idea
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
[14:16] <gema> rbasak: are you there?
[14:16] <rbasak> gema: yes
[14:17] <rbasak> gema: I've got a few minutes - I've a call at 1530
[14:17] <gema> rbasak: ack
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[15:29] <phillw> hi skaet sorry to bother you again at a mad busy time, but I'm trying to get as much prep work on our wiki done as possible. Will the release images be at http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/12.04/release/ ? Or should I prep the links up for a different URL?
[15:37] <skaet> phillw,  the ReleaseNotes pages for lubuntu has the path I expect them to land in.
[15:37] <skaet> will be confirming all the paths later tonight (UK time)
[15:37] <phillw> thanks, I'll go check.
[15:37] <skaet> :)
[15:38] <phillw> okies - I'll have to task that to one of the other wiki team. It's already 21:08 here :)
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
[16:11] <skaet> jibel, gema - we're going forward with the respins of the amd64 images to pick up the multiarch fix.
[16:11] <jibel> skaet, ack
[16:13] <skaet> Please check that the fix is in place,  and then just spot test a couple of other cases as sanity check.   No need to do full retest.  We've got the full set of results, and this shoulb be limited scope impact.
[16:13] <skaet> Thanks jibel.  :)
[16:25] <jibel> skaet, is bug 899001 the fix we want to verify with the rebuild ?
=== elopio_ is now known as elopio
[16:44] <skaet> jibel,  bug: 987383 and bug 899011 were the ones to verify
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== plars_ is now known as plars
=== Jacky is now known as Guest90879
=== Guest90879 is now known as JackyAlcine
=== JackyAlcine is now known as Guest85884
=== Guest85884 is now known as Jacky
=== Jacky is now known as Guest70035
=== Guest70035 is now known as Jacky
=== Jacky is now known as Guest53736
=== Guest53736 is now known as Jacky
[18:46] <jibel> astraljava, I had some spare cycles and verified wubi on xubuntu
[19:36] <jibel> balloons, we need testers to recheck amd64
[19:40] <ersi> the iso? or wubi?
[19:40] <ersi> and, anything in perticular on the amd64 ones?
[19:42] <phillw> jibel: I see no new builds on iso-tracker?
[19:42] <jibel> phillw, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/214/builds
[19:43] <jibel> this was a respin to fix bug 899001 - gst-install wants to install i386-version of codec packages on amd64
[19:43] <jibel> ersi, ^
[19:44] <phillw> jibel: that's where I'm at, however I'm not on the best i/net connection in the world :)
[19:45] <jibel> phillw, np :)
[19:47] <phillw> jibel: just the ubuntu ones dated 25th?
[19:48] <jibel> xubuntu and ubuntu studio need help, other flavors that were rebuilt have been tested already
[19:54] <phillw> jibel: so, 25th dated for xubuntu & ubuntu-studio .. the lubuntu testers could feasibly test xubuntu, not sure about studio. But I will email the team and ask if they can help out.
[20:03] <cking> just hit a bug doing OEM installation, 64 bit, bug 988517
=== salem_ is now known as _salem