/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/04/25/#ubuntustudio-devel.txt

=== scottl-work is now known as scott-work
=== astraljava changed the topic of #ubuntustudio-devel to: Ubuntu Studio Development Channel | https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio | Release Candidates been moved to Final! YAY!
len-dtscott-work, astraljava  This move to final appears not to need retest. Is that correct?13:24
astraljavalen-dt: Yes, that's my understanding too.13:33
len-dtastraljava, and then release (when it comes) will be what we base 12.10 on I would guess.13:52
scott-workjust this morning i signed the release manifest to change the status as "approved for release"13:52
* len-dt is new to this stuff as this is his first cycle...13:52
len-dtAs some people have talked about AWN as a panel for US, I downloaded it to look at. It pulls in gnome3 fallback and unity... some 118 packages.13:55
len-dtIt looks pretty, but in the end it is just another panel and I think I could get the same functionality out of the xfce panel.13:56
len-dtscott-work, astraljava  I think if we are going to do workflows with changing menus similar to what I had mocked up, it would be best to work on them as an xfce panel applet.13:58
scott-worklen-dt: that is the reason that we haven't really made more progress with AWN (re: dependecies)14:02
len-dtscott-work, I think we could make xfce panel look the same minus the fancy graphics.14:03
len-dtI don't see a vast difference in the underlying function.14:04
* len-dt is off to work, will read back log on return.14:04
scott-worklen-dt: re: work flows - if we create any new applications we need to especially cognizant of the time it will take to get into the repositories (which could be months)14:06
len-dtscott-work, if there is nothing out there now, we have no choice. What I have  done is all script... no source. That could be dropped into our "look" package.14:10
scott-worklen-dt: it could possibly, but the package approval process is in place for a variety of reasons, including vetting new code for security (along with other items) and shouldn't be abused unecessarily14:12
scott-workwe should think through this before making any decisions14:13
astraljavalen-dt: There'll usually be huge changes when the archives open again, but probably not this time as Debian is frozen for a new release as well.17:40
astraljavaNot really sure about how's it going to be this time.17:40
astraljavaRight, new amd64 images.17:49
astraljava;./17:49
astraljavabug #899001 is haunting us, so please check if you can help with that. I'll be testing it within the few next hours, but I could use some backup if possible.17:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 899001 in sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) "gst-install wants to install i386-version of codec packages on amd64" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/89900117:59
astraljavaErr... sorry, the image isn't yet available. I'll shout out again when it is.18:02
astraljavaOk, go fetch!18:35
knomewhat? i didn't hear. shout louder18:41
len-dtastraljava, I can't help with the amd64 stuff... 20:21
len-dtastraljava, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/216/builds still shows the test results from before the respin for adm64 ISOs20:23
len-dtastraljava, scott-work and whoever else can test the amd64 ISO, the page to post results is http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/214/builds20:31
acmeincI'm confused regarding the Testcases page.  Is it asking us if *only* the install passed with no bugs, or if install AND testing passed with no bugs.20:42
len-dtacmeinc, Which page? (url) I think the two tests are live works and install works.20:48
acmeinclen, yes that's the one...so I'm assuming I would say "Passed with no bugs" if my install worked from both the Live and Install mode, even though I'm seeing bugs post installation?20:49
acmeincin short, is this page only asking to be sure the installation from both modes is working properly?20:50
scott-worklen-dt: i can test the 64bit this evening20:50
len-dtacmeinc, There are some known bugs that will not be fixed before release.20:50
len-dtscott-work, Ok .20:50
len-dtacmeinc, we would only be looking for bugs that make things unusable at this point.20:51
len-dtacmeinc, so after install, it should reboot and the installer should be able to login and run something (irc or browser for example.)20:54
len-dtacmeinc, Installer means the person who installed, not the installer software.. 20:56
* len-dt is not a great communicator.20:56
acmeinclen, ok, thx for the clarifation, install works just fine, and sample apps as well.21:10
acmeinci'll mark it21:10
len-dtacmeinc, Good.21:11
len-dtI think thats our release then.21:12
acmeincwould you rather me post general 12.04 questions to the non-devel area?21:13
len-dtacmeinc, I don't know really, if it is about how to then yes, if it looks like something that could use changing here is good.21:15
acmeincwell it seems bluetooth has gone away since 11.04-studio, which is a concern of mine21:15
acmeincunless its just done differently...in that case, i'd post to the general21:16
len-dtacmeinc, I think that would be a bug. I think that was mentioned before... none of us has the hardware to check that I know.21:16
len-dtOh that was you all ready :)21:17
acmeinclen, i have a bluetooth dongle i used successfully in pairing on 11.04.  on 12.04 the applet is gone..i tried bluemon and installing th e applet manually, but neither find the "adapter".  21:18
acmeincWould you like me to file a bug, or note an existing bug, or try-out something for you?21:19
len-dtIt needs a bug report. Is there an existing bug?21:19
acmeinci wouldn't know :)21:19
len-dtacmeinc, if there was an applet before it should still be there. If we are missing it. That is a bug.21:21
len-dtacmeinc, I don't see a BT applet listed in the available panel applets. I don't know if that is because my hardware doesn't support BT though.21:25
* len-dt is gone to pick kids up at school.21:26
acmeincreport filed under Ubuntu Studio Project, I hope that was right.21:38
scott-workwas typing something on another channel and thought i should share here, hopefully the paste works well:21:45
scott-work[16:39] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we scripted opening qjackctl, starting jack with certain settings, open ardour + hydrogen + whatever else, and make all the connections? [16:39] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we applied that same idea to work flows for creating graphics?  or editing video? [16:40] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we made this use a gui and had rectangles for each "process" for a work flow21:45
scott-workcrap, no21:45
scott-work[16:39] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we scripted opening qjackctl, starting jack with certain settings, open ardour + hydrogen + whatever else, and make all the connections?21:46
scott-work[16:39] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we applied that same idea to work flows for creating graphics?  or editing video?21:46
scott-work[16:40] <scott-work> _guitarman_: what if we made this use a gui and had rectangles for each "process" for a work flows with choices and a default chosen?21:46
scott-work[16:40] <scott-work> for example, let's consider editing video:21:46
scott-work[16:40] <scott-work> user starts the app21:46
scott-work[16:41] <scott-work> see's that there are choices for editing audio, editing video, creating a title screen, and publishing to web21:46
scott-work[16:41] <scott-work> so each process (e.g. editing audio vs editing video) is in a rectangle and the various choices are under it21:46
scott-work[16:42] <scott-work> the user clearly now understands not only what work flow we intended, which applications are available, but also which apps we suggest as "preferred"21:47
scott-work[16:42] <scott-work> what if we could generate a script for the user once they have their preferred work flow or tool chain (chosen applications)21:47
scott-work[16:43] <scott-work> that is just a sample of what i mean by "user improvements" or "usage improvements" = making it easier for users21:47
scott-work[16:44] <scott-work> also we are considering a "record mode" for audio, maybe it turns off network manager, pulse audio, blue tooth, ubuntu one if they are running21:47
scott-work[16:44] <scott-work> maybe it also changes or adds a dock on the side of the screen that shows only applications for audio, maybe even have then sequences to mimic the work flow21:47
scott-work[16:45] <scott-work> this idea could also be applied for video or graphics or photography or ebook21:47
scott-workalso, we could even consider that different workspaces can be named, have their own backdrops, and maybe even have their own docks (i'm guessing on this one)21:49
scott-workmaybe have an "video" workspace that has applications in the dock for video work21:49
len-dtScottL, I don't like the workspace idea for at least two reasons :)21:59
len-dtScottL, 1) I normally use more than one WS for just audio (or just other workflows for that matter)22:00
len-dtScottL, 2) having workspaces with different BGs an panels increases the system load all the time.(memory at least)22:02
len-dtScottL, 3) (I said two right? :)  it would encourage people to leave unrelated apps running in an unseen WS which would also use extra resources22:03
len-dtScottL, KDE (apparently) already offers such a setup, so installing kubuntu and playing with it might give you an idea how it would work out.22:05
len-dtScottL, KDE was not chosen for US  because it is a resource hog.22:06
acmeincseems like a lot of work to benefit a select few.  i have a script which opens my audio recording suite in succession, but really, how many people will do the same? my 2c22:17
ScottLlen-dt, dont' sweat about it yet ;)22:48
ScottLthese are just ideas, nothing concrete and i wanted to bring these and others up to the group and try to find a good direction forward22:48
len-dtScottL, no sweat, just my two cents.22:48
ScottLi imagine as we talk through these issues (like you mentioned) we will find our path22:48
len-dtScottL, the more ideas we have the more ideas that are left over once we shoot down the unusable ones...22:50
ScottLlen-dt, acmeinc, i saw you talking about the latest image, how did the testing go?  any concerns for release (not small ones)?  is there a reason not to tell #ubuntu-release that it is ready for release?22:54
len-dtScottL, I have no concerns...22:54
* len-dt must have missed _something_22:55
len-dtScottL, That is with 32bit.22:55
acmeinci can finish testing 64 (latest) tonight at midnight...im at work now22:58
len-dt-queuebot/#ubuntu-release- ISO Tracker: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Precise Pre-release] has been removed22:58
len-dt-queuebot/#ubuntu-release- ISO Tracker: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Precise Final] has been updated (20120425)22:58
ScottLacmeinc, testing is done my friend :)22:59
ScottLi have to finish release notes tonight as well and then start emailing people/places/lists22:59
* len-dt is busy trying to figure out backup order for all the computers around here.23:00
acmeincwell then...23:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!