[06:31] <jo-erlend> hey. I took over as an Ubuntu LoCo contact and I'm now working on getting some kind of overview. Part of that is to see if all admins are still active. So I'd like to get a list of a persons activities on Launchpad in a certain time range. Is that possible?
[06:33] <wgrant> jo-erlend: You can get some idea of their activities using a page like <https://launchpad.net/~wgrant/+karma>. No specifics, but it tells you the sort of things they've been doing recently.
[06:35] <jo-erlend> wgrant, perfect. That's all I need.
[08:53] <angeloc> Hi guys, i'm writing some scripts for ubuntu accomplishments, until now i solved all my problems reading online api documentation, but I'm now in stuck
[08:53] <angeloc> i have to find all packages uploaded by a person, can you suggest me the best way?
[08:56] <angeloc> nobody?
[08:58] <czajkowski> angeloc: you've asked in -dev also and no reply I suspect people are not around today after the release yesterday
[08:59] <angeloc> czajkowski: yes, can see, they got drunk?
[09:00] <czajkowski> angeloc: doubtful, perhaps just resting.
[09:00] <angeloc> czajkowski: i'm joking!
[09:49] <ancoron_w> Hi *, I'm just running a local instance of launchpad and was wondering how I am supposed to enable user management (register/login) based on non-openid provider?
[09:52] <lifeless> ancoron_w: you aren't supposed to - that isn't supported
[09:52] <lifeless> ancoron_w: you could possibly add it back in, but the stuff that looks like it works is very very minimal - just used by the test suite
[09:53] <ancoron_w> OK, so if I want to run a site-local instance of launchpad I have to provide a site-local openid as well?
[09:54] <wgrant> Any OpenID provider that provides sreg responses with a name and a trustworthy email address will do. You could use login.ubuntu.com, for example.
[09:56] <ancoron_w> Hm, I probably would need to run my own as I don't want to force our users to register externally. Also I would like integration with LDAP.
[10:13] <maxb> I think what the Bazaar-in-corporate-environments use-case really needs is for some group of people to come together and fork a subset of the Launchpad code and do it up as something with packaged releases
[10:13] <wgrant> Yeah
[10:14] <maxb> Sadly, as much as I love Bazaar, actually using it for non-Launchpad, non-trivial stuff is nigh on impossible
[10:14] <wgrant> Sort of like what sloecode is trying to do
[10:14] <ancoron_w> maxb: totally agree
[13:27] <angeloc> Hi guys, i'm writing some scripts for ubuntu accomplishments, until now i solved all my problems reading online api documentation, but I'm now in stuck
[13:27] <angeloc> i have to find all packages uploaded by a person, can you suggest me the best way?
[13:39] <StevenK> angeloc: There look to be a few methods on IPerson that might do what you want, but they are not exported over the API. I think the best way forward is to describe what you want and put it into a bug report. If you're not afraid of getting your hands dirty, feel free to join #launchpad-dev and we can discuss how best to solve it.
[13:41] <angeloc> StevenK: thank you, really happy you replied me! joining #launchpad-dev!
[14:20] <Laney> what's the best way to disable reporting of new bugs on a project (and keep the old bugs available)?
[14:20] <Laney> just selecting "Somewhere else" in +configure-bugtracker?
[16:38] <Laney> yeah, that seems to have done it
[21:26] <aalex-sat> hello
[21:27] <Lekensteyn> hello
[21:28] <aalex-sat> Building a package fails. It seems like the builder finds the -dev dependency from another PPA that is in the deps, but not the binary library package: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/103179440/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.spinframework_0.3.13~lucid~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[21:30] <Lekensteyn> is that your PPA?
[21:35] <Lekensteyn> sounds like a caching issue(???), try rebuilding it?
[21:35] <Lekensteyn> the version is ok http://ppa.launchpad.net/sat-metalab/metalab/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages
[21:43] <aalex-sat> Lekensteyn, yes it is.
[21:44] <aalex-sat> Lekensteyn, yes, it seems it finds it... (the -dev) and the version matches... but maybe the -0 version of the lib (we built) is not found.
[21:44] <aalex-sat> I don't quite understand that error message.
[21:47] <Lekensteyn> the error means that "libcppintrospection-3.0-dev" is tried to be installed, but it can't because of a dependency issue
[21:47] <Lekensteyn> the package libcppintrospection-3.0-0 (exact version 3.0.0-5~lucid~ppa1) is required, but it cannot be installed
[21:47] <Lekensteyn> I see
[21:48] <Lekensteyn> libopenthreads14 is not available in Lucid
[21:48] <Lekensteyn> so that's why the package cannot be intsalled
[21:49] <aalex-sat> Lekensteyn, yes... my colleague hard-coded a binary library package in the build-deps... aha. That must be his error.