[06:44] <alkisg> Hi there, I just filed LP bug #989425, are we to just wait for an adblock update in the PPA?
[06:44] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 989425 in ubuntu-mozilla-ppa-bugs "Firefox in Precise is incompatible with xul-ext-adblock-plus" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/989425
[06:48] <micahg> alkisg: you shouldn' thave xul-ext-adblock-plus on precise :)
[06:48]  * micahg forgot about the lucid upgrade case...it should be installed in the profile and updated still
[06:48] <alkisg> micahg: why not? There's a ~precise build for it in the PPA
[06:48] <micahg> alkisg: what PPA?
[06:49] <alkisg> micahg: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/xul-ext
[06:49] <micahg> bdrung: ^^
[06:49] <alkisg> It says there that this is the support channel for that PPA
[06:49] <micahg> alkisg: indeed, I just don't deal with it :), glad to see someone is using it though
[06:50] <alkisg> Yes it's very valuable, otherwise we don't have the ability to install adblock plus in thousand of PCs without manually doing it for each and every user :(
[06:51] <alkisg> I've been using Precise + adblock from the PPA since Christmas, never had a problem with it, but today the firefox update conflicted with xul-ext-adblock-plus, and it uninstalled it...
[06:53] <micahg> sorry, I don't see the conflicts
[06:54] <alkisg> apt-cache show xul-ext-adblock-plus | grep Breaks ==> firefox (>= 12.0~a1+)
[06:55] <alkisg> Firefox as of today is 12.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1, bigger than the version in "Breaks:", while previously it was 11.0+build1-0ubuntu4
[07:03] <micahg> alkisg: I don't have the extension ;), I thought the breaks was in firefox, rather it's on firefox and a new version should be uploaded, although I don't understand why that arch all extension has a breaks on a higher version to begin with since extensions compatible with Firefox 4+ are compatible by default
[07:07] <alkisg> I guess it's because they don't want to have to care about those xul extension packages from the firefox package... otherwise it would be saner, e.g. firefox 15 comes out and is incompatible with older extensions? it can just Break: them, knowing which exact version to break
[07:07] <alkisg> Maybe a solution could be to have a fake, generic, "extensions-compatibility" package which firefox could break: instead, and those PPA xul extensions could depend on the appropriate version of it
[07:08] <alkisg> This way the Break: could be declared in firefox, but only for that fake package, not for every xul ext package out there
[07:08] <micahg> alkisg: it was originally done before the compatible by default was turned on, it's only needed for binary extensions now which aren't compatible with new releases by default
[07:30] <bdrung> micahg: i will fix it
[11:39] <asulil> hi all
[11:40] <asulil>  can you please tell how to  justfy my text on TB? thank you
[13:11] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, hah, just tried this: https://twitter.com/#!/bhearsum/status/195858636759777281 ;)
[13:11] <bhearsum> :)
[15:09] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, i noticed that crash reports from ubuntu's firefox beta's don't show up in the default search results on socorro (or, at least I don't think they are). do you know who i'd talk to about that?
[15:09] <chrisccoulson> ie, if you view linux crashes in 12.0b5, you only see mozilla.org builds
[15:10] <chrisccoulson> but if you search for linux crashes in 12.0, you see ours (although, they seem to have disappeared since the actual release)
[15:10] <chrisccoulson> i'm guessing there is something that maps buildid to the version number?
[15:19] <bhearsum> chrisccoulson: i'd start with Laura Thomson or Robert Kaiser
[15:20] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, thanks
[20:13] <chrisccoulson> i should really check my bugmail more often
[20:14] <chrisccoulson> i didn't realize that i'm meant to be pushing firefox symbols to a different server already :(
[20:31] <FernandoMiguel> why is +1 in invite only!?
[20:34]  * micahg is in there
[20:34] <FernandoMiguel> :/
[20:34] <FernandoMiguel> invite me in , micahg
[20:35]  * micahg is not ops
[20:38] <Unit193> mode/#ubuntu+1 +Ccimnt can you speak?