[02:31]  * txomon|home is away: Estoy ocupado
[10:38] <veger> Could someone set bug #949143 to Triaged?
[10:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 949143 in subversion "[needs-packaging] Provide Subversion 1.7.x in the Ubuntu Software Repo" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/949143
[11:55] <nik90> anybody know the package name for ubuntu installer?
[11:56] <nik90> I tried ubuquity, but it says it is an upstream project and does not manage bugs in launchpad
[11:56] <nik90> ubiquity*
[11:56] <ogra_> ubiquity is right, but you should use it in the ubuntu project
[11:57] <ogra_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity ... vs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubiquity
[11:57] <ogra_> (the latter is the upstream project for ubiquity, the former is the ubiquity package in ubuntu
[11:57] <ogra_> )
[11:59] <nik90> ogra: thnx :)
[12:00] <ia> Hello. I will be very appreciate for any [useful] feedback/comments/confirmations to this bug #991902
[12:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 991902 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "blinking blank screen after booting [asus zenbook ux21]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/991902
[12:00] <nik90> ogra, when ever I click on affects project and search for ubiquity it gives me the the 2nd link
[12:01] <nik90> ogra, how do I make it point to the first link?
[12:06] <nik90> anybody/
[12:06] <nik90> I am trying to achieve this in ttps://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/991895/
[12:06] <nik90> https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/991895
[12:06] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 991895 in unity "Animation flickering during OS install 12.04" [Undecided,Invalid]
[12:08] <nik90> nevermind, i found it :)
[16:46] <EvilResistance> quick question, but if a bug has been fixed in an Ubuntu package in a later version of Ubuntu than the bug is reported on, should the bug be marked as "Fix Released", or left as "Confirmed"
[16:48] <EvilResistance> (in this case, the bug is reported on a package in Natty, but the fix is incorporated into Precise)
[17:01] <EvilResistance> (repost) quick question, but if a bug has been fixed in an Ubuntu package in a later version of Ubuntu than the bug is reported on, should the bug be marked as "Fix Released", or left as "Confirmed"
[17:01] <EvilResistance> (in this case, the bug is reported on a package in Natty, but the fix is incorporated into Precise)
[17:04] <jtaylor> EvilResistance: it is marked fix released, if it applies to earlier versions and should be fixed you can ask for it to be nominiated for that series
[17:05] <EvilResistance> well it can't be fixed, because the fix was done upstream in Precise (ZNC 0.206-1, and ZNC 0.204-1 and later do not build in natty (missing deps), even in backports (because backports can't build-dep on other backports))
[17:05] <EvilResistance> at least not in Natty
[17:05] <EvilResistance> it can be fixed in Oneiric by a backport, but...
[17:06] <jtaylor> then it should only be marked fix released in precise/quantal
[17:06] <micahg> well, if the bug was never valid in a later release, it's invalid
[17:06] <EvilResistance> its marked in Natty
[17:06] <EvilResistance> so...
[17:07] <EvilResistance> not sure how to handle it...
[17:07] <EvilResistance> and tbh its a very minor bug, lower priority than low imo
[17:07] <Daekdroom> Is it possible to apply the patch to the older release?
[17:07] <EvilResistance> if and only if i write a patch, no patch exists for it as it stands
[17:07] <jtaylor> if its lower than low importance its not worth an SRU
[17:07] <jtaylor> just close it
[17:08] <EvilResistance> Bug #897038
[17:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 897038 in znc "/usr/share/doc/znc/README.Debian refers to non-existent file" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/897038
[17:08] <EvilResistance> very very minor
[17:08] <jtaylor> yes that does not need fixes in stable releases
[17:08] <jtaylor> if its fixed in quantal, close it
[17:08] <EvilResistance> so, status -> Invalid?
[17:08] <jtaylor> whatever is most appropriate
[17:08] <EvilResistance> considering i can't set Won't Fix...
[17:09] <EvilResistance> and considering its been fixed in Debian (0.206-1) and Precise/Quantal (same version, per last minute sync request with an FFe)
[17:09] <jtaylor> if the issue was once there and now not, its fix release
[17:10] <EvilResistance> regardless of whether the issue still exists in Natty or Oneiric?
[17:10] <Daekdroom> Well, it can be fixed in Oneiric, but not in Natty.
[17:10] <EvilResistance> and it can only be fixed in Oneiric with a backport, which I'd be happy to request/test
[17:10]  * EvilResistance did that before for ZNC 0.204
[17:11] <ia> Hello. I will be very appreciate for any [useful] feedback/comments/confirmations to this bug #991902
[17:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 991902 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "blinking blank screen after booting [asus zenbook ux21]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/991902
[17:15] <EvilResistance> Maverick's EOL right?
[17:15] <EvilResistance> !maverick
[17:15] <ubot2> Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) was the thirteenth release of Ubuntu. !End-Of-Life on April 10th, 2012, see http://ubottu.com/y/maverick for details.
[17:15] <EvilResistance> yep...
[17:15] <EvilResistance> in which case there's something that needs marking as "Won't Fix" for Maverick: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/php5/+bug/882291
[17:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 882291 in php5 "Maverick: php5-gd does not place gd.ini in correct location" [Undecided,Fix released]
[17:16] <EvilResistance> (in Natty, it was fixed)
[18:39] <hggdh> EvilResistance: done, thanks
[19:09] <s9iper1> anybody help me in signing the PGP key ?
[19:11] <jtaylor> the key?
[19:11] <jtaylor> have you verified the owner?
[19:15] <s9iper1> jtaylor: no
[19:16] <jtaylor> then you shouldn't sign it
[19:16] <s9iper1> i had the pgp signed and its on my launchpad account but i get expired now i dont know how to resibmit it
[19:18] <s9iper1> jtaylor: i generate it and do all the steps and than i send it to server but  launchpad id can not recognize it,,,  i wana know how the launchpad recognize it if we have ni fingure print in the key ?
[19:20] <s9iper1> no*
[19:20] <jtaylor> probably a question for #launchpad
[19:21] <jtaylor> a key always has a fingerprint, I don't understand the problem
[19:22] <s9iper1> jtaylor: when we generate the key than we have to manually enter the fingerprint or it is automatically present in it ?
[19:25] <jtaylor> it is always present
[19:25] <jtaylor> you have to enter a passphrase to secure the key
[19:28] <s9iper1> jaytalor: yes i have entered
[19:28] <s9iper1> while generating
[19:36] <EvilResistance> hggdh, no problem (considering I filed that bug a while ago, I can tell when its supposed to be Won't Fix)
[20:09] <guntbert> about bug reports: should I change the status of a bug (from "incomplete" to something else) after giving the requested information?
[20:10] <micahg> guntbert: you can reset it back to new if all the information has been provided
[20:10] <guntbert> micahg: will do, thx
[21:25] <mfisch> bdmurray: hey is bugcontrol not a normal launchpad team?  I'm surprised that I don't see it in my list of teams on my LP "homepage"
[21:27] <bdmurray> mfisch: I see it there
[21:27] <bdmurray> mfisch: for your page
[21:27]  * mfisch sees it now and puts the vodka down
[21:27] <mfisch> thanks bdmurray ;)
[21:32] <mfisch> bdmurray: does bugcontrol have an official icon?  I'm writing an ubuntu accomplishment using jono's accomps system
[21:34] <bdmurray> mfisch: yes its a box with a check in it
[21:34] <bdmurray> mfisch: I'd be interested in see that accomplishment
[21:34] <mfisch> bdmurray: do you have a larger image than that small one in my homepage?
[21:34] <mfisch> bdmurray: I'm doing a bugsquad one as well, I grabbed that bug pic from the wikui
[21:35] <bdmurray> mfisch: not that I remember having
[21:45] <mfisch> bdmurray: I think you got the icon from the Open Icon library, I am downloading and looking for a larger copy