[00:46] <ElderP> good evening folks
[09:13] <azat> Hi all, how can I download log of build that not finished yet?
[09:14] <wgrant> azat: You can only see the last few lines as shown on the build page.
[09:14] <wgrant> The full log isn't available until it completes.
[09:15] <azat> wgrant: But it never complete because there is an error in while loop, and if I stop the build I can`t get log too
[09:15] <azat> But on local machine it build succesfully
[09:15] <wgrant> azat: You've built it in pbuilder locally?
[09:15] <wgrant> Is it perhaps trying to access the Internet?
[09:15] <wgrant> That's not supported from the Launchpad build farm.
[09:16] <azat> Not it not access to internet
[09:16] <azat> I build libevent 2.0
[09:16] <azat> Localy I just run with debuild
[09:16] <wgrant> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto
[09:17] <wgrant> Try pbuilder, it gives you a clean build environment.
[10:00] <azat> wgrant: it builds with pbuilder
[10:00] <azat> on local machine
[10:12] <azat> wgrant: have any other ideas in what problem is?
[10:13] <wgrant> azat: Do you have a link to the build?
[10:13] <azat> Ofcouse, a sec
[10:15] <azat> https://launchpad.net/~a3at-mail/+archive/libevent/+build/3441556, i'v already send a patch to developers (but can`t uderstand why this happens) https://github.com/libevent/libevent/pull/8
[10:15] <wgrant> azat: Oh
[10:15] <wgrant> azat: It'll be a kernel version issue
[10:15] <wgrant> The PPA builders still run hardy kernels
[10:15] <wgrant> That's 2.6.24
[10:16] <azat> Oh.. but how can I see which of syscalls are not supported?
[10:16] <wgrant> The manpages will usually tell you when certain features were added
[10:16] <wgrant> VERSIONS The accept4() system call is available starting with Linux 2.6.28; support in glibc is available starting with version 2.10.
[10:16] <wgrant> Possibly relevant
[10:17] <wgrant> Oh look, it's using accept4 :)
[10:18] <azat> Do launchpad will update it kernels?
[10:18] <azat> For buildd
[10:18] <wgrant> We'll probably upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Linux 3.2) later this year.
[10:18] <wgrant> I don't know quite when, though.
[10:18] <azat> wgrant: yes, now I see that it is accept4
[10:19] <azat> BTW, Is it possible to save log after canceling of build?
[10:19] <wgrant> Not easily, unfortunately.
[10:19] <wgrant> Cancellation basically destroys the VM that the build is running it.
[10:20] <wgrant> To grab the log we'd have to negotiate with the build slave to copy the log across even though the build isn't finished. Now we just kill it immediately, to keep it simple so it always works.
[10:21] <azat> wgrant: I understand, hanks
[12:23] <Sweetshark> hi there, is there any way to restart the build at https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/+build/3441748 ? it was canceled because of a "no space left on device" error, I Id like to retry building it hoping it gets a buildd that is not that limited ....
[12:25] <wgrant> Sweetshark: You need to reduce the build size.
[12:25] <wgrant> Or make arrangements with IS to get larger build FSes, but I don't think they'd like that idea much.
[12:34] <Sweetshark> wgrant: "reducing the build size" would make that build different from what will be shipped, or removing inbuild tests both of which is unacceptable. yes, IS should get larger build FS (and should have gotten them half a year ago). For now I am looking for a way to retry that build hoping to get a buildd with more space this time.
[12:37] <czajkowski> Sweetshark: you already have a large build size for the PPa much larger than I've ever seen set for others
[12:40] <Sweetshark> czajkowski: the problem is that LO depends on ~all of main, it needs some space to work with above that.
[12:41] <czajkowski> Sweetshark: as wgrant has already pointed outyou need to reduce the size or talk to IS.
[12:46] <Sweetshark> czajkowski: are you sure about that larger build size for i386 too? because amd64 is happy.
[12:47] <wgrant> Sweetshark: There are some hardware differences, but are you sure it's not doc builds and the like that only happen on i386?
[12:47] <Sweetshark> wgrant: ah, true.
[12:48] <wgrant> I forget if i18n is still build from the same source.
[12:50] <Sweetshark> wgrant: it is again. it wasnt for some time with some ugly and broken hack, which broke l10n for some important cornercases.
[12:50] <wgrant> I thought there must have been a reason I'd forgotten how it worked :)
[12:51] <wgrant> That would do it.
[15:36] <Lekensteyn> Hi, is this the right channels for questions on the API?
[15:36] <geser> the LP API? yes
[15:37] <Lekensteyn> Okay, what is the "memo" field used for?
[15:37] <Lekensteyn> as in https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/%7Ebumblebee/+archive/stable?ws.op=getPublishedBinaries&ws.size=75&memo=75&ws.start=75
[16:01] <Lekensteyn> ok got it thanks to internal documentation.
[16:01] <Lekensteyn> memo=X returns entry X if there are no entries for the requested ws.start param
[17:29] <dobey> anyone know how to fix this error: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/97012128/vcs-imports-abiword-trunk.log ?
[19:04] <smoser> hey. feeling dumb with launchpadlib.
[19:05] <smoser> i can get a specification with something like: ubuntu.getSpecification(name="servercloud-q-awstools")
[19:05] <smoser> but i can't find a way to get a specification other than by name
[19:12] <lifeless> smoser: what other ways would you like ?
[19:14] <smoser> i kind of wanted to "find" the list
[19:14] <smoser> either by saying "what specifications are there for project "Ubuntu"?"
[19:14] <smoser> or what specifications is 'smoser' the drafter of
[19:15] <smoser> all i can see right now is i can go to something like: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/
[19:15] <smoser> and search for names... and then use those.
[19:16] <smoser> i'm sure i'm just missing something
[19:20] <lifeless> according to https://api.launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#distribution
[19:21] <lifeless> it should on .all_specifications
[19:21] <lifeless> and probably a better one is valid_specifications
[19:22] <lifeless> smoser: ^
[19:27] <smoser> lifeless, thanks.
[21:12] <mhmodibrhm> Hellooo
[21:17] <david0rk> Hi all.
[21:17] <david0rk> is anyone on fairly familiar with bazaar?
[21:19] <david0rk> Hello?
[21:20] <david0rk> anone on?
[21:32] <mhmodibrhm> hello, i am a new ubuntu member and i have some questions about my mail
[21:36] <lifeless> !ask | david0rk
[21:36] <lifeless> !ask | mhmodibrhm
[21:38] <david0rk> Can anyone walk me through setting up bazaar  & integrating it with launchpad
[21:38] <mhmodibrhm> ok when my @ubuntu.com mail will work?
[21:41] <mhmodibrhm> lifeless: i am just approved as a new member and i want to know when my @ubuntu.com email will be working and if i want to change its name what could i do?
[21:41] <lifeless> it gets processed every few days
[21:41] <lifeless> to tweak it you can talk to the sysadmins in #canonical-sysadmin
[21:42] <lifeless> david0rk: I don't have the time right now, but where have you gotten up to ?
[21:42] <lifeless> (someone else may be able to help you, particularly if they know where you are up to)
[21:43] <david0rk> lifeless, I've got launchpad setup.   i've set a folder on my pc as tree
[21:44] <david0rk> i just need to add my source code (i'm assuming make a branch, copy my source to that folder) and push to launchpad
[21:49] <lifeless> that sounds about right
[22:19] <david0rk> ok. I've pushed a "blank" branch to launchpad.  Now on my pc what do i do to get my code to launchpad?
[22:22] <david0rk> nevermind.  I figured out using a bit of common sense and tinkering.   BAZAAR IS AWESOME!
[22:25] <lifeless> cool :)
[22:27] <david0rk> i didn't realize i had to add the files to the branch, (not just copy them there like dropbox or something) and then commit them before pushing.