[06:45] <dholbach> good morning
[08:00] <ajmitch> a belated good morning, dholbach
[08:47] <dholbach> hey ajmitch
[12:46]  * cielak is away: Busy/Away
[17:34] <wendar> OpenSinhalease won't compile on Precise :(
[17:34] <wendar> looks like GTK 2->3 problems
[17:52]  * cielak is back (gone 05:05:25)
[20:26] <ajmitch> wendar: what's the build failure?
[20:26] <ajmitch> gtk+ 2 apps should still build on precise
[20:28] <wendar> It gives a pile of Pango and GTK Warnings, and then coredumps
[20:28] <ajmitch> ouch
[20:28] <wendar> last is: /home/allison/src/arb/opensinhalease/pristine/opensinhalease-12.04.1/opensinhalease_lib/Window.py:77: GtkWarning: IA__gtk_icon_theme_load_icon: assertion `GTK_IS_ICON_THEME (icon_theme)' failed
[20:28] <wendar>   LaunchpadIntegration.add_items(self.ui.helpMenu, 1, True, True)
[20:29] <ajmitch> it's not loading both gtk 2 & 3 into the same process?
[20:29] <wendar> I don't know, haven't looked into it
[20:29] <ajmitch> ok
[20:29] <ajmitch> those sort of problems are a bit tricky :)
[20:30] <wendar> I sent an email to the quickly-talk mailing list with the full build log
[20:30] <wendar> we'll see if they have any better ideas
[20:31] <wendar> (and also let the developer know that their submission was hung up on building on precise)
[20:31] <wendar> they gave it a version number of 12.04.1, but forgot to update the target
[20:31] <wendar> so, it was still building on oneiric in their PPA (and working fine)
[20:31] <ajmitch> I think we may have a slight double-up of sessions on the schedule at UDS, maybe one of them we can sit down & try & work on the queue
[20:32] <wendar> as in, too many sessions scheduled?
[20:32] <wendar> yeah, it looked like the packaging-requirements session could be merged into one of the others
[20:32] <wendar> we surely can't need 4 sessions :)
[20:32] <ajmitch> yeah :)
[20:33] <ajmitch> currently they'll all be on the schedule
[20:33] <wendar> and, there was another session scheduled for reviewing MyApps bugs
[20:33] <ajmitch> busy week
[20:33] <wendar> if we can get it down to 3 sessions, and use our session mostly for queue work, we should be good
[20:33] <ajmitch> http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-q/track/community/ is probably the best list to work from
[20:34] <ajmitch> of course the one I submitted is in the last timeslot on friday
[20:35] <wendar> did dpm have any way to move it earlier in the week?
[20:36] <wendar> things do fill up fast
[20:36] <ajmitch> not sure, mhall119 might do though
[20:36] <wendar> of course, we could always do some queue work in the hallway one afternoon
[20:36] <ajmitch> sure
[20:36] <wendar> and leave the friday session for recruiting
[20:37] <ajmitch> I doubt we'll all be booked solid for the week
[20:37] <wendar> yeah
[20:37]  * ajmitch just needs to find a way to get some free space on his laptop
[20:37] <wendar> always tricky
[20:38] <wendar> I just added a bunch more detail to the Quickly tips
[20:38] <wendar> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Submissions/QuicklyTips
[20:38] <wendar> Listing out the changes we make
[20:39] <ajmitch> apps built on precise shouldn't need the dh_python2 conversion now
[20:41] <ajmitch> that is a very useful list though
[21:30] <mhall119> wendar: I can move a session to anytime you want
[21:33] <malin> mhall119: How can I apply for a job in canonical? I am studiying informatics
[21:33] <wendar> mhall119: early in the week would be nice, if we can swing it
[21:33] <wendar> I know the early part of the week tends to be crowded, but that leaves us space to add on any extras if we need them later
[21:33] <mhall119> malin: our job openings are posted at http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/careers
[21:34] <mhall119> find one that you think you're a fit for and submit an application
[21:34] <mhall119> wendar: what's the session?
[21:35] <wendar> mhall119: community-q-app-review-board
[21:35] <wendar> currently in the last slot on Friday
[21:36] <mhall119> wendar: moved it to Tuesday at noon
[21:37] <wendar> mhall119: awesome, thanks!
[21:37] <malin> mhall119: thanx :)
[21:37] <mhall119> np
[21:38] <ajmitch> mhall119: thanks
[21:39] <ajmitch> that just added a conflict for me on the lxc demo & q&a session
[21:40] <ajmitch> so it'll conflict for stgraber as well, I expect
[21:40]  * ajmitch can't imagine that scheduling something like UDS is ever much fun :)
[21:54] <wendar> ajmitch, mhall119: ah, I guess we'll have to move it again
[22:43] <mhall119> ajmitch: never fun, no
[22:46] <mhall119> ajmitch: you're not marked at required for the lxc session, that's why
[22:47] <mhall119> and stgraber isn't for the ARB session
[22:48] <ajmitch> ah right
[22:48] <mhall119> ajmitch: I moved it to 9am instead, does that work better?
[22:48]  * ajmitch probably isn't required for the LXC session, but we'd like stgraber at the ARB if possible :)
[22:48] <mhall119> if people are marked at required to attend, the scheduler warns us about conflicts
[22:49] <ajmitch> I'll keep that in mind, thanks :)
[22:50] <ajmitch> looks like 9AM fits well
[23:41] <malin> ajmitch: could you tell me exactly what I need to change in this lens to get it into software center? https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/782/