=== jbicha1 is now known as jbicha [00:52] jcastro: You need to stop teasing G+ with blank Electronic Arts sessions :) [01:02] Wooo! ddebs support into soyuz? Yes please! [01:05] RAOF: cool [01:11] RAOF: it wasn't just that jcastro taunting us [01:13] yay, I can now select text in email again! :D [01:14] Funky! [01:14] indeed. [01:15] cyphermox: oh! I want some of that! :P [01:15] most annoying bug ever :) [01:16] yup yup [01:16] there's a patch on the upstream bug; I'll upload to quantal in a minute, then start shepherding it through the SRU process === jbicha is now known as Guest10768 [04:37] Good morning === geser_ is now known as geser === bigon_ is now known as bigon [08:56] good morning everyone [09:00] oh, finally understood why all icones appear in duplicate in gnome-shell's overview, need to disable "Debian" directory from alacarte (the menu editor tool) [09:00] can't that be done by default in ubuntu please? [09:04] according to what I see by googling, that happens for unity as well... [09:04] xclaesse, there is no "Debian" directory by default [09:04] at least, i don't have one here.... [09:04] what pulled it then? [09:05] is menu-xdg installed by default? [09:05] xclaesse, no, it's not installed by default [09:06] xclaesse, did you install the "gnome" meta package? it seems that recommends menu-xdg for some very strange reason [09:06] right, that's it [09:07] can it be removed from deps if it provides nothing useful, please? [09:08] xclaesse, i guess so. did you report a bug? [09:11] chrisccoulson, I fell stupid, but I've already looked many times, but launchpad does not seems to have a "I WANT TO REPORT A BUG" button [09:12] xclaesse, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/. it's on the RHS for me [09:12] how wrong can it be that "Report a bug" link goes to a page not telling how to do it [09:12] xclaesse, oh, you get redirected, don't you? [09:13] ohh, so "Report a bug" is useful only if you go to the package page [09:13] waw [09:13] seriously... [09:14] you're supposed to use ubuntu-bug, not the launchpad web interface [09:15] yeah, that's true, although it probably doesn't make that much difference in this case :) [09:15] chrisccoulson, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/993844 [09:15] Launchpad bug 993844 in meta-gnome3 "drop menu-xdg dependency" [Undecided,New] [09:15] but for firefox, I enforce that quite vigorously now, and just close bugs that are reported via the launchpad interface ;) [09:15] well, it does in that the web interface is deliberately making it difficult [09:15] xclaesse, thanks [09:16] chrisccoulson, speaking about bugs when installing that meta-package: grub displays a "debian" image after installing gnome-desktop-environment [09:17] those are really debian metapackages [09:17] perhaps we should think about getting them out of ubuntu [09:17] Laney, ubuntu needs at least a package i-want-the-real-gnome-desktop [09:18] yes [09:18] yeah, it does seem like this is the sort of thing that shouldn't be based on debian [09:18] i'm sure we used to carry quite a large delta for the gnome2 metapackages [09:19] chrisccoulson, I guess canonical does zero testing of gnome env now? :/ [09:19] xclaesse, well, i don't. but i can't speak for my other colleagues :) [09:20] why not just collaborate more with Debian to reduce the delata [09:20] *delta [09:21] i think it's reasonable to expect differences here [09:21] perhaps a normal delta would be alright though [09:21] and things like different images can be kept in Debian [09:21] any idea what package provides grub's theme? [09:27] morning [10:01] chrisccoulson, reported that one as well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome3/+bug/993865 [10:01] Launchpad bug 993865 in meta-gnome3 "desktop-base changes grub's theme to debian" [Undecided,New] [10:03] pitti, ping [10:03] hello davidcalle [10:03] pitti, how are you? [10:04] quite fine, thanks! just made some progress on debugging a bug I've chased for a week now [10:06] pitti, I would need your advice on a potential sru. There is a localization bug in the Video lens ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/993002 ), that has been fixed yesterday with the help of experimented ln18 people from #ubuntu-translators. Do you think it would qualified as an sru? Or backport? [10:06] Launchpad bug 993002 in unity "Unity video lens doesn't work when installing in Cuba country" [Undecided,Fix committed] [10:07] Yeah, I happened to have noticed my grub had the debian theme, but I didn't know the source === Amoz_ is now known as Amoz [10:12] davidcalle: that's not a good backport, it shoudl be an SRU [10:12] davidcalle: backports is for new versions, SRUs are for bug fixes [10:12] pitti, ok [10:13] pitti, I'll modify the report to be sru compliant, and assign ubuntu-sru. Anything else I need to do? [10:17] davidcalle: you need to upload a fix to precise-proposed [10:17] or get it uploaded through your sponsor [10:18] pitti, sure, I was talking about the administrative side of things :) Thanks a lot. [10:18] davidcalle: no, that's pretty much it -- have a bug, link to it in changelog, upload it [10:18] we try to make it as easy as possible [10:19] and make sure that the bug has reproduction steps === huats_ is now known as huats === slomo_ is now known as slomo [11:36] chrisccoulson, hi :), could you push your firefox 13b2 package to quantal too? [11:37] ricotz, not when it doesn't build [11:37] chrisccoulson, so you already know it doesnt build? [11:37] ricotz, yeah [11:37] i see :\ [12:20] ricotz: ping? [12:20] Sweetshark, pong [12:27] ricotz: did you do any work on 3.5.3 backporting or are you planning to? [12:28] Sweetshark, lucid and oneiric are currently building [12:28] https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ppa/+builds?build_text=&build_state=building [12:29] ricotz: ah, great! I will reply to http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/11319.html?view=16695#t16695 quoting your awesomeness then ;) [12:29] Sweetshark, will do natty too later today [12:30] Sweetshark, but lucid amd64 might fail [12:32] ricotz: ppa fs size again? [12:32] Sweetshark, ah, sorry, i considered your precise ppa upload as testbuild which can be dropped if it is published in precise [12:33] Sweetshark, yeah, maybe the builder is blacklisted but the lucid build is smaller [12:34] the oneiric builds should be fine [12:34] ricotz: oh, no, did you just delete the 3.5.3 precise upload? [12:35] Sweetshark, i did :\, this morning [12:36] ricotz: arrgh, that one is published in >100 websites as here you can update easily! [12:36] *grmble* [12:36] let me try something [12:36] pitti: is there a way to maybe copy the 3.5.3 precise-proposed package over to the libreoffice ppa? [12:37] Sweetshark: yes, can do that [12:37] Sweetshark: what's the URL of the PPA? [12:37] pitti: please do for major shitstorm avoidance. [12:38] pitti: ppa:libreoffice/ppa [12:38] pitti, doing it already [12:39] ricotz: oh, you can do that from the web uI? [12:39] yes, if it doesnt timeout :\ [12:39] pitti, please go ahead if you like [12:40] (as a sideeffect we will have all l10n in the ppa then and not only 12 langs, which is kinda nice). [12:40] Sweetshark: to clarify, you mean source+binaries, to the PPA for "precise"? [12:40] pitti, ah it worked [12:40] 2012-05-03 12:40:19 ERROR libreoffice 1:3.5.3-0ubuntu1 in precise (same version has unpublished binaries in the destination archive for Precise, please wait for them to be published before copying) [12:40] I suppose ricotz beat me to it [12:40] pitti: yes [12:41] yep, there it is [12:41] * ricotz feels better now [12:42] oh, and we have ppc additionally there, also nice. [12:43] Sweetshark, yeah, not sure if ppc really get published [12:44] pitti: "all builds were successfull, but have not yet been published" <- does that mean amd64/i386 too? [12:44] I hope ricotz copied the binaries, too [12:44] Sweetshark, it takes some time [12:45] the publishing process, i mean [12:45] pitti, i did [12:45] ricotz: please dont delete stuff from me in that ppa without pinging me first. If I do testbuilds I do them locally or in one of my really personal ppas. [12:46] Sweetshark, ok [12:46] g2g, bye === dobey_ is now known as dobey === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [13:43] pitti: wireless-tools done. [13:44] cyphermox: cool, thanks === mpt_ is now known as mpt [15:34] good night everyone! [15:35] pitti just one question [16:12] hey [16:13] heya === Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === mimico_afk is now known as mimico [19:33] chrisccoulson: ooh. are we going to start shipping firefox with gstreamer backend now? :) [19:34] when trying to test 12.04 from cd no launcher, whats up? [19:35] bob__: a bug maybe? you should file it :) [19:36] where is that done at? [19:37] dobey: it would only be possible in oneiric and later [19:38] micahg: that's fine by me [19:39] bob__: you can run "ubuntu-bug unity" on the live cd, or https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/unity/+filebug [19:40] bob__: the former is better, as it will collect useful information about your hardware [19:41] dobey: the second link will redirect to a help page for people who are non members of bug control [19:41] how does one get to the terminal to do that? [19:41] ctrl-alt-T [19:41] k thanks [19:47] chromium http://i46.tinypic.com/2cp9u28.png What is the reason it 12.04 xubuntu [19:50] beyler: try #xubuntu [19:52] micahg: does not respond to anybody out there [19:53] then try #ubuntu [19:55] micahg: k [21:07] names [21:07] \ [21:08] RAOF: You gone broke my quantal desktop === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [21:09] robert_ancell2, hey [21:09] robert_ancell2, how are you? [21:10] seb128: good, but stuck in text mode [21:10] robert_ancell2: downgrade libxfont to 1:1.4.4-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxfont/+bug/992745 [21:10] Launchpad bug 992745 in libxfont "X doesn't load in Quantal, downgrading libxfont1 to Precise version fixes it : could not open default font 'fixed'" [Critical,Fix committed] [21:10] robert_ancell2, quantal? not scared ;-) [21:10] it just got uploaded to debian to be synced to quantal an hour or so ago [21:10] Sarvatt: ah, that's what I'm looking for [21:11] Sarvatt: Is there any easy way to do the downgrade? (no web browser to find the link) [21:11] seb128: precise was working too well :) [21:12] robert_ancell2, except that lightdm forces me to reboot every second login :p [21:12] robert_ancell2: i386 or amd64? [21:12] robert_ancell2, mterry got a fix btw [21:12] Sarvatt: amd64 [21:12] seb128, well that sounds fun - which bug is that one? [21:12] robert_ancell2, add a precise source and sudo apt-get install libxfont1/precise ? [21:12] robert_ancell2: wget http://goo.gl/drqCo :) [21:13] robert_ancell2, yeeah was just mailing you [21:13] Sarvatt: easy, cheers [21:13] robert_ancell2, https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity-greeter/986967/+merge/104622 [21:13] robert_ancell2, the "alpha never reachs 1 and so the greeter doesn't transition" [21:13] robert_ancell2, and your idea to move to Year.Month versioning seems good [21:15] Sarvatt: You sent me the link for 1.4.5-1 instead of 1.4.4-1 [21:15] robert_ancell2: shoot, sorry! [21:15] mterry: cool [21:15] mterry: we just need to convince the unity team to do the same [21:15] robert_ancell2: http://goo.gl/PYdyf [21:16] thats libxfont1_1.4.4-1_amd64.deb [21:17] yay, back to graphics! [21:17] Sarvatt, what happened to "if you break Ubuntu you fix or revert it"? ;-) [21:17] seb128: who broke ubuntu? (i cant upload anything either) :P [21:17] libxfont (1:1.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low [21:17] . [21:17] * Ease sync for Ubuntu: strip -Bsymbolic-functions from LDFLAGS [21:17] (LP: #992745). [21:18] some toolchain change and an auto sync broke it [21:18] toolchain didn't change recently I think [21:18] oh, a robert_ancell [21:19] seb128, I think the assumption that we can just autolayer Ubuntu on top of Debian and everything will magically work broke it [21:19] seb128: is there some way a core-dev can trigger a sync without filling a bug? it was uploaded to debian about an hour ago and might be able to be synced now [21:20] still too new to requestsync it, been trying [21:20] robert_ancell, yeah, that's because we have an incompatible toolchain with them, which is a bit of an issue [21:20] Sarvatt: syncpackage -d sid -r quantal [21:20] Sarvatt, it can't be officially synced if not published I think [21:20] Sarvatt: though LP usually needs much more than an hour to notice the new package in Debian [21:20] i.e the tools don't look to incoming [21:21] debian publisher doesn't run as often that the Debian one, like twice a day [21:22] robert_ancell, so yeah, my lightdm issue was the "logging in..." greeter stuff [21:23] robert_ancell, should we wait for other fixes to SRU or just get one for that one? [21:23] seb128, is it very widespread? I'm surprised it's only shown post release [21:23] I'd say release immediately [21:23] robert_ancell, mterry: the bug is annoying enough that I would prefer to not wait post UDS to SRU it [21:23] robert_ancell, dunno, we got a few duplicates and a few people mentioning it on IRC, and I and pitti did hit it [21:23] agreed [21:24] robert_ancell, i.e that's enough people around that I guess that lot of users will hit it, though for some reason it doesn't happen on first login and not everybody user multiple users or log out and in again [21:24] well anyway [21:25] mterry, please SRU it, thanks ;-) [21:25] I can verify the SRU once it's in [21:25] robert_ancell, did you have anything else you wanted to squeeze into this SRU? [21:25] mterry, no [21:25] robert_ancell, OK, will package it up [21:26] robert_ancell, btw you don't have any idea about the multimonitor greeter handling not working until you connect,disconnect a monitor? [21:26] robert_ancell: squeeze some love into it. [21:26] dobey, creepy [21:26] robert_ancell, i.e it goes on mirror mode on boot [21:26] heh [21:26] robert_ancell, if that's an easy fix it would be nice to sneak that in as well, multimonitor is cool when it works ;-) [21:27] seb128, no, it probably needs an Xpert to look at that one. I know mirror mode is the default, though I don't know why g-s-d doesn't override that when it starts [21:27] perhaps we have to kick g-s-d? [21:27] robert_ancell, I though we didn't enable xrandr in unity-greeter? [21:28] oh, no, it's in the enabled list [21:28] seb128, yeah [21:28] so yeah, maybe that's the issue [22:06] jasoncwarner_, ping, you around? [22:06] jasoncwarner_, want you to try a fix for the log in issue [22:06] jasoncwarner_, enable http://launchpad.net/~mterry/+archive/ppa2 and let me know [22:32] seb128, fyi, I'm waiting on user responses before uploading the SRU [22:32] mterry, screw users! [22:32] ;-) [22:32] mterry, what you mean there is that you don't trust me right? [22:32] mterry, don't answer that... it's a trap :) [22:33] I suspect they are just amd64 users (forgot that hadn't built yet when I sent them there) [22:35] mterry, I did comment pointing that a bit earlier [22:36] yup, want to see what they say [22:55] robert_ancell: I was wondering why you were up so early. But you're now all the way over *there*, aren't you! [22:55] RAOF, yep [22:57] lol