[00:15] bkerensa: is nathan williams one of yours? [00:15] saw some incoming charms from him [00:15] awesome. [00:16] jcastro: one of mine... yes he is [00:16] :P [00:16] He is a Oregonian [00:16] ;) [00:16] \o/ [00:16] jcastro: so we now have Me, Adam_G, Kees and nathwill [00:17] <3 [00:19] jcastro: if your with jono, could you ask him if we are going to do community round tables please [00:19] ok [00:20] ty [00:21] jcastro: is http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-q/meeting/20401/community-q-juju-training-events/ supposed to be scheduled twice? [00:21] huh weird [00:21] no [00:21] just once [00:21] pick one and delete pls [00:21] k [03:32] Hi, is jcastro around? [03:35] JoseeAntonioR: I doubt it, it's 23:35 in his timezone [03:35] if you stick around, he'll show up in a few hours [03:36] paultag: Hmm, well, thanks. I'll send him an email, then, it's also late over here. [03:36] gotcha [05:05] paultag: it's not quite that late, but he's probably at the bar [05:06] paultag: jcastro and I are in San Fran already, so we're PDT [06:42] good morning [06:44] morning === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaroane === lfaroane is now known as lfaraone [09:02] aloha [09:06] hello czajkowski [09:15] Hello. [10:39] dholbach: you're amazing!! [10:39] thank you [10:40] de nada === daker__ is now known as daker [12:21] I seem to have landed myself into charing the womens flossie pannel, charing another discussion and giving a sepeate talk. at a confernece in May in London [12:23] Props to you? [12:24] czajkowski: volunteered without realising to what you volunteered? (: [12:24] no I agreed to give a talk [12:24] now doing 3 sessions [12:24] (: [12:24] still it'll be fun 2 day event [12:24] and it's in London so no travelling [12:25] * Tm_T tends to volunteer himself too easily in time to time [12:29] congrats czajkowski [12:59] czajkowski: ping [13:00] ugh pong [13:00] sup [13:01] :-( [13:01] czajkowski: it looks like gmb made BPs for the clinic... and you made meetings.. is there a reason to have the BPs? [13:01] I don't know [13:01] I dont think so tbh [13:02] should it be verified prior to getting rid of them? [13:03] nah [13:03] we can create a bp if needed on the day [13:03] else stick with my ones as I've bloged and linked them internally [13:04] kk [13:04] cheers [13:37] cjohnston: I'm down as mandatry 2 things on at the same time [13:37] what happens [13:38] :) [13:38] Grr, wrong channel [13:39] DJones: We always welcome smiles :-) [13:40] Heh, trouble is, the smile was meant for a chat with my wife on pidgin, not irc with irssi [13:40] lol [13:40] So not just wrong window, wrong app [13:40] well... I hope she got her smile [13:41] Eventually, although the smile could be because she said she was going out for the night === JanC_ is now known as JanC [15:58] Goodbye. [17:00] alright my friends [17:00] see you sunday afternoon [17:00] big hugs [17:01] yay [17:01] :) [17:05] mhall119: ping [17:05] http://paste.ubuntu.com/967332/ [17:05] IS would like to have a cool monitoring thing for the icecast streams [17:05] but need help with it [17:06] it's not like a formal request or anything important, they're just wondering if someone can look at it and make it work [17:06] jcastro: make that code work? [17:06] "once the IS folks have icecast running, you should find some kind of gtk/gstreamer ninja and persuade them to figure out why http://paste.ubuntu.com/967332/ doesn't work" [17:10] so I'm happy to help, but I'm going to need more information that that to know what I can do [17:11] czajkowski: what two meetings [17:19] jcastro: who's working on that app? [17:27] mhall119: Chris Jones, Ng on irc [17:27] ok [17:33] hi jcastro [17:33] hi [17:33] what's up [17:34] http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-q/meeting/20397/community-q-irc-workshops/ what is that? [17:34] openweek, developerweek, etc. [17:34] ah right ok [17:34] I will propose a different one for the IRCC/IRC team plan for bots and stuff [17:43] so when proposing a meeting these days do I have to make the blueprint then propose it on summit, or just propose it on summit? [17:45] BP please [17:46] community-q-whatever [17:46] then jono approves [17:46] cjohnston: hey so IS is confused with the room names, different on summit vs. the IRC rooms, etc. [17:46] so I told them to make a canonical list of the room names [17:46] and we'll just go with that [17:47] they are not different! [17:47] they are the slug names from the rooms [17:47] oh ok, well, whatever is user visible [17:48] anyway, just a heads up [17:48] if they publish the list and it's the same then woo [17:48] jcastro: its always been #ubuntu-uds-roomname [17:48] and the slugs are all lower case and - replaces space [17:48] * AlanBell was very careful [17:48] * jcastro nods [17:49] cjohnston: their concern was the "roomname" part [17:49] for which room? [17:49] he wasn't specific [17:49] he's Sciri on IRC though if you wanna ping him [17:49] * jcastro is off to do cloud stuff now [17:49] no cloud for you [17:50] thanks jcastro [17:50] AlanBell: FYI, marianna had to change the rooms some [17:50] moved some public ones to private, and some private ones to public [17:53] ok, looks like junior ballroom 3 and room 212 have been removed [17:57] AlanBell: yeah, those are both for private meetings only now [17:59] ok, well removing rooms isn't a problem really, I am mainly worried about people ending up in the wrong place, extra rooms with nothing visible scheduled in them are harmless [18:03] AlanBell: #canonical-sysadmin please [18:15] cjohnston: meant to be 2 one tuesda and one thursday [18:15] czajkowski: ? [18:15] i dont understand [18:16] cjohnston: going by your comment above [18:17] czajkowski: I think your talking about the clinics (sorry, im in 7 conversations right now).. I haven't had a change to fix the blueprint ones yet... [18:17] ok [18:20] AlanBell: Are you in UK still? [18:22] yes [18:22] leaving tomorrow === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan [19:17] czajkowski: the two blueprint created meetings have been deleted [19:21] cjohnston: cheers [19:31] hey I forgot, that qt session [19:32] did we ever get it back? [19:35] you arent talking to me are you [19:38] jcastro: the bof? [19:38] doesn't look like it [19:58] yay Cloudfront [20:10] * AlanBell wonders if there is a theme for the UDS end party [20:10] california dreamin' [20:11] "UDS closing party -- California dreamin' beach party!" [20:11] I dare anyone to go swiming in the ocean [20:11] ok me and my back are now offically not talking [20:11] hmm, so we have to dress like we are not expecting it to rain. Might be tricky for the brits. [20:11] I may crawl from sf airport to hotel and collapse tomorrow [20:11] greg-g: I'd like to see them try from "West Hall" in a Marriot in Oakland :) [20:12] czajkowski: aww :( [20:12] pleia2: oh right, well, go over to the Oakland Port [20:12] eww [20:12] pleia2: though, if the cops saw a big mass of people walking towards the Oakland Port again.... [20:12] bay party? :) [20:12] AlanBell: handkerchief as a hat for starters in 4 corners. oh sandles and socks, and red face from being burnt [20:12] hahaha [20:12] no no, you don't wear the socks when you go to the beach [20:13] you wear the socks everywhere else :) [20:13] no no ou do if you're british! [20:13] "Ubuntu Developers Attempt to Disrupt International Commerce by Taking Over Oakland Port" [20:13] greg-g: there shall be no 'attempt' only full control [20:13] :) [20:13] hehe [20:13] okease UDS folks always do things 100000% [20:14] non of this attempt lark [20:14] :) [20:14] pizza or chinese for dinner [20:14] so not budging from the couch so anything that delivers really [20:14] pizza [20:14] I'm thinking dominios [20:14] we have chinese*1000 here [20:14] I need their garlic dip [20:14] pizza always wins in my book [20:15] might have to go shopping in SF for some beach stuff :) [21:30] AlanBell: A beach ball at the very least [21:30] :D [21:34] mhall119: uds.ubuntu.com registration is "OpenID discovery error: Error fetching XRDS document: (60, 'server certificate verification failed. CAfile: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt')" [21:35] apparently its being doing that for a day or two [21:38] bkerensa: ugh, ping IS, I don't think that's us [21:39] mhall119: will do [21:45] bummer, the UDS register link isn't working https://forms.canonical.com/udsreg/ [21:54] jbicha: looks like we're having some all-over SSO errors [21:54] bkerensa: what did IS say? [22:06] mhall119: I just RT'ed [22:06] mhall119: should I ping directly? [23:12] jcastro, I think there may be some issues with LP auto scheduling [23:12] my accomplishments sessions have not appeared in summit [23:12] mhall119, ^ [23:12] cjohnston, ^ [23:13] jono: link? [23:13] cjohnston, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-q-ubuntu-accomplishments-development-planning [23:14] and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-q-growing-ubuntu-community-accomplishments [23:15] jono: your definitions are wrong [23:15] jono: new [23:15] jcastro: see.. you said that the track leads should fix stuff [23:15] :) [23:15] I'm still missing the qt-bof one too [23:15] jcastro: link [23:16] jcastro: I'm removing LP support for uds-r [23:16] cjohnston, which definition? [23:16] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-q-qt-bof [23:16] jono: on the BPs you have "Definition" approved [23:16] ^^^ this one has to be on monday [23:16] cjohnston, right, oh so it needs to be new? [23:16] jcastro: you don't know how to do them either [23:16] oh, me too [23:16] cjohnston, why does it not allow approved definitions to be accepted? [23:16] I totally forgot about that [23:16] jono: new discussion or drafting [23:17] jcastro: ya.. totally removing LP support for next UDS [23:17] heh [23:17] thanks cjohnston [23:17] * jcastro fixes his [23:17] how long is the import cron right now? [23:17] removing LP support for what? [23:17] cjohnston: ^ [23:17] i think still 20 [23:17] k [23:18] jono: ok so fix the definition, wait 20 minutes or so, and then check again [23:18] jono: creating meetings from blueprints.. its WAY too error prone [23:18] thanks cjohnston [23:18] * jcastro does the same [23:18] cjohnston, well it is how we do UDS [23:18] so we need that functionality [23:18] it might be error prone but it is efficient in the wider scope of Ubuntu [23:18] we need that support in summit [23:18] i guess it depends on how much time is spent fixing errors [23:19] there are serious flaws that we need to fix.. and the fix is creating a meeting and linking a blueprint to it, not creating a blueprint and the meeting being made from it [23:21] blueprints are not designed for the functionality that they are being used for [23:21] I know what you mean, I'll explain it to jono IRL [23:21] ty [23:22] cjohnston, jcastro lets discuss this next week [23:22] I personally think that the amount of errors we have with the current situation is so small as to justify moving to manually adding meetings and manually associating blueprints [23:22] but I agree it is valuable for us to have a discussion [23:25] jono: to you, sure.. to me.. no.. jono in the first page of meetings in the summit admin, a total of 100.. 17 of them are named wrong.. you just gave me two with errors, jcastro one, thats 20.. skaet gave us about 6 earlier, and slangasek has had a handful of them too... thats 30 or so... that I have already been approached to fix.. [23:26] I can explain it! [23:26] i have no idea how many more exist, but I'm fairly certain there are more [23:26] I know what you mean, once I explain it to jono he'll know what you mean [23:26] cjohnston, right, so lets discuss this next week and evaluate how much of an issue this is [23:26] since it's hard to explain on IRC [23:27] I agree with jcastro, let's discuss it next week [23:27] my primary responsibility is to ensure that summit meets the needs of UDS, and I think we should have a discussion to balance out these needs with the practicality of summit and how people use it [23:29] jono: hey where you located right now? [23:30] jono: mark you both required for the summit session or do you want one specifically for this discussion? [23:30] cjohnston, I think just a one on one meeting makes sense [23:30] jcastro, I am in a plenary [23:30] oh [23:49] jcastro: have you had any Cancun yet?