[00:20]  * TheMuso trawls through the US schedule.
[00:20] <TheMuso> UDS
[03:29] <pitti> Good morning
[03:30] <pitti> robert_ancell: I just got it again, had to restart lightdm three times; and that was on very first login attempt right after fresh boot
[03:30] <robert_ancell> pitti, after mterrys update?
[03:30] <pitti> robert_ancell: for a while now already; I first noticed it last week
[03:31] <robert_ancell> pitti, he made a fix today for it
[03:31] <pitti> oh? Nothing on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+changelog yet
[03:31] <pitti> perhaps still sitting in unapproved
[03:31] <pitti> can't see it on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1
[03:32] <robert_ancell> pitti, it's a u-g bug
[03:32] <mterry> pitti, I have it in a PPA for testing
[03:32] <pitti> ah
[03:32] <mterry> pitti, ppa:mterry/ppa2
[03:32] <mterry> pitti, only i386 is built
[03:32] <robert_ancell> mterry, still?
[03:32] <robert_ancell> slooow builders
[03:32] <mterry> pitti, but let me know if it fixes it for you!  I've had positive feedback so far and was going to SRU tonight
[03:32] <pitti> I can't reproduce it at will, but get it quite often
[03:33] <pitti> mterry: sweet!
[03:33] <pitti> mterry: bumped build score; now 5 h -> 1 min :)
[03:33] <mterry> :)
[03:34]  * RAOF looks up which particular login issue it is, and whether it's the one he's suddenly started seeing.
[03:34] <pitti> RAOF: after entering your password it hangs at "authenticating.."
[03:34] <pitti> (the string might be different in actual English)
[03:34] <RAOF> Yeah, that sounds like it.  Except it says "logging in..." for me.
[03:34] <pitti> "sudo stop lightdm" doesn't even seem to help, I need sudo pkill -u lightdm
[03:35] <pitti> and then restarting
[03:35] <pitti> RAOF: yeah, that's it
[03:35] <RAOF> Man, how long does it take for launchpad to scrape sid for new packages?  Ah, there it goes.
[03:48]  * TheMuso hasn't seen that bug here... yet
[03:51] <RAOF> If it's the bug I'm seeing then I think it's timing-related; I only see it on the super-fast-ssd ivybridge, not on the fast-ssd sandybridge :)
[03:52] <TheMuso> ah.
[08:22] <chrisccoulson> good morning everyone
[08:28] <pitti> it's a Chris!
[08:28] <pitti> hey chrisccoulson
[08:28] <chrisccoulson> hi pitti. how are you?
[08:29] <pitti> quite fine, thanks!
[08:29] <pitti> apport mostly works with Python 3 now
[08:31] <chrisccoulson> excellent :)
[08:31] <chrisccoulson> pitti, you're flying tomorrow aren't you?
[08:33] <pitti> chrisccoulson: yes, I will; arriving at SFO at 16:20
[08:33] <pitti> you?
[08:34] <chrisccoulson> pitti - yeah, i fly tomorrow too. although, i arrive at 13.25
[08:34] <chrisccoulson> i still need to pack :)
[08:34] <pitti> argh, me too
[08:37] <Sweetshark> pitti: wrt bug 992232. I wondered if it makes sense to have a ppa libreoffice universe and build libreoffice with deps on universe there. e.g. upload a libreoffice version 1:3.5.3-0ubuntu1~universe1 which also builds report-builder. People would still use all their packages from main except the reportbuilder one.
[08:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 992232 in libreoffice "no libreoffice-report-builder in precise" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/992232
[08:53] <pitti> Sweetshark: that would work, yes; if there is much demand for it
[09:09] <Sweetshark> pitti: well, I would just do it now, and then could see how many people are actually using it
[09:23] <Sweetshark> ricotz: by the way that is something you could change for the next backport: reenabling report-builder
[09:28] <Sweetshark> ricotz: I just created https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-3-5 could you copy your latest 3.5 backports over to it (see http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/10977.html).
[09:29] <Sweetshark> ricotz: ah wait
[09:29] <Sweetshark> ricotz: we should do that when the package passed SRUing in precise.
[09:50] <ricotz> Sweetshark, i see, but i think there was a reason to disable report-builder on lucid at least, so maybe possible on oneiric+
[09:51] <Sweetshark> ricotz: yeah, no sweat -- when people are not complaining it is not too much of an issue anyway likely ;)
[09:51] <ricotz> Sweetshark, i am not really comfortable to duplicate 3.5.x again already, and the ppa needs at least 7gb
[09:52] <ricotz> Sweetshark, what is the first 3.6.x release you want to upload to quantal?
[09:53] <ricotz> ok, i am fine with waiting for someone demanding report-builder first ;)
[09:54] <Sweetshark> ricotz: I hope to upload a pre-3.6.0 to quantal soonish.
[09:56] <ricotz> Sweetshark, ok
[09:59] <Sweetshark> ricotz: but first I have to rebase and cleanup our diff to debian ;)
[10:00] <ricotz> Sweetshark, alright
[10:00] <ricotz> Sweetshark, so what about deleting the maverick packages?
[10:13] <Sweetshark> ricotz: i wouldnt mind that. do you have any download stats wrt to maverick hand? I assume them to be very low, but who knows ....
[10:14] <ricotz> Sweetshark, i pm'ed you with the reason
[10:15] <ricotz> maverick isnt supported anymore
[10:15] <ricotz> and we shouldnt encourage people to use it
[10:15] <Sweetshark> ricotz: right ;)
[10:34] <ricotz> Sweetshark, btw, i am not a fan of reducing the languages, i don't think this change should stay
[10:34] <ricotz> g2g, bye
[10:42] <Sweetshark> ricotz: me neither, Im already homing in the artillery to change this on UDS ...
[10:45] <ricotz> Sweetshark, i doesnt affect my upload and i also removed it there
[10:45] <ricotz> now i am really gone ;)
[12:28] <pitti> time to stop for today; got up early anyway, and still need to pack for UDS
[12:28] <pitti> Sweetshark: which flight are you on?
[12:28] <pitti> Sweetshark: I leave from Frankfurt at 14:00
[12:28] <pitti> tomorrow
[12:29] <Sweetshark> nah, I will leave on sunday 10amish from frankfurt
[12:30] <jbicha> I would have thought you guys were already in Oakland, have a good flight!
[12:33] <pitti> jbicha: thanks! some desktop guys are there for the product team sprint
[16:17] <seb128> mterry, hey
[16:17] <seb128> mterry, how are you?
[16:17] <mterry> seb128, still sick  :(
[16:18] <seb128> :-(
[16:18] <seb128> mterry, there is a unity-greeter session, should I tell them you will not come?
[16:18] <mterry> seb128, I'm talking to achiang now about it, I'll come down
[16:19] <seb128> ok
[16:33] <jbicha> mterry: yay! you could share UbuFlu with us ;)
[16:33] <jbicha> I do hope you're feeling better soon, I was sick in January and it was a pain
[16:36] <seb128> dobey, hey
[17:02] <dobey> seb128: hi
[17:04] <seb128> dobey, how are you?
[17:04] <dobey> seb128: good, you?
[17:04] <seb128> dobey, I'm good thanks
[17:04] <seb128> dobey, I was looking at the top reported issues by whoopsie on precise
[17:04] <seb128> dobey, ubuntu-installer is on the list
[17:04] <seb128> ubuntuone-installer
[17:05] <dobey> yeah i know. i need to talk to mvo about it when i get to uds
[17:05] <seb128> dobey, what do you need from mvo?
[17:05] <seb128> seems like a missing depends issue?
[17:05] <seb128>  "ubuntuone-control-panel-qt" (No such file or directory)
[17:05] <dobey> no it's a problem with aptdaemon
[17:05] <seb128> how so?
[17:05] <dobey> ubuntuone-installer is what installs ubuntuone-control-panel-qt
[17:05] <dobey> because it's not on the cd, because of space
[17:06] <dobey> aptdaemon is sending the finished signal, though there was apparently a problem or something, and the package wasn't installed
[17:06] <seb128> dobey, well, it's ubuntuone-installer which trieds to run ubuntuone-control-panel-qt when it's not installed
[17:06] <dobey> seb128: it only runs it when it gets the finished signal from aptdaemon
[17:06] <seb128> oh, are you sure that's the case?
[17:06] <dobey> yep
[17:07] <seb128> pitti, hey, still there?
[17:08] <seb128> dobey, ok
[17:11] <seb128> slomo_, hey, there?
[17:36] <mvo> dobey: hm, might it be that there is a check for  exit_status when the signals is deliversed? i.e. if the exit status is success and not some failure mode ?
[17:40] <dobey> mvo: i don't know. don't really have time to look into it today either. figured it would just be faster to bug you in person next week :)
[17:42] <mvo> dobey: sounds good
[19:00] <slomo_> seb128: now i am
[19:00] <slomo_> seb128: contentless pings are not very useful ;)
[19:02] <seb128> slomo_, hey, yeah sorry
[19:03] <seb128> slomo_, I was wondering if you would be interested to ship gstreamer profiles in the debian package
[19:04] <slomo_> seb128: sure, you mean the ones in bad that i missed?
[19:04] <seb128> slomo_, context is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/945987
[19:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 945987 in rhythmbox "No Settings are available in "Preferred format", only preset defaults are used" [High,In progress]
[19:05] <seb128> slomo_, i.e https://launchpadlibrarian.net/102703396/GstLameMP3Enc.prs
[19:05] <seb128> and one similar for ogg
[19:05] <seb128> slomo_, currently rhythmbox default encoding quality is pretty poor with no ui way to change it
[19:05] <slomo_> ah you mean new profiles that are not upstream either? could you file a bug upstream so we can get it fixed there?
[19:06] <slomo_> but i'm fine with shipping them in the debian package in the meantime too
[19:08] <seb128> slomo_, ok, is upstream shipping any profile atm? I don't know exactly how that works
[19:08] <seb128> slomo_, ronoc has been looking at the mp3 quality issue and came with that and a gep file for rhythmbox
[19:08] <slomo_> yes, i think there's one for x264 and faac at least
[19:09] <slomo_> seb128: ls /usr/share/gstreamer-0.10/presets shows quite some :)
[19:10] <seb128> slomo_, ok, so I should open a bug upstream about adding one for mp3?
[19:11] <seb128> slomo_, thanks
[19:11] <ronoc> slomo_, seb128 will do
[19:11] <slomo_> seb128: yes
[19:12] <slomo_> hmm
[19:12] <slomo_> there is one
[19:12] <slomo_> GstLameMP3Enc.prs
[19:12] <seb128> slomo_, hum, from where?
[19:12] <seb128> slomo_, no such file on my disk
[19:13] <seb128> slomo_, http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=GstLameMP3Enc.prs&mode=exactfilename&suite=unstable&arch=any
[19:13] <seb128> no match
[19:14] <slomo_> transmageddon: /usr/share/gstreamer-0.10/presets/GstLameMP3Enc.prs
[19:14] <slomo_> lol
[19:14] <seb128> "transmageddon" was shipping it in "stable"
[19:14] <slomo_> ok, yes please file this upstream :)
[19:14] <seb128> slomo_, will do ;-)
[19:22] <slomo_> seb128: if you have packaging patches i'll accept them too of course :)
[19:22] <slomo_> seb128: btw, there are gstreamer1.0 packages on git.debian.org, in case you want to merge them into ubuntu already while they wait in NEW
[19:24] <seb128> slomo_, ok; thanks
[19:24] <seb128> need to move, bbl
[20:49] <mpt> seiflotfy, hi
[20:49] <mpt> You paged me on Google Docs, but I can't tell when :-)
[20:50] <seiflotfy> mpt: yeah
[20:51] <mpt> As you can see, I expanded the "Clear Usage Data" design to include date ranges
[20:51] <seiflotfy> yep
[20:51] <seiflotfy> when should we start?
[21:36] <ronoc> slomo_, sorry did you get my msg above ?
[21:36] <ronoc> or question above
[21:37] <slomo_> ronoc: no
[21:37] <ronoc> slomo_, for that mp3 preset bug on bugzilla, do you want me to assign it as part of the plugins ugly package ?
[21:37] <ronoc> or component of gstreamer
[21:38] <slomo_> ronoc: yes please... product gstreamer and component gst-plugins-ugly
[21:38] <ronoc> grand
[21:38] <slomo_> ronoc: if you're unsure... just put it somewhere... someone will correct it :)
[21:39] <ronoc> slomo_, all good