[00:12] In #ubuntu-bots, Resistance said: !notunity is Ubuntu 11.10 (and later) uses GNOME 3 with the !unity shell by default. To use GNOME Shell instead, install the "gnome-shell" package and investigate "gnome-tweak-tool". For GNOME Fallback mode, which is similar to GNOME 2, install "gnome-panel". Both packages will place entries in the Sessions dropdown. Using Natty? See !classic === ISO8601 is now known as yano [00:53] hello [00:53] can i get unbanned from #ubuntu [00:57] no. === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang [01:02] so what do i need to do to get unbanned [01:03] kevin__, stop coming here every day [01:03] i need to get back on ubuntu channel please [01:03] askubuntu.com kevin__ [01:03] please tell me what needs to be done [01:04] u cannot deny me this channel cause of what u think i did [01:04] kevin__, coming here every day will not make that happen sooner [01:04] u dont want me to talk to professionals ive not botherd u for months about this dangit until yesterday i need this now please [01:07] u give me no choice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [01:07] ? [01:15] kevin__: it is time for you to part this channel, please. [01:18] okie dokie [01:36] /cs k IdleOne Please do not idleone in #ubuntu-ops ;) [01:36] tehehehe [02:09] In #ubuntu, bullet2222 said: ubottu lol linux mint is ubuntu [02:44] * elky raises an eyebrow at bazhang [02:45] elky, yes? [02:46] just making sure you're around as backup [02:46] for the misogyny in -ot? [02:46] yuh [02:54] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [02:55] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [02:55] FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [04:29] you all make me sick [04:29] fuck you [04:42] Well that was a nice quick resolution. [04:47] 2012-01-25 06:18:54 :: cryptopsy (~cryptopsy@unaffiliated/aborticide) has joined #archlinux [04:47] same guy [04:49] cryptopsy is a loooooooong time issue on the network [04:50] some people never grow up === head_v is now known as Guest48210 [07:29] Ben64 called the ops in #ubuntu () === Guest48210 is now known as head_victim [08:40] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (Elotero appears to be abusive and has been muted, will need to be UNMUTED MANUALLY) [08:41] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (repeated abuse from elotero) [09:40] how can we set chanserv notify-stuff? [09:52] nevermind, that was an xchat issue. [13:26] We probably should setup a factoid for the new resolv.conf behavior. [13:27] !resolvconf [13:27] resolvconf is a set of scripts that's used to manage /etc/resolv.conf in 12.04, for more information please see: http://www.stgraber.org/2012/02/24/dns-in-ubuntu-12-04/ [13:27] I was trying to get a document together on it [13:27] please update to make it not suck :) [13:27] tsimpson: oh, neat. [13:27] maybe put it into the ubuntu wiki ? [13:28] so it's an "official" document [13:28] that would be the ideal, but I think it'd be more than a copy+paste [13:29] totally [13:29] that's why I was writing on my local machine before formatting [13:30] great, once it's up, just change the link over in the factoid [13:30] tsimpson: is that your page/link currently ? [13:31] or just a random ones [13:31] that's Stéphane Graber's blog [13:31] (stgraber) [13:31] I'm not aware of Stéphane [13:32] he works for Canonical, on the foundations team I think [13:32] I'm confident in the source material, if that's what you're asking ;) [13:33] that wasn't where my first question was going....but it was certainly where it would have ended up [13:33] I wouldn't have stuck a random link in ubottu anyway [13:34] no, but good information against solid information is useful to know [13:34] it's not subjective/someones opinion [13:34] it's useful to know [14:00] * jrib gives up on trying to enforce /away [15:04] tsimpson, Pici: where does one report such things? [15:04] jrib: Either on the ubuntu-website project on launchpad, or into #canonical-sysadmin [15:04] both are equally slow ;) [15:04] I looked at the latter first. [15:07] thanks [16:52] ello, since when is "lame" an abused word at ubuntu related channels, or is it only, when one user complain about it, when you use it? [16:53] Joit: you where asked by a user to stop multiple times [16:53] the reason she found it offensive was clearly explained [16:53] you continued to argue it rather than just stopping [16:53] ikonia that was not myquestion [16:53] you got removed from the channel [16:54] so, if i ask any thing in a channel, when i am often there, other users have to do what i want, because i am famous? [16:54] Joit: it's not "abused" it's derogatory and inappropriate for the conversation you where having, hence why a user in the channel asked you to stop [16:54] can someone else answer this pls, not Ikonia? [16:54] not at all [16:54] a user asked you not to use the phrase "lame" to describe things as she didn't see how it related to a disability and found it offensive [16:54] you chose to keep trying to argue it rather than just stop using "lame" [16:54] thats a bit one sided ikonia [16:54] no, it's not [16:54] I was in the channel watching, hence why I removed you [16:55] its the same, as if i am a channel op, and behave like i want [16:55] that has nothing to do with it [16:55] I used the phrase lame also in response to you, maco didn't like it, I stopped and didn't use it again [16:55] I abided by the request the same as you should have [16:55] i pasted at last only a link from the dictionary, that he can update his knowledge from the definition from the word [16:56] the definition maco gave was pretty much the same context as your dictionary [16:56] when somenoe says, you are blond, then i dont need to be insulted, because I AM Blond [16:56] We try to respect other users, and the request to not use that word isn't unheard of. [16:56] and posting the dictionary doesn't change the fact that maco didn't like the word in context to the discussion [16:56] Joit: that's the point, you where referencing something that wasn't "lame" [16:57] ikonia: that is his personal problem, i know a lot words too, what i dotn want to hear, but have to read often [16:57] i remeber having a similar discussion with handycapped persons too, and they dont feeled bothere [16:57] d [16:57] that's not going to change anything [16:57] otherwise, it was even fun with them to talk [16:57] Joit: you're question has been answered [16:58] this answer sounds more like, you did anser it for you, but not for me [16:58] what [16:58] all i see is a abuse from channel op rights [16:59] I'm sorry you feel that way. Anything else we can help you with ? [16:59] Pici: her explanation is not really logical, and btw, maco only asked me ONCE not few times [17:00] Joit: Why should anyone need to be asked more than once? [17:00] not the point, but ikonia claimed, he asked me few times, what is not true [17:01] so arguing with false statements is not really the way it should go [17:01] Joit: sorry, I'll be more clear. You where asked not to use it once, you asked why and you where given a solid description from maco why [17:01] you then continued [17:01] i did not continue, to use it, i pasted the definition [17:02] why? No one was talking about it anymore. [17:02] thats a big different, in case you dont understand it, and no reeeason to remove someone from the channel [17:02] how did that change anything ? the user in question made it clear her reasons, a dictionary definition doesn't change that, especially when the definition was pretty much what the user had said [17:03] i was not even so far, to use it further [17:03] well, you've had it explained for you now, I'm not sure what else you want [17:03] @mark Joit Disagrees with ikonia's kick [17:03] The operation succeeded. [17:04] there we go, it's noted in the logs [17:04] Joit: You're not banned. [17:04] i know, i am actually only here becaus of my first question, but anyhow ikonia can make a drama ith it [17:05] i was actually more about it to ask a neutral question [17:05] but ikonia seems to need to defend ehr first heavy [17:05] you asked why it was unacceptable, I've explained it [17:05] there is nothing to defend [17:05] Joit: Did you get the answer to your question, or do you need me to restate it? [17:06] [18:52:59] ello, since when is "lame" an abused word at ubuntu related channels, or is it only, when one user complain about it, when you use it? [17:06] Joit: Did you get the answer to your question, or do you need me to restate it? [17:07] Pici: thats not the answer to my question, it actually only looks like an answer, what you wanna give, and you have op rights , som, your opinion as op is right. [17:08] Pici: i told you the example, we did talkw ith handy capped persons in the channel, and they did not feeled bothered [17:08] evewn, why dont you know, if i am not handycapped [17:08] Joit: We try to respect the views of our users. The request to not use the word 'lame' is not unreasonable. [17:09] ok [17:11] seriously, nothing is more hard as to discuss with a women. BUT I did NOT look at someone or call a name :P [17:12] oh sexism as well? [17:12] Joit: You don't need to be handicapped or a minority or whatever to be offended by words that can be used in a derogatory manner. And while 'lame' has somewhat entered the general lexicon, I think it would be rude to continue to use it if someone requested that that I stop. [17:13] And I have no idea why you needed to bring gender into this. [17:16] Hello! [17:16] ikonia: [17:16] Why am I banned?= [17:16] lars__: you know you are banned from #ubuntu due to your past behaviour, I can't discuss this now, so please just leave [17:16] Yes i know [17:16] ok - bye then [17:16] but i want to be unban [17:17] Pici: Joit apologies for interupting [17:17] Joit: Is there anything else? [17:17] pici, well you answered at last the question simple [17:18] but ikonia for what i appologize, or for what i dont, leave that by me, and dont put me words into my mouth pls [17:18] what ? [17:19] Joit: ikonia was apologizing to you for the interruption with lars [17:19] ikonia's client just puts the : automatically after the first person whose nick is completed [17:19] ah, i now see that [17:20] ikonia: then its no problem you should can discuss with 2, i can kinda multitask, so no excuse neded by me [17:20] kubuntu called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic () [17:20] ok, lets then end no the discussion, i have other things to do too [17:21] at last, where do i fill a bug for klipper, :P thats not at the ubuntu bug tracker [17:21] lets then end this discussion* [17:21] you use the ubuntu bug tracker as I told you [17:21] klipper is kde related? [17:22] thought its maybe better to write directly at kde [17:22] ok, then kde.org [17:22] well, i may try it. Bye [17:22] bye [17:23] btw, in kubuntu we do prefer people go directly to kde [17:23] noted [17:24] there are waaaay not enough people in kubuntut to handle all the bug reports [17:24] yes, I can see that would be a problem [17:34] sorry, was talking to one of my coworkers, wasn't sure if you needed me here. [17:35] and I guess not. [17:44] Pici: minor sidenote, alteregoa is one of the few forever guests on the #ubuntu-de* ban list [17:47] Fuchs: He has a history here too. [17:47] I'm sort of waiting for an excuse to ban him again. [17:47] not a big surprise, I thought I might inform you guys anyway [17:47] *and gals [18:38] i got a message from ubottu about 'reviewing' a ban, is it expecting a response from me? (the link it provides is dead, ie: it just says come in here) [18:39] if you marked it with eir, it's fine [18:39] ubottu pulls the information from eir [18:39] Myrtti: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [18:39] yes yes, shush you stupid bot [18:39] hm, i'll check with eir, as i can't really remember [18:41] hm, eir doesn't have a match of the hostmask for the given ubuntu room [18:41] yano: eirid 36464 [18:42] that's a different ban i set than the one ubottu is bugging me about [18:43] oh, most likely. Ubottu does not remind you of the eir bans, she has a mind of her own [18:43] ah, does it want me to remove it, comment on it, or just know that i'm aware of the ban? [18:43] by it i mean ubottu [18:44] yano, just answer her "shaddap" [18:44] hehe [18:44] ubottu: shaddap [18:44] :X [18:44] see? [18:44] lol [18:45] yano: don't worry about it too much, we'll get it eventually, the ban she's complaining about I mean [18:46] ok, i just didn't want to leave it lost in the abyss [18:47] yano: which id ubottu says it is about? [18:47] i think, 48543, as the ending of the url says log=48543 [18:48] oh, for -ot [18:48] eir is not aware of bans/mutes in ot [18:48] yea for offtopic [18:48] ah [18:49] oh him, trolling about kardashian girl again [19:33] In #ubuntu, alusion said: !tab guntbert that is correct [19:33] * Pici sighs [21:27] HELLO BELOVID UBUNTU OPS TEAM [21:27] CAN I GET BACK ON #UBUNTU [21:28] IVE GOT SOME NEW COMPUTER INTERFACING DEVICES TO SOLVE PROBLEMS OF THE PAST WHATEVER THEY WERE [21:30] less caps please [21:31] I MUST USE CAPS TO PROPERLY COMMUNICATE WITH YOU [21:31] no, caps are un-necessary on the Internet. it's considered a form of shouting [21:32] U ARE POSSIBLY HACKTILIAS ON TALKING ME OUT OF CAPS?? [21:33] DO NOT PROCIEVE THIS AS SHOUTING PLEASE [21:34] @btlogin [21:34] CAPS MEAN IT IMPORTANT [21:34] ITS IMPORTANT [21:34] STILL A BIT OF INTERFACING ISSUES [21:37] ANYBODY THIER [21:37] ??? [21:41] kevinisexploiter, firstly, quit the caps. secondly, please be honest with us. [21:42] I AM TOTALLY HONEST AND I AM SORRY BUT CAPS IS THE ONLY WAY TO AVIOD CONFUSION WHAT IS SO HORRIBLE ABOUT CAPS?? [21:43] POSSIBLY NOT HAVING CONFUSION?? [23:11] OP on ##electronics please, we've got a case of massive trollage and no ops are around at the time. Thanks. The user is "kevinisexploiter" [23:11] yano, what was he doing? [23:12] mostly talking in caps after being told to stop and ranting on about foxconn [23:14] cute [23:45] Hello ops can you add the daily http to the #ubuntu+1 channel messages.