| koolhead17 | hello alamo | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| timrc | alamo, https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/provider-configuration-ec2.html | 00:23 |
| koolhead17 | :P | 00:23 |
| alamo | :-) | 00:24 |
| koolhead17 | SpamapS, you around? | 00:54 |
| aljosa | what should admin-secret for local environment be? root password? | 02:18 |
| aljosa | in environments.yaml | 02:19 |
| marcoceppi | aljosa: No, just a random string of characters | 02:22 |
| marcoceppi | Note to myself, relation-set doesn't accept a unit-name and it may be a bug | 03:47 |
| marcoceppi | Note to myself, I was not reading my code right | 03:49 |
| bkerensa | marcoceppi: so do I get to write about your plenary in the next issue of Ubuntu User Magazine? :) | 05:00 |
| === almaisan` is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| koolhead17 | morning all | 13:49 |
| koolhead17 | SpamapS, around | 14:21 |
| SpamapS | koolhead17: I am here on IRC. Good morning (I'm back home now though) | 14:49 |
| SpamapS | koolhead17: did not have a chance to say bye yesterday. It was good meeting you and having you there at UDS. :) | 14:49 |
| koolhead17 | SpamapS, same here sir. :) | 14:50 |
| FunnyLookinHat | So - who won the charm competition? :D | 14:54 |
| SpamapS | FunnyLookinHat: winners announced today at the closing plenary IIRC | 14:57 |
| === fenris is now known as Guest56365 | ||
| _mup_ | Bug #998153 was filed: example passes passwords via command line arguments <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/998153 > | 17:05 |
| === daker is now known as daker__ | ||
| _mup_ | juju/scale-test r541 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com | 17:44 |
| _mup_ | pep8ify ec2 provider | 17:44 |
| SpamapS | How's it going in room 205 today everybody? ;) | 17:48 |
| marcoceppi | SpamapS: pretty good, light today | 17:53 |
| SpamapS | marcoceppi: did you fix your gitolite/gluster thing yet? I want to see that stuff promulgated. :) | 17:56 |
| marcoceppi | SpamapS: yeah, I'm just testing the final setups | 17:56 |
| SpamapS | sweet | 17:59 |
| SpamapS | ninjix: hey, are you still working on the proxmox thing? | 18:14 |
| ninjix | SpamapS: yes | 18:14 |
| ninjix | working on improved client class | 18:15 |
| ninjix | was just looking at MaaS docs | 18:15 |
| ninjix | getting some more ideas | 18:16 |
| SpamapS | ninjix: cool. :) | 18:16 |
| marcoceppi | any ideas? http://askubuntu.com/questions/134977/juju-tutorial-with-lxc-fail/135080#comment161056_135080 | 18:28 |
| SpamapS | marcoceppi: reading | 18:37 |
| ahasenack | quick question about default passwords for database admins. From the mysql charm: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/982179/ | 18:39 |
| SpamapS | bcsaller: hey didn't you include a tool that users can run to gather a bunch of helpful things for debugging the local provider? | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | why store the pass in the file in the install hook? Is the install hook ever called again during the life cycle of the unit? | 18:39 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: yes, in upgrade-charm it gets called again | 18:39 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: or, it might anyway ;) | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: ah | 18:39 |
| bcsaller | SpamapS: misc/devel-tools/juju-inspect-local-provider but it might not be making into the package properly | 18:39 |
| SpamapS | bcsaller: ah yeah it would need to be added to the EXTRA_DIST in setup.py I think | 18:40 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: so, that could be a best practice? That and some chmod 0600 or something I suppose | 18:40 |
| SpamapS | bcsaller: thanks tho, I think thats what we need for this user | 18:43 |
| SpamapS | marcoceppi: I posted a comment to try and help him run the juju-inspect-local-provider tool | 18:45 |
| marcoceppi | SpamapS: thanks, if that works I'll edit it back in to the question | 18:45 |
| marcoceppi | that would be good for the docs too | 18:45 |
| SpamapS | Yeah I think we should probably distribute that in /usr/share/docs or /usr/lib/juju or something. | 18:46 |
| SpamapS | perhaps even the path.. but then I think it needs a man page. :-P | 18:46 |
| SpamapS | and on OS X /puppies/unicorns or wherever it is they put extra program data | 18:47 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: the mysql charm is very old, and needs revisiting at nearly every level I suspect. But yes, I think its fine to generate a password and store it somewhere "safe" | 18:55 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: ok, thanks | 18:55 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: to push a charm while I'm working on it, is the lp project called "charms"? | 18:59 |
| ahasenack | pushing to "lp:~ahasenack/charms/openldap" doesn't seem to work, for example | 18:59 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: lp:~ahasenack/charms/precise/openldap/something | 18:59 |
| ahasenack | ah, ok | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: its a distro | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: if 'something' is 'trunk' then the charm store will publish that charm | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: and will not re-publish it until you increment the 'revision' file. | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: but only after approval, right? | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | will it publish | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | no it will be published as cs:~ahasenack/precise/openldap | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | hm | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | 'trunk' is special, its like a PPA | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | ok, but this is really not ready for consumption | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | I just want it somewhere in lp as a backup mainly | 19:01 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: then call it 'inprogress' or something else other than 'trunk' | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | ok | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: thanks | 19:01 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: and btw, thank you for doing openldap. Do you have a bug open for it? | 19:03 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: and yes, the docs mention all this, sorry for not paying more attention | 19:03 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: no | 19:03 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: Kees was considering doing LDAP so make sure you open a bug to avoid duplication | 19:03 |
| ahasenack | SpamapS: I have never done a charm before, he would probably do a better one and I wouldn't want to prevent him from doing it | 19:04 |
| ahasenack | meaning, I won't mind if monday comes and he has one ready, what I'm doing is not wasted work, it's learning :) | 19:04 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: no you guys can collaborate on it though. :) | 19:04 |
| SpamapS | ahasenack: anyway, that sounds good. :) | 19:05 |
| SpamapS | BTW, reviews guys! rreeeeviews! | 19:12 |
| SpamapS | 9 ready for action | 19:12 |
| ahasenack | the logs can be a bit worrying at first: 2012-05-11 12:20:30,400 unit:slapd/2: hook.output ERROR: + open-port 389 | 19:21 |
| ahasenack | but that's just stderr | 19:21 |
| ahasenack | but being used in the same place as you see DEBUG, INFO, it can make you think it's actually an error | 19:21 |
| SpamapS | ahs3: thats only because you're running with set -x :) | 19:31 |
| SpamapS | ahs3: sorry that was for ahasenack | 19:31 |
| ahs3 | SpamapS: heh. that's what i figured :) | 19:32 |
| nathwill | marcoceppi, added comment on that askubuntu question. | 19:52 |
| Destreyf_ | Is it currently possible in juju to provision multiple services to a single machine? | 20:18 |
| Destreyf_ | using MAAS as the infastructure. | 20:18 |
| Destreyf_ | Am i still connected? | 20:20 |
| Destreyf_ | Looks like it. | 20:20 |
| === Destreyf_ is now known as Destreyf | ||
| Destreyf | there we go, corrected my nick. | 20:20 |
| SpamapS | Destreyf: can you provide an example of where you would want to put multiple services on one machine? | 20:50 |
| _mup_ | Bug #998238 was filed: local provider should setup ufw to accept connections to zookeeper from containers <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/998238 > | 20:56 |
| nathwill | yaaay | 20:57 |
| SpamapS | nathwill: ;) good find! | 20:57 |
| nathwill | pfft. someone in here helped me with it before... i suspect you... | 20:58 |
| nathwill | :P | 20:58 |
| nathwill | all i did was remember the answer. | 20:58 |
| marcoceppi | nathwill: you should make that an answer (though if it's the case, that question should be closed as a duplicate) | 20:58 |
| SpamapS | it wasn't me, but its still very cool. :) | 20:58 |
| SpamapS | marcoceppi: I think its quite likely | 20:59 |
| marcoceppi | mm, I'll wait to see if the author responds | 21:00 |
| nathwill | marcoceppi, it's exactly what had happened to me. | 21:02 |
| nathwill | also, i tried looking for how to close it as a dupe... couldn't find it, don't believe i have the privs | 21:02 |
| SpamapS | nathwill: flag it, but lets make sure thats the problem first | 21:27 |
| nathwill | SpamapS: okey doke | 21:38 |
| SpamapS | m_3: are you guys going to do a lightning talk about your bazillion node hadoop cluster? | 21:48 |
| nathwill | woot hadoop! | 22:19 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: nope | 22:28 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: good idea though... didn't think of it | 22:28 |
| hazmat | m_3, greetings almost done | 22:57 |
| SpamapS | marcoceppi: congrats! | 23:01 |
| SpamapS | james_w: you too | 23:01 |
| marcoceppi | thanks SpamapS! | 23:03 |
| marcoceppi | now to polish | 23:04 |
| bkerensa | grats marcoceppi :) | 23:08 |
| nathwill | SpamapS, just remembered, hazmat was the one who helped. notchoo | 23:16 |
| m_3 | jamespage: the "provisioner"... can some of that be handled by running charmtester against maas? | 23:37 |
| m_3 | I guess it's a little different b/c of ISO testing | 23:39 |
| m_3 | still seems like there's something there | 23:39 |
| jcastro | SpamapS: yo yo debian new queue? | 23:56 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: just now retitled the ensemble ITP to juju | 23:56 |
| jcastro | \o/ | 23:56 |
| m_3 | nice | 23:56 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: need to fix some things, deps and such, to work in Debian | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!