[00:23] <koolhead17> hello alamo
[00:23] <timrc> alamo, https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/provider-configuration-ec2.html
[00:23] <koolhead17> :P
[00:24] <alamo> :-)
[00:54] <koolhead17> SpamapS, you around?
[02:18] <aljosa> what should admin-secret for local environment be? root password?
[02:19] <aljosa> in environments.yaml
[02:22] <marcoceppi> aljosa: No, just a random string of characters
[03:47] <marcoceppi> Note to myself, relation-set doesn't accept a unit-name and it may be a bug
[03:49] <marcoceppi> Note to myself, I was not reading my code right
[05:00] <bkerensa> marcoceppi: so do I get to write about your plenary in the next issue of Ubuntu User Magazine? :)
[13:49] <koolhead17> morning all
[14:21] <koolhead17> SpamapS, around
[14:49] <SpamapS> koolhead17: I am here on IRC. Good morning (I'm back home now though)
[14:49] <SpamapS> koolhead17: did not have a chance to say bye yesterday. It was good meeting you and having you there at UDS. :)
[14:50] <koolhead17> SpamapS, same here sir. :)
[14:54] <FunnyLookinHat> So - who won the charm competition?  :D
[14:57] <SpamapS> FunnyLookinHat: winners announced today at the closing plenary IIRC
[17:05] <_mup_> Bug #998153 was filed: example passes passwords via command line arguments <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/998153 >
[17:44] <_mup_> juju/scale-test r541 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com
[17:44] <_mup_> pep8ify ec2 provider
[17:48] <SpamapS> How's it going in room 205 today everybody? ;)
[17:53] <marcoceppi> SpamapS: pretty good, light today
[17:56] <SpamapS> marcoceppi: did you fix your gitolite/gluster thing yet? I want to see that stuff promulgated. :)
[17:56] <marcoceppi> SpamapS: yeah, I'm just testing the final setups
[17:59] <SpamapS> sweet
[18:14] <SpamapS> ninjix: hey, are you still working on the proxmox thing?
[18:14] <ninjix> SpamapS: yes
[18:15] <ninjix> working on improved client class
[18:15] <ninjix> was just looking at MaaS docs
[18:16] <ninjix> getting some more ideas
[18:16] <SpamapS> ninjix: cool. :)
[18:28] <marcoceppi> any ideas? http://askubuntu.com/questions/134977/juju-tutorial-with-lxc-fail/135080#comment161056_135080
[18:37] <SpamapS> marcoceppi: reading
[18:39] <ahasenack> quick question about default passwords for database admins. From the mysql charm: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/982179/
[18:39] <SpamapS> bcsaller: hey didn't you include a tool that users can run to gather a bunch of helpful things for debugging the local provider?
[18:39] <ahasenack> why store the pass in the file in the install hook? Is the install hook ever called again during the life cycle of the unit?
[18:39] <SpamapS> ahasenack: yes, in upgrade-charm it gets called again
[18:39] <SpamapS> ahasenack: or, it might anyway ;)
[18:39] <ahasenack> SpamapS: ah
[18:39] <bcsaller> SpamapS: misc/devel-tools/juju-inspect-local-provider but it might not be making into the package properly
[18:40] <SpamapS> bcsaller: ah yeah it would need to be added to the EXTRA_DIST in setup.py I think
[18:40] <ahasenack> SpamapS: so, that could be a best practice? That and some chmod 0600 or something I suppose
[18:43] <SpamapS> bcsaller: thanks tho, I think thats what we need for this user
[18:45] <SpamapS> marcoceppi: I posted a comment to try and help him run the juju-inspect-local-provider tool
[18:45] <marcoceppi> SpamapS: thanks, if that works I'll edit it back in to the question
[18:45] <marcoceppi> that would be good for the docs too
[18:46] <SpamapS> Yeah I think we should probably distribute that in /usr/share/docs or /usr/lib/juju or something.
[18:46] <SpamapS> perhaps even the path.. but then I think it needs a man page. :-P
[18:47] <SpamapS> and on OS X /puppies/unicorns or wherever it is they put extra program data
[18:55] <SpamapS> ahasenack: the mysql charm is very old, and needs revisiting at nearly every level I suspect. But yes, I think its fine to generate a password and store it somewhere "safe"
[18:55] <ahasenack> SpamapS: ok, thanks
[18:59] <ahasenack> SpamapS: to push a charm while I'm working on it, is the lp project called "charms"?
[18:59] <ahasenack> pushing to "lp:~ahasenack/charms/openldap" doesn't seem to work, for example
[18:59] <SpamapS> ahasenack: lp:~ahasenack/charms/precise/openldap/something
[19:00] <ahasenack> ah, ok
[19:00] <SpamapS> ahasenack: its a distro
[19:00] <SpamapS> ahasenack: if 'something' is 'trunk' then the charm store will publish that charm
[19:00] <SpamapS> ahasenack: and will not re-publish it until you increment the 'revision' file.
[19:00] <ahasenack> SpamapS: but only after approval, right?
[19:00] <ahasenack> will it publish
[19:00] <SpamapS> no it will be published as cs:~ahasenack/precise/openldap
[19:00] <ahasenack> hm
[19:00] <SpamapS> 'trunk' is special, its like a PPA
[19:01] <ahasenack> ok, but this is really not ready for consumption
[19:01] <ahasenack> I just want it somewhere in lp as a backup mainly
[19:01] <SpamapS> ahasenack: then call it 'inprogress' or something else other than 'trunk'
[19:01] <ahasenack> ok
[19:01] <ahasenack> SpamapS: thanks
[19:03] <SpamapS> ahasenack: and btw, thank you for doing openldap. Do you have a bug open for it?
[19:03] <ahasenack> SpamapS: and yes, the docs mention all this, sorry for not paying more attention
[19:03] <ahasenack> SpamapS: no
[19:03] <SpamapS> ahasenack: Kees was considering doing LDAP so make sure you open a bug to avoid duplication
[19:04] <ahasenack> SpamapS: I have never done a charm before, he would probably do a better one and I wouldn't want to prevent him from doing it
[19:04] <ahasenack> meaning, I won't mind if monday comes and he has one ready, what I'm doing is not wasted work, it's learning :)
[19:04] <SpamapS> ahasenack: no you guys can collaborate on it though. :)
[19:05] <SpamapS> ahasenack: anyway, that sounds good. :)
[19:12] <SpamapS> BTW, reviews guys! rreeeeviews!
[19:12] <SpamapS> 9 ready for action
[19:21] <ahasenack> the logs can be a bit worrying at first: 2012-05-11 12:20:30,400 unit:slapd/2: hook.output ERROR: + open-port 389
[19:21] <ahasenack> but that's just stderr
[19:21] <ahasenack> but being used in the same place as you see DEBUG, INFO, it can make you think it's actually an error
[19:31] <SpamapS> ahs3: thats only because you're running with set -x :)
[19:31] <SpamapS> ahs3: sorry that was for ahasenack
[19:32] <ahs3> SpamapS: heh.  that's what i figured :)
[19:52] <nathwill> marcoceppi, added comment on that askubuntu question.
[20:18] <Destreyf_> Is it currently possible in juju to provision multiple services to a single machine?
[20:18] <Destreyf_> using MAAS as the infastructure.
[20:20] <Destreyf_> Am i still connected?
[20:20] <Destreyf_> Looks like it.
[20:20] <Destreyf> there we go, corrected my nick.
[20:50] <SpamapS> Destreyf: can you provide an example of where you would want to put multiple services on one machine?
[20:56] <_mup_> Bug #998238 was filed: local provider should setup ufw to accept connections to zookeeper from containers <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/998238 >
[20:57] <nathwill> yaaay
[20:57] <SpamapS> nathwill: ;) good find!
[20:58] <nathwill> pfft. someone in here helped me with it before... i suspect you...
[20:58] <nathwill> :P
[20:58] <nathwill> all i did was remember the answer.
[20:58] <marcoceppi> nathwill: you should make that an answer (though if it's the case, that question should be closed as a duplicate)
[20:58] <SpamapS> it wasn't me, but its still very cool. :)
[20:59] <SpamapS> marcoceppi: I think its quite likely
[21:00] <marcoceppi> mm, I'll wait to see if the author responds
[21:02] <nathwill> marcoceppi, it's exactly what had happened to me.
[21:02] <nathwill> also, i tried looking for how to close it as a dupe... couldn't find it, don't believe i have the privs
[21:27] <SpamapS> nathwill: flag it, but lets make sure thats the problem first
[21:38] <nathwill> SpamapS: okey doke
[21:48] <SpamapS> m_3: are you guys going to do a lightning talk about your bazillion node hadoop cluster?
[22:19] <nathwill> woot hadoop!
[22:28] <m_3> SpamapS: nope
[22:28] <m_3> SpamapS: good idea though... didn't think of it
[22:57] <hazmat> m_3, greetings almost done
[23:01] <SpamapS> marcoceppi: congrats!
[23:01] <SpamapS> james_w: you too
[23:03] <marcoceppi> thanks SpamapS!
[23:04] <marcoceppi> now to polish
[23:08] <bkerensa> grats marcoceppi :)
[23:16] <nathwill> SpamapS, just remembered, hazmat was the one who helped. notchoo
[23:37] <m_3> jamespage: the "provisioner"... can some of that be handled by running charmtester against maas?
[23:39] <m_3> I guess it's a little different b/c of ISO testing
[23:39] <m_3> still seems like there's something there
[23:56] <jcastro> SpamapS: yo yo debian new queue?
[23:56] <SpamapS> jcastro: just now retitled the ensemble ITP to juju
[23:56] <jcastro> \o/
[23:56] <m_3> nice
[23:57] <SpamapS> jcastro: need to fix some things, deps and such, to work in Debian