[00:02]  * roadmr_uds is sorry he didn't reply to crjon :/ 
[07:34] <njin> Hello, which is the difference between -dbg and -dbgsym packages? Which one is suggested for the best result ? Thanks
[10:21] <jarlath_> Could someone verify that they are affected by the bug I reported? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/997934
[10:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 997934 in libreoffice "Spellcheck does not detect any mis-spelled words on 12.04" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[10:21] <jarlath_> I have a few users with this issue, but it doesn't seem to be a hot topic on launchpad as I would have expected.
[10:38] <SynchroM> Hi, I'm looking for a bug supervisor for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/795602
[10:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 795602 in aptitude "Please SRU aptitude 0.6.3-3.2" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[14:31] <Resistance> micahg:  LP Bug 402962 - Upstream says they won't support or fix the version of totem that is in Precise, as its over a year old.  They want this to be tested with the *latest* totem they have, and I dont have a precise machine i can build that in.  What next on the bug, since upstream says "This isn't supported software"
[14:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 402962 in totem "Totem inhibits screensaver when playing music" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/402962
[14:32] <Resistance> (Upstream bug has that in it)
[14:46] <geofft> njin: -dbgsym is created by the build process for everything, -dbg by the packager (usually Debian, 'cause they don't have a build process where -dbgsym can get created)
[14:47] <geofft> njin: -dbg is also in the regular archive as a result. Not sure there's a practical difference if you have ddebs.ubuntu.com enabled.
[15:34] <micahg> Resistance: ah, forgot about that :)
[15:34] <Resistance> micahg, so then this bug, because its obsolete'd upstream, should be Invalid'd or similar here, no?
[15:34] <micahg> totem is 3.0, upstream is 3.4 for stable 3.6 for development, quantal should have a newer one at some point
[15:34] <Resistance> micahg, Debian'd need an uptodate one first
[15:34] <Resistance> its 3.0.1 in sid
[15:34] <Resistance> 3.2.something in experimental
[15:34] <micahg> Resistance: nah, leave it triaged, if you can test with quantal when 3.6 gets uploaded, or 3.5.x, that would be great
[15:35]  * Resistance assumes that someone iwll actually upload it
[15:35] <micahg> yeah, I think that's planned for this cycle
[15:37] <Resistance> hope so, considering whatever version exists in Precise is far older than upstream
[15:38] <Resistance> although if the bug occurs in 3.4 (which upstream wants tested), then i'm free to reopen the upstream bug
[20:47] <DoctorSher> Hey guys, can anyone help me with the nature of a bug report?
[20:48] <greg-g> Depends on which bio-climate you are referring to
[20:48] <greg-g> DoctorSher: what's the question? :)
[20:48] <DoctorSher> Haha :)
[20:48] <DoctorSher> Actually, never mind I think >.>
[20:48] <DoctorSher> I had to run the apport-collect command and it wasn't doing anything, so I was wondering what the problem was
[20:48] <DoctorSher> but I just reran it and it's working :)
[20:51] <greg-g> DoctorSher: ahh, good deal, glad it worked :)
[20:51] <greg-g> DoctorSher: thanks for helping report good bugs
[20:52] <DoctorSher> No problem :) although, I guess I do still have a question
[20:53] <DoctorSher> The nature of my bug was a kernel bug that didn't allow my specific wifi adapter to get a connection on certain routers
[20:53] <greg-g> yuck
[20:53] <greg-g> I'm bad with kernel issues, the best place to ask is in #ubuntu-kernel
[20:53] <DoctorSher> so I had to boot into a previous kernel to connect to the internet.  Should I be running the apport-collect command inside the working internet one (I assumed this)?
[20:53] <greg-g> but they might all be kind of busy, due to UDS going on
[20:54] <DoctorSher> Well, I'm just curious if I was supposed to run the bug report command in there or say that I couldn't update it because the kernel with the problem doesn't connect to the internet
[20:54] <DoctorSher> and then hit confirm
[20:55] <greg-g> apport-collect with the working kernel is probably good, otherwise you couldn't send the info to LP :) And I would just say which kernel isn't working in your bug report
[20:56] <DoctorSher> Gotchya, thanks!
[20:58] <greg-g> np
[20:58] <greg-g> have a good weekend :)
[20:58] <DoctorSher> you too!
[22:16] <patrickceg> Hello, is there a wiki article about how to browse through and read Launchpad bugs?
[22:17] <micahg> patrickceg: what do you mean by read?
[22:18] <patrickceg> Essentially I want to know what every field in the bug report means
[22:23] <patrickceg> I used DevTrack (paid software) in the past filing and looking at bugs, but the interface of Launchpad is very different
[22:24] <micahg> patrickceg: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs
[22:24] <patrickceg> Just came across it as you typed up the link ;) I'll report back if I have other questions as there's a good deal to read