[01:00] <leo-unglaub> hi, i am having some problem with a package on launchpad
[01:00] <leo-unglaub> there is a build, but no debian directory
[01:00] <leo-unglaub> how is this possible???
[01:12] <leo-unglaub> noone here?
[01:28] <maxb> I'd say that's not possible :-)
[01:33] <leo-unglaub> maxb: i thought that to
[11:49] <cjohnston> gmb: thanks for all your help last week!
[16:15] <joey> bac: quick question if you're awake
[16:15] <bac> joey: it is noon...
[16:15] <joey> bac: staging is down so I can't test this...   a PUBLIC team can be the owner of a PRIVATE team. Correct?
[16:15] <joey> bac: yeah but you often travel everywhere :-) You're like Waldo
[16:16] <bac> i think that is not true
[16:16] <bac> that would seem very leaky to me
[16:16] <joey> so I'm wanting to create ~linaro-sysadmins  which would be the deactivated owner of public and private teams
[16:16] <joey> right now I own most of them
[16:16] <bac> at minimum it would need to have restricted membership policy
[16:18] <joey> any idea when staging is back bac? I can try it there
[16:18] <joey> I don't have .dev installed any longer
[16:19] <bac> joey: i don't know.  i'd try in launchpad-ops
[16:20] <bac> joey: the privacy stuff has changed a lot since i've been working on other tasks, so i cannot give you a definitive answer.  sinzui probably can.
[16:20] <bac> joey: i'll be glad to help find the answer when i return in an hour or so
[16:22] <joey> thanks
[16:24] <sinzui> joey, the absentee owner scenario looks sane. Lp will let the owner see the team and take ownership of the admins fail
[16:25] <sinzui> joey, https://qastaging.launchpad.net/ is up, but the data is stale
[16:25] <joey> thanks sinzui .. let me see if I can do a test run there
[16:27] <joey> sinzui: no joy.  503 on the backend db when I try to edit
[16:27] <joey> rocking oops page though
[16:28] <sinzui> what are you editing?
[16:29] <ppisati> i've a ppa problem, is it the right channel?
[16:33] <sinzui> ppisati, yes
[16:34] <ppisati> cool, so i created my own ppa, and i tried to upload a pkg to be built there (it's a kernel) but i got an email saying:
[16:34] <ppisati> Rejected:
[16:34] <ppisati> Cannot build any of the architectures requested: armel
[16:35] <ppisati> [flag@newluxor natty]$ head ubuntu-natty/debian.ti-omap4/changelog
[16:35] <ppisati> linux-ti-omap4 (2.6.38-1209.23) natty; urgency=low
[16:35] <ppisati> ...
[16:35] <ppisati> and according to this: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas
[16:36] <ppisati> armel is available for natty
[16:36] <ppisati> where can i look for more info?
[16:42] <joey> sinzui: (cc bac) thanks. Now that the DB is up I've confirmed what I want to do will work :-)
[16:42] <ppisati> sinzui: ^^
[16:54] <sinzui> ppisati, ARM is only available to Canonical and it's partners. They require special setup by an admin to make that feature work.
[16:56] <ppisati> sinzui: actuallu i'm from canonical, who shall i contact?
[16:57] <sinzui> Visit #launchpad-ops on Canonical's servers. Ask a "webops I need my ppa arm enabled"
[16:57] <sinzui> ^ ppisati
[16:57] <ppisati> sinzui: ack
[20:17] <CarlFK> https://launchpad.net/~loell/+archive/ppa                   gyachi                                               1.2.9-0.1~lucid1                                                                  Loell Anthony Erecre                                      (2010-06-22)
[20:17] <CarlFK> before I go trying to build that under oneiric, is how can I search for other PPAs that have gyachi ?
[20:19] <CarlFK> https://launchpad.net/~adilson/+archive/experimental?field.series_filter=oneiric                   gyachi                                               1.2.11-0.1ppa1~oneiric1.1                                                                  Adilson dos Santos Dantas                                      (2011-10-16)
[20:19] <CarlFK> yay