[00:35] Does anyone here know why apport isn't sending crash reports to Launchpad anymore? [00:36] It seems to be just submitting them to the whoopsie database. [00:55] thats correct [00:56] whoopsie-daisy is much better at gathering and coordinating the crashes; actual bugs are filed for the crashes identified by daisy [01:14] lifeless: And who is the reporter?/ [01:14] /who has access to the crash database? [01:42] lifeless? === bcurtiswx is now known as Guest14632 [01:54] I suggest setting Bug #990677 to Wishlist. Note someone else already provided a non-canned answer since it was a (complex) feature request. [01:54] Launchpad bug 990677 in ubuntu "improving deb install process efficiency" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/990677 === Guest14632 is now known as bcurtiswx [02:23] Is there a response for someone filing bugs against obsoleted versions? Bug #992370 is filed against Ubuntu 8.04... [02:23] Launchpad bug 992370 in ubuntu "can't watch videos and computer very slow" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/992370 [03:18] patrickceg: bugs against 8.04 are still valid for a little while longer [03:19] although this i dont think is a bug [03:19] patrickceg: that one about videos and computer being slow isnt exactly a bug, i'd mark that Invalid or Incomplete, but that's just me personally [03:29] : Where is the list of dates when bugs are out of date? I know 8.04 was EOL'd https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2011-April/000144.html [03:30] patrickceg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases [03:30] you might want to note that server still is supported [03:30] i'd post to the mailing list about that one, then [03:30] because that'd be desktop [03:30] but even then [03:31] its not a bug at all [03:31] so it'd be "Invalid" anyways [03:31] what they need is ubuntuforums.org or askubuntu.com [03:31] or #ubuntu [03:31] not a bug [03:33] patrickceg: ^ [03:33] this'd be "Invalid"'d if I had seen it first, just because its not a bug [03:34] Thanks I'll keep that in mind. I'm signing off for tonight... [03:50] Logan_: a developer will be [03:51] Oh. [03:51] I guess that's convenient for triagers. :P === Resistance is now known as EvilResistance === yofel_ is now known as yofel === zyga_ is now known as zyga [10:40] hello, if I try to remove libtotem-plparser17, synaptic ask to remove brasero too. Is this an apt bug ? Is this a brasero bug ? or is it a libtotem-plparser17 bug? [11:50] njin: brasero depends on libtotem-plparser17. So yes, you try to remove it, brasero will also get removed. [11:51] njin, it's not a bug [11:52] ok thanks guys, seen just now. [11:53] why do you want to remove that lib anyway? [11:53] it's a playlist parser list [11:53] I was trying to see if banshee can be a valid substitute for totem and rhythmbox, but seems to have limitations === bregma_ is now known as bregma === zyga is now known as zyga-food [14:51] hi all === zyga-food is now known as zyga [17:47] hi all [17:47] where ~/.pbuilderrc is located? [17:59] alo21, in terminal type 'ls ~/.p*' without the ' [17:59] does .pbuilderrc show? [18:01] bcurtiswx: http://paste.ubuntu.com/987564/.. is better if I read http://wiki.ubuntu-it.org/Programmazione/Pbuilder [18:01] alo21, .pbuilderrc doesn't exist you would need to create it [18:02] alo21, what are you trying to do? [18:17] Hi, I've just translated the strings reported on bug #999177 , should I update the status to In Progress or Fix Commited? [18:17] Launchpad bug 999177 in language-pack-gnome-it "keyboard layout not completly translated in italian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/999177 [18:22] bcurtiswx: set up pbuilder to test my patches [18:22] irc_willynux, I think strings are translated in the applications themselves not from the language packs.. [18:23] depends on the application [18:24] micahg, i think in this case if it was using the language pack only parts of sentences would be in english not entire sentences, right? [18:24] idk, depends on the application :) [18:25] the application is keyboard layout from system settings, I did the translation in launchpad... Is that the way to do it? [18:25] alo21, you need to create .pbuilderrc then if you want to change settings in there [18:26] bcurtiswx: thanks [18:26] alo21, yw [18:27] irc_willynux, i should know the answer to that but I do not, sorry [18:33] ok, no problem :) I'll ask in ubuntu-translators channel maybe better [19:18] could someone tell me where usually confiduration files are stored? [19:26] alo21: system config usually under /etc, user config usually under ~/ -- ~/.config, ~/.local, etc, depending on the application [19:27] hggdh: amule [19:27] alo21: sorry I do not use amule [19:27] hggdh: thakns anyway :) [19:28] alo21: 'man amule' may help [19:30] alo21: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/en/man1/amule.1.html points to ~/.aMule [19:31] hggdh: thanks again [19:47] How can I write patch.... directly into the source= [19:47] ? [19:51] alo21: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix [19:55] could someone tell me how to make a patch? [19:58] alo21: you write the patch, and then diff from an unchanged source. Or use bzr, or git [19:58] easier to follow wylde's advice [19:59] hggdh: write it with gedit? [19:59] alo21: in whatever IDE or editor you like. [19:59] wylde: so I should open the source, change to fix the bug [19:59] try it [19:59] ? [19:59] right? [20:00] wylde: sorry [20:00] alo21: the easiest way I know is to use bzr to branch the code, edit and create a diff [20:01] wylde: wait... I would to test it before commit [20:01] wylde: Once I found where the bug is... [20:01] alo21: yes, all the required steps are outlined on the link I posted [20:02] wylde: sorry I did not receive it, because my connection goes down [20:02] alo21: I personally have only ever patched Documentaion bugs. But the process is similar. [20:02] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix [20:03] wylde: I have read it yet... but i did not understand it a lot [20:03] although... I can get away with a simple diff for the doc bugs. Not sure if that's sufficient for coding bugs. [20:03] wylde: patch -p1 < ../bugfix.patch ... how can I create a patch without uploading it on LP? [20:05] LP has nothing to do with writing a patch [20:05] alo21: that's all I have to offer, like I said. I've only patched documentation bugs. It's likely a lot simpler that whgat you're asking. I've not yet attempted to patch those types of bugs. [20:05] wylde: ok [20:05] 1. bzr branch [20:05] wylde: thanks [20:06] 2. apply all patches in ./debian/patches (if the package is using quilt, very easy) [20:06] 3. write your patch [20:06] 4. save the diff somewhere else (again, quilt would help) [20:07] hggdh: ok... thank you so much === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha [20:13] ok... I create the patch, merge it with the code, but now I would like to test it [20:16] you do not _merge_ it with the code, the patch is applied during package build time [20:16] alo21: which package is it? [20:16] hggdh: amule [20:16] for which version? === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha [20:18] precise === Ursinha is now known as Guest74162 [20:19] hggdh: precise === Guest74162 is now known as Ursula___ === Ursula___ is now known as Ursula_ === Ursula_ is now known as Ursinha [20:37] interesting. amule in quantal is 2.3.1-7, and on lp:ubuntu/amule is 2.2.5-1.1ubuntu1 [20:38] alo21: so the first thing to do is verify if this (whatever you are trying to fix) is fixed on quantal [20:39] hggdh: It seems that the bug is not fixed on quantal [20:40] alo21: since the quantal source in LP is out-of-date, it is better for you to check on #ubuntu-motu how to proceed. BUT [20:40] if it is not fixed on quantal, the first patch has to be there [20:40] THEN you can request a SRU for precise [20:40] (and sorry for the delay, had a phone call) [20:41] hggdh: do not worry [20:41] :) [20:42] heh. I am not worried, I am just trying to make your life easier... [21:24] hggdh: i run this command: pbuilder-dist build ../_.dsc [21:24] I do not receve any errors... but I cannot find my package [21:26] alo21: did you look at ~/pbuilder? [21:27] hggdh: here I am [21:28] What did you say a moment ago? [21:29] hggdh: inside my ~/pbuilder folder, I have two files [21:29] 1) precise_result 2) precise-base.tgz [21:33] I have to go... If you can, could you eamil me, please? [21:33] you find my adress at LP as alo21 [21:33] that's... different [21:48] o.O [22:12] hggdh: and now you know why i work with the source packages and not the bzr branches ;P [22:12] (the bzr branches arent always up-to-date with the source package, in some cases) [23:42] EvilResistance: yes, this can happen... not good, though, it would be better if consistency were to be maintained