[06:22] <ScottK> infinity: Were any decisions about the future of armel made at UDS?
[12:52] <infinity> ScottK: Nope.
[14:01] <Laney> Are you ready for us (backporters) to start uploading ourselves now?
[16:37] <stgraber> slangasek: there you go ^
[16:38] <slangasek> stgraber: have you by chance tested that the debconf prompt shows?
[16:39] <stgraber> slangasek: yeah, I tested it in the same test environment as the previous sru and confirmed that I get the debconf prompt with it
[16:39] <slangasek> ok, great
[16:40] <slangasek> hmm; normally we would want db_go to be guarded with '|| true'
[16:40] <slangasek> because it returns non-zero if the question isn't shown
[16:41] <slangasek> however, in this case it's critical so it should never not be shown anyway
[16:41] <stgraber> do you want me to re-upload just to be safe?
[16:41] <slangasek> nah, I've accepted it as-is
[16:41] <slangasek> just recording my thoughts here :)
[16:42] <stgraber> ok, I'll push with "|| :" for the quantal one
[18:34] <broder> Laney: if you do upload backports yourself, be sure to at least get the u-d-t from the daily ppa
[18:34] <broder> i pushed some changes this weekend or something (forget exactly when)
[18:35] <micahg> are we supposed to be uploading our own backports now?
[18:35] <broder> i think we're close to making it standard operating procedure
[18:36] <broder> colin asked for a tool to make sure that a backport in the queue is actually no-change
[18:36] <broder> but other than that all the pieces are in place
[18:36] <broder> (Laney and i have done a couple of backports our selves)
[18:36] <micahg> I noticed :)
[18:38] <Laney> just making sure that it is law
[18:38] <highvoltage> Laney Lays down the Law
[23:30] <RAOF> infinity: You want the -proposed d-shlibs to get released into preciseupdates and
[23:30] <RAOF> -security, right?  That looks like the right thing to do.
[23:57] <infinity> RAOF: Yeah, ideally.