cjwatson | slangasek: "however, in this case it's critical so it should never not be shown anyway" - except in the noninteractive case ... is that relevant here? | 00:05 |
---|---|---|
cjwatson | Laney: once broder is ready based on my test run with him, please do go ahead and make that SOP | 00:05 |
infinity | RAOF: Cheers. I'll go back to my flu now. | 00:10 |
RAOF | Good luck with that :) | 00:10 |
slangasek | cjwatson: dunno... what does db_go return for critical+noninteractive? | 01:05 |
cjwatson | slangasek: oh, db_go - sorry, it's db_input that returns 30 for critical+noninteractive, db_go returns 0 unless the last operation was a backup (unlikely in that circumstance) | 09:19 |
cjwatson | micahg: I'd like to use your bug 998103 as a test of compatibility glue in ubuntu-archive-tools; would that be OK? | 14:00 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 998103 in precise-backports "Please backport unknown-horizons 2012.1+dfsg1-1 (universe) from quantal" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/998103 | 14:00 |
cjwatson | similar to the code I already have there to deal with cases where people forget about the new world order and ask archive admins to process syncs for them | 14:03 |
Laney | cjwatson: If you're blocking on that, there's another one I can approve | 14:21 |
cjwatson | Laney: sounds good, especially if you can confirm whether the backportpackage command my code produces is correct | 14:26 |
slangasek | cjwatson: db_go> ok, great :) | 14:27 |
Laney | cjwatson: hrm, possibly, but Evan would be better placed. He made some recent changes that I've not fully caught up with. | 14:27 |
Laney | bug #999132 | 14:27 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 999132 in precise-backports "Please backport widelands 1:17-2 (universe) from quantal" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/999132 | 14:27 |
cjwatson | DEBEMAIL="iain@orangesquash.org.uk" DEBFULLNAME="Iain Lane" backportpackage -u ubuntu -c 999132 -d precise -s quantal widelands | 14:30 |
Laney | LGTM | 14:31 |
cjwatson | yeesh, I'd test it but the orig is 167 MiB | 14:32 |
Laney | hm, looks like -v isn't hooked up to anything | 14:33 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Laney | I thought it might be safer to pass that too, but clearly not if it does nothing | 14:33 |
cjwatson | my current u-a-t diff is http://paste.ubuntu.com/989007/ | 14:33 |
Laney | I wonder why we treat the backporter as requestor | 14:45 |
cjwatson | Laney: I think because they were rather more likely to have a sense of development ownership than your average user requesting a backport is | 14:49 |
Laney | It feels a bit more like sponsorship, since we expect others to do the testing now. Maybe that's just me though. | 14:52 |
slangasek | Laney: well, I've seen backport requests in the past from people whose launchpad "real name" fields were inappropriate to list in a changelog ;) | 15:00 |
slangasek | infinity, stgraber: ad hoc bug report - getaddrinfo() appears to not be doing name resolution of non-FQDNs correctly in precise for IPv6 hosts | 15:08 |
infinity | slangasek: Do you mean "not at all", or "incorrectly", as in it returns garbage? | 15:11 |
* infinity suspects it might be time to upgrade his home network to v6... | 15:12 | |
slangasek | skaet: can you send out some announcement to ubuntu-devel this week about how we're supposed to handle release notes in the blueprints this cycle? It's best to get that announced ASAP since everyone's drafting this week | 15:12 |
skaet | slangasek, will do. | 15:12 |
slangasek | infinity: "not at all" - I have to stick a . on the end of every hostname to get ping6 to return anything useful | 15:12 |
slangasek | skaet: ta :) | 15:12 |
stgraber | slangasek: do you have any more detail? looks fine here | 15:13 |
stgraber | >>> socket.getaddrinfo("shell01.dmz.dcnue", 22) | 15:13 |
stgraber | [(10, 1, 6, '', ('2001:470:714b:1025:218:51ff:fec2:289a', 22, 0, 0)), (10, 2, 17, '', ('2001:470:714b:1025:218:51ff:fec2:289a', 22, 0, 0)), (10, 3, 0, '', ('2001:470:714b:1025:218:51ff:fec2:289a', 22, 0, 0)), (2, 1, 6, '', ('172.22.25.30', 22)), (2, 2, 17, '', ('172.22.25.30', 22)), (2, 3, 0, '', ('172.22.25.30', 22))] | 15:13 |
stgraber | >>> socket.getaddrinfo("dnsr05.dmz", 22) | 15:14 |
stgraber | [(10, 1, 6, '', ('2607:f2c0:f00f:2725:8837:98ff:fe43:90e6', 22, 0, 0)), (10, 2, 17, '', ('2607:f2c0:f00f:2725:8837:98ff:fe43:90e6', 22, 0, 0)), (10, 3, 0, '', ('2607:f2c0:f00f:2725:8837:98ff:fe43:90e6', 22, 0, 0)), (2, 1, 6, '', ('172.17.25.30', 22)), (2, 2, 17, '', ('172.17.25.30', 22)), (2, 3, 0, '', ('172.17.25.30', 22))] | 15:14 |
stgraber | right, looks good here (with lan.sherb.stgraber.net sherb.stgraber.net stgraber.net in my search path) | 15:15 |
infinity | slangasek: I'm taking another sick day, my flu seems to be intent on trying to kill me, but if you and stgraber figure out a way to blame glibc for your issues, let me know. | 15:18 |
slangasek | infinity: bah and ack - throw me a canonicaladmin request? | 15:29 |
infinity | slangasek: Done. | 15:30 |
stgraber | skaet: http://iso.qa.dev.stgraber.org/qatracker/milestones/216/builds <-- see the (ready) next to Edubuntu and the big "Mark ready" button | 15:34 |
skaet | stgraber, not seeing... permissions? | 15:36 |
skaet | (but happy that I should be seeing it... ;) ) | 15:36 |
stgraber | skaet: are you logged in? | 15:37 |
skaet | yup. :) | 15:37 |
stgraber | skaet: in all cases, you should see the (ready) next to Edubuntu | 15:37 |
=== jrgifford_ is now known as jrgifford | ||
stgraber | cjwatson: I just saw https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/lxc/0.7.5-3ubuntu55 which looks wrong. -ubuntu54 was moved to updates but AFAIK -ubuntu55 still needs testing | 15:43 |
stgraber | cjwatson: hallyn will upload a new ubuntu55 to -proposed to fix that and include an extra change | 15:45 |
stgraber | (adding a fix for bug 999187) | 15:46 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 999187 in lxc "lxc-create for armhf fails with error "failed to execute template 'ubuntu'"" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/999187 | 15:46 |
cjwatson | stgraber: hm, I guess pending-sru is a bit overenthusiastic there | 15:49 |
cjwatson | stgraber: it may have to be ubuntu56 now, sorry | 15:49 |
stgraber | yeah, I'll upload ubuntu56 using -v to include ubuntu55 | 15:50 |
cjwatson | there must have been a race, as pending-sru would only have printed that if -updates were >= -proposed | 15:51 |
cjwatson | yeah, published 00:34:39 UTC, removal requested 00:35:06 UTC | 15:52 |
cjwatson | so just rotten luck | 15:52 |
stgraber | skaet: thanks for the screenshot. So at least the user part of the change "(ready)" is visible there. I can't easily check but it looks like the website doesn't know you're in ubuntu-release. Maybe logging out and back in will fix it (making sure ubuntu-release is ticked on the SSO page) | 16:03 |
skaet | stgraber, will do and let you know if that changes anything. | 16:04 |
stgraber | skaet: whenever I update to a new DB snapshot from production the SSO is acting a bit weird in Drupal. Sometimes logging me out randomly (that's why I asked) or just not mapping the roles properly, I guess I should be doing something a bit more clever than simply dumping the whole DB (like remove the existing SSO tickets :)) | 16:05 |
stgraber | the good thing is that it only affects the development/staging environment, not production deployments | 16:05 |
skaet | :) | 16:05 |
stgraber | cjwatson: can you let that one in? it contains the old -ubuntu55 and adds a cherry-pick from quantal (one line, trivial bug/fix) | 16:07 |
stgraber | skaet: I'm working on the ISO tracker blueprint, do you know the LP username for timrc? (LP tells me timrc doesn't exist) | 16:10 |
slangasek | stgraber: http://paste.ubuntu.com/989151/ | 16:12 |
stgraber | skaet: nevermind, found him | 16:13 |
slangasek | stgraber: /etc/gai.conf is unmodified | 16:13 |
slangasek | mdns is enabled for hosts | 16:13 |
stgraber | slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/989160/ | 16:14 |
slangasek | I do have an IPv4 /etc/hosts entry for this particular host which shadows the DNS, but that has not previously been a problem | 16:14 |
stgraber | I'd blame the /etc/hosts entry, I seem to remember seeing a similar behaviour here (and wanted it). Basically putting an IPv4 entry in /etc/hosts will make getaddrinfo() return it and not do any further resolving (so no IPv6 record returned) | 16:17 |
slangasek | stgraber: confirmed that this is not a problem with oneiric eglibc | 16:17 |
slangasek | hmm | 16:17 |
slangasek | well, yuck | 16:17 |
slangasek | why do you want this behavior? | 16:17 |
stgraber | I use it sometimes when I want to avoid using IPv6 for a specific host (where the IPv6 address doesn't respond) | 16:17 |
slangasek | hmm | 16:17 |
slangasek | it's definitely a regression for me | 16:18 |
slangasek | my /etc/hosts entries are there as a guard against DNS resolution failing so I can still get around the local network during a network outage | 16:19 |
slangasek | but I don't want to hard-code IPv6 addresses there | 16:19 |
stgraber | slangasek: then you should move "files" after "dns" in /etc/nssswitch.conf? | 16:19 |
slangasek | well, I won't do that :) | 16:19 |
slangasek | I would sooner remove the entries from /etc/hosts | 16:20 |
slangasek | but I would like to know the upstream justification for this behavior change | 16:20 |
stgraber | slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/989173/ | 16:21 |
* slangasek nods | 16:21 | |
slangasek | doesn't it seem a little odd that the behavior should be dependent on whether an fqdn is used? | 16:21 |
stgraber | I don't have Oneiric around but at least Lucid had the same behaviour as Precise | 16:22 |
slangasek | oh, you're seeing this with lucid, interesting | 16:22 |
slangasek | would a (Canonical) archive admin care to review the fluendo packages in partner/precise/unapproved? | 16:22 |
stgraber | I'm not familar with the files nss module but it might be that it simply won't match the fqdn syntax (with the final dot) | 16:23 |
slangasek | heh, funny | 16:24 |
stgraber | so my guess is that the bug is that it worked at all for you ;) | 16:25 |
slangasek | blah | 16:25 |
cjwatson | stgraber: ok, done | 16:26 |
stgraber | cjwatson: thanks | 16:27 |
=== jbicha_ is now known as jbicha | ||
=== Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Guest8786 | ||
slangasek | cjwatson: hmm. bug #863741 became un-fixed in precise; rpcbind dropped back to priority: optional (was priority: standard in precise). | 22:06 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 863741 in nfs-utils "apt doesn't want to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrade" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/863741 | 22:06 |
slangasek | cjwatson: thoughts on how to fix this? null SRU + priority override? :/ | 22:06 |
stgraber | skaet: so I tried to get the full changelog in the build notes of the tracker but it's really quite ugly (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/16074/testcases), I think it'd be best just to give a link (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/219/builds/16075/testcases) | 22:16 |
stgraber | an alternative is to parse the changes file and only extract the changelog entry which should be quite a bit shorter than the whole changes entry | 22:17 |
skaet | stgraber, link will work for now. However, maybe you can reuse the changelog extraction code in: http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/lucid-updates.py? | 22:30 |
stgraber | skaet: oh yeah, that'd work | 22:36 |
skaet | :) | 22:36 |
micahg | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/quantal_probs.html doesn't seem to be getting updated, is this known? | 23:48 |
cjwatson | slangasek: hmph; if it's meant to be priority standard, shouldn't it be seeded or something? | 23:53 |
slangasek | cjwatson: it probably should've been :/ | 23:53 |
cjwatson | slangasek: I have a feeling that if we ran change-override.py -s precise-updates or whatever it is, that might result in a new publication to precise-updates ... | 23:53 |
cjwatson | ICBW | 23:54 |
cjwatson | micahg: looking | 23:54 |
slangasek | I don't know that it needs to be standard for quantal anyway, it was entirely to try to force the issue with apt not wanting to replace portmap with rpcbind on upgrades | 23:54 |
slangasek | 2012-05-15 23:55:25 ERROR Could not find binaries for 'rpcbind/None' in Primary Archive for Ubuntu: precise-UPDATES | 23:55 |
slangasek | looks like I should pocket-copy first | 23:55 |
slangasek | cjwatson: ^^ think I should do it? | 23:55 |
cjwatson | I think that would make sense, yes | 23:57 |
cjwatson | least-bad | 23:57 |
slangasek | done | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!