ovnicraft | so i get working bzr send but i want to know if there is any web tool to scan the email or mail list check the patches and manage it ? | 00:05 |
---|---|---|
spiv | ovnicraft: bundlebuggy | 00:21 |
ovnicraft | yes i am trying to install, but last update was in 2009 | 00:23 |
ovnicraft | is not a good signal | 00:23 |
ovnicraft | i can't install it | 00:33 |
ovnicraft | there is any another tool like it? | 00:33 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
vila | hi all (and a special hi to 7 digits lp bugs ;) | 07:03 |
mgz | morning all! | 08:03 |
mgz | bug 1000000 | 08:12 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1000000 in Edubuntu "For every bug on Launchpad, 67 iPads are sold" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1000000 | 08:12 |
mgz | ehehhee | 08:12 |
fullermd | Who knew apple was causing so many problems? | 08:14 |
=== bob2_ is now known as bob2 | ||
bob2 | if it's the same price, it doesn't really address the listed problems (but of course: FREEDOM) | 08:18 |
vila | mgz: hehe, too bad you don't have IRC logs ;O) | 08:23 |
fullermd | Of course an iPad is, what, like 400 bucks? So fixing a bug on LP should be worth... $26,800... | 08:29 |
* fullermd gets hacking. | 08:29 | |
* bob2 kicks in $5 | 08:30 | |
fullermd | The sad part of getting a mail from PQM on -commits is that it underlines how few mails have come from PQM on -commits of late... | 09:34 |
mgz | indeed. | 09:40 |
bob2 | fullermd, otoh, PQM LIVES | 10:15 |
* fullermd dives for a shotgun. | 10:17 | |
mgz | ha, christian perrier complaining about inflated launchpad bug count, | 10:23 |
jam | mgz: because of the 1M rollover? | 10:24 |
mgz | and too many dupes of bug 728840 on samba4... which jelmer fixed! | 10:24 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 728840 in samba4 (Ubuntu Natty) "upgradeprovision crashed with LdbError in connect(): (80, 'Failed to load modules from: /usr/lib/samba/ldb\n')" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728840 | 10:24 |
bob2 | the ipad one above seemed to have used spamming to get the round number | 10:24 |
mgz | yeah, flooding bug reports to get the magic number is a little silly, but it's not unusual | 10:25 |
mgz | I remember peeps doing it to get a magic number wikipedia article | 10:25 |
fullermd | Is that supposed to be a _supporting_ argument? :p | 10:25 |
bob2 | tl;dr some people are lame, film at 11 | 10:26 |
jelmer | mgz: I don't think bubulle is really complaining about the bug numbers | 10:26 |
jelmer | mgz: more about the fact that there are so many bug reports that aren't particularly useful | 10:26 |
mgz | jelmer: but the whol point of errors.ubuntu.com and related work for precise was to improve this | 10:26 |
bob2 | making bug reporting very easy isn't without downsides :) | 10:26 |
mgz | and the samba4 thing he's complaining about isn't even new | 10:26 |
jelmer | mgz: for precise, we still good a flood of duplicate bug reports | 10:27 |
jelmer | mgz: all of which had to be marked as dupes | 10:27 |
mgz | right, the crash deduping stuff isn't perfect, but it's (mostly) a big improvement | 10:28 |
mgz | there's only one 9-series bug in that impressive dupe list. | 10:28 |
jelmer | mgz: it doesn't seem to be working for the samba4 package | 10:28 |
jelmer | mgz: the bug only occurs for the upgrade to oneiric afaik | 10:29 |
mgz | certainly the crash stuff on precise has mostly worked for me, pointed at (already fixed) bug reports where they existed | 10:32 |
mgz | though didn't do anything useful for one with a smashed stack (unsuprisingly) | 10:33 |
jelmer | I've been doing a lot of manual bug duping for samba4 in precise too, so it certainly doesn't seem to work for that | 10:33 |
jelmer | related, opening the stracktraces attached to those automated bug reports in chromium/firefox (often the only way to see what the bug is about) has quite a bit of overhead | 10:34 |
jelmer | I do think we have made progress, but I also agree with bubulle that (at least for the samba4 package) the automated bug reports are more of a nuisance than really useful at this point. | 10:35 |
mgz | right, launchpad attachments aren't the best way of looking at that info | 10:35 |
mgz | really they need to link back to the new fancy stuff | 10:36 |
jelmer | mgz: hmm, errors.ubuntu.com is interesting | 10:43 |
mgz | it's a mini version of the really nice crash stuff mozilla have had for ages | 10:44 |
jelmer | mgz: it seems it has only reports for specific packages though | 10:44 |
mgz | which is great for analysing crash frequency and causes | 10:44 |
jelmer | mgz: so it's not apport based then? | 10:44 |
mgz | I'm not sure on all the details, it's Evan's baby | 10:44 |
jelmer | ah | 10:45 |
bialix | hi all | 14:06 |
jelmer | hi bialix | 14:11 |
mgz | hey alexander | 14:19 |
vila | hey bialix | 14:28 |
vila | ha, too late ;) | 14:28 |
mgz | just missed, vila :) | 14:29 |
vila | hey bialix | 14:30 |
bialix | hi bzr-core guys! | 14:30 |
vila | darn, sound broken again... | 14:30 |
bialix | what is your plans about new releases? | 14:30 |
jelmer | vila: *piiiing* | 14:30 |
mgz | bialix: well, we really need to release 2.5.1 with the various fixes | 14:30 |
bialix | it seems all you are very busy last months, it's very quiet in ML/merge proposals | 14:31 |
mgz | right, we've not been working on bzr | 14:32 |
bialix | mgz: can I ask why? | 14:42 |
mgz | meh, we should have posted something to the list ages back | 14:43 |
mgz | so, I'm still not sure what we're going to be working on next month | 14:43 |
mgz | but we're not on bzr feature work for the forseeable future. | 14:44 |
mgz | jam is doing sprint hand-off this week of the U1 work he was doing on rotation since the autumn | 14:45 |
mgz | then hopefully we can get a few things better sorted out. | 14:46 |
=== idnaria is now known as idnar | ||
bjp | is something wrong with this revisionspec: -rbefore:date:2012-05-03,11:34:00 | 18:38 |
bjp | i'm getting 'requested revision does not exist in branch' but there are plenty of revisions and the last one is from before that | 18:39 |
james_w | bjp, "bzr help revisionspec" reads like there has to be a revision after the date in question for that to work | 18:44 |
bjp | for -rdate:, but i read (somewhere) that -rbefore:date: grabs one before that date | 18:45 |
james_w | bjp, it probably grabs the revision before the one pointed to by the date thing | 18:45 |
bjp | ooh | 18:45 |
james_w | before(date) rather than (before date) | 18:46 |
bjp | so i need to do a special case for last revision older than date? (i'm trying to batch some bzr commands) | 18:46 |
james_w | bjp, that's what it reads like, but I'm not positive | 18:47 |
thopiekar | hello. Using "bzr branch ftp://<user>:<pass>@<ip>/<dir>/<branch>/ " gives me the error that the connection has been refused and using bzrlib in a python script gives the same error: http://pastebin.com/mb6aPK7p | 20:41 |
lifeless | thopiekar: that suggests that the ftp server isn't running or is firewalled | 21:11 |
thopiekar | but the link is working as you put it into a browser or connect to it via ftp client | 21:41 |
thopiekar | lifeless: ^ | 21:41 |
thopiekar | and I get the same error when using the local ip in my private network (no firewall) | 21:43 |
=== spm` is now known as spm | ||
thopiekar | something similar when pushing code via ftp: http://pastebin.com/WiEv4FHk | 22:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!