[00:47] <Logan_> bug 1000000
[00:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000000 in edubuntu "For every bug on Launchpad, 67 iPads are sold" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1000000
[00:48] <Logan_> greg-g, highvoltage
[00:48] <EvilResistance> erm...?
[00:48] <highvoltage> :)
[00:48] <Logan_> EvilResistance: the one millionth bug
[00:48] <EvilResistance> oh, right, against "Edubuntu" project :P
[00:48] <EvilResistance> Logan_:  was thinking for a second "This isn't a bug...!"
[00:48] <Logan_> haha
[00:48]  * EvilResistance didnt notice that it wasn't filed against Ubuntu
[00:49] <highvoltage> it is a bug! ... against Edubuntu!
[00:49] <Logan_> ._.
[00:49] <bkerensa> =o
[00:49] <Logan_> lame-o
[00:49] <bkerensa> Stay Calm and Make Things
[00:50] <Logan_> Edubuntu is so boring
[00:50] <Logan_> it's like Ubuntu with extra packages
[00:50] <Logan_> revolutionary :P
[00:50] <Logan_> well, I guess that's what all spins are
[00:51] <EvilResistance> not really
[00:51] <EvilResistance> since Kubuntu and Xubuntu and stuff have different package sets
[00:51] <Logan_> true
[00:54] <highvoltage> well, if kubuntu, xubuntu and edubuntu weren't pure ubuntu then they wouldn't be flavours
[00:54] <highvoltage> they're always going to be ubuntu in a different configuration with all the packages still in the ubuntu archives.
[01:37] <EvilResistance> any bugcontrol person around?  got an older request that i posted a few days ago that never got handled
[01:41] <micahg> EvilResistance: sure
[01:41] <EvilResistance> sec, lemme get this off my notepad again
[01:41]  * EvilResistance has been creating a log of bugs he's had triaged / importance-changed, etc.
[01:41] <EvilResistance> micahg:  LP Bug 994189.  To change (on psmisc): Severity change to 'Low'.  Status of 'Confirmed' is valid as the bug was confirmed by multiple users.   Further reasoning for "Low" status:  This bug does not affect an essential aspect of the program, and only occurs in a limited scope of the application (for not correctly detecting the process as entered (and as it exists in process names)
[01:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 994189 in psmisc "killall incorrect tab completion" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/994189
[01:42] <EvilResistance> against psmisc, at least, it needs its importance on low.
[01:45] <micahg> EvilResistance: the process is called plugin-container, so the description is wrong
[01:46] <micahg> and the subject as well
[01:46] <micahg> I agree with low importance though
[01:48] <EvilResistance> micahg:  indeed.  having said this, they are correct in one part where when you do `killall plugin-container` it doesnt work, but does work on `killall plugin-containe`, and i was able to confirm that myself
[01:48] <EvilResistance> so that part about them identifying *that* bug was correct (and was confirmed by me in a Precise VM)
[01:49] <micahg> yes, this is true, so the issue isn't the tab completion but the lack of proper execution IMHO
[01:49] <EvilResistance> mhm
[01:49] <psusi> if it turns out that someone's machine needs acpi=off to boot, should the bug be closed or reassigned to linux and triaged?
[01:49] <micahg> depends if the board is supposed to support ACPI or not I would guess
[01:49] <psusi> well obviously it is *supposed* to but it's broken
[01:50] <EvilResistance> micahg:  can you do me a favor, and either memoserv me the changes that need to be done to that, or privmsg me that?  i'm still grepping two weeks of logs for this channel for the importance or triaging or status changes I've recommended to here that've been handled and approved
[01:50]  * EvilResistance is keeping a record :P
[01:50] <micahg> psusi: then, yes, sounds like a bug :)
[01:50] <EvilResistance> (and the logs on xchat here are horridly low, because of a bug that is inherent to my system only)
[01:50] <micahg> EvilResistance: just clean it up to address the actual issue vs what was perceived (still from the point of view of the problem)
[01:51] <EvilResistance> they're right about tab completion not working though
[01:51] <EvilResistance> micahg:  i was considering splitting their "reported bug"
[01:51] <micahg> EvilResistance: huh?  what's the issue with tab completion?
[01:51] <EvilResistance> because tab completion doesnt work on there as they report it
[01:51] <micahg> no, it works fine
[01:51] <micahg> it doesn't kill fine
[01:51] <EvilResistance> micahg:  killall plugin-[tab] doesnt work on bash or zsh, there was multiple confirmation on that
[01:51] <EvilResistance> at least on that day when i checked it didnt work
[01:52] <micahg> EvilResistance: sounds like multiple bugs then
[01:52] <EvilResistance> so should this bug be split into two
[01:52] <micahg> at least
[01:52]  * EvilResistance was considering this, but did not want to do that at the time, since it was late when he was going through it)
[01:52] <EvilResistance> then that poses two questions:
[01:52] <micahg> EvilResistance: works fine in bash for me
[01:53] <EvilResistance> hmm, i'll double check here, since its been a few days
[01:53] <EvilResistance> but two questions still
[01:53] <EvilResistance> (1) should two new bugs be filed, individually for each of the bugs reported in this bug?
[01:53] <EvilResistance> or
[01:53] <EvilResistance> (2) should this bug be modified to count for either one of the two bugs, and the other bug be split into its own bug
[01:53] <micahg> EvilResistance: clean up this bug for the primary issue, file for the secondary one
[01:53] <EvilResistance> will do
[01:54] <EvilResistance> after i finish grepping the irc logs for here for all the triage/importance/status changes i've recommended (since i'm almost done)
[01:54] <micahg> filing separate bugs for both would be if the bug is a hodge podge and not clear about either
[01:54] <EvilResistance> micahg:  which package controls tab completion for bash though?
[01:54] <micahg> bash-completion?
[01:54] <EvilResistance> wonderful, i'll have to remove some of the affects: on the original bug then
[01:55] <micahg> yep
[01:55] <EvilResistance> how do i remove the affects, outside of setting it for "Invalid"?
[01:55] <EvilResistance> when i last tried, i couldnt
[01:55] <EvilResistance> (it literally wouldnt let me, as if i didnt have permissions)
[01:55] <micahg> EvilResistance: you need to be bug control I think
[01:55] <micahg> EvilResistance: which ones should be removed
[01:57] <EvilResistance> micahg:  gimme a minute, still looking at logs
[01:59] <EvilResistance> which bug was this i was on about again?
[01:59] <EvilResistance> (as i said, low scrollbacks threshold)
[01:59] <micahg> Bug #994189
[01:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 994189 in psmisc "killall incorrect tab completion" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/994189
[02:00] <EvilResistance> needs removed against "gnome-terminal" and "psmisc" after i modify title/description to be specific to the tab completion.  i'll file a new bug against `psmisc` about the execution error one that we were going to split off of that initial bug
[02:01] <micahg> EvilResistance: no, I think the primary bug is against psmisc which is why I already set the importance
[02:01] <micahg> it was a misnomer that the issue was tab completion IMHO
[02:01] <EvilResistance> ah, indeed
[02:01] <EvilResistance> indeed
[02:01]  * EvilResistance misread as well at the time
[02:01] <EvilResistance> remove against gnome-terminal and bash-completion then
[02:03] <micahg> EvilResistance: done
[02:04] <EvilResistance> thanks much.
[02:05] <micahg> EvilResistance: thank you for your bug work
[02:05] <EvilResistance> micahg:  no problem :)
[02:06] <EvilResistance> yet another way for me to contribute to Ubuntu: helping with bugs
[02:06] <EvilResistance> micahg:  regarding what i brought up with you during UDS over IRC here, regarding bug importance and core-vs-noncore, i sent an email out to the mailing list about this
[02:07] <EvilResistance> s/this/it/
[02:07] <EvilResistance> so a discussion about what we should do about that can occur
[02:48] <EvilResistance> micahg:  on LP Bug 994189, i've changed the title, do you want me to change the description as well still?
[02:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 994189 in psmisc "Incorrect execution of `killall` on `plugin-container`" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/994189
=== bcurtiswx is now known as Guest43701
=== EvilResistance is now known as Resistance
[03:14] <micahg> Resistance: yeah, please add a reproducer and tag testcase
=== Guest8786 is now known as Ursinha
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000
=== ryanakca_ is now known as ryanakca
[13:56] <Noxygen> hello guys
[13:56] <Noxygen>  I'm brand new to the bugsquad, (I've signed up and read all the HowTo) but I still have a question, could someone help me to figure out the way "duplicates" are working and how to set this up ?
[14:08] <trinikrono> Noxygen: well you need to find the master bug first
[14:08] <trinikrono> then you can mark any dupes you find to be a duplicate of that one
[14:09] <trinikrono> did you have something in mind Noxygen ?
[14:11] <Noxygen> Ive this one : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates/+bug/1000232 I've marked it as confirmed and I didn't find any other of these (he works on ubuntu 12.10 so I might be a reason)
[14:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000232 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates "nvidia-current-updates 295.49-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current-updates kernel module failed to build" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[14:15] <trinikrono> why did you think this was a dupe anyways Noxygen this looks new
[14:16] <Noxygen> that's what I thought but usually, how do you check ? just copy-pasting the bug name ?
[14:19] <trinikrono> search in the package first
[14:19] <Noxygen> okay I did it, I wanted to be sure I've been doing it the right way
[14:19] <trinikrono> but this bug looks like someting the #ubuntu+1 would handle but i am not sure
[14:20] <trinikrono> did you test the bug yourself Noxygen ?
[14:20] <trinikrono> i see you set the status to confirmed
[14:21] <Noxygen> I had the same problem but with the 12.04
[14:21]  * trinikrono nudges Noxygen it does look like a dupe though
[14:21] <trinikrono> look at the other bugs
[14:22] <trinikrono> bug 993506
[14:22] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 993506 in nvidia-graphics-drivers "nvidia kernel module fails to build on 3.4.x kernel [fatal error: asm/system.h: No such file or directory]" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/993506
[14:22] <trinikrono> i believe this is the master bug
[14:22] <trinikrono> your bug has that same error in the make.log
[14:23] <trinikrono> also it has a lot of dupes
[14:23] <trinikrono> so you can go ahead and mark yours as a duplicate
[14:23] <Noxygen> okay thanks for your help, (how did you find this one ?)
[14:28] <trinikrono> easy i just clicked on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates
[14:28] <trinikrono> by the bug title
[14:28] <trinikrono> you can see all the bug reports for that package there
[14:29] <Noxygen> haaaaaaaa I Seeeeeeee now xP Thanks (I can be pretty stupid sometimes)
[14:32] <trinikrono> well nice find, make sure to keep looking for dupes like that
[14:34] <trinikrono> be sure to tell them to look at the master bug to see the workaround Noxygen
[14:35] <Noxygen> okay trinikrono
[15:02] <Noxygen> I'm leaving bye everyone (thanks trinikrono), Have a nice evening for those in Europe
[15:37] <rooijan> anyone have a quick suggestion.  I filed bug 999923.  Basically a regression in my mind in U12.04 when using gvfs to connect to Microsoft DFS. I am not sure which package really cause this bug.
[15:37] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 999923 in ubuntu "gvfs cannot access Microsoft DFS Folder Target" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/999923
[15:46] <njin> Can I send this upstream ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1000277 . no dups available with apport title
[15:46] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000277 in gimp "gimp-2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in completion_match_func()" [Undecided,New]
[15:55] <greg-g> well done highvoltage :)
[16:17] <alo21> hi all
[16:17] <alo21> I received an error when I digit:  bzr bd -- -S -us -uc
[16:18] <alo21> can someone help me please?
[16:19] <njin> alo21 why are there --
[16:20] <alo21> njin: you can find here the mistake; http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/990910/
[16:22] <alo21> njin: do you know what should it be?
[16:22] <njin> debuild: fatal error at line 1350:
[16:23] <alo21> njin: so... what is the solution?
[16:23] <njin> look at line 1350
[16:24] <alo21> njin: it tells me only that dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S failed... so I have to suppost that I need buildpackage -rfakeroot
[16:24] <alo21> njin: right?
[16:28] <njin> http://www.mail-archive.com/trplayer@braille.uwo.ca/msg00283.html
[16:29] <njin> alo21:^^
[16:29] <alo21> njin: Can I make one more question?
[16:29] <njin> sure
[16:31] <alo21> njin: why we chat in english?
[16:32] <njin> alo21: for this kind of things you can find a valid help from warp10
[16:36] <alo21> njin: where are "make" configuration file is located in Ubuntu?
[16:43] <zirpu> anyone gotten activemq to startup on 12.04?
[16:44] <zirpu> i get no errors or logs.
[16:44] <ali1234> which packages are responsible for installing the various gnome-panel applets?
[16:48] <ali1234> http://imagebin.org/212600
[16:49] <ali1234> for example, 2 is indicator-applet, or possibly indicator-applet-complete
[16:49] <ali1234> which packages are responsible for 1, 3, and 4?
[16:53] <zirpu> found it. activemq package doesn/t install a symlink for the activemq-run.jar in /usr/share/java/
[16:57] <highvoltage> greg-g: :)
[17:01] <alo21> njin: luckly I resolved installing "debjelper"
[17:01] <alo21> njin: thnaks for your support
[17:02] <Resistance> you mean debhelper :P
[17:23] <wylde> jajaja? :P
[17:23] <Resistance> o.O
[17:24] <wylde> spanish ---> j = h
[17:46] <alo21> why pbuilder does not make me a folder called .pbuilderrc ?
[17:46] <alo21> hi all
[18:01] <wylde> alo21: ~/.pbuilderrc is a hidden file if it isn't created yet you make it and insert the lines you want/need
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_
[22:27] <mikedep333-serve> hi, I just reported this bug by running "ubuntu-bug gnome-disk-utility"
[22:27] <mikedep333-serve> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1000472
[22:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000472 in gnome-disk-utility "gnome-disk-utility won't let you select certain partitions" [Undecided,New]
[22:27] <mikedep333-serve> but it did not upload very much automatically
[22:27] <mikedep333-serve> it also made me wait like 5 minutes on the launchpad page after running the command
[22:27] <mikedep333-serve> *very much system info
[22:28] <mikedep333-serve> my system is a weird combination of ubuntu-desktop * ubuntu server packages, dist upgraded like 5 times (from like 9.10)
[22:28] <mikedep333-serve> I know I at least want to tell them what version of their package I am using.
[22:29] <Resistance> Package: gnome-disk-utility 3.0.2-2ubuntu7
[22:30] <Resistance> look at your bug's description under "Package"
[22:30] <mikedep333-serve> yes
[22:30] <Resistance> \it tells them that package
[22:30] <Resistance> and the version
[22:30] <Resistance> *and* the OS you're on
[22:30] <Resistance> you're always free to add information to the comments, if you think its needed
[22:31] <mikedep333-serve> oh, my bad
[22:31] <mikedep333-serve> yeah, I just figured they'd need more info of some kind
[22:31] <Resistance> they'll ask you for more info if necessary
[22:31] <mikedep333-serve> and that I could automatically prepare it with some commands
[22:31] <mikedep333-serve> great, thanks
[22:33] <Resistance> mikedep333-serve:  can you see if anyone else is having your issue?  I can't because my drive has no free space
[22:33] <Resistance> (if its happening to multiple people it can be confirmed)
[22:39] <mikedep333-serve> I looked at the description of every bug for gnome-disk-utility
[22:39] <mikedep333-serve> I didn't see anything that sounds like mine.
[22:40] <mikedep333-serve> sorry, I looked at every "summary"
[22:40] <Resistance> mmkay
[22:41] <mikedep333-serve> thx anyway
[22:42] <Resistance> yep