[01:52] <cnd> RAOF, bryceh: so I guess we just chalk up bug 973297 to some magical ABI illness and SRU a rebuild?
[01:53] <RAOF> It'd be nice to know precisely how that ABI changed, but a rebuild SRU sounds reasonable.
[07:41] <RAOF> Bah.
[07:42] <RAOF> Turns out that things get more complicated when you can have more than one pointer.
[08:20] <mlankhorst> heya
[08:22] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: what do you mean by a metapackage pulling everything in? isn't that what they're designed for :)
[08:24] <mlankhorst> I suppose, but was more curious about the -dev packages
[08:25] <tjaalton> ok so you have libfoo-dev, which needs to be replaced by libfoo-dev-lts-q, without a metapackage pulling it in?
[08:25] <mlankhorst> yeah
[08:26] <mlankhorst> and right now it seems to just hold back the dummy-enablement instead
[08:26] <tjaalton> well for build-depends they are renamed so only -lts-q will get installed
[08:27] <mlankhorst> I mean
[08:27] <mlankhorst> The following packages have been kept back:
[08:27] <mlankhorst>   dummy-enablement
[08:27] <tjaalton> is there some git repo where you could push the packaging to?
[08:28] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: I'm using my dummy ppa atm
[08:28] <tjaalton> right, but it's hard to check things from there
[08:28] <mlankhorst> although I should probably add a versioned depends to dummy-enablement
[08:28] <tjaalton> though I don't actually have time for this anyway :)
[08:28] <tjaalton> holiday time soon
[08:28] <tjaalton> back next week
[08:29] <mlankhorst> sure
[08:29] <mlankhorst> it's just annoying there doesn't seem to be a straight way to force the package manager to upgrade, it doesn't want to replace dummy-dev by dummy-dev-lts-q
[08:30] <tjaalton> what dependencies does dummy-dev-lts-q have?
[08:31] <mlankhorst> dummy-lts-q
[08:31] <tjaalton> right
[08:31] <mlankhorst> and breaks/replaces on dummy-dev
[08:31] <tjaalton> sounds correct
[08:34] <mlankhorst> actually might need a 'conflicts' instead of breaks
[08:51] <tjaalton> no conflicts shouldn't be needed
[08:51] <tjaalton> not sure, check debian policy
[08:51] <tjaalton> read it in any case :)
[09:42] <mlankhorst> Yes exactly. I know you work for Intel, but surely its not forbidden by
[09:42] <mlankhorst> contract to look outside of arch/x86/ ? I know!, look at arch/ia64/
[09:42] <mlankhorst> that's still Intel.
[18:14] <johanbr> Are multitouch gestures supposed to work on clickpads in precise?
[18:15] <hyperair> i'm not sure if they are, but they don't.
[18:17] <johanbr> :) at least then I know it's not a local problem
[18:17] <johanbr> thank you!