[01:52] RAOF, bryceh: so I guess we just chalk up bug 973297 to some magical ABI illness and SRU a rebuild? [01:52] Launchpad bug 973297 in xorg-server (Ubuntu Precise) "Xorg recognizes Logitech Headset USB dongle as input device then segfaults in XIChangeDeviceProperty" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/973297 [01:53] It'd be nice to know precisely how that ABI changed, but a rebuild SRU sounds reasonable. === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth [07:41] Bah. [07:42] Turns out that things get more complicated when you can have more than one pointer. [08:20] heya [08:22] mlankhorst: what do you mean by a metapackage pulling everything in? isn't that what they're designed for :) [08:24] I suppose, but was more curious about the -dev packages [08:25] ok so you have libfoo-dev, which needs to be replaced by libfoo-dev-lts-q, without a metapackage pulling it in? [08:25] yeah [08:26] and right now it seems to just hold back the dummy-enablement instead [08:26] well for build-depends they are renamed so only -lts-q will get installed [08:27] I mean [08:27] The following packages have been kept back: [08:27] dummy-enablement [08:27] is there some git repo where you could push the packaging to? [08:28] tjaalton: I'm using my dummy ppa atm [08:28] right, but it's hard to check things from there [08:28] although I should probably add a versioned depends to dummy-enablement [08:28] though I don't actually have time for this anyway :) [08:28] holiday time soon [08:28] back next week [08:29] sure [08:29] it's just annoying there doesn't seem to be a straight way to force the package manager to upgrade, it doesn't want to replace dummy-dev by dummy-dev-lts-q [08:30] what dependencies does dummy-dev-lts-q have? [08:31] dummy-lts-q [08:31] right [08:31] and breaks/replaces on dummy-dev [08:31] sounds correct [08:34] actually might need a 'conflicts' instead of breaks [08:51] no conflicts shouldn't be needed [08:51] not sure, check debian policy [08:51] read it in any case :) [09:42] Yes exactly. I know you work for Intel, but surely its not forbidden by [09:42] contract to look outside of arch/x86/ ? I know!, look at arch/ia64/ [09:42] that's still Intel. [18:14] Are multitouch gestures supposed to work on clickpads in precise? [18:15] i'm not sure if they are, but they don't. [18:17] :) at least then I know it's not a local problem [18:17] thank you!