[11:38]  * cjwatson fixes the broken lock file handling for quantal_probs et al
[14:50] <slangasek> cjwatson, SpamapS: could I trouble one of you for an expedited SRU review of ia32-libs?
[14:51] <slangasek> (installing the fluendo package from partner is currently broken if you have ia32-libs installed)
[15:03] <cjwatson> slangasek: yep, where is it?
[15:08] <slangasek> cjwatson: precise-proposed unapproved
[15:15] <cjwatson> slangasek: accepted; do you want to go ahead and copy that to quantal once it's built?
[15:15] <slangasek> will do, thanks
[15:16] <slangasek> which reminds me that there are a couple that RAOF processed this morning that are in the same boat (e.g., software-center) - copying
[15:16] <slangasek> cjwatson: do we have any report for "packages in -proposed newer than packages in devel"?
[15:17] <slangasek> er, correction, I processed software-center last night ;p
[15:17] <slangasek> I think I meant update-notifier
[15:23] <cjwatson> slangasek: No report, but you can work it out easily with suite-diff.py
[15:24] <cjwatson> for x in main restricted universe multiverse; do suite-diff.py ubuntu/dists/{precise-proposed,quantal}/$x/source/Sources.gz gt; done
[15:24] <cjwatson> Quite a few there that could do with copying up
[15:25] <cjwatson> Well, some of those are unverified updates, in general I actually only copy from -updates except on request
[15:25] <cjwatson> for x in main restricted universe multiverse; do suite-diff.py ubuntu/dists/{precise-updates,quantal}/$x/source/Sources.gz gt; done  ->  6
[15:27] <slangasek> looks like it, doesn't it
[15:28] <slangasek> update-manager contains Arch: any packages... ought we require a re-upload?
[15:33] <cjwatson> slangasek: perhaps a good idea, yes
[15:34] <cjwatson> though it's bound to be rebuilt at some point :)
[15:37] <slangasek> + [cjwatson] Port ubiquity: DONE
[15:37] <slangasek> !
[15:38] <cjwatson> s'in the archive and everything
[15:39] <slangasek> wow
[15:39] <cjwatson> whether it works for *other people* ;-)
[15:39]  * slangasek grins
[15:48]  * cjwatson sends an RT ticket: "Please remove archive admin access to lp_queue@cocoplum"
[15:49] <cjwatson> Speak now or forever etc.
[15:50] <slangasek> :)
[15:55] <micahg> ls
[15:55] <micahg> oops :)
[15:58]  * skaet_ watching to see what surprises pop up from that RT ticket
[16:02] <slangasek> it's the low-hanging fruit
[16:02] <slangasek> the only reason I ever access ~lp_queue is to steal back my rejected uploads and reupload them ;)
[16:07] <cjwatson> yeah, I'm fairly sure lp_queue is easy, just asking for the sake of paranoia
[16:08] <cjwatson> in several months nobody came up with anything substantial except for syncs and backports, and those are migrated
[16:08] <cjwatson> I cleaned up most of the old junk in its home directory today
[16:09] <micahg> cjwatson: what about overrides
[16:09] <cjwatson> lp_queue is not involved in those
[16:10] <cjwatson> almost all the ordinary administrative operations (that aren't API/UI) are lp_archive
[16:10] <cjwatson> lp_queue is just the user that runs the upload processor
[16:13] <infinity> slangasek: I use lp_queue to catch and reject uploads I'm to embarassed to let through. ;)
[16:13] <infinity> Somehow, I don't think anyone will see that as a valid use-case. :P
[16:13] <infinity> s/to/too/
[16:15] <cjwatson> afraid not really :)
[16:16] <infinity> ;)
[23:02] <stgraber> any sru team member around? I'd love to see lxc 0.7.4-0ubuntu7.3 currently in natty-proposed be moved to natty-updates. It's currently preventing a natty container from starting console/tty jobs, basically preventing the user from using it at all.
[23:03] <stgraber> the fix was confirmed around a month ago but nobody changed the verification state on the bug. I confirmed the fix here too and changed the tag this afternoon.
[23:06] <slangasek> peeking
[23:07] <slangasek> doing
[23:09]  * infinity is too late.
[23:10] <slangasek> you can have the next one :)
[23:11] <infinity> I'll do some binary new to make up for it.
[23:13] <infinity> And then go drown myself in chicken soup.
[23:13] <RAOF> Bah.  I thought I checked for all the SRUs I approved yesterday that their version was less than that in quantal.  I should add an automated check to queuediff.
[23:17] <slangasek> RAOF: no harm done, it was on my radar anyway :)