[00:01] sidnei: we are still early in the process, it will be merged /synced soon [00:03] roaksoax, ok, thanks! [00:05] I've got to be missing something in this setup. Is the maas server expecting some node to connect to it with the MAC address i created in the webUI? or is it going to create a new node with that mac and fire it up? if so - where do i see what the individual nodes are doing? I see it talks about virsh and WOL (almost as if it expects me to setup a new KVM node using PXE) [00:07] hey my maas installation got messed up [00:08] pdtpatrick: MAAS fires it up. We have no way to show what a node is doing yet. [00:08] I was wondering is there a way to do complete reinstall of maas [00:08] it gave me an fatal error last night [00:09] jtv: so having gone through the MAAS setup and bringing up the UI, setting up the MAC addy in there pretty much sets up a node for first boot using the images it downloaded. That said, do u know why my setup is stuck on Commissioning ? [00:10] pdtpatrick: do you see any errors on the node's page in the UI, or on its own console? [00:10] anyone [00:10] harushimo: what kind of error? [00:11] fatal error: password authenciation [00:11] I just want to complete wipe the install and do a reinstall [00:11] I don't know if that is possible [00:12] that should fix it [00:12] You might be able to dump the database, uninstall-reinstall, and then restore the database. But haven't tried that. [00:13] how do I do that? [00:14] harushimo: before you even start trying, please understand that I have no idea whether it'll work! [00:14] it may not [00:14] unless I try [00:14] If you overlap with European timezones, another thing worth trying may be to ask allenap (who should not be online now) [00:14] I think he did the authentication. [00:15] oh okay [00:15] thanks [00:15] There may be some way to re-generate the credentials. [00:15] that is what I'm trying to figure out [00:16] If you're interested (perhaps just for exploration), the MAAS database is in postgres. I think on an installed system (as opposed to our dev setups) you can log in using “psql maas” or dump it using “pg_dump maas” [00:16] log in where? [00:17] I can't even access the web interface now [00:17] through the terminal? [00:17] I can't even install apache on the computer [00:17] maas total screwed up a lot of stuff [00:17] which is okay [00:18] I'm learning [00:19] its okay. that is how I learn [00:19] I just want to get maas working [00:24] (sorry, was afk for a brief spell) [00:24] What I mean is you should be able to log in directly to the database by typing “psql maas” on the command line. I'm not sure you'd be authorized though; haven't worked with an installed setup yet. [00:25] its on my computer [00:25] I'm authorized [00:25] Then try it! [00:25] If it works, it'll give you an SQL shell on the MAAS database. [00:25] sudo apt-get psql maas [00:25] sudo psql mass? [00:26] i get an error fatal: role "harushimo" does not exist [00:27] Just “psql maas” — do you have psql installed? [00:27] (Stupid me. Of course you do or you wouldn't have gotten that error) [00:28] that is cool [00:28] I can't apt-get install anything [00:28] Then “psql maas -U maas” may work. [00:28] ok [00:29] peer authentication failed for user "maas: [00:29] I mean maas [00:29] this is always happens [00:29] So you're not authorized. :( [00:30] how do I authorize myself [00:30] I even did this on sudo [00:30] Basically, the database is set up to authenticate the maas user by checking what _system_ user is making the connection. [00:30] ok [00:30] Try sudo'ing to the user “postgres” [00:30] (It's the PostgreSQL equivalent of root) [00:31] sudo postgres -U [00:31] or sudo postgres [00:32] I may have to do a reinstall of the system [00:32] luckily I don't have anything on it [00:32] jtv: I'm not seeing any errors [00:32] I want to know if there is a way to fix maas [00:33] pdtpatrick: depending on the version you have, there may be a “Retry commissioning” button on the node's page. [00:33] jtv: so here's the node page: http://cl.ly/19452c2d3M1B3S0Z1J2j and here's the page when i click on edit: http://cl.ly/3S2R1Y43132M1D11291O [00:33] harushimo: it's a very young project still, so a lot of this will have to mature over time. [00:33] * jtv follows links [00:33] thats okay [00:34] I just want to get a basic cloud setup [00:34] jtv: here's the version of maas i have [00:34] ii maas 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ub Ubuntu MAAS Server [00:34] * jtv juggles conversations [00:34] thanks guys. I'll be back on later [00:34] Good luck! [00:34] thank you [00:35] pdtpatrick: I think that's pretty old… I haven't kept track of the packaging side of MAAS; any chance there's an upgrade available? [00:35] did a full system upgrade and no luck [00:36] In the original version, I think a node in this state is just stuck. [00:36] unless there's a ppa I'm unaware of [00:36] I can't think of one; maybe there's a backport. Daviey: do we have newer versions of MAAS available somewhere? [00:36] should i use this? : https://launchpad.net/~maas-maintainers/+archive/dailybuilds === Arc_ is now known as a5m0 [00:37] pdtpatrick: that looks like the same version you have, actually. [00:38] pdtpatrick: do you have just the one node? [00:38] Version: 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1 vs 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0+557+50~precise1 [00:38] i have 7 nodes [00:38] http://cl.ly/0j0K2Q2S023E47081i1E [00:39] And all stuck in Commissioning? :( [00:39] What should have happened is this: [00:39] MAAS fires up the node. It boots and runs a small script. [00:40] The MAAS server provides some setup data to it over http. [00:40] Finally, the script contacts that same http service to signal that it's done commissioning and is now ready to use. [00:40] Pardon me: the script contacts that same http service to signal that it's done commissioning and *the node* is now ready to use. [00:41] (The Ready state means that a node is ready for a user to allocate it) [00:41] :( [00:41] What this may mean is that the node was unable to reach the MAAS service. [00:42] aahh the daily build was different than mine [00:42] Then I guess the daily build comes off trunk (lp:maas) rather than the 1.0 branch we released with the 12.04 CD. [00:42] http://cl.ly/033t1A1v3D013z163u2R [00:43] That's a much newer version. There are some schema changes; I hope the installation script will know how to apply them. [00:43] i can see that now [00:43] Yup, that's from trunk. [00:44] In that version, you should have a “Retry commissioning” option on the node page. [00:44] don't see that [00:44] Do you get the “Delete node” option? [00:44] http://cl.ly/3k0U40461L1h1Z1z083H [00:44] yup [00:45] Ah, I'm being dense again. The retry option only appears when commissioning has actually _failed_, and we don't time it out yet if it never finishes. [00:45] should i check in /var/log/maas to see if anything is happening ? [00:46] Always good to have a look. [00:46] I'm looking at maas.log and pserv.log and txlongpoll.log [00:46] In particular, see if you can find an http log that shows requests to MAAS. Look for the /metadata/ path. [00:46] tail -f shows nothing happening [00:46] That's not surprising. [00:47] The txlongpoll.log is of no interest; it's basically for ajax interaction in the UI. [00:47] The pserv.log is for the provisioning server. That's the component that (using another product called Cobbler) fires up the node. [00:47] http://cl.ly/2u331N1J2p2q3f2h3v0r [00:47] MAAS did succeed in turning the nodes on, right? [00:47] there's my apache2 log [00:48] (Maybe we should add a favicon.ico just to shut up those errors) [00:48] Here's what i did - i installed the maas server according to the guide, i logged into the UI, added nodes and its being stuck on commissioning since [00:49] Did MAAS manage to power up the nodes? [00:50] when u say power? are u expecting a VM to be running somewhere? like in KVM or xbox ? [00:50] vbox* [00:51] i c this in settings [00:51] http://cl.ly/0U0M1B0j3b0G2w2P2X44 [00:51] No, but MAAS needs to turn those machines on in order to control what image they boot into. [00:52] Now, if you turned those machines on by hand before adding them to MAAS and then left them on, then just rebooting them by hand may do the trick. [00:52] in that case, how can i check a machine is turned on is what confuses me. Unless maas gives you a vnc console like KVM and I'm supposed to connect to some node. I also only know the MACs of the servers [00:53] pdtpatrick: wait, are these virtual or physical machines? [00:53] hmmmm i think the docs didn't explain something. It sounds like ur asking whether i have a physical server setup to listen to maas to be provisioned [00:54] No, just whether these are physical machines we're talking about, or whether these nodes are virtual machines. [00:54] jtv: i've not setup any physical or virtual sever which is why i was asking whether maas creates these VMs or is it expecting a machine to be running virtual box or a physical machine with those specific macs that it can go ahead and provision [00:54] Ah! Yes, in order to manage servers, you need servers. [00:54] Okay so there's no machine -- i've not setup anything besides entering the MACs on the UI [00:55] Well that explains why MAAS isn't hearing from those servers. :) [00:55] haha wow -- i think the docs should have explained that :) [00:55] MAAS is meant to manage physical servers, with as one application, the ability to deploy cloud infrastructure on those machines. [00:55] I sort of assumed that that would be documented somewhere as well! [00:56] i was thinking it is like AWS where it'll fire up an instance and then give u access to it [00:56] well - that solves that confusion [00:56] Yeah. :) [00:56] It's _similar_ to AWS, but it manages proper metal. [00:56] (Hence the name: it manages metal, as a service) [00:57] good point :) [00:57] hmmm back to the drawing board. Now I'm not sure what the advantage is using this plus openstack vs using servers managed by puppet + mcollective [00:57] If you've got a minute, I'll file a bug for this and perhaps you can add a quick story of how you got to setting up a MAAS installation without getting presented with the basics along the way? [00:58] jtv: will try and do that [00:58] OK, just a mo' [00:59] thanks again [01:00] There goes my alarm clock. Scared the life out of me. [01:01] pdtpatrick: if you would just add the details here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1000509 [01:01] Launchpad bug 1000509 in maas "Basics not explained?" [High,Triaged] [01:01] (You have a Launchpad account?) [01:01] yup [01:02] Great. Thanks for your patience! [01:06] jtv: added [01:06] Thanks for you help [01:06] Thanks. About the advantage over servers managed by puppet etc., I'm not a sysop and have very little experience with those, but I think the key thing is that you don't just set up servers, manage them, and deploy services on them; you get a pool of servers that you can deploy to specific tasks from the central command line. [01:07] Or, from the UI, you can allocate servers (or have your users allocate servers), use them, and later release them to the pool again. [01:07] that could be interesting [01:08] does maas have to control the DHCP server ? [01:08] I'm guessing it would since it needs to set up the params for PXE booting ? [01:09] most places already have DHCP server so I'm just wondering how is it going to listen on the network to grab those MACs entered in the UI [01:10] I guess for now I'm best to just follow the project until it is more mature [01:10] That's pretty much in a nutshell. I'm pretty sure we've got a work item in the backlog to make it work with an external DHCP server. [01:10] Yup - is there some mailing or newsletter i could follow ? [01:10] There's a mailing list — hang on, I'll dig it up. [01:11] maas-devel@lists.launchpad.net is the public development mailing list. [01:12] It's still pretty quiet; we do most of the work on IRC. [01:14] in here or a different room ? [01:15] A bunch of rooms, to be honest, some private. [01:15] i c [01:15] well i'll just try to keep with what I can get my hands on. [01:15] Thanks again [01:15] Now, this stuff is out in the open and we want it to be transparent, so feel free to prod us. [01:16] You got it [01:16] * jtv is dismayed by the volume of his inbox [01:17] pdtpatrick: thanks for playing with it and giving us your feedback. That's important for getting it more mature. I'll move on to that inbox now! [01:17] You're welcome. Take care [01:24] how would I configure bind9 for a local network? I would like to address my computers by name, so I attempted to to add the following record http://pastebin.com/dAZegGsY [01:24] but I get a server fail when I attempt to dig the address [01:25] /etc/bind/named.conf.local looks like this http://pastebin.com/j40z0Ht3 [01:27] ok, just restarted bind and it seems to work...? === Resistance is now known as LordOfTime [02:22] hallyn: http://paste.ubuntu.com/991691/ [02:22] hallyn: that seems easier to SRU than lxc-ip ;) [02:22] it's abusing the netns function of ip a tiny bit, but well, it works ;) [02:34] stgraber: is that a new thing? I'm still on 2.6.32 here, and I haven't noticed "ip netns" [02:35] You should double-quote "$1" and probably error out if lxc-info exits unsuccessfully. [02:36] twb: patch was submitted to iproute a year ago, so maybe 11.10 already had it, otherwise it's new in 12.04 [02:37] twb: yeah, the script was meant as a proof of concept for hallyn more than something I'd really use ;) checking that the container indeed exists and is running, as well as ensuring you're root would be useful at least [02:38] stgraber: oh right, I remember eric mentioning that ip supported that. [02:38] stgraber: cool. I'll leave it in your capable hands :) [02:38] hallyn: yeah, I've noticed it a few months ago on 12.04 but didn't try to use it with lxc, turned out it's really quite simple ;) [02:38] Okey dokey [02:39] do yo uwant to switch it out for q too? [02:40] hallyn: not sure for Q, for P it seems like we can get away with just a 2-3 lines delta which should be much easier to SRU [02:40] (btw if you want me to follow up on it that's fine, just tell me :) [02:41] it's probably more robust to re-use ip... not that i can see much going wrong with using sys_setns from python [02:42] i just bought one of these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816401170 and 12.04 can't see it... any advice? [02:45] hallyn: right, looking at lxc-ip's code, I think it'd be better for now to switch to using "ip netns" on both precise and quantal. I think we should also add a function to the API to retrieve all IPs from the container's network namespace so we can get that into lxc-info and the python module [02:45] specifically, it can't see the nic. [02:46] hallyn: or if you don't want that kind of code in the C library, it should be easy enough to do with ns_attach/execute_in_container from the python code (or in the C code of the python module) [02:48] stgraber: yeah i'm not sure it needs to be in the c library. it's not dependent on anything in liblxc. But either way [02:50] OTOH [02:50] stgraber: I need to run soon, but I don't like the ln -s into /run/netns/$1 [02:50] racy [02:51] manpage says that's for named netns. But the name == the pid, so it seems like it should work just using the pid without that file? [02:52] hallyn: apparently ip doesn't support "netns exec PID", only "netns exec NAME" [02:52] though I can symlink to anything I want, including the pid [02:53] stgraber: better to tmpfile that then [02:54] how come my server has a static IP set but every once in a while it looses its IP and pulls a dhcp IP [02:54] hallyn: indeed, a random name is probably be best to avoid the (unlikely) race [02:54] stgraber: yeah i guess that addresses my concern [02:55] cool, thanks :) [02:55] good night [02:56] hallyn: I'll have a look at SRUing this tomorrow (well, putting it somewhere in the SRU queue) [02:56] stgraber: wait there's another one waiting for SRU I think [02:56] hallyn: and will also fix Jibel's bug in the process (package conflict) [02:57] yeah, we have one in proposed currently, so I'll have this one ready to be pushed to -proposed once the other one has cleared [02:57] ok cool - thanks [02:57] good night [02:57] good night [03:02] what does this mean? ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [03:29] oh nm, haha. this damn thing is IPMI.. [03:29] urgh [03:46] how do I configure a secondary "storage' network? I set eth1 to address 10.10.10.1/2 and netmask 255.255.255.0 w/o gateway and am able to ping 1/2 from that machine but cannont ping 2/1 [03:47] Uh, what? [03:47] Oh I see, that's not a CIDR. [03:47] three18ti_: do not use 1.2.3.4/5 notation, because the /x aready means something else. [03:48] oh, yea. sorry. [03:48] I mean I have two machines 10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 (n/s 255.255.255.0) connected directly on eth1 [03:49] I can ping 1 from 1 and 2 from 2 put I can't ping 2 from 1 and vice versa [03:53] They can't BOTH be directly connected. [03:54] Do you have a switch, or a hub, or what [03:54] so, eht0 is connected to a switch -> router -> internet [03:54] eth0 of which host [03:55] I would like eth1 to be a private "storage" network, but don't have a second switch yet, so I have my two machines directly connected with a patch cable. [03:55] both. both hosts are connected on eth0 to the internet. [03:55] eth1 should be isolated from the internet. [03:56] I still don't follow. Please sketch an ascii-art diagram and pastebin it [03:56] ok. [03:57] http://paste.debian.net/169201/ is an example of what I mean (yours need not be so elaborate) [04:00] http://pastebin.com/7a5TK0H7 [04:01] not exactly like your example. Let me know if I'm still unclear. [04:03] I need to switch monitors around, so if I disconnect I'll be right back, [04:07] OK so IIUC you have a normal switched 192.168/16 private network, and you want to additionally hook up a point-to-point connection over separate cables going into separate ethernet ports in the back of Machine1 and Machine2? [04:13] ok, that was fun... [04:14] twb, did that diagram make sense? [04:17] OK so IIUC you have a normal switched 192.168/16 private network, and you want to additionally hook up a point-to-point connection over separate cables going into separate ethernet ports in the back of Machine1 and Machine2? [04:18] yes. [04:19] in the future, I would like this to be a dedicated network, but for the time being it's just a point to point connection. [04:20] OK so just run a cable between them, and do ip link set eth1 up; ip address add dev eth1 brd + 10.10.10.1 peer 10.10.10.2 [04:20] Er, sorry, of course "brd +" is not needed on a point-to-point link [04:21] on both machines? [04:22] linkseteth1 ip; ip address add dev eth1 10.10.10.1 peer 10.10.10.2 [04:22] On the second machine the IPs would be reversed [04:22] linkseteth1 ip; ip address add dev eth1 10.10.10.2 peer 10.10.10.1 [04:22] I don't nkow what "linkseteth1 ip" is; I said "ip link set eth1 up" [04:23] ip link set eth1 ip; ip address add dev eth1 10.10.10.2 peer 10.10.10.1 [04:24] yea, apparently I can't type... [04:24] *up* not *ip* [04:24] ok, wow. thanks! :) [04:24] And you might need to double-check the "peer" part; I usually just use /30's or so. [04:25] The ip a add should set up the route automatically; otherwise you'll also need to use ip r === Gallomimia_ is now known as Gallomimia [04:35] Ok, I'm setting up an Ubuntu web server. What is the best free (GPL'd) web control pannel software? [04:35] i just installed webmin today. it's relatively painless to install. Not pretty, but it is functional. [04:36] three18ti: Ubuntu doesn't support Webmin [04:36] tell that to... me... [04:36] I just did ... :) [04:37] http://www.webmin.com/deb.html [04:37] Well, you should tell my computers that it doesn't work... [04:37] literally added the repos, updated the key, and apt-get installed it... [04:39] http://i.imgur.com/FGbYO.png [04:39] mr-rich, ^ [04:43] I have maintained webmin modules, and in my professional opinion "it is functional" is an outrageous lie. [04:43] It is, as best, marginally less bumbling than a FNG sysadmin [04:44] well, as you can see, I've installed it three hours ago. So I cannot attest to the functionality of the product. [04:45] */I've/I/ [04:45] what do you like twb? [04:46] Learning to use the bloody system. [04:46] twb, what is bloody system? [04:46] linocisco: the ubuntu server that you're tasked with babysitting [04:47] twb, ok [04:56] twb, what about for reselling web services? Unfortunately, you can't expect your customers to know what they're doing and expect to make money. [04:57] That industry can die in a fire. [04:59] twb, +1... but it pays my rent... [04:59] I work for a data centre that started as a web hosting company... we do some bass ackwards $4!t... [05:01] FWIW in that situation, we wrote a little in-house python WHCP that was hard-coded to do what we needed and nothing more. [05:02] Which I'm not happy about, but I'm a lot less unhappy about it than I was about webmin [05:03] ... I hate RHE/CentOS... (don't mind Fedora) but cPanel is not... horrible. I support mostly WebSitePanel and Helm though... :( [05:04] cpanel is horrible [05:04] It even ships its own broken apache instead of using the distro's one. [05:06] haha, you're just a hater. :P seriously though, what's so horrible about cPanel? it's certainly better than Webmin. [05:09] three18ti_: 15:04 It even ships its own broken apache instead of using the distro's one. [05:09] And there was this "easy_apache" thing that got in the way [05:11] it ships with an independent web server so if there is an issue with the apache config, you can still access the CP. what's so "broken" about it? I agree with you about easy_apache... it's a pain in the ass. but as long as you use easy_apache you won't break cPanel (don't even get me started on this). [05:12] so yea, I agree, there's lots of problems with it. but I challenge you to name a "good" control panel. [05:13] I'm just trying to understand your point of view. [05:18] My point is there is *no* good WHCP. And it's impossible to build one, because the very idea that a piece of software can take an incompetent user's requests and convert them into competent sysadmin actions, is absurd. [05:19] If the user wants to learn, give them the CLI. If the user doens't want to learn, let them pay for a competent human operator. [05:19] I can agree with that. Very astute. [05:20] If there are security reasons to prevent them getting a root shell, then a WHCP is... probably not the best way to enact that security policy. [05:25] it's like I always say, wordpress is a remote shell with a neat blog feature. [05:31] how can i check if nfs service is running ? [05:31] http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2010-November/005685.html [05:31] having a issue related to that [05:31] blendedbychris: nfs kernel server? [05:31] ya [05:32] It will be listed in /proc/mounts [05:32] Oh sorry, brain fart [05:32] rpcinfo -p localhost will mention it, at least [05:33] exportfs will mention specific exports I think [05:33] twb: The program 'exportfs' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: [05:33] apt-get install nfs-kernel-server [05:33] yes, if you run exportfs without -r it queries the current state of affairs [05:33] blendedbychris: if that package is not installed, you definitely don't have a an NFS server running [05:33] twb: well [05:33] http://pastie.textmate.org/private/wbz1tqczepsuc7gtdkoqzq [05:33] in cluster theres an option to enable nfs [05:34] it is disabled by default [05:34] u need to turn that on [05:34] pdtpatr1ck: i've enabled it [05:34] r u using version 3 of NFS or version 4 ? [05:34] I am discussing *actual* NFS; I don't know anything about gluster "pretending" to be an NFS server or whatever [05:34] yes [05:34] twb: does that look like a nfs server trying to be run though? the last line maybe? [05:35] twb: i understand that btw :) [05:35] http://paste.debian.net/169208/ is an active lucid NFSv3 kernel server [05:35] i just wasn't sure if nfs-server was hidden somewhere considering that post references a "kernel" nfs service [05:35] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Using_NFS_with_Gluster [05:35] quota and lock services are TECHNICALLY not required, but it would be unusual for them to be absent [05:36] NFSv4 of course has additional gssapi/krb stuff [05:36] pdtpatr1ck: have you spoken to the gluster people about it? [05:36] pdtpatr1ck: i have that set to off [05:36] Sorry, wrong nick [05:36] twb: ya i'm bugging them [05:36] but i figured i'd ask the rudimentary "is nfs running" question in here heh [05:37] wow ... webmin seems a bit ... overkill [05:37] so let me understand ur issue -- ur using glusterfs and trying to mount the gluster shares as NFS right ? [05:37] pdtpatr1ck: indeed [05:37] u don't need NFS-kernel-server [05:38] pdtpatr1ck: right... [05:38] you just need the glusterfs package and nfs.enable should be on [05:38] then u would run mount.nfs -o vers=3 and then the rest of ur setup [05:39] [2012-05-17 00:26:12.71863] C [nfs.c:240:nfs_start_subvol_lookup_cbk] 0-nfs: Failed to lookup root: Input/output error [05:39] [2012-05-17 00:29:03.552540] E [nfs3.c:724:nfs3_getattr] 0-nfs-nfsv3: Failed to map FH to vol [05:40] cluster volume info [05:40] damn auto correct [05:41] s/cluster/gluster [05:41] http://pastie.textmate.org/private/2dyi2vaeqmye7ptvazhrq [05:41] this has me somewhat concerned [2012-05-17 00:26:12.71806] I [afr-self-heal-common.c:705:afr_mark_sources] 0-srv-replicate-0: split-brain possible, no source detected [05:42] r u able to mount using the mount.gluster option ? [05:42] let me try again… i wasn't able to earlier [05:43] ah [05:43] pdtpatr1ck: yes but i get -bash: cd: /srv.gluster: Input/output error [05:43] [2012-05-17 00:43:10.513155] I [afr-self-heal-common.c:705:afr_mark_sources] 0-srv-replicate-0: split-brain possible, no source detected [05:43] is related [05:44] [2012-05-17 00:43:07.409932] W [fuse-bridge.c:419:fuse_attr_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: 2: LOOKUP() / => -1 (Input/output error) [05:44] does ur status say created? when u run volume info ? [05:44] says "Started" [05:44] fwiw these two bricks are empty [05:44] does lsmod show the driver? [05:45] driver? [05:45] try "modproble cluster" [05:45] whoops [05:45] "modprobe gluster" [05:45] FATAL: Module gluster not found. [05:45] u don't have gluster installed on the client then [05:46] i don't think that's true [05:46] does gluster --version show anything ? [05:46] yes [05:46] plus i'm using the cli? [05:46] is fuse loaded ? [05:46] "modprobe fuse" && dmesg | grep -i fuse [05:46] !ur [05:46] U is the 21st letter of the modern latin alphabet. Neither 'U' nor 'Ur' are words in the English language. Neither are 'R', 'Y', 'l8', 'ryt', 'Ne1' nor 'Bcuz'. Mangled English is hard for non-native English speakers. Please see http://geekosophical.net/random/abbreviations/ for more information. [05:47] modprobe fuse returns nothing [05:47] [ 1.283854] fuse init (API version 7.17) [05:48] wat? [05:48] welcome back? [05:48] switched to computer i have gluster running on [05:49] fuse is running [05:49] modprobe fuse [05:49] [ 1.283854] fuse init (API version 7.17) [05:49] okay [05:49] type "mount." and press tab [05:49] is gluster one of your options ? [05:49] i have glusterfs, nfs, fuse [05:49] yes [05:49] otherwise i wouldn't have been able to mount -t glusterfs :) [05:50] Grumble intermitting non-breaking spaces, grumble [05:50] i think this split brain crap is throwing off [05:50] pdtpatrick: care to take this in #gluster [05:50] sure -- those guys know a lot more than i do but let's talk there. [05:51] twb seems to want a dead chan :) [05:53] blendedbychris: I want people to stop writing IRC clients that automatically convert " " into " " [05:53] (Where is a non-breaking space, but I assume you can't actually SEE them because if you could, you would fix your IRC client.) [05:54]