| imbrandon | i for one think it would be awsome and probably the only project i've seen yet that it would make sense to do something like that | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| imbrandon | ok dinners calling, be back | 00:00 |
| === fjlacoste is now known as flacoste | ||
| car | this is more of a launchpad/bzr question .. but, is it possible to checkout / branch the florence milestone? | 00:51 |
| hazmat | car, florence is precise | 04:24 |
| car | thx | 04:24 |
| hazmat | car, we keep trunk pretty stable (the ppa is a nightly build from trunk with tests) | 04:24 |
| hazmat | car, there is one ugly bug in precise with local environments and restarts though | 04:25 |
| car | I see | 04:25 |
| hazmat | bug 958312 | 04:26 |
| _mup_ | Bug #958312: Change zk logging configuration <juju:Fix Released by hazmat> <juju (Ubuntu):Fix Released> <juju (Ubuntu Precise):Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/958312 > | 04:26 |
| hazmat | else its a pretty good | 04:26 |
| car | cool, thx | 04:26 |
| iSeeDeadPixels | are there any VM charms? | 12:12 |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === izdubar is now known as MarkDude | ||
| jcastro | hazmat: heya | 13:47 |
| jcastro | juan told me he handed over the code for the sponsorship queue over to you? | 13:47 |
| hazmat | jcastro, he did | 13:53 |
| jcastro | hazmat: when can we haz? I am wondering how much damage the UDS explosion left, heh | 13:59 |
| ninjix | join /#ubuntu-cloud | 14:12 |
| ninjix | awh... invite only | 14:13 |
| iSeeDeadPixels | ninjix, #ubuntu-server | 14:14 |
| jcastro | it just sends you to #ubuntu-server | 14:14 |
| iSeeDeadPixels | anyways, MaaS problems? | 14:14 |
| ninjix | I am testing with using a cloud-init seed iso. How do you instruct cloud-init not to look for any datasource on the post initial boot? | 14:15 |
| ninjix | basically I'm want use cloud-init to rapid provision persistent machines without having to rely on PXE/DHCP/DNS etc... | 14:18 |
| jcastro | hazmat: feel free to answer my question. :) | 14:21 |
| ninjix | anyone have a link to a maas + juju tutorial? | 14:24 |
| jcastro | https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuCloudInfrastructure#Installing_the_MAAS_server | 14:25 |
| jcastro | MarkDude: hey dude, is there an equivalent of ITP bugs in Fedora? Like if I wanted to follow along your progress in a bug report? | 14:25 |
| MarkDude | Well 1st I talk to admin folks. | 14:26 |
| MarkDude | Then I will share results with juju ML | 14:27 |
| MarkDude | Name suggestion for the board that will apporve new charms so far? | 14:27 |
| imbrandon | btw i failed misseribly at making the rpm yesterday, gonna give it another go this afternoon | 14:27 |
| MarkDude | Fedora Unified Charms Reop | 14:28 |
| MarkDude | repo | 14:28 |
| MarkDude | FUCR | 14:28 |
| MarkDude | :D | 14:28 |
| imbrandon | lol | 14:28 |
| ninjix | jcastro: thanks | 14:28 |
| MarkDude | We will see if that flies. I mean we created Fedora Unity, just so we could use FU at conferences | 14:29 |
| * MarkDude needs to go swear a bit. I have a computer that does everything, but , actually see the hard drive AFTER bios | 14:38 | |
| hazmat | jcastro, its not quite a drop in, needs some refactoring along the way. if you want a deadline, let's say monday. | 15:02 |
| hazmat | hopefully sooner, but that's what i'm comfortable committing to atm | 15:03 |
| jcastro | monday sounds awesome to me | 15:03 |
| jcastro | SpamapS: Wanna hang out for a bit later? | 16:34 |
| jcastro | I have some follow up charm workflow questions for ya | 16:34 |
| imbrandon | Probably the most Epic Fooball games to ever take place http://www.flickr.com/photos/imbrandon/7222206314/in/set-72157629786858262/ | 16:37 |
| imbrandon | Foosball | 16:39 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: sure let me just get through the morning email crunch :-P | 16:46 |
| jcastro | \o/ | 16:52 |
| imbrandon | FINALY i'm ready to push the drupal charm | 16:57 |
| imbrandon | woot woot, time to merge and do some chovin | 16:57 |
| jcastro | who's up for some bikeshedding? | 17:02 |
| jcastro | we'll need a group name for the charm reviewers | 17:02 |
| jcastro | I'm thinking ... ~charm-reviewers | 17:02 |
| jcastro | Or, can we just reuse ~charmers? | 17:02 |
| hazmat | beauticians.. snakeoil, farmers, so many possibilities | 17:03 |
| jcastro | it would be great if we could get away with not having another team | 17:03 |
| hazmat | jcastro, don't we already have a team for this? | 17:04 |
| * hazmat needs a mindmap of the teams | 17:04 | |
| hazmat | venn diagram even | 17:04 |
| jcastro | we have ~charmers, which is people who have access to lp:charms | 17:04 |
| jcastro | I was just wondering if we switch to this kind of review process if we need a new team, or if we can just use ~charmers, which is what we've been doing | 17:05 |
| jcastro | keeping ~charmers makes the most sense to me | 17:05 |
| jcastro | and if you're and ~charmers and don't want to do reviews then you can just leave the team | 17:05 |
| negronjl | jcastro: we can just use ~charmers | 17:15 |
| negronjl | jcastro: we would then have to subscribe the charmers to the bugs | 17:15 |
| jcastro | right | 17:17 |
| jcastro | ~charmers it is then! | 17:17 |
| jcastro | DRAFT: https://juju.ubuntu.com/CharmsProposedProcess | 17:20 |
| jcastro | SpamapS: that's basically "our process modified to be like ubuntu sponsorship" | 17:20 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: can charmers ever be unsubscribed from bugs in /charms ? | 17:27 |
| jcastro | good question | 17:27 |
| jcastro | let me try it | 17:27 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: looks like it can... so yeah, charmers should be fine | 17:28 |
| jcastro | yep | 17:29 |
| jcastro | I just tried subscribing, refreshing the bug list, and undoing that | 17:29 |
| jcastro | man, this will work awesome | 17:29 |
| SpamapS | bzr push lp:~your-launchpad-username/charms/precise/nagios/your-branch-name | 17:30 |
| jcastro | fyi, the now-out-of-context links in that page will be replaced with the big list. | 17:30 |
| SpamapS | s/nagios/fixed-charms-name/ | 17:30 |
| jcastro | fixed | 17:31 |
| SpamapS | To review Ubuntu merge proposals, check out these UDD instructions. | 17:31 |
| jcastro | yeah that will be replaced | 17:31 |
| SpamapS | ok it looks pretty good to me | 17:32 |
| jcastro | ok so barring hazmat getting hit by a truck we should be good to go on this on monday | 17:33 |
| jcastro | well, I mean, good for me to propose to the list for monday | 17:34 |
| jcastro | SpamapS: should I modify all the bugs now? Or wait | 17:34 |
| jcastro | with the subscribing, etc. | 17:34 |
| hazmat | jcastro, don't forget the plane crash | 17:36 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: wait | 17:36 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: lets get the word out that the sponsorship queue will change on day X, and do it all at once. | 17:37 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: ok, ready to G+ in 10 | 17:50 |
| SpamapS | jcastro: actually make that 5 | 17:50 |
| jcastro | sure! | 17:53 |
| jcastro | just fire it up whenever | 17:53 |
| negronjl | jcastro: SpamapS: I just looked at the proposal and it looks good to me | 17:53 |
| jcastro | negronjl: hey you mentioned you wanted to try it on aws | 17:57 |
| jcastro | do you have an instance up with what it looks like? | 17:57 |
| jcastro | I'm curious to see how doomed we are | 17:57 |
| negronjl | jcastro: I can get that done in just a minute....hold on | 17:57 |
| jcastro | hazmat: wanna join us on G+? We have some queue questions | 18:23 |
| hazmat | sure | 18:29 |
| imbrandon | uht oh :) | 18:29 |
| dpb_ | hi -- I have a MP that was approved, is there something else I should do? can I commit? https://code.launchpad.net/~davidpbritton/juju/dont-proxy-https/+merge/105353 | 18:52 |
| SpamapS | Hey can somebody review the format of this email? This is what I'm thinking of sending out to all committers to official charms next week: | 18:54 |
| SpamapS | http://paste.ubuntu.com/994670/ | 18:54 |
| SpamapS | dpb_: needs two +1's | 18:55 |
| SpamapS | dpb_: Its still considered "Needs review" | 18:55 |
| dpb_ | oh boy... thx SpamapS | 18:55 |
| SpamapS | dpb_: when the second +1 comes in, they will merge it for you since you're not in ~juju | 18:55 |
| SpamapS | dpb_: resources are a bit scarce on the review queue at the moment: https://code.launchpad.net/juju/+activereviews | 18:56 |
| dpb_ | SpamapS: great, I was wondering about that one. | 18:56 |
| dpb_ | SpamapS: ya, even for my very trivial change. :) | 18:56 |
| SpamapS | dpb_: indeed, yours is probably trivial enough | 18:57 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: +1 on the email | 18:57 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: ty! | 18:57 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: I have a question about it: Do we assume the new maintainer is the one with most commits or do we wait for a response before taking that action ? | 18:57 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: we wait | 18:57 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: ok | 18:58 |
| * negronjl is out to lunch | 18:58 | |
| SpamapS | negronjl: if nobody steps up, in about 2 weeks, we will evaluate dropping the charm or having ~charmers take temporary ownership | 18:58 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: perfect | 18:58 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: I will send an email today that says basically "If you don't want to get nagged next week, assign yourself to any charms you are obviously the maintainer of" | 18:58 |
| * SpamapS is also out to lunch now | 18:59 | |
| === hspencer is now known as hspencer[afk] | ||
| dpb_ | Hey all -- is there any reason why stderr prints trigger an ERROR log message in juju-log? Seems like it should be informational only. (unlike a program exit, for instance) | 19:47 |
| jimbaker | dpb_, reported in bug 955209 - this will get fixed | 19:55 |
| _mup_ | Bug #955209: charm.log uses 'Error' for all stderr messages <juju:Confirmed> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/955209 > | 19:55 |
| dpb_ | jimbaker: sweet! thx. :) | 19:56 |
| imbrandon | SpamapS: i reached out to that asmi.... other cloud tool guy yesterday | 20:56 |
| imbrandon | he seemed very very cool and actually was JUST checking out juju and bacicly said the same thing we was about it only reversed | 20:57 |
| imbrandon | it was kinda funny | 20:57 |
| imbrandon | anyhow i think he is gonna pop in now and then and maybe collaborate on a larger "ideas" type scale | 20:57 |
| imbrandon | least that was what we talked about, share the pros and cons with each others approach etc etc from the get go rather than a long un-spoken silence like some rival projects | 20:58 |
| imbrandon | seemed really down to earth | 20:58 |
| imbrandon | SpamapS: is it too early to file a MIR for nginx in Q ? heh | 21:01 |
| dpb_ | hazmat: Hi, was there something else I needed to do for https://code.launchpad.net/~davidpbritton/juju/dont-proxy-https/+merge/105353? | 21:20 |
| hazmat | dpb_, nope looks good, i'll land it | 21:24 |
| hazmat | just need to get a bug in for it for the SRU process | 21:24 |
| dpb_ | hazmat: thx! | 21:24 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, any objections to landing this one for SRU bug 993034 | 21:25 |
| _mup_ | Bug #993034: lxc deployed units don't support https APT repositories <juju:Confirmed for davidpbritton> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/993034 > | 21:25 |
| _mup_ | juju/juju-status-expose-hint r537 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 21:41 |
| _mup_ | Adjust juju status so that exposed: false is output for a service if there are open ports but not exposed | 21:41 |
| koolhead17 | philipballew, hey | 22:08 |
| philipballew | koolhead17, hey! | 22:09 |
| philipballew | not sleeping? | 22:09 |
| koolhead17 | nopes :( | 22:09 |
| === hspencer[afk] is now known as hspencer | ||
| koolhead17 | hey hspencer :) | 22:09 |
| hspencer | hey koolhead17 | 22:09 |
| koolhead17 | hspencer, how are you doing | 22:10 |
| hspencer | doin good | 22:10 |
| hspencer | just workin hard | 22:10 |
| hspencer | how you? | 22:10 |
| koolhead17 | am okey not able to sleep :P | 22:11 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: that one is perfect for SRU | 22:34 |
| SpamapS | imbrandon: go ahead and file the MIR for nginx. :) | 22:34 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: ping | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!