[00:12] <patrickceg> penguin42: Thanks, although it sucks to "give up" on an issue... This is so different from in-house development where the environment is controlled where you can get the exact setup of a bug reporter
[00:12] <LordOfTime> mind if i see the bug?
[00:12]  * LordOfTime is curious
[00:13] <penguin42> patrickceg: Well, you have to hope you can hand it over to someone who is an expert on the package
[00:13] <patrickceg> It's 997876 - I poked at it on one of my first days trying triage.
[00:13] <LordOfTime> LP Bug 997876
[00:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 997876 in firefox "No manual sort for bookmarks" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/997876
[00:14] <LordOfTime> did you check upstream?
[00:14] <LordOfTime> to see if this was removed upstream
[00:14] <LordOfTime> because if it was removed upstream, then this bug/featurerequest needs upstreaming
[00:14] <LordOfTime> for the ffox devs to handle
[00:14] <patrickceg> I did a quick search but bookmarks is so common I got screenfulls of results
[00:15] <LordOfTime> heh
[00:15] <LordOfTime> i'm poking the ffox channel on the mozilla IRC net
[00:16] <patrickceg> Essentially the OP is blocked from drag-and-drop or copy+paste sorting bookmarks manually - something I can't reproduce on either of my machines
[00:17] <LordOfTime> nor can I
[00:17] <LordOfTime> i'm checking upstream now
[00:24] <LordOfTime> confirmed the bug is nonexistent upstream, and the fucntionality exists upstream
[00:25] <LordOfTime> i'm marking that as Incomplete unless we can see additional information to say otherwise
[00:35] <patrickceg> LordOfTime: Thanks for the help - I couldn't find anything that looks like the same problem upstream either.
[00:35] <LordOfTime> well it doesnt exist upstream
[00:35] <LordOfTime> and we'd only upstream if we confirmed it iirc
[03:45] <wxwok> Anyone saw this? kernel: [18237.394318] NVRM: Xid (0000:01:00): 6, PE0001. My graphic card is gts250.
[03:45] <wxwok> on 12.04
[07:12] <sary> Salutation.
[07:12] <sary> Could someone please triage this bug , https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1001066
[07:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1001066 in xorg "X freezes with a crash" [Undecided,New]
[13:47] <vibhav> Could someobdy set the importance of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eggdrop/+bug/885329 to high?
[13:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 885329 in eggdrop "eggdrop crash on i386" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[13:49]  * penguin42 looks
[13:50] <penguin42> vibhav: Should it also be set as triaged
[13:50] <vibhav> yeah
[13:52] <penguin42> I've done it for the main eggdrop one, do you also need it doing for the oneiric task?
[13:52] <vibhav> yes
[13:52] <penguin42> does it also happen on Precise?
[13:52] <vibhav> yes
[22:52] <dlentz> if anyone sees this, please mark this Triaged/Low.   Thanks.
[22:52] <dlentz> 995689
[22:52] <LordOfTime> LP Bug 995689
[22:52] <dlentz> bug 995689
[22:52] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 995689 in clementine "clementine should build-depend on libprotobuf-dev (for Spotify support)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/995689
[22:55] <LordOfTime> bugcontrol peoples:  i concur with dlentz on importance=low for LP Bug 995689.  Reasoning and Criterion: The bug is one that affects a non-essential aspect and limited scope of the application.   I also agree it is ready for triaging because it has specific information on what needs to be done as a fix, and has specifically outlined what the problem is.
[22:55] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 995689 in clementine "clementine should build-depend on libprotobuf-dev (for Spotify support)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/995689
[22:55] <LordOfTime> dlentz:  its best to include your reasons when you ping bugcontrol people ;p
[22:55] <LordOfTime> micahg:  you there?
[22:56] <LordOfTime> usually micah's around within ten minutes of me pinging :/
[23:01] <dlentz> LordOfTime, thanks
[23:01] <LordOfTime> dlentz:  yep, now we just wait
[23:01] <LordOfTime> actually... i wonder if the security team has bugcontrol...  mdeslaur, do you have bugcontrol powers?
[23:01] <LordOfTime> or should i wait for micahg to show up :P
[23:01]  * mdeslaur reads backscroll
[23:02] <mdeslaur> done
[23:03] <LordOfTime> thanks
[23:03] <mdeslaur> np
[23:03] <LordOfTime> mdeslaur:  also, i'll need some patches reviewed for the NGINX CVE debdiffs i've got, i'll be uploading them (and the patches i had to hand-make for these) to that bug in the next, oh, hour or so?
[23:03] <LordOfTime> (since MTecknology passed that bug onto me, its my job to handle them :/)
[23:04] <mdeslaur> LordOfTime: please subscribe ubuntu-security-sponsors to the bug once you've uploaded the debdiffs, and whoever's on community duty will take a look
[23:04] <LordOfTime> wonderful, i'll do that (assuming i remember in an hour xD)
[23:04] <LordOfTime> i need to confirm they run first :P
[23:04]  * LordOfTime always does that confirmation, since he learned that when doing backports
[23:37] <sary> Salutation , could someone please assit on a bug to triag
[23:37] <LordOfTime> sary:  which bug
[23:37] <LordOfTime> and is it already triaged, or in need of triaging, or is it a new bug
[23:38] <sary> its new , and needs a triaging bug 1001066
[23:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1001066 in xorg "X freezes with a crash" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1001066
[23:39] <LordOfTime> sary:  we usually don't triage bugs until someone other than the original poster can confirm the bug
[23:39] <LordOfTime> and crashes don't necessarily mean bugs
[23:40] <sary> aha , i see .. so what should i do in this case.
[23:41] <micahg> well, crashes usually mean bugs of some sort, sometimes they can be hard to decipher
[23:42] <LordOfTime> agreed with micahg
[23:42] <LordOfTime> micahg: also, this is tagged as an apport bug, shouldnt that be privated until someone on bugcontrol checks it for privacy stuffs?
[23:42] <micahg> depends if the reporter uncheck the private box
[23:42] <LordOfTime> looks like they unchecked "private"
[23:43] <LordOfTime> should it be reset to private until someone checks for private information and the likes?
[23:43] <LordOfTime> i mean, its 4 days old, but still
[23:44] <micahg> LordOfTime: it was reported with ubuntu-bug PKG, not through the crash reporter, that's why it's public
[23:44] <sary> I have joined the BugSquad team , but its still a long way for me to go and start within , so i asked for some sort of advice .. is there anything else i should add to the bug.
[23:44] <LordOfTime> ah, then why's it tagged apport-bug?
[23:44] <micahg> ubuntu-bug is an apport cli binary
[23:44] <LordOfTime> ahh
[23:44] <LordOfTime> i see
[23:44] <sary> the crash reporter doesn't seem to work here , am not sure why
[23:45] <LordOfTime> micahg:  where do you find out whether its filed with ubuntu-bug or is an apport crash bug?
[23:45] <LordOfTime> or rather how do you determine that
[23:45] <micahg> err...I should say executable, not binary
[23:45]  * LordOfTime knew what you meant
[23:45] <micahg> LordOfTime: no stack trace attached
[23:45] <LordOfTime> ahhhhh
[23:45] <sary> I mean , i can't tell if it did send the bug .
[23:45] <LordOfTime> i see
[23:46] <micahg> sary: you can start here for triaging X bugs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Triaging
[23:46]  * LordOfTime returns to dealing with the nginx CVE stuffs
[23:46] <sary> Thanks , i'll check it out.
[23:48] <LordOfTime> mdeslaur:  micahg:  if i'm in the process of fixing the CVE issues as stated in Bug 956150, and i am about to upload the patches/debdiffs, outside of subscribing the ubuntu-security-sponsors team, should i also mark the bug as 'in progress'?
[23:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 956150 in nginx "March 15th 2012 Security Advisory" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956150
[23:49] <micahg> LordOfTime: well, you'd normally do that to show you're working on it, once the patches are attached and sponsors subscribed, it goes back to confirmed
[23:50] <LordOfTime> i see
[23:50] <LordOfTime> i'll leave it as confirmed then, since i'm assigned to it anyways