| === jbicha is now known as Guest1332 | ||
| micahg | BTW, the rest of the tntnet binaries will be coming through shortly | 06:46 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | pitti: could I ask you to process the promotion requests in the ubuntu-archive queue as well please? | 06:49 |
| micahg | multiverse -> universe ones I mean | 06:49 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| pitti | micahg: done | 06:59 |
| micahg | pitti: thanks | 06:59 |
| RAOF | Another gtk+3.0? :/ | 10:08 |
| seb128 | RAOF, there was a regression in the previous one | 10:09 |
| RAOF | Yay. | 10:10 |
| cjwatson | precise daily CD builds should be up and running again now, though the first ones haven't run yet | 14:02 |
| skaet | :) | 14:14 |
| * ogra_ crosses fingers for arms | 14:14 | |
| === bjf[swapped] is now known as bjf | ||
| bjf | skaet, pitti, can someone copy the Precise kernel package (3.2.0-24.38) from -proposed to -updates? | 14:44 |
| skaet | bjf, hmm... looks like someones just taken care of it. | 14:48 |
| pitti | bjf: done | 14:48 |
| skaet | :) | 14:49 |
| bjf | pitti, thanks | 14:49 |
| pitti | (ubuntu-docs shouldn't go to -security, rejecting that) | 14:51 |
| cjwatson | I have moved the sync-blacklist to lp:~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist; please stop using the old location (which I'm going to render inoperative) | 17:42 |
| * micahg assumes that includes fixing syncpackage and/or launchpad to check the new location as well? | 17:43 | |
| cjwatson | No, because they already used http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/sync-blacklist.txt | 17:44 |
| cjwatson | Launchpad itself hasn't cared for some months | 17:44 |
| cjwatson | The only clients are syncpackage and auto-sync, both client-side | 17:45 |
| micahg | sorry, ignore me :) | 17:45 |
| bdmurray | is this the right channel to talk about the SRU-ability of a bug for Precise? | 21:22 |
| slangasek | probably | 21:24 |
| infinity | Almost certainly. | 21:25 |
| bdmurray | I want to SRU this change to Precise but I'm not excited about writing a test case | 21:25 |
| bdmurray | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/quantal/apport/ubuntu/revision/1961 | 21:25 |
| bdmurray | honestly, I'm not sure how to get a .deb to generate that message | 21:25 |
| slangasek | hmm, quite | 21:26 |
| bdmurray | and this seems like an 'obviously safe patch' to me | 21:27 |
| slangasek | obviously safe, yes, but we also want to be sure it fixes the bug | 21:29 |
| bdmurray | ah true | 21:29 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: how about dpkg-divert --add --local --rename --divert /usr/bin/dpkg.real /usr/bin/dpkg, and then a wrapper script that deliberately clobbers any files in /var/cache/apt/archives with bogus data? | 21:30 |
| infinity | If you're diverting dpkg, you can just replace it with something that throws the error every time it's run... | 21:31 |
| infinity | Mangling data seems a bit silly at that point. | 21:31 |
| bdmurray | The foundations bug bot takes care of these after reporting and I only see 24 tagged not-debian-format so maybe its not worth it | 21:32 |
| slangasek | maybe something like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/999824/ | 21:33 |
| slangasek | (untested) | 21:33 |
| slangasek | infinity: this bug is tied up with whether strings are localized or not | 21:33 |
| slangasek | infinity: so I think it's easier to do a wrapper script than to correctly emulate dpkg behavior | 21:34 |
| slangasek | (I'm not even sure which fd the message is output on...) | 21:34 |
| slangasek | $ sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.9.1-5_amd64.deb | 21:34 |
| slangasek | dpkg-deb: error: `/var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.9.1-5_amd64.deb' is not a debian format archive | 21:34 |
| slangasek | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.9.1-5_amd64.deb (--install): | 21:34 |
| slangasek | subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2 | 21:34 |
| slangasek | Errors were encountered while processing: | 21:34 |
| slangasek | /var/cache/apt/archives/postfix_2.9.1-5_amd64.deb | 21:34 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: ^^ tested | 21:35 |
| jdstrand | cjwatson: fyi, I started adding comments to the end of the commands I have been running on cocoplum so that 'history' will show why I am doing things | 21:35 |
| jdstrand | cjwatson: (referencing your eliminating shell access on cocoplum work items here) | 21:36 |
| bdmurray | slangasek: okay, noted I'll open a bug with the test case and precise task but may wait for more bugs before causing the SRU work | 21:38 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: sounds good | 21:38 |
| cjwatson | jdstrand: OK, but maybe best just edit the wiki page directly if you do something not mentioned there; I'm probably not going to trawl the history again :) | 21:39 |
| jdstrand | well, it was more about "why did he do that?" if someone was looking there. I will update the wiki as needed | 21:40 |
| cjwatson | Laney: your update-sources problems were a MoM bug - 'def open' at the top level of a module is liable to produce abject confusion ... | 21:50 |
| Laney | hrm, how did it ever work then? | 21:51 |
| cjwatson | It used to use file() | 21:51 |
| cjwatson | I changed it some time ago (since file() no longer works in Python 3), but either an older version of Python resolved local definition vs. builtin differently, or I didn't deploy that change until after MoM stopped working for other reasons | 21:52 |
| cjwatson | Ooh, this new box has twice the disk too | 21:53 |
| cjwatson | And a honkload of CPUs | 21:53 |
| Laney | woot | 22:09 |
| lamont | slangasek: what have you done!?!? | 22:15 |
| slangasek | lamont: mm? | 22:21 |
| jdstrand | fyi, my team has also been seeing oddities with the work items tracker | 22:26 |
| slangasek | lamont: I have done many things... care to be more specific? :) | 22:26 |
| lamont | slangasek: the postfix dpkg -i highlighted me, that's all. | 22:26 |
| slangasek | oh, haha | 22:26 |
| slangasek | lamont: I replaced dpkg with a very malicious shell script | 22:26 |
| jdstrand | people haven't been able to delete things from 'security-q-ecryptfs' and things are reordered after save ('security-q-apparmor-dev') | 22:26 |
| lamont | slangasek: ah, yes, I can see that now. | 22:27 |
| jdstrand | to delete, when I went to edit, I copied all the work items somewhere (I used gnote), and then deleted everything from the work items, saved it, then added them all back minus the one I deleted | 22:27 |
| jdstrand | s/I deleted/I wanted deleted/ | 22:28 |
| slangasek | skaet: do you know who it was that worked on the WI implementation in launchpad? | 22:29 |
| jdstrand | I will probably be copying things somewhere else for a little while | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!