[06:00] <hiatus> am i missing something or does the app categories not show up with the latest version of ubuntu?
[08:38] <njin> Hallo, can someone manage bug 1001976 ? is not the first time that i see reported problems with citrix, but I don't know what is it. thanks
[10:27] <jussi> Is it possible to get legacy scrollbars back?
[10:35] <seb128> jussi, try to LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0 yourcommand?
[10:37] <jussi> seb128: thats a fair hassel - Im currently on KDE using a couple of GTK apps, which Id like to have scrollbars same as my kde apps
[10:37] <seb128> jussi, well set it in your session environment?
[10:37] <jussi> seb128: sounds good - how would I do that?
[10:37] <scriptwarlock> is a sudden of transfer/change of workspace to a certain app that occupies most of the desktop space horizontally is by design?
[10:38] <seb128> jussi, dunno, I don't use KDE
[10:38] <jussi> seb128: ok, thanks anyway
[10:40] <seb128> jussi, you can try to gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface ubuntu-overlay-scrollbars false
[10:40] <seb128> should work as well
[10:41] <scriptwarlock> is a sudden transfer/change of workspace to a certain app that occupies most of the desktop (or in minimize mode) space horizontally is by design?
[10:41] <jussi> seb128: ahh that works, thank you
[10:41] <seb128> jussi, yw
[15:12] <tsdgeos> didrocks: ping
[15:13] <didrocks> hey tsdgeos
[15:13] <tsdgeos> didrocks: hey, did you do the stuff that shows the nautilus favorites in the nautilus quicklist?
[15:13] <tsdgeos> found a blog that claims you did
[15:13] <didrocks> tsdgeos: indeed
[15:13] <tsdgeos> but you can't trust the interwebs these days :D
[15:14] <didrocks> heh :)
[15:14] <tsdgeos> didrocks: there's a bug in which if the folder is called foo_bar
[15:14] <tsdgeos> it things _ is the "underline stuff"
[15:14] <tsdgeos> so you get foobar with b underlined
[15:14] <tsdgeos> didrocks: if you point me where to look at i'd like to try to fix it
[15:14] <didrocks> ah interesting :)
[15:15] <didrocks> yeah, one sec, take the ubuntu nautilus branch
[15:15] <tsdgeos> probably some gtk thing creeping in
[15:15] <didrocks> bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-desktop/nautilus/ubuntu
[15:15] <didrocks> should be gtk I'm afraid
[15:15] <didrocks> let me look, one sec
[15:17] <didrocks> tsdgeos: I would say the bug is in dbusmenu
[15:17] <tsdgeos> oki
[15:17] <tsdgeos> i'll have a look at both
[15:17] <tsdgeos> tx for the pointers
[15:18] <didrocks> I pass the bookmark content straight from the one shown in nautilus sidebar
[15:18] <didrocks> tsdgeos: see debian/patches/12_unity_launcher_support.patch
[15:19] <seb128> tsdgeos, didrocks: bug #961129 might need to be undupped, it was marked as duplicate of a bug that got fixed before precise, if that's still an issue it might turns out it was not a dup and should be changed back
[15:20] <didrocks> thanks for the pointer seb128, tsdgeos you maybe want to keep that one in mind
[15:20] <tsdgeos> yep
[15:20] <tsdgeos> there's https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/961170 too
[15:48] <MGandTL> 'afternoon all. I'm running quantal, and I'd like to build unity and get started, but I've got a problem with dependencies: http://paste.ubuntu.com/999250/ - the current version of libboost is 1.49
[15:49] <tsdgeos> didrocks: are you sure it's not expected dbusmenu behaviour? because dbusmenu-qt has code that converts _ to &, so it seems to be the designed behaviour that _ is the marker for underlining in dbusmenu
[15:50] <tsdgeos> or at least the dbusmenu-qt implementator though so
[15:50] <didrocks> tsdgeos: it is, but I'm not sure how it should be treated then when you want an underscore to be an undescore
[15:50] <didrocks> tsdgeos: does __ works? (2 underscore)
[15:51] <tsdgeos> didrocks: yep
[15:51] <tsdgeos> well
[15:51] <tsdgeos> "works" as in
[15:51] <didrocks> tsdgeos: so maybe change the nautilus quicklist patch to replace _ with __?
[15:51] <tsdgeos> i get foo_bar in the quicklist when the folder is called foo__bar
[15:51] <tsdgeos> didrocks: makes sense to me
[15:52] <didrocks> that should do it ;)
[15:52] <tsdgeos> ok, will code the patch
[15:52] <didrocks> thanks tsdgeos
[15:52] <tsdgeos> tomorrow, getting close to my eod
[15:52] <tsdgeos> like 5 min away from it
[16:12] <MGandTL> Can anyone tell me how to fix the dependency problem and build unity?
[16:14] <mhall119> MGandTL: did you build Nux first?
[16:15] <MGandTL> ...nope. Didn't have on precise, so I assumed I didn't have to.
[16:16] <mhall119> MGandTL: I've been told it's usually a good idea
[16:16] <MGandTL> Even so, I presume that to do that I would have to get nux, which depends upon an old version of lobboost.
[16:16] <MGandTL> *libboost
[16:16] <mhall119> MGandTL: http://unity.ubuntu.com/getinvolved/development/unity/#build-nux
[16:16] <MGandTL> thanks, will read that.
[16:17] <greyback> MGandTL: I'm a fan of this doc http://askubuntu.com/questions/28470/how-do-i-build-unity-from-source
[16:18] <MGandTL> http://paste.ubuntu.com/999250/
[16:18] <MGandTL> I should clarify-I know how to, but I can't install dependencies.
[16:18] <MGandTL> but thanks for the advide. :D
[16:19] <greyback> MGandTL: sorry I didn't read up. What version of libboost1.46-dev have you installed?
[16:20] <mhall119> MGandTL: that should all be condensed into http://unity.ubuntu.com/getinvolved/development/unity/ now
[16:20] <MGandTL> np. I haven't. apt-get build-dep fails as I've got 1.49
[16:21] <MGandTL> I can manually install 1.46...but shouldn't the depency be on the most recent version, or a specific version?
[16:21] <MGandTL> thanks mhall119.
[16:22] <mhall119> np
[16:24] <MGandTL> stuff it, I'll install 1.46. Thanks for the help everyone!
[16:28] <greyback> MGandTL: sorry that's all I can recommend. the package build-depends explicitly requires 1.46
[16:28] <MGandTL> greyback, no problem. I gathered. ;)
[16:29] <greyback> MGandTL: well good luck with the build!
[16:30] <MGandTL> ...uh-oh. Build errors, looks like somewhere in boost. Oh well, thanks for your time. This evening's job. :D Thanks for the help again greyback.
[16:30] <greyback> MGandTL: np
[17:05] <Roshan> hello everyone,
[17:05] <ais523> hi
[17:05] <Roshan> i hav an idea that ask for more consistency
[17:06] <Roshan> can we extend non-active behaviour to windows title bar?
[17:06] <Roshan> both in active and inactive windows, the color of titlebar and border is same
[17:08] <ais523> hmm, that might just be a feature of the theme, because I'm reasonably sure that Compiz can do that already
[17:08] <ais523> so it might just be a case of finding where inactive title bar color is set in the theme and changing it
[17:09] <Roshan> ais523, oh..thanx..
[17:09] <Roshan> just hope that the upstream devs noticed it
[17:11] <Roshan> ais523 , which color caould bmake a better consistency , given the color in active windows is black?
[17:11] <Roshan> ais523, is ubuntu 12.10 go for a new theme??
[17:12] <ais523> probably a lighter shade of gray is usual
[17:12] <ais523> I'm not in charge of theming (or anything else), so can't really tell you about any plans that might not be there (I'm not an Ubuntu developer)
[17:12] <Roshan> ok..me too..:)
[17:13] <Roshan> and still dreaming of a Ubuntu dev one day:)
[17:14] <Roshan> ais523, do u know how to make GTK+3 theme?
[17:15] <ais523> no
[17:17] <Roshan> Quit
[23:59] <bobweaver> Hello there could I ask a newbie question plz What are some of the tools  that you all use to develop unity scopes and lens ? Are there any gui tools ? Would qtdesign work ? Or I guess my question is what are your fav. programs to write unity lens plugins and daemon's in ? thanks for your time.