=== alkisg1 is now known as alkisg === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [12:49] hello any one there? [12:49] hiii...? [12:50] hello guys ne1 there? === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [19:40] highvoltage: ayt? [19:40] tya [19:40] You're working at Revolution Linux, right? [19:41] th1a: indeed [19:41] I just remembered that a few years ago we were talking to them about their system for integrating various applications on their servers. [19:41] They had some pluggable thingy. ;-) [19:42] hmm, not sure what it was at the time. might have been webforge. or it might have been the configuration management system we use, bcfg2. [19:42] Well, it was for, say, keeping user databases in sync. [19:43] ah probably OAPS [19:43] That rings a bell. [19:43] http://www.revolutionlinux.com/Account-provisionning?var_recherche=OAPS [19:44] (I know the RL website is sucky, I take no responsibility in that :) ) [19:44] lol [19:44] That's what edubuntu needs. [19:45] yeah unfortunately the "O" in "Open Accound Provisioning System" is a misnomer :-/ [19:45] s/Accound/Account/g [19:45] Yes... [19:46] the main developer on that is pushing on changing that, so perhaps it might one day. [19:47] Yes, there was some possibility of it happening or we wouldn't have been talking about it at all. [19:55] We're going to have to come up with some kind of strategy -- even if it is just the simplest thing possible for the next release. [19:56] in schooltool? [19:57] I mean for integration between pieces in Edubuntu. [19:58] yes, indeed. at least most things seem to integrate quite well with AD/ldap, and we're really interested in running a domain on samba4 [19:58] Some perl scripts written by the Zentyal guys... [19:58] but I know that that's not enough by far [19:58] Maybe we should just focus on LDAP. [20:03] Yeah, that might be the best approach as far as user and group management. [20:04] Just put the message passing architectures out of my mind. [20:05] OAPS is so complicated with that that I can't begin to wrap my mind around it. [20:05] Well, yes, that too. [21:37] is samba4 usable yet?