/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/05/22/#launchpad.txt

scienteshow do i turn off launchpad annoying me with my own bugs?01:23
scientesnvm01:23
slick666hello LP team02:40
slick666I was hoping to get a pointer on how to move a personal branch into a team branch02:40
slick666I think I'm just googleing the wrong terms and not finding this02:40
thumperhi slick66602:41
thumperlet me just check02:41
thumpersee if it is still the same02:41
slick666cool02:42
thumperslick666: go to the branch02:42
thumperslick666: on the right hand side, click the change details02:42
thumperslick666: you can then specify the owner with a drop down select box02:42
slick666ah I see it and follow02:42
slick666oh cool02:42
thumperslick666: I think the reason we didn't have an ajax change button was due to the potential for naming conflicts02:42
thumperhowever that isn't really a good reason02:42
thumperand there is no technical reason why it couldn't be fixe02:43
thumperd02:43
slick666actually I was poking at documentation and looking for a command line solution02:43
thumperoh...02:43
slick666this is way easier :P02:43
thumperI think you can do it with launchpadlib too02:43
thumperI think I got that working...02:43
slick666I was thinking bzr branch, bzr push something something02:43
thumperyou should just be able to change the owner reference02:44
thumperand lp_save()02:44
thumperpushing to a new place works too02:44
thumperbut it doesn't keep the existing subscribers02:44
thumperor linked bugs or merge proposals02:44
thumperas the old branch is still around02:44
slick666yea, thats what I was running into02:45
slick666thanks thumper, problem solved02:45
thumpernp02:45
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging
mgzanyone aware of issues with codehosting currently?09:00
mgzlp:~gz/bzr/2.5_backport_rmbranch_fixes exists over bzr+ssh but not over http09:00
wgrantmgz: You're the one that's meant to be aware of this now :P09:02
wgrantmgz: But I believe the HTTP rewriter always uses a slave database, and they're lagging by a bit at the moment.09:03
wgrantSo if it's a new branch it might not be there yet.09:03
jamwgrant: I'm pretty sure they are served09:03
jamby the same location now, isn't it?09:03
mgzwgrant: thanks, now I am becoming more aware.09:03
jamah, different pg db09:03
jamso it doesn't know how to translate URL to path on disk09:03
wgrantjam: Same location on disk, yeah09:03
mgzand this means I can blame stub?09:03
wgrantPretty much.09:03
wgrantSee the discussion in #-ops09:04
mgzace.09:04
wgrantWell09:04
wgrantBlame Rosetta09:04
wgrantand stub09:04
stubI'm pedalling as fast as I can09:04
czajkowskipoor stub09:09
Nafallowgrant: oh hey! can ppas build stuff for debian yet? as in, can I put squeeze in my changelog and the buildfarm will DTRT?09:12
StevenKNope09:12
Nafallobah09:12
czajkowskiNafallo: ello09:13
Nafallowhat's the timeline on that feature?09:13
Nafallohola czajkowski09:13
wgrantNafallo: Not clear if it will ever happen09:13
Nafallowgrant: are you saying you've stopped being bored in weekends? ;-)09:13
czajkowskiNafallo: no it's ok I plague poor wgrant09:13
wgrantNafallo: I implemented the necessary code in 200909:14
wgrantNafallo: It's trivial.09:14
czajkowskihe now runs away at weekends to avoid me and my questions09:14
Nafallohaha09:14
wgrantNafallo: Builder and disk resources are more the problem now09:14
Nafalloczajkowski: he's a clever guy :-)09:14
wgrantAnd potentially social considerations09:14
czajkowskiwgrant: your idea of trivial and everyone elsses differs09:14
Nafallowgrant: oh. hrm. yeeah... that makes sense to me...09:14
wgrantNafallo: Maybe one day when we recruit 1SS into the build farm :)09:15
Nafallowgrant: *grins*09:15
wgrantBut it's certainly not feasible now09:15
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
mptThere should be a law against assigning bugs or work items to teams ...10:08
gesermpt: "It is forbidden by law to file bug or work items." something like that?10:09
mptgeser, no, just to assign them to teams10:09
mptfiling them is fine10:09
gesermpt: then file a bug which requests that the assign column gets hidden and assign it to the LP devs :)10:11
mptHiding it wouldn't work, because that would prevent assigning bugs to individuals.10:12
geserah, indivuals are ok but just teams not10:13
mptright10:13
czajkowskimpt: are you a happy chappy today!10:19
mptI'm a box of birds, czajkowski10:20
czajkowskimpt: as always :)10:20
czajkowskimpt: unlike my battery icon which looks like a bee :/10:20
mptA bee?10:21
mptScreenshot?10:21
davmor2mpt: that's animal cruelty that is :P10:21
xnoxIs launchpad ok? it has been 'processing' lp:~dmitrij.ledkov/ubuntu/quantal/btrfs-tools/merge for a while. =)10:21
czajkowskixnox: day downtime should be back up now10:22
xnoxczajkowski: if you say so =)))10:22
xnoxok.10:22
czajkowskimpt: http://twitpic.com/9msmw2   http://twitpic.com/9mtp01     http://twitpic.com/9mtqml10:22
czajkowskixnox: in theory if not poke wgrant or stub10:22
mptczajkowski, that is very strange. It looks as if one of the icons is missing, so for just that icon, it's falling back to a different theme.10:24
czajkowskimpt: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/100122910:24
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1001229 in indicator-power "wrong icon for the power indicator after last 12.04 update" [Medium,Confirmed]10:24
czajkowskimpt: aye jut it's randomly changing every 2-3 mins only way to make it behave is to plug in your power supply10:24
tsdgeoshi guys, i can't change the branch status (the one under Branch Information) in https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/nautilus/fix_quicklist_underscore even if it's my branch, any idea why? Could i convince you to do it for me?10:50
czajkowskitsdgeos: you should be able to do this10:54
tsdgeosi hope i could10:54
tsdgeoss/hope/wish10:54
tsdgeosdon't see the yellow pencil10:54
jelmertsdgeos: there is no yellow icon next to the statu ?10:55
jelmer*status10:55
tsdgeosnope10:55
tsdgeosoh wait10:55
jelmertsdgeos: and you're logged in under the right account?10:55
tsdgeosi'm not logged in10:55
tsdgeos:D10:55
* tsdgeos hides10:55
* czajkowski peers at tsdgeos :)10:55
tsdgeossorry guys10:55
tsdgeosand gal10:55
czajkowskitsdgeos: tis grand10:55
xnoxmaybe it's just me, but "Updating branch..." feels slow today11:13
xnoxunless there is backlog11:13
czajkowskixnox: they are working on things atm11:35
czajkowskiso perhaps thats why11:36
xnoxok11:36
gemahello, trying to work with the new blueprint work items section. is there a way to assign two people to one task? When I try to put the task twice with different names  against it, launchpad makes all of them the same name12:09
gemauhmmmm... it seems now it allowed me to, is it me or does it reorder the tasks?12:12
dobeysinzui: it would be pretty awesome if LP could work correctly in Netscape Navigator 3.04 Gold ;)14:37
sinzuidobey 3.04 parsed numbers wrong. I suspect that it is imposable for it to ever position content correctly on the screen14:41
dobeysinzui: it should work fine if you use tables :)14:42
sinzuiYes. I was pretty angry with how quick tables were subverted to layout tools in 199414:42
sinzuiI think it took 2 days from the moment Netscape added support for them14:43
sinzuibut I do remember that moment in the Netscape 0.0 beta that I saw an animated GIF. That was really impressive14:43
dobeyCSS is just a complex description of how to draw tables, anyway14:45
sinzuiI don't think so. Positioning and z-index are a very different way of solving layout. Maybe you are referring to display:inline-block which is a really nice way to create a grid without a table14:47
dobeyi mean, for most sites, the end result is the same, and z-order is not necessary.14:48
mgzthe branch <lp:~clint-fewbar/charms/oneiric/statusnet/apparmor> has its stacking borked or similar15:03
dobeymgz: i guess you should bug SpamapS directly about that?15:07
mgzchecking that no one else is already on the case, it's a known issue with the oneiric charms apparently15:08
mgzseems like it's currently not being handled, context is:15:14
mgz<https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/2012-May/001536.html>15:14
dobeystacking looks correct on lp for clint's branch15:16
dobeyit's stacked on lp:charms/oneiric/statusnet15:17
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
m_3james_w: ping16:51
james_whi m_316:52
james_whow's it going?16:52
* m_3 stands around looking guilty :)16:52
m_3james_w: so... we've got these branches16:52
m_3james_w: they're frozen still too I think16:53
james_wyeah16:53
m_3james_w: any suggestions on who to ask for help here?16:53
james_wI think that will need a Launchpad change to unfreeze them16:53
czajkowskim_3: what's up ?16:53
m_3james_w: and then bzr reconfigure them in a script?16:53
m_3czajkowski: fundamental problem is that we have a series of branches that're stacked on the wrong bases if I understand correctly16:54
m_3example:16:54
m_3lp:~charmers/charms/oneiric/sbuild/trunk16:54
m_3I try to branch it and it's pointing to the precise branches16:55
m_3czajkowski: history is... lemme just pastebin the email summary16:55
m_3czajkowski: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1001230/ summarizes how we got these branches into their current state16:57
czajkowskiok16:58
jimisHello all. Thought you'd like to know: It happens often to me that Launchpad times out when I try to browse big projects. Trying a second time after 30 seconds or so and request succeeds.16:58
m_3czajkowski: note that I mis-stated what `branch-distro` does in that email... it doesn't just _rename_ the branches16:58
czajkowskim_3: findibng out how best to help 2 ticks16:58
james_wah right16:59
james_wI don't know if the freezing will mean that we can't fix the stacking16:59
james_wwe can likely get an admin to fix the stacking without having to unfreeze them though16:59
james_wabentley, hi, I'm sure you will know: how can we fix a branch that is stacked on a non-existent branch due to a rename?16:59
james_wreconfigure --stacked-on seems to try and activate the fallback, so you have to have a working branch to use it?16:59
m_3czajkowski: many thanks!!! no particular rush... we need to a.) fix this and b.) make sure we don't do it again next release16:59
czajkowskim_3: nods just rying to find out as heading away but will get someone first17:00
m_3james_w: the branches are based on _different_ branches (that also have lp:charms aliases)... not nec non-existent branches17:00
james_wm_3, for next release an option to branch-distro to set the name to 'trunk' would seem to avoid this?17:00
lifelessthat got wont-fix I think17:01
lifelessm_3: james_w: Stacking *is not semantic*, it shouldn't matter if oneiric is stacked on precise, as long as it was setup that way using bzr primitives (which will migrate data if needed)17:02
james_wm_3, for redis-master it is complaining about https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/precise/redis-master/precise/ which doesn't exist17:02
lifelessm_3: james_w: The branche should be stacked on +branch/ddddddd urls, not on long path urls.17:02
m_3james_w: I think that's the target branch for lp:charms/redis-master thought17:02
lifelessIf they are long path urls, something is broken somewhere.17:02
m_3s/thought/though/17:02
james_wm_3, no, lp:charms/redis-master points to .../trunk17:03
m_3james_w: ah, right17:03
james_wm_3, branch-distro sets up that stacking, so I'm assuming the renaming you did to get /trunk is what broke the stacking17:03
m_3james_w: right... sounds correct17:04
lifelessjames_w: branch-distro is broken if it set .../trunk17:04
james_wlifeless, branch-distro is what is broken then17:04
lifelessjames_w: see my prior comment17:04
james_w    old_location_branch.set_stacked_on_url('/' + new_db_branch.unique_name)17:04
lifelessit should stack on numeric is17:04
lifeless*ids*17:04
lifelessto allow renames to be done.17:04
m_3lifeless: branch-distro set to /precise... but juju requires /trunk... so we renamed17:05
m_3lifeless: the rename script is in the email summary (halfway-ish) in http://paste.ubuntu.com/1001230/17:05
lifelessjames_w: yeah, its using unique_name, which is fragile17:06
lifelessjames_w: could you file a bug? Its 5am here...17:06
lifelessthumper did a project to migrate all existing branches to numeric stacked pointers, and change LP to stack numerically itself.17:07
james_whttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/100301617:07
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1003016 in Launchpad itself "branch-distro stacks on unique_name of new branches, not allowing renames" [Undecided,New]17:07
lifelessWe don't however magically change a symbolic name to a numeric17:07
lifelesswe just provide a good default to bzr's config when it inspects the server17:07
chrisccoulsonwho broke armhf? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/105811044/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-armhf.thunderbird_13.0~b2%2Bbuild1-0ubuntu3_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz17:08
chrisccoulson:)17:08
james_wchrisccoulson, which slave is that?17:09
chrisccoulsonjames_w, nihal17:09
james_wchrisccoulson, cjwatson reported that already, and it's on the list to be hit with a cluebat17:10
chrisccoulsonah, cool. thanks!17:10
czajkowskiheh17:10
james_whttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/100301717:10
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1003017 in Launchpad itself "Allow changing the new name of the branches produced by branch-distro" [Undecided,New]17:10
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging
james_wm_3, do you know if there is a bug about the oneiric branches being frozen?17:11
m_3james_w: dunno17:11
m_3james_w: Bug #99198017:12
ubot5Launchpad bug 991980 in Juju Charms Collection "Oneiric official branches are all locked" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/99198017:12
james_wthanks17:12
james_wnow that we've filed all the bugs hopefully we can get to fixing the broken branches now :-)17:13
lifelessjames_w: a bug about the wrong stacking location I meant.17:13
james_whttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/100301617:14
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1003016 in Launchpad itself "branch-distro stacks on unique_name of new branches, not allowing renames" [High,Triaged]17:14
lifelessjames_w: we won't fixed the name choice, I don't know the bug number offhand to dupe it.17:14
james_walready commented with the bug number!17:14
lifelessjames_w: if I'm sloppy right now, its because its 5am ;)17:14
lifelessjames_w: but in this case, I loaded the page before your comment :)17:15
james_wsure17:17
james_whow can we fix the stacked on location of these broken branches?17:17
lifelessre-run the migration script thumper wrote17:17
lifelessits idempotent17:18
lifelessneed to rename the branches back first.17:18
lifelessso that it can find and resolve the names17:18
m_3lifeless: can you point to thumper's migration script?17:19
james_wm_3, it's in the LP tree, one moment17:20
dobeyis there a way to tell recipes on lp to include the "NubuntuM" part of the version?17:22
james_wm_3, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/view/head:/scripts/update-stacked-on.py17:23
james_wto be used with http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/view/head:/scripts/get-stacked-on-branches.py17:23
james_wdobey, you mean from the changelog?17:23
m_3james_w: thanks... looking now17:25
dobeyjames_w: yes.17:25
james_wdobey, {debversion}17:26
james_wdobey, requires format 0.417:26
dobeyah ok, cool17:27
dobeythanks17:27
dobeyjames_w: might you also know what LockNotHeld error from bzr means? #bzr seems to be deaf to my cry at the moment :)17:27
* james_w can't hear dobey 17:38
james_wdobey, I don't really know17:38
dobeyheh17:38
dobeyok17:38
james_wdobey, possibly that locking isn't being done correctly and the operation in question needs a lock that hasn't been taken, but I think that error is different17:39
james_wdobey, possibly that the lock on disk isn't the state that bzr thinks it should be17:39
james_wpossibly something else17:39
dobeyhmm17:39
james_wdobey, getting a backtrace by running with "bzr -Derror" might be useful17:39
james_w"bzr -Dlock" might be useful too17:40
dobeyjames_w: so it's not from bzr the program itself, but from tarmac using bzrlib17:40
james_wah, hmm17:40
james_wdobey, do you have plugins that interact with bzrlib as well by any chance?17:41
dobeyyes17:41
james_wand is tarmac running on precise?17:41
dobeyyes17:41
james_wI have no new information for you17:42
james_wbut they are possible sources of the error given that we aren't seeing it without those two things17:42
james_wclass ObjectNotLocked(LockError):17:43
james_w    _fmt = "%(obj)r is not locked"17:43
james_w    # this can indicate that any particular object is not locked; see also17:43
james_w    # LockNotHeld which means that a particular *lock* object is not held by17:43
james_w    # the caller -- perhaps they should be unified.17:43
dobeyhmm17:44
dobeythat's quite odd17:44
dobeythanks17:44
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara
=== Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo
milkhowdy. i'm looking to login to my milkmiruku account, but the password reset doesn't work for what i think the address should be. what might my options be?20:09
dobeywhat should the address be?20:21
milk_it should be something @milkmiruku.com. i thought i'd have gone with launchpad@milkmiruku, but it might have been before, but my milkmiruku@gmail.com doesn't work either20:25
=== milk_ is now known as milk
dobeymilk: perhaps you should check spam folder20:25
milkoch, i tried again with gmail and it worked. prolly pebkac. thanking you.20:28
=== cinerama_ is now known as ceinrama
=== ceinrama is now known as cinerama

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!