scientes | how do i turn off launchpad annoying me with my own bugs? | 01:23 |
---|---|---|
scientes | nvm | 01:23 |
slick666 | hello LP team | 02:40 |
slick666 | I was hoping to get a pointer on how to move a personal branch into a team branch | 02:40 |
slick666 | I think I'm just googleing the wrong terms and not finding this | 02:40 |
thumper | hi slick666 | 02:41 |
thumper | let me just check | 02:41 |
thumper | see if it is still the same | 02:41 |
slick666 | cool | 02:42 |
thumper | slick666: go to the branch | 02:42 |
thumper | slick666: on the right hand side, click the change details | 02:42 |
thumper | slick666: you can then specify the owner with a drop down select box | 02:42 |
slick666 | ah I see it and follow | 02:42 |
slick666 | oh cool | 02:42 |
thumper | slick666: I think the reason we didn't have an ajax change button was due to the potential for naming conflicts | 02:42 |
thumper | however that isn't really a good reason | 02:42 |
thumper | and there is no technical reason why it couldn't be fixe | 02:43 |
thumper | d | 02:43 |
slick666 | actually I was poking at documentation and looking for a command line solution | 02:43 |
thumper | oh... | 02:43 |
slick666 | this is way easier :P | 02:43 |
thumper | I think you can do it with launchpadlib too | 02:43 |
thumper | I think I got that working... | 02:43 |
slick666 | I was thinking bzr branch, bzr push something something | 02:43 |
thumper | you should just be able to change the owner reference | 02:44 |
thumper | and lp_save() | 02:44 |
thumper | pushing to a new place works too | 02:44 |
thumper | but it doesn't keep the existing subscribers | 02:44 |
thumper | or linked bugs or merge proposals | 02:44 |
thumper | as the old branch is still around | 02:44 |
slick666 | yea, thats what I was running into | 02:45 |
slick666 | thanks thumper, problem solved | 02:45 |
thumper | np | 02:45 |
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | ||
mgz | anyone aware of issues with codehosting currently? | 09:00 |
mgz | lp:~gz/bzr/2.5_backport_rmbranch_fixes exists over bzr+ssh but not over http | 09:00 |
wgrant | mgz: You're the one that's meant to be aware of this now :P | 09:02 |
wgrant | mgz: But I believe the HTTP rewriter always uses a slave database, and they're lagging by a bit at the moment. | 09:03 |
wgrant | So if it's a new branch it might not be there yet. | 09:03 |
jam | wgrant: I'm pretty sure they are served | 09:03 |
jam | by the same location now, isn't it? | 09:03 |
mgz | wgrant: thanks, now I am becoming more aware. | 09:03 |
jam | ah, different pg db | 09:03 |
jam | so it doesn't know how to translate URL to path on disk | 09:03 |
wgrant | jam: Same location on disk, yeah | 09:03 |
mgz | and this means I can blame stub? | 09:03 |
wgrant | Pretty much. | 09:03 |
wgrant | See the discussion in #-ops | 09:04 |
mgz | ace. | 09:04 |
wgrant | Well | 09:04 |
wgrant | Blame Rosetta | 09:04 |
wgrant | and stub | 09:04 |
stub | I'm pedalling as fast as I can | 09:04 |
czajkowski | poor stub | 09:09 |
Nafallo | wgrant: oh hey! can ppas build stuff for debian yet? as in, can I put squeeze in my changelog and the buildfarm will DTRT? | 09:12 |
StevenK | Nope | 09:12 |
Nafallo | bah | 09:12 |
czajkowski | Nafallo: ello | 09:13 |
Nafallo | what's the timeline on that feature? | 09:13 |
Nafallo | hola czajkowski | 09:13 |
wgrant | Nafallo: Not clear if it will ever happen | 09:13 |
Nafallo | wgrant: are you saying you've stopped being bored in weekends? ;-) | 09:13 |
czajkowski | Nafallo: no it's ok I plague poor wgrant | 09:13 |
wgrant | Nafallo: I implemented the necessary code in 2009 | 09:14 |
wgrant | Nafallo: It's trivial. | 09:14 |
czajkowski | he now runs away at weekends to avoid me and my questions | 09:14 |
Nafallo | haha | 09:14 |
wgrant | Nafallo: Builder and disk resources are more the problem now | 09:14 |
Nafallo | czajkowski: he's a clever guy :-) | 09:14 |
wgrant | And potentially social considerations | 09:14 |
czajkowski | wgrant: your idea of trivial and everyone elsses differs | 09:14 |
Nafallo | wgrant: oh. hrm. yeeah... that makes sense to me... | 09:14 |
wgrant | Nafallo: Maybe one day when we recruit 1SS into the build farm :) | 09:15 |
Nafallo | wgrant: *grins* | 09:15 |
wgrant | But it's certainly not feasible now | 09:15 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
mpt | There should be a law against assigning bugs or work items to teams ... | 10:08 |
geser | mpt: "It is forbidden by law to file bug or work items." something like that? | 10:09 |
mpt | geser, no, just to assign them to teams | 10:09 |
mpt | filing them is fine | 10:09 |
geser | mpt: then file a bug which requests that the assign column gets hidden and assign it to the LP devs :) | 10:11 |
mpt | Hiding it wouldn't work, because that would prevent assigning bugs to individuals. | 10:12 |
geser | ah, indivuals are ok but just teams not | 10:13 |
mpt | right | 10:13 |
czajkowski | mpt: are you a happy chappy today! | 10:19 |
mpt | I'm a box of birds, czajkowski | 10:20 |
czajkowski | mpt: as always :) | 10:20 |
czajkowski | mpt: unlike my battery icon which looks like a bee :/ | 10:20 |
mpt | A bee? | 10:21 |
mpt | Screenshot? | 10:21 |
davmor2 | mpt: that's animal cruelty that is :P | 10:21 |
xnox | Is launchpad ok? it has been 'processing' lp:~dmitrij.ledkov/ubuntu/quantal/btrfs-tools/merge for a while. =) | 10:21 |
czajkowski | xnox: day downtime should be back up now | 10:22 |
xnox | czajkowski: if you say so =))) | 10:22 |
xnox | ok. | 10:22 |
czajkowski | mpt: http://twitpic.com/9msmw2 http://twitpic.com/9mtp01 http://twitpic.com/9mtqml | 10:22 |
czajkowski | xnox: in theory if not poke wgrant or stub | 10:22 |
mpt | czajkowski, that is very strange. It looks as if one of the icons is missing, so for just that icon, it's falling back to a different theme. | 10:24 |
czajkowski | mpt: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1001229 | 10:24 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1001229 in indicator-power "wrong icon for the power indicator after last 12.04 update" [Medium,Confirmed] | 10:24 |
czajkowski | mpt: aye jut it's randomly changing every 2-3 mins only way to make it behave is to plug in your power supply | 10:24 |
tsdgeos | hi guys, i can't change the branch status (the one under Branch Information) in https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/nautilus/fix_quicklist_underscore even if it's my branch, any idea why? Could i convince you to do it for me? | 10:50 |
czajkowski | tsdgeos: you should be able to do this | 10:54 |
tsdgeos | i hope i could | 10:54 |
tsdgeos | s/hope/wish | 10:54 |
tsdgeos | don't see the yellow pencil | 10:54 |
jelmer | tsdgeos: there is no yellow icon next to the statu ? | 10:55 |
jelmer | *status | 10:55 |
tsdgeos | nope | 10:55 |
tsdgeos | oh wait | 10:55 |
jelmer | tsdgeos: and you're logged in under the right account? | 10:55 |
tsdgeos | i'm not logged in | 10:55 |
tsdgeos | :D | 10:55 |
* tsdgeos hides | 10:55 | |
* czajkowski peers at tsdgeos :) | 10:55 | |
tsdgeos | sorry guys | 10:55 |
tsdgeos | and gal | 10:55 |
czajkowski | tsdgeos: tis grand | 10:55 |
xnox | maybe it's just me, but "Updating branch..." feels slow today | 11:13 |
xnox | unless there is backlog | 11:13 |
czajkowski | xnox: they are working on things atm | 11:35 |
czajkowski | so perhaps thats why | 11:36 |
xnox | ok | 11:36 |
gema | hello, trying to work with the new blueprint work items section. is there a way to assign two people to one task? When I try to put the task twice with different names against it, launchpad makes all of them the same name | 12:09 |
gema | uhmmmm... it seems now it allowed me to, is it me or does it reorder the tasks? | 12:12 |
dobey | sinzui: it would be pretty awesome if LP could work correctly in Netscape Navigator 3.04 Gold ;) | 14:37 |
sinzui | dobey 3.04 parsed numbers wrong. I suspect that it is imposable for it to ever position content correctly on the screen | 14:41 |
dobey | sinzui: it should work fine if you use tables :) | 14:42 |
sinzui | Yes. I was pretty angry with how quick tables were subverted to layout tools in 1994 | 14:42 |
sinzui | I think it took 2 days from the moment Netscape added support for them | 14:43 |
sinzui | but I do remember that moment in the Netscape 0.0 beta that I saw an animated GIF. That was really impressive | 14:43 |
dobey | CSS is just a complex description of how to draw tables, anyway | 14:45 |
sinzui | I don't think so. Positioning and z-index are a very different way of solving layout. Maybe you are referring to display:inline-block which is a really nice way to create a grid without a table | 14:47 |
dobey | i mean, for most sites, the end result is the same, and z-order is not necessary. | 14:48 |
mgz | the branch <lp:~clint-fewbar/charms/oneiric/statusnet/apparmor> has its stacking borked or similar | 15:03 |
dobey | mgz: i guess you should bug SpamapS directly about that? | 15:07 |
mgz | checking that no one else is already on the case, it's a known issue with the oneiric charms apparently | 15:08 |
mgz | seems like it's currently not being handled, context is: | 15:14 |
mgz | <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/2012-May/001536.html> | 15:14 |
dobey | stacking looks correct on lp for clint's branch | 15:16 |
dobey | it's stacked on lp:charms/oneiric/statusnet | 15:17 |
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
m_3 | james_w: ping | 16:51 |
james_w | hi m_3 | 16:52 |
james_w | how's it going? | 16:52 |
* m_3 stands around looking guilty :) | 16:52 | |
m_3 | james_w: so... we've got these branches | 16:52 |
m_3 | james_w: they're frozen still too I think | 16:53 |
james_w | yeah | 16:53 |
m_3 | james_w: any suggestions on who to ask for help here? | 16:53 |
james_w | I think that will need a Launchpad change to unfreeze them | 16:53 |
czajkowski | m_3: what's up ? | 16:53 |
m_3 | james_w: and then bzr reconfigure them in a script? | 16:53 |
m_3 | czajkowski: fundamental problem is that we have a series of branches that're stacked on the wrong bases if I understand correctly | 16:54 |
m_3 | example: | 16:54 |
m_3 | lp:~charmers/charms/oneiric/sbuild/trunk | 16:54 |
m_3 | I try to branch it and it's pointing to the precise branches | 16:55 |
m_3 | czajkowski: history is... lemme just pastebin the email summary | 16:55 |
m_3 | czajkowski: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1001230/ summarizes how we got these branches into their current state | 16:57 |
czajkowski | ok | 16:58 |
jimis | Hello all. Thought you'd like to know: It happens often to me that Launchpad times out when I try to browse big projects. Trying a second time after 30 seconds or so and request succeeds. | 16:58 |
m_3 | czajkowski: note that I mis-stated what `branch-distro` does in that email... it doesn't just _rename_ the branches | 16:58 |
czajkowski | m_3: findibng out how best to help 2 ticks | 16:58 |
james_w | ah right | 16:59 |
james_w | I don't know if the freezing will mean that we can't fix the stacking | 16:59 |
james_w | we can likely get an admin to fix the stacking without having to unfreeze them though | 16:59 |
james_w | abentley, hi, I'm sure you will know: how can we fix a branch that is stacked on a non-existent branch due to a rename? | 16:59 |
james_w | reconfigure --stacked-on seems to try and activate the fallback, so you have to have a working branch to use it? | 16:59 |
m_3 | czajkowski: many thanks!!! no particular rush... we need to a.) fix this and b.) make sure we don't do it again next release | 16:59 |
czajkowski | m_3: nods just rying to find out as heading away but will get someone first | 17:00 |
m_3 | james_w: the branches are based on _different_ branches (that also have lp:charms aliases)... not nec non-existent branches | 17:00 |
james_w | m_3, for next release an option to branch-distro to set the name to 'trunk' would seem to avoid this? | 17:00 |
lifeless | that got wont-fix I think | 17:01 |
lifeless | m_3: james_w: Stacking *is not semantic*, it shouldn't matter if oneiric is stacked on precise, as long as it was setup that way using bzr primitives (which will migrate data if needed) | 17:02 |
james_w | m_3, for redis-master it is complaining about https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/precise/redis-master/precise/ which doesn't exist | 17:02 |
lifeless | m_3: james_w: The branche should be stacked on +branch/ddddddd urls, not on long path urls. | 17:02 |
m_3 | james_w: I think that's the target branch for lp:charms/redis-master thought | 17:02 |
lifeless | If they are long path urls, something is broken somewhere. | 17:02 |
m_3 | s/thought/though/ | 17:02 |
james_w | m_3, no, lp:charms/redis-master points to .../trunk | 17:03 |
m_3 | james_w: ah, right | 17:03 |
james_w | m_3, branch-distro sets up that stacking, so I'm assuming the renaming you did to get /trunk is what broke the stacking | 17:03 |
m_3 | james_w: right... sounds correct | 17:04 |
lifeless | james_w: branch-distro is broken if it set .../trunk | 17:04 |
james_w | lifeless, branch-distro is what is broken then | 17:04 |
lifeless | james_w: see my prior comment | 17:04 |
james_w | old_location_branch.set_stacked_on_url('/' + new_db_branch.unique_name) | 17:04 |
lifeless | it should stack on numeric is | 17:04 |
lifeless | *ids* | 17:04 |
lifeless | to allow renames to be done. | 17:04 |
m_3 | lifeless: branch-distro set to /precise... but juju requires /trunk... so we renamed | 17:05 |
m_3 | lifeless: the rename script is in the email summary (halfway-ish) in http://paste.ubuntu.com/1001230/ | 17:05 |
lifeless | james_w: yeah, its using unique_name, which is fragile | 17:06 |
lifeless | james_w: could you file a bug? Its 5am here... | 17:06 |
lifeless | thumper did a project to migrate all existing branches to numeric stacked pointers, and change LP to stack numerically itself. | 17:07 |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1003016 | 17:07 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1003016 in Launchpad itself "branch-distro stacks on unique_name of new branches, not allowing renames" [Undecided,New] | 17:07 |
lifeless | We don't however magically change a symbolic name to a numeric | 17:07 |
lifeless | we just provide a good default to bzr's config when it inspects the server | 17:07 |
chrisccoulson | who broke armhf? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/105811044/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-armhf.thunderbird_13.0~b2%2Bbuild1-0ubuntu3_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz | 17:08 |
chrisccoulson | :) | 17:08 |
james_w | chrisccoulson, which slave is that? | 17:09 |
chrisccoulson | james_w, nihal | 17:09 |
james_w | chrisccoulson, cjwatson reported that already, and it's on the list to be hit with a cluebat | 17:10 |
chrisccoulson | ah, cool. thanks! | 17:10 |
czajkowski | heh | 17:10 |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1003017 | 17:10 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1003017 in Launchpad itself "Allow changing the new name of the branches produced by branch-distro" [Undecided,New] | 17:10 |
=== czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | ||
james_w | m_3, do you know if there is a bug about the oneiric branches being frozen? | 17:11 |
m_3 | james_w: dunno | 17:11 |
m_3 | james_w: Bug #991980 | 17:12 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 991980 in Juju Charms Collection "Oneiric official branches are all locked" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/991980 | 17:12 |
james_w | thanks | 17:12 |
james_w | now that we've filed all the bugs hopefully we can get to fixing the broken branches now :-) | 17:13 |
lifeless | james_w: a bug about the wrong stacking location I meant. | 17:13 |
james_w | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1003016 | 17:14 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1003016 in Launchpad itself "branch-distro stacks on unique_name of new branches, not allowing renames" [High,Triaged] | 17:14 |
lifeless | james_w: we won't fixed the name choice, I don't know the bug number offhand to dupe it. | 17:14 |
james_w | already commented with the bug number! | 17:14 |
lifeless | james_w: if I'm sloppy right now, its because its 5am ;) | 17:14 |
lifeless | james_w: but in this case, I loaded the page before your comment :) | 17:15 |
james_w | sure | 17:17 |
james_w | how can we fix the stacked on location of these broken branches? | 17:17 |
lifeless | re-run the migration script thumper wrote | 17:17 |
lifeless | its idempotent | 17:18 |
lifeless | need to rename the branches back first. | 17:18 |
lifeless | so that it can find and resolve the names | 17:18 |
m_3 | lifeless: can you point to thumper's migration script? | 17:19 |
james_w | m_3, it's in the LP tree, one moment | 17:20 |
dobey | is there a way to tell recipes on lp to include the "NubuntuM" part of the version? | 17:22 |
james_w | m_3, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/view/head:/scripts/update-stacked-on.py | 17:23 |
james_w | to be used with http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/view/head:/scripts/get-stacked-on-branches.py | 17:23 |
james_w | dobey, you mean from the changelog? | 17:23 |
m_3 | james_w: thanks... looking now | 17:25 |
dobey | james_w: yes. | 17:25 |
james_w | dobey, {debversion} | 17:26 |
james_w | dobey, requires format 0.4 | 17:26 |
dobey | ah ok, cool | 17:27 |
dobey | thanks | 17:27 |
dobey | james_w: might you also know what LockNotHeld error from bzr means? #bzr seems to be deaf to my cry at the moment :) | 17:27 |
* james_w can't hear dobey | 17:38 | |
james_w | dobey, I don't really know | 17:38 |
dobey | heh | 17:38 |
dobey | ok | 17:38 |
james_w | dobey, possibly that locking isn't being done correctly and the operation in question needs a lock that hasn't been taken, but I think that error is different | 17:39 |
james_w | dobey, possibly that the lock on disk isn't the state that bzr thinks it should be | 17:39 |
james_w | possibly something else | 17:39 |
dobey | hmm | 17:39 |
james_w | dobey, getting a backtrace by running with "bzr -Derror" might be useful | 17:39 |
james_w | "bzr -Dlock" might be useful too | 17:40 |
dobey | james_w: so it's not from bzr the program itself, but from tarmac using bzrlib | 17:40 |
james_w | ah, hmm | 17:40 |
james_w | dobey, do you have plugins that interact with bzrlib as well by any chance? | 17:41 |
dobey | yes | 17:41 |
james_w | and is tarmac running on precise? | 17:41 |
dobey | yes | 17:41 |
james_w | I have no new information for you | 17:42 |
james_w | but they are possible sources of the error given that we aren't seeing it without those two things | 17:42 |
james_w | class ObjectNotLocked(LockError): | 17:43 |
james_w | _fmt = "%(obj)r is not locked" | 17:43 |
james_w | # this can indicate that any particular object is not locked; see also | 17:43 |
james_w | # LockNotHeld which means that a particular *lock* object is not held by | 17:43 |
james_w | # the caller -- perhaps they should be unified. | 17:43 |
dobey | hmm | 17:44 |
dobey | that's quite odd | 17:44 |
dobey | thanks | 17:44 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo | ||
milk | howdy. i'm looking to login to my milkmiruku account, but the password reset doesn't work for what i think the address should be. what might my options be? | 20:09 |
dobey | what should the address be? | 20:21 |
milk_ | it should be something @milkmiruku.com. i thought i'd have gone with launchpad@milkmiruku, but it might have been before, but my milkmiruku@gmail.com doesn't work either | 20:25 |
=== milk_ is now known as milk | ||
dobey | milk: perhaps you should check spam folder | 20:25 |
milk | och, i tried again with gmail and it worked. prolly pebkac. thanking you. | 20:28 |
=== cinerama_ is now known as ceinrama | ||
=== ceinrama is now known as cinerama |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!