=== niceguyj_ is now known as niceguyjames === yofel_ is now known as yofel [11:47] can someone review python-jsonschema please its sitting in binary new, and its blocking glance [12:00] zul: Sorry for the delay. For main inclusion, I expect that the MIR team will want (a) a watch file and (b) for the package to run its test suite at build time (e.g. 'python -m unittest discover'). Neither of these block acceptance into the archive, though, so accepted. Thanks [12:00] cjwatson: cool...ill get to that today, thanks [12:02] zul: Hmm, why does python-jsonschema seem to install into /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ directly rather than as a symlink into /usr/share/pyshared/? Am I hallucinating? [12:02] cjwatson: im not sure but ill take another look at it [12:08] Not a big deal since there'll be no python2.8, but it's a bit weird [12:14] cjwatson, zul: I think that's completely expected [12:14] dh_python2 just does that now, it seems the /pyshared/ approach has been dropped [12:15] i. e. it affects all python packages now [12:15] not just -jsonschema [12:15] Oh, huh [12:15] Surprising [12:16] NB I'm not saying that it really should be like that, just that it's not package specific, but a changed behaviour from dh_python2 apparently [12:16] Yeah, I see that now === seb128 is now known as robert_ancell === robert_ancell is now known as seb128 [14:19] pitti and cjwatson: The change doko made in dh_python2 in Ubuntu is uncoordinated with Debian and gratuitously breaks packages. It should be reverted. [14:21] The relevant bug is Bug 1001912 [14:21] Launchpad bug 1001912 in python-defaults "dh_python2: revert pyshared removal in 2.7.3-0ubuntu3" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1001912 [15:18] ScottK: doko is currently away so you shouldn't expect a quick response from him; I think you should go ahead and revert it for now as the safer option [15:18] slangasek: Thanks. [15:19] slangasek: Would you mind saying so on ubuntu-devel ML too (so I can point to it when he gets back)? [15:19] well, he has been replying on the bug [15:19] I mind saying on ubuntu-devel that he's away, yes :) [15:20] slangasek: Right, I mean that I should go ahead. [15:20] I don't mind leaving the reason out. [15:20] I guess inside canonical you have some kind of free/busy calendar. [15:20] it would actually be nice if there were somewhere where anyone could mark themselves as temporarily away. [15:20] ScottK: sure [15:20] (sorry I'm just thinking out aloud) [15:48] cjwatson: Hey, what changes do i need to make on nusakan to start using a livefs? [15:50] * ogra_ wonders if you actually need any code changes === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [15:51] theoretically you might be able to just use the right cmdline [15:52] Daviey: mail me the details of what you're doing and I can advise and/or sort it out [15:52] cjwatson: Does it really need a mail? 'make ubuntu server use live-installer' [15:53] * ogra_ thinks theoretically teh following might just work ... : buildlive ubuntu-server daily-live && for-project ubuntu-server cron.daily-live [15:54] but you will likely need ubiquity adjustments or do you plan to run under X ? [15:55] ogra_: We've tested with d-i net installs, using live-installer udeb, not ubiquty. [15:56] Daviey: please mail me :) [15:56] I don't have a lot of spare brain [15:56] and I need to know what if anything you've done to livecd-rootfs so far [15:57] also you guys owe me two live-installer bug reports from UDS [15:57] cjwatson, can you add me to the response. Would like to understand this. [15:57] Daviey: ^- [15:58] cjwatson: were they not reported.. *sigh*.. Sorry... Well, we can't switch until they are fixed.. So, i'll shelve this, pending those bugs. [15:59] Daviey: have you done anything to livecd-rootfs? [16:08] cjwatson: nein [16:18] Daviey: here, I have one of the bugs fixed locally already (missing kernel). do you remember off the top of your head what the other one was? [16:20] cjwatson: One was kernel not being installed if outside the squashfs.. and the other was a debconf value for remote retrieval of squashfs [16:20] oh, that one [16:20] hm, not sure how to do those two simultaneously, mind :) [16:20] maybe it would be easier to disable the kernel hack in server squashfs generation for now [16:21] * cjwatson also notes that live-installer doesn't seem to update the initramfs, at least from code inspection [16:21] well.. if you are netinstalling, you don't have the kernel on the filesystem, do you? [16:21] which means they need additional retrieval, unless bundled into the quashfs (yucky) [16:22] bundling it into the squashfs isn't particularly yucky [16:22] it's a removal of an Ubuntu-specific optimisation *shrug* [16:22] all other squashfses carry it [16:22] well, it means for cd image, the kernel is shipped twice? [16:22] Yes [16:22] Not the end of the worl [16:22] d [16:22] no. [16:22] It makes some difference for space, but we got by without it for quite a while [16:23] update-initramfs> Ah, never mind, it'll remove casper and then update-initramfs, now that I look at it [16:24] cjwatson: okay, bundling seems reasonable, and satisfies cd and netinst. [16:24] I've fixed live-installer to cope with unbundling (I think) anyway [16:28] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule [16:28] oo, thanks [16:28] has been updated, based on the interlock. [16:29] if anyone spots any glitches, please flag. :) [16:29] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock [16:29] has all the key events in it now as well. [16:30] (getting a few more details added from Linaro though...) [16:36] Daviey: and you have network image support as well, assuming I didn't screw it up. can't easily test it until we have images. [16:45] Is the chroot problem on nihal known? See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/2.7.3-0ubuntu4/+build/3509558 [16:47] I got ops to fix that, but didn't go through and retry stuff. Oh, but that's more recent. Not again. [16:48] reported [16:55] Thanks. [16:56] Hope those boxes get upgraded to precise/armhf soon ... [16:58] * ogra_ hopes for highbank instead :) [17:05] ogra_: you should have put that calxeda server in your bag while there weren't looking ;) [17:05] damned, now you tell me ! [17:06] though i would have been to sick to carry it i guess [17:25] geez [17:25] ubuntu-server-dove/quantal/armel+dove failed to build [17:26] i wouldnt have thought i'd ever seee such a message again :) [17:26] ogra_: awesome!!! [17:26] heh [17:26] i doubt building dove was intentional :) [17:26] ogra_: that's going straight to google+! [17:40] ogra_: wasn't intentional, I was experimenting but not with that; I'll fix it up in a bit === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] [22:07] best. process improvement. ever. [22:08] ? [22:08] oh, you've ignored queuebot :P [22:08] ;) [22:08] backports DIY + queuebot = fast acceptance [22:08] so was that sarcasm? :) [22:08] ah [22:09] the queuebot should just send to twitter [22:10] that's certainly easy to implement ;) [22:10] that was a very fast backport! [22:12] still binary NEW to go! [22:12] * Laney whips ubuntu-archive [22:13] Laney: That's not the proper backports versioning. [22:14] Should be 1.9.9-1~precise1 [22:14] it is what broder and cjwatson came up with at UDS [22:14] Sigh. [22:14] Any particular reason to change or are we just changing for changes sake? [22:14] to work around the zaney zebra wrap-around [22:14] I thought there was a concerted effort to try to reduce the use of codenames post release? [22:14] We're about to wrap round the alphabet. [22:14] FSVO "about". [22:15] We need to stop assuming that codenames sort. [22:15] OK. [22:15] Backports is approximately the last place we need to assume that though. [22:15] err .. stop assuming that. [22:15] Indeed. But why wait? :-) [22:16] It's also one of the few places that was assuming it in the first place. [22:16] It's certainly a change there should be some communication about. [22:16] OK. [22:16] well, i would hope that there would be a newer upstream version of software come wrap-around time for the backports usecase.. [22:16] but yes, it's a race regardless. [22:16] I mind the surprise more than I mind the change. [22:16] I was hoping broder would send mail about it ;-) [22:17] hm, the process page doesn't mention versioning at all any more [22:17] * cjwatson eyes openlp and wonders if he can get the local primary school to stop using Powerpoint for projecting hymns ... [22:18] the modern age... back in my day we made good with OHP [22:19] hand written lyrics no less. [22:19] of course [22:20] kids today, don't know they are born, eh Laney ? [22:21] * Laney shares a Werthers with Daviey