[07:01] good morning [09:56] my project finally got built, can someone check if this lens now meets the arb-requirements? https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/782/ [09:56] https://code.launchpad.net/~malinkb [10:04] hi Malin, I'm not a member of the ARB, but here are a couple of suggestions after looking at your app: [10:04] - I'd suggest adding icons in all sizes [10:05] - There are a few typos in the long description e.g. 'lense', I'd suggest running a spell checker and editing it [10:09] ah, I see. I should fix the typos [10:09] hm, so what other sizes do I need? [10:11] ah, I should have 128x128, 32x32 and 16x16, but why? [10:11] they are shown in different places, but I don't know exactly which [10:12] yeah, cause the lens it self needs 64x64 only [10:12] but if it needs different sizes for the software center, I should add larger and smaler of course [10:12] yeah [10:13] Malin, and I think there is no need to add the link to the homepage in the description, that is already shown in the software center as a link from the home page field you fill in as part of the submission process [10:17] oki [10:17] so I should remove the link to the launchpad-project-page? [10:20] in the description, yes, but not on the other field :) [10:35] ah, oki [10:35] very cool lens, btw :) [10:35] hm, I uploaded more icons, but the 128x128 became unsharp :S [10:35] ah, you think so? thanx [10:36] I want to implement some few new features to it [10:37] there is a realtime-service available, so I need access to an api for it, then it wil present realtime info for the busstop you are going to travel from :) [10:46] But first step is complete. The lens, works. The second thing is to get it into software center [10:46] then I can improve it [12:33] Malin, http://askubuntu.com/questions/141594/where-are-the-different-app-icon-sizes-submitted-through-the-app-developer-site [12:34] Malin, I would ping someone from the ARB to review it, or send an e-mail to ubuntu-app-devel(AT)lists(DOT)ubuntu(DOT)com [12:42] dpm: oki :) thanx [12:42] yw :) [12:43] I have to put in a newer link to source code i think [12:48] hm. dosen't work [12:49] :( [12:51] ah, it have to be admitted first :) [16:43] ajmitch: has wendar been around lately? [16:43] not that I've seen [16:46] she has a work item for writing an ARB backend for pkgme [16:47] but I don't know what she was planning, as i don't think it's possible to do that [16:47] right, she was making good progress on that one at UDS [16:47] why don't you think it's possible? [16:47] because the backends are source-specific, not destination specific [16:47] I can see an ARB+python backend, and an ARB+cmake backend [16:48] but not just one single ARB backend [16:48] right, we talked about the ARB backend calling the other backends [16:48] oh, ok... [16:48] the ARB backend would get used because of the extra info passed through from the myapps site [16:48] hmmm, too bad backends are script, not objects [16:49] yeah [16:49] python's polymorphism would have made that task easier [16:49] currently it just calls one backend, rther than chaining them together, so it has to be done manually [16:49] but as james_w suggested, you can have a backend run pkgme again [16:50] recursively calling pkgme? [16:50] so once we get the ARB queue under control again, I'll need to catch up with you on some of the developer.u.c documentation [16:50] yep [16:51] sure, I think most of the stuff I need for developer.u.c is already on your wikis, I just need to know which ones to use [16:51] there's also the API documentation stuff to look at [16:51] what do you mean? [16:51] not quite as related, but I've got work items for that [16:51] oh, finding outdated links? [16:52] the GDN frontend [16:52] oh, right [16:52] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-q-platform-docs [16:52] yeah, we'll probably want to do a hangout or something to discuss our plans for that [16:52] ok [16:52] I need to get that gdn code and poke around at it too [16:53] * ajmitch has branched it, looked at it brielfy, but didn't do much at all in the week after uds [16:53] as we'll need to pick that or RTD before doing any front-end work [16:53] cursed ubuflu [16:54] hey ajmitch, recovered from ubuflu already? [16:54] mostly [16:54] good to hear that :) [16:56] seems like we almost forgot it's the last friday of the month this week, I'd better mail the list & see if people are around for a meeting [16:57] hey, may I ask you guys to review the app I sent at https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/874/ ? I'd like to write a series of blog posts about how it got started and how it got to the USC, and it'd be awesome if it were available in the SC when I write the first post. Should be easy to review: it's a quickly app andrewsomething had already a look at it and I merged his packaging changes [16:58] I can try & look at it this weekend if someone else doesn't get to it [16:58] firstly I need to get the AU lens in, along with catching up on some others :) [16:59] cool, thanks [17:00] ok, motu meeting is over, I'm going to try & get a couple of hours more sleep :) [17:00] * ajmitch will be around later [23:43] darn, no dpm around still [23:43] mhall119: if you're around, is it ok to change the visibility on http://developer.ubuntu.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=99&action=edit to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntudeveloperportal/+bug/968235 ? [23:45] ajmitch: I'm not sure what's being done on there [23:45] did you write the page, or just making changes to it? [23:46] or does it just need to be made public? [23:46] I didn't write it or make changes, I was hoping to catch dpm to ask if it was inadvertantly left as private [23:46] afaict it just needs to be made public [23:46] but I didn't want to just do so without checking with someone [23:46] hmmm, it looks out of date now [23:48] yeah, lots of that is too old to be helpful [23:49] ajmitch: maybe it would be better to just change the link that points there to point to http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/ instead [23:50] ok [23:53] assuming it'll let me edit [23:53] I think I'll leave it until later