[01:47] <blkperl> can someone mark bug 997096 as high - reasons: renders essential features or functionality of the application and has a servere impact on a small portion of ubuntu users
[01:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 997096 in eglibc "nscd segmentation fault" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/997096
[01:48] <blkperl> high importance rather
[04:18] <Logan_> micahg: For bug 990985, you said that the description containing "Java" wasn't in the apt-cache show response, but it does still show up in the Software Center. Any reason behind this?
[04:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 990985 in ubuntu-restricted-extras "Description Says It'll Install Java, But It Doesn't" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/990985
[04:19] <micahg> Logan_: what release?
[04:19] <Logan_> I'm in Precise
[04:19] <Logan_> but there haven't been any changes since then
[04:19] <Logan_> for the package, at least
[04:19] <micahg> app-install-data might need a refresh
[04:20]  * Logan_ looks
[04:22] <Logan_> holy crap that's a large file
[04:22] <Logan_> it seems so...inefficient
[04:23] <Logan_> it froze my browser :-(
[05:11] <micahg> Logan_: I think that Bug #998309  could be reevaluated
[05:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 998309 in vim "remove vim-tiny will remove ubuntu-minimal (dup-of: 100029)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/998309
[05:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 100029 in ubuntu-meta "[wishlist] remove vim-tiny/vim-minimal from ubuntu default install." [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/100029
[05:11] <Logan_> How so?
[05:12] <micahg> reason given isn't valid anymore, we can put something on the CD without it being in minimal (and nano is in standard, not minimal at this point)
[05:13] <Logan_> hmm
[05:13] <Logan_> but note the related bug I linked to
[05:13] <micahg> I just did :)
[05:14]  * micahg digs deepr
[05:16] <micahg> nope, don't see any reason
[05:17] <Logan_> micahg: reason for?
[05:17] <micahg> don't see any comments why vim-tiny should be in minimal
[05:17]  * micahg reopens
[05:17] <Logan_> oh
[05:18] <Logan_> which one are you reopening?
[05:18] <Logan_> 100029?
[05:18] <micahg> the new one
[05:18] <Logan_> whoops, I fail
[05:18] <Logan_> which one are you reopening? :-P
[05:20] <micahg> Bug #998309
[05:20] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 998309 in vim "remove vim-tiny will remove ubuntu-minimal (dup-of: 100029)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/998309
[05:20] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 100029 in ubuntu-meta "[wishlist] remove vim-tiny/vim-minimal from ubuntu default install." [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/100029
[05:22] <Logan_> micahg: you should reopen 100029 instead
[05:22] <Logan_> it's older
[05:22] <micahg> Logan_: no, it's history at this point :)
[05:22] <Logan_> :-(
[05:23]  * Logan_ subscribes
[05:24] <Logan_> micahg: you've gotta admit
[05:24] <Logan_> I handled that bug well. :-P
[05:24] <Logan_> added the correct package, marked the current one as invalid, added a detailed explanation
[05:24] <Logan_> I'm a new triager, so I'm still trying to get good at this :-P
[05:26] <micahg> Logan_: heh, don't worry about
[05:26] <micahg> Logan_: you got the facts straight, the extra leap I made was because I have a dev hat as well :)
[05:26] <Logan_> heh
[05:26] <Logan_> you and your hat
[05:28]  * micahg needs a hat rack
[05:35]  * micahg marks it triaged as wel
[05:38] <Logan_> cool beans
[05:39] <micahg> Logan_: thanks for your work on this :)
[05:39] <Logan_> haha, np
[05:39] <Logan_> thank you!
[11:11] <mitya57> Hi there, can anybody please add precise targets to bug 990689 and bug 1002802?
[11:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 990689 in unity-mail "No message count" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/990689
[11:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1002802 in unity-mail "[SRU] Unity-Mail 0.92.3 bugfix release" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1002802
[11:29] <ritz> heya, looking for a bug supervisor to nominate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-nettool/+bug/806606 for SRU, as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates .
[11:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 806606 in gnome-nettool "ip information frame not displayed correctly" [Critical,Fix released]
[11:29] <ritz> new to this process, let me know if I missed on something here
[11:38] <ritz> seb128, hi, busy ? ^^^
[11:48] <seb128> ritz, hi
[11:50] <seb128> ritz, nominated for oneiric, you should probably subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to it as well
[11:57] <ritz> seb128, will do, thanks
[11:57] <seb128> yw!
[17:23] <Nex2> hi
[17:24] <Nex2> i've got a problem with my system as it frequently freezes... I'm running ubuntu 12.04 and a nvidia card. I've read something about this issue but could not find a solution. Can anyone help me?
[17:25] <Nex2> when it freezes, I can still move my cursor, but can't switch to tty or something else
[17:26] <Nex2> btw: is this the right channel to ask? :)
[17:52] <Nex2> I guess I'm in the wrong channel? and should join ubuntu?
[17:52] <Nex2> #ubuntu
[17:54] <s9iper1> just click on ubuntu with # like this #ubuntu
[19:35] <Nex2> that does not really answer my question and tbh I don't understand what you want to tell me :)
[19:36] <Nex2> anyway, I still guess this is the wrong channel...thanks anyway...have a nice evening...bye
[20:57] <hendry> what's the best tool to report an issue with xrandr? reportbug?
[21:23] <Logan_> hendry: ubuntu-bug libxrandr2
[21:23] <Logan_> (Assuming that's the package providing xrandr.)
[21:24] <Logan_> hendry: Actually, ubuntu-bug x11-xserver-utils
[21:24] <Logan_> Because, according to http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/precise/man1/xrandr.1.html, that command is provided by that package
[21:34] <hendry> umm, i get this Apport dialog about "development is completed"
[21:34] <hendry> bit confused what to do next
[21:40] <hendry> when i do continue, it does build up a profile of my system, but doesn't allow me to add information how to trigger the bug
[21:40] <hendry> very confused how to report a bug