[00:09] RAOF, did you mean to drop the work item mlankhorst just added? [00:09] - [mlankhorst] Deal with fallout from nouveau ddx update: TODO [00:09] guessing was just a race condition :-) [00:09] bryceh: No, I did not. Race condition :) [01:01] sweet, and now dpkg-control has package hashing support [01:02] dpkg-control --source-suffix foo --binary-suffix foo -k xdmx,xdmx-tools,xnest [02:02] Iiiinteresting. [02:02] Intel has just decided that it doesn't particularly want to render text. [02:03] Ah, right. [02:03] I've hit that UXA bug. [02:03] Score [02:05] that will be the lead story on phoronix tomorrow [02:06] "chris halse rogers discovers intel bug" [02:29] My every utterance *does* have a weight that attracts others' notice :) [02:44] yeah, sort of like jesus [05:14] i'm getting some tearing with 3.4 final on sandy bridge [05:14] is this normal? [07:22] RAOF: race condition of 90 minutes ;o [07:22] Heh. [07:22] Race condition of not refreshing the page :) [08:13] hi, i need an driver for my ati radeon express x1100, ubuntu 12.04 [08:15] what package shoult i take? [08:18] meho: r600 if it works? :) [08:18] which you should already be using btw [08:21] mlankhorst, its a fresh installation, i think this is a universal driver by unbutu? [08:23] meho: yeah r600 is the open source driver, should already be there on fresh installs [08:23] if it works no need to install drivers :) [08:25] mlankhorst, in systeminformation der card is known as: unknown? how can i activate the 3d acceleration? [08:26] meho: how do you know you're not getting 3d acceleration atm? [08:28] i think so :), cause the card is unknown. and no effects like on my pc. [08:40] mlankhorst, you`r right! the acceleration is allready on. ich tested it with cairo-dock. [08:40] :-) [08:41] meho: yeah the open source drivers are better than fglrx if they work, so i dont recommend installing drivers in most cases [08:41] mlankhorst, i dont understand why is the card in unity-system-info unknown? [08:42] mlankhorst, but with "sudo lspci | grep -i vga" it shows:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200M] [08:44] mlankhorst, thank you for helping! [08:45] RAOF: I guess the lts-stack thing isn't completely tested? [08:56] Processing the control file... [08:56] Traceback (most recent call last): [08:56] File "../../dpkg-control", line 142, in [08:56] killings = options.kill_binaries.split(',') [08:56] AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split' [08:59] hmm, can't we sru mesa 8.0.3 now with the relaxed policy? [09:01] tbh we should sru synaptics-1.6.3 when its released [09:02] there's no 1.6.2 yet :) [09:03] synaptics-1.6-branch.version() [09:11] need to get the new mesa in quantal first though [09:12] yeah was looking at some stuff, small errors in each of the scripts that made them not work [09:43] RAOF: script works after a few fixes [10:13] RAOF: pushed them :) [10:43] RAOF: hmm.. do we need to rename binary drivers? Aren't we already updating them in backports when they become available? [10:47] you mean blobs? [10:47] no need to [10:47] since they have -updates [10:47] though, -updates is changed at will [10:47] so maybe they do need renames after all [10:48] im just commenting them out for now, too much work in fglrx [11:07] ok fun, script's still broken :) [11:12] RAOF: ping if still awake [11:38] now to figure out how to mimmic launchpad locally [11:38] build packages with the other packages I built [11:39] set up a chroot, build them there [11:39] suppose [11:40] or if using sbuild, teach it to use a local package cache, but i've never done that.. [11:40] should have a local repo though, still haven't configured reprepro for it tho [11:40] ill just build in tmpfs chroot [11:52] hm interesting [14:17] bryceh/RAOF: I've been trying to build the renamed things, but all the debian/rules modifications are the biggest bottleneck atm. I'm trying to automate those modifications as much as I can. :-) [15:23] bryceh: I've made https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Bugs/UpdateManagerWarningForI8xx which had moved a redirect to X/i8xxUnsupported. Its important to keep the redirect as update-manager contains that url in it. [17:58] bdmurray, ok sounds good [17:58] bdmurray, I'd reaped that in a wiki spring cleaning a few weeks back [18:00] bryceh: oh i posted my findings so far on the mailing list, tldr version: undecided :) [18:03] mlankhorst, ok reading [18:04] but reply there, im going to bike to a friend now and back for the next few hours [18:04] bb :) [22:31] ok that was fun [22:36] RAOF, we need utouch-geis pocket copied from precise-proposed to quantal [22:36] is there a way for me to do that? [22:36] or does an archive admin like yourself need to do it? [22:53] cnd: I don't know off the top of my head how to do that. I *think* you could requestsync. [22:53] Or you could just upload to quantal, of course. [22:56] RAOF, isn't there an issue if it has the same version? [22:56] it would be rebuilt [22:56] and thus there would be two different packages with the same version [22:57] Right, you'd need to bump the version. [22:58] We're actually well past the time where you should be uploading to quantal first, anyway. [22:59] RAOF, this is for a package before quantal was opn [22:59] open [22:59] Not the one that I accepted on Wednesday? [23:00] yes, the one you accepted into precise-updates [23:00] it was uploaded to precise-proposed before that though [23:00] while quantal wasn't yet open [23:00] Oh, right. And I forgot to copy it to quantal. [23:01] so is this something you need to take care of? [23:01] Yes. [23:01] ok [23:01] thanks :)