[00:09] <bryceh> RAOF, did you mean to drop the work item mlankhorst just added?
[00:09] <bryceh> - [mlankhorst] Deal with fallout from nouveau ddx update: TODO
[00:09] <bryceh> guessing was just a race condition :-)
[00:09] <RAOF> bryceh: No, I did not.  Race condition :)
[01:01] <bryceh> sweet, and now dpkg-control has package hashing support
[01:02] <bryceh>  dpkg-control --source-suffix foo --binary-suffix foo -k xdmx,xdmx-tools,xnest
[02:02] <RAOF> Iiiinteresting.
[02:02] <RAOF> Intel has just decided that it doesn't particularly want to render text.
[02:03] <RAOF> Ah, right.
[02:03] <RAOF> I've hit that UXA bug.
[02:03] <RAOF> Score
[02:05] <bjsnider> that will be the lead story on phoronix tomorrow
[02:06] <bjsnider> "chris halse rogers discovers intel bug"
[02:29] <RAOF> My every utterance *does* have a weight that attracts others' notice :)
[02:44] <bjsnider> yeah, sort of like jesus
[05:14] <eric_> i'm getting some tearing with 3.4 final on sandy bridge
[05:14] <eric_> is this normal?
[07:22] <mlankhorst> RAOF: race condition of 90 minutes ;o
[07:22] <RAOF> Heh.
[07:22] <RAOF> Race condition of not refreshing the page :)
[08:13] <meho> hi, i need an driver for my ati radeon express x1100, ubuntu 12.04
[08:15] <meho> what package shoult i take?
[08:18] <mlankhorst> meho: r600 if it works? :)
[08:18] <mlankhorst> which you should already be using btw
[08:21] <meho> mlankhorst, its a fresh installation, i think this is a universal driver by unbutu?
[08:23] <mlankhorst> meho: yeah r600 is the open source driver, should already be there on fresh installs
[08:23] <mlankhorst> if it works no need to install drivers :)
[08:25] <meho> mlankhorst, in systeminformation der card is known as: unknown? how can i activate the 3d acceleration?
[08:26] <mlankhorst> meho: how do you know you're not getting 3d acceleration atm?
[08:28] <meho> i think so :), cause the card is unknown. and no effects like on my pc.
[08:40] <meho> mlankhorst, you`r right! the acceleration is allready on. ich tested it with cairo-dock.
[08:40] <mlankhorst> :-)
[08:41] <mlankhorst> meho: yeah the open source drivers are better than fglrx if they work, so i dont recommend installing drivers in most cases
[08:41] <meho> mlankhorst, i dont understand why is the card in unity-system-info unknown?
[08:42] <meho> mlankhorst, but with "sudo lspci | grep -i vga" it shows:01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RC410 [Radeon Xpress 200M]
[08:44] <meho> mlankhorst, thank you for helping!
[08:45] <mlankhorst> RAOF: I guess the lts-stack thing isn't completely tested?
[08:56] <mlankhorst> Processing the control file...
[08:56] <mlankhorst> Traceback (most recent call last):
[08:56] <mlankhorst>   File "../../dpkg-control", line 142, in <module>
[08:56] <mlankhorst>     killings = options.kill_binaries.split(',')
[08:56] <mlankhorst> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'split'
[08:59] <tjaalton> hmm, can't we sru mesa 8.0.3 now with the relaxed policy?
[09:01] <mlankhorst> tbh we should sru synaptics-1.6.3 when its released
[09:02] <tjaalton> there's no 1.6.2 yet :)
[09:03] <mlankhorst> synaptics-1.6-branch.version()
[09:11] <tjaalton> need to get the new mesa in quantal first though
[09:12] <mlankhorst> yeah was looking at some stuff, small errors in each of the scripts that made them not work
[09:43] <mlankhorst> RAOF: script works after a few fixes
[10:13] <mlankhorst> RAOF: pushed them :)
[10:43] <mlankhorst> RAOF: hmm.. do we need to rename binary drivers? Aren't we already updating them in backports when they become available?
[10:47] <tjaalton> you mean blobs?
[10:47] <tjaalton> no need to
[10:47] <tjaalton> since they have -updates
[10:47] <tjaalton> though, -updates is changed at will
[10:47] <tjaalton> so maybe they do need renames after all
[10:48] <mlankhorst> im just commenting them out for now, too much work in fglrx
[11:07] <mlankhorst> ok fun, script's still broken :)
[11:12] <mlankhorst> RAOF: ping if still awake
[11:38] <mlankhorst> now to figure out how to mimmic launchpad locally
[11:38] <mlankhorst> build packages with the other packages I built
[11:39] <tjaalton> set up a chroot, build them there
[11:39] <mlankhorst> suppose
[11:40] <tjaalton> or if using sbuild, teach it to use a local package cache, but i've never done that..
[11:40] <tjaalton> should have a local repo though, still haven't configured reprepro for it tho
[11:40] <mlankhorst> ill just build in tmpfs chroot
[11:52] <mlankhorst> hm interesting
[14:17] <mlankhorst> bryceh/RAOF: I've been trying to build the renamed things, but all the debian/rules modifications are the biggest bottleneck atm. I'm trying to automate those modifications as much as I can. :-)
[15:23] <bdmurray> bryceh: I've made https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Bugs/UpdateManagerWarningForI8xx which had moved a redirect to X/i8xxUnsupported.  Its important to keep the redirect as update-manager contains that url in it.
[17:58] <bryceh> bdmurray, ok sounds good
[17:58] <bryceh> bdmurray, I'd reaped that in a wiki spring cleaning  a few weeks back
[18:00] <mlankhorst> bryceh: oh i posted my findings so far on the mailing list, tldr version: undecided :)
[18:03] <bryceh> mlankhorst, ok reading
[18:04] <mlankhorst> but reply there, im going to bike to a friend now and back for the next few hours
[18:04] <mlankhorst> bb :)
[22:31] <mlankhorst> ok that was fun
[22:36] <cnd> RAOF, we need utouch-geis pocket copied from precise-proposed to quantal
[22:36] <cnd> is there a way for me to do that?
[22:36] <cnd> or does an archive admin like yourself need to do it?
[22:53] <RAOF> cnd: I don't know off the top of my head how to do that. I *think* you could requestsync.
[22:53] <RAOF> Or you could just upload to quantal, of course.
[22:56] <cnd> RAOF, isn't there an issue if it has the same version?
[22:56] <cnd> it would be rebuilt
[22:56] <cnd> and thus there would be two different packages with the same version
[22:57] <RAOF> Right, you'd need to bump the version.
[22:58] <RAOF> We're actually well past the time where you should be uploading to quantal first, anyway.
[22:59] <cnd> RAOF, this is for a package before quantal was opn
[22:59] <cnd> open
[22:59] <RAOF> Not the one that I accepted on Wednesday?
[23:00] <cnd> yes, the one you accepted into precise-updates
[23:00] <cnd> it was uploaded to precise-proposed before that though
[23:00] <cnd> while quantal wasn't yet open
[23:00] <RAOF> Oh, right. And I forgot to copy it to quantal.
[23:01] <cnd> so is this something you need to take care of?
[23:01] <RAOF> Yes.
[23:01] <cnd> ok
[23:01] <cnd> thanks :)