[02:35] <Bluefoxicy> bluefox@icebox:~$ sudo fstrim -v /
[02:35] <Bluefoxicy> [sudo] password for bluefox:
[02:36] <Bluefoxicy> /: 10519232512 bytes were trimmed
[02:36] <Bluefoxicy> how about running fstrim in a cron job?
[10:42] <Fudge> howdy
[15:12] <BluesKaj> hey all
[20:11] <rrva> hi! I want to slim down on memory usage on my ubuntu precise laptop. What the best route to go? I use gnome3 desktop but there are waaay to many processes running after I did a default install. There are many things I personally do not need. Any common guides on what packages to purge?
[20:12] <penguin42> rrva: This channel is for the next ubuntu - quantal - Precise is in #ubuntu
[20:13] <rrva> ok what would quantal guidelines be?
[20:14] <genii-around> They would be the same. You are better to ask in the correct channel
[20:45] <MrChrisDruif> jbicha; what section should I definitely read on http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/ before I try to tackle my own bug?
[21:07] <jbicha> MrChrisDruif: you definitely need getting set up, but there are several other parts that are probably important too
[21:09] <MrChrisDruif> Yeah. I'm curious btw who decided to give epiphany-browser in quantal version number 3.5.1-0ubuntu1 ....debian sid is still at 3.4.2-1
[21:11] <MrChrisDruif> jbicha; packages are grabbed from debian sid right?
[21:15] <jbicha> MrChrisDruif: not really, epiphany-browser is part of GNOME and 3.5.1 is the first development snapshot of what will be GNOME 3.6
[21:17] <MrChrisDruif> And gnome 3.6 will be included in 12.10? If so, why is only epiphany-extensions updated and the rest not? <_<"
[21:18] <jbicha> GNOME didn't release a version 3.5.1 of epiphany-extensions
[21:20] <MrChrisDruif> That's what making me curious why Ubuntu does have one
[21:20] <jbicha> when it is time for a release, some parts of GNOME haven't changes, or the developer might be busy
[21:21] <jbicha> here's a list of all of the GNOME releases in May: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2012-May/thread.html
[21:22] <MrChrisDruif> Well, -extensions is still 3.4.0-2 while -browser is at 3.5.1-0ubuntu1 O_O
[21:22] <jbicha> right and that's fine, the extensions still work, right?
[21:23] <jbicha> you'll also need http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/fixing-a-bug.html
[21:24] <jbicha> and the part that needs fixing is in debian/control.in and debian/control