[05:27] <micahg> xclusive585: I don't maintain boinc :)
[05:33] <xclusive585> well who does micahg? I've got head's to crack. No, just kidding they've been making great progress communicating and getting things done, I've been watching quietly from afar
[05:33] <micahg> xclusive585: Ubuntu doesn't have maintainers, what do you need
[05:34] <xclusive585> I need nothing. as I said they are working on things. Just waiting to see the final fixes find there way down the repository line. In time. Thanks for your help in that issue also.
[06:52] <ritz> Hi, I was looking for an SRU on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-advantage/+bug/987363 for oneiric
[06:52] <ubot2> ritz: Error: <Bugtracker.plugin.Launchpad instance at 0xa91202c> bug 987363 not found
[06:52] <ritz> CVE-2012-1594
[06:52] <ubot2> ritz: epan/dissectors/packet-ieee80211.c in the IEEE 802.11 dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted packet. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-1594)
[06:57] <micahg> ritz: #ubuntu-hardened can help you with that later today (~5-6 hrs)
[06:58] <ritz> micahg, thanks :)
[12:52] <larsduesing> Am I here right for questions with apport?
[12:53] <larsduesing> devel-questions
[13:16] <hggdh> larsduesing: better ask devel questions on #ubuntu-desktop or #ubuntu-devel> I think you will find some developers on -desktop
[13:17] <larsduesing> ok, thanks
[13:18] <hggdh> clarification: you should find some *apport* developers on -desktop
[13:18] <larsduesing> *g*
[13:18] <larsduesing> thank you
[13:56] <seb128> is anyone on precise using proposed who could ack that software-center 5.2.2.1 still works fine for them on bug #1002271?
[13:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1002271 in software-center "REGRESSION: crash in cell renderer" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1002271
[14:26] <hggdh> seb128: no backtraces for me, will mark verification-done
[14:26] <seb128> hggdh, hey, thank you! did you get the issue before?
[14:26] <hggdh> seb128: yes
[14:26] <seb128> great
[17:53] <TheLordOfTime> Bug Control People: this should have an importance of "high" since it prevents the application from running correctly, and because it has a severe impact on the program for a (currently small) number of people: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/982609
[17:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 982609 in samba4 "invalid smb.conf file" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[17:55] <TheLordOfTime> roadmr: alive?
[17:55] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: yes :)
[17:55] <TheLordOfTime> roadmr: see above
[17:56] <TheLordOfTime> (note: while i show up in "Bug Control", its solely for the nginx package, as I work upstream with triaging and upstreaming bugs)
[17:56] <TheLordOfTime> (for nginx)
[17:58] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: ok, I think it's a pretty big deal if samba4 fails to install :)
[17:58] <TheLordOfTime> indeed
[17:58] <TheLordOfTime> i said "high", but it might be crit
[17:58] <TheLordOfTime> (after reexamining)
[18:00] <roadmr> urgh
[18:01] <TheLordOfTime> this is why i hate working with installatio nerror bugs, kind of hard to figure out sometimes :/
[18:01] <TheLordOfTime> oop i lied, its high
[18:01]  * TheLordOfTime yawns
[18:01] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: yes, I wouldn't go as far as critical
[18:01] <TheLordOfTime> i think i need more coffee
[18:02]  * TheLordOfTime makes a quick coffee run
[18:02] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: there, I set importance to high and added your criteria to keep track of what's been done
[18:02]  * TheLordOfTime returns with a large coffee
[18:03] <TheLordOfTime> how fortunate there's a coffee shop one floor up and i have a running tab there :P
[18:03] <TheLordOfTime> roadmr: thanks
[18:03] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: np, thanks for triaging the bug :)
[18:03] <TheLordOfTime> yep
[18:04] <TheLordOfTime> at least i dont have to stab bugcontrol about nginx bugs now :P
[18:04] <TheLordOfTime> all i have to deal with is the security team :/
[18:04]  * TheLordOfTime has been working on some bugs that are CVEs, and the security team has to address those
[18:04] <roadmr> heheh :)
[18:05] <TheLordOfTime> anyways, while i have you here, can you point me to how to add DEP3 headers to patches?  i havent found one source that mentions where/how to add them to patches
[18:05] <TheLordOfTime> (security team request on the security bugs for nginx i mentioned)
[18:06] <TheLordOfTime> normally, patches i use are derived from already-created patches upstream, and then just included into the debdiffs, but they want DEP3 on these patches (for CVEs)
[18:16] <roadmr> TheLordOfTime: sorry, I've never done that so I don't know how it's done :(
[18:18] <TheLordOfTime> i'll poke my contact on the security team then
[18:18] <TheLordOfTime> :P
[18:19] <roadmr> hehe sorry I couldn't help more :(
[18:20] <TheLordOfTime> nah, not a problem, it seems several people don't know it *shrugs*
[19:57] <hggdh> for reference, DEP3 tags are described in http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
[22:07] <mfisch> bdmurray: question on old bugs, if the bug is no longer reproducable, presumably fixed sometime in the years since the bug was filed, does it go to Invalid?
[22:10] <bdmurray> mfisch: yes
[22:10] <mfisch> bdmurray: I did not see that anywhere in our wiki, perhaps we can document it somewhere
[22:42] <hggdh> actually, if it *has* been confirmed, it should go as fix-released, unknown fix, works on <Ubuntu version>