[02:28] <desrt> robert_ancell: arrive 25, depart 2
[02:29] <robert_ancell> desrt, me too! snap!
[02:38] <RAOF> robert_ancell: I should have a system-compositor that could be used for some testing in the next couple of days. I'm not entirely sure how to go about testing it, though.
[02:44] <robert_ancell> RAOF, we get it into main and have it optionally enabled from lightdm
[02:44] <robert_ancell> and then find victims, er I mean willing testers
[02:45] <RAOF> I was hoping for something slightly less total :()
[02:45] <robert_ancell> RAOF, well, why not?  I guess we could PPA the system compositor part and then still have support in lightdm
[02:45] <RAOF> I guess I need to develop a testing dm harness, basically.
[02:45] <robert_ancell> oh, I see
[02:46] <robert_ancell> you'd need to simulate the kernel interfaces for that right?
[02:47] <RAOF> Not really, no; it could be run under X11.
[02:47] <RAOF> At least, the system compositor part of it can be. The dm needs to be a singleton, so there's fun interaction between the testing dm and the *actual* dm.
[02:48] <RAOF> But the interface between system-compositor and dm should be able to be tested under an existing user session.
[02:48] <robert_ancell> when does the compositor contact the dm?
[02:49] <RAOF> When interesting stuff happens - namely, when clients are ready to switch to.
[02:49] <robert_ancell> isn't the dm just the thing that ran the compositor from it's point of view
[02:49] <RAOF> Right, but the dm needs to talk to the compositor to do all its dm bits - handing off client fds, switching between user sessions, etc.
[02:50] <RAOF> Also, why doesn't C have a bulit-in hashtable type.
[02:50] <RAOF> Stupid primitive language :/
[02:52] <robert_ancell> So you have to write a stub dm right?
[02:52] <RAOF> Yeah, that's what I'm thinking.
[02:53] <RAOF> I was just talking myself into it.
[02:53] <robert_ancell> RAOF, where is the repo?
[02:55] <RAOF> It's on github on the basis that I have a github account and weston's in git. https://github.com/RAOF/weston ; it's not yet in a state to do anything interesting. I need to finish off a bit of the init work, then fold up patches in a more sensible order, then there'll be something to test.
[02:55] <lifeless> is there a code import for it ? :)
[02:56] <robert_ancell> RAOF, so will it be the weston package or will we fork and cut down and make "unity-system-compositor"
[02:56] <RAOF> lifeless: Not yet, no. I'll wait until it's at least marginally useful ;)
[02:56] <RAOF> robert_ancell: At this point I think it can be a part of the weston package.
[02:57] <RAOF> robert_ancell: That's how I'm developing it, and I haven't any hit serious roadblocks yet.
[02:58] <RAOF> It'll also be easy to fork weston and strip out the non-system-compositor bits if it turns out that we need to.
[02:58] <robert_ancell> RAOF, so it will be flexible in terms of supporting multiple transitions and upstream will be happy to take the changes?
[02:59] <RAOF> Yes, and I believe so.
[03:00] <RAOF> The transitions should all be handleable strictly within the system-compositor plugin, or we could do something slightly more annoying like pluggable transitions. Either way, weston already has a reasonably nice way to get the compositor to animate stuff.
[03:28] <lifeless> RAOF: do you know how I can get my middle trackpad button back?
[03:28] <lifeless> RAOF: so that paste is immediate, not 2 seconds later
[03:29] <RAOF> It is immediate here...
[03:29] <lifeless> ><
[03:29] <RAOF> You're talking about a real third button, right?
[03:29] <lifeless> yes, x201s
[03:29] <lifeless> three buttons, pad, two buttons top to bottom
[03:30] <lifeless> RAOF: if I chord on the bottom two, its instant
[03:30] <RAOF> Urgh.
[03:30] <RAOF> Um...
[03:30] <lifeless> I'm guessing its the 'you can scroll with this button' ''feature''
[03:30] <RAOF> So, the answer to your question is "I don't know"
[03:31] <RAOF> I don't see why that would be the case; you've already finished the tap, which means you can't possibly want to scroll with it.
[03:31] <RAOF> Probably just a garden-variety bug.
[03:40] <pitti> Good morning
[05:29] <didrocks> good morning
[05:30] <pitti> bonjour didrocks, ca va?
[05:30] <didrocks> guten morgen pitti! I'm great, thanks, and you?
[05:30] <didrocks> long week-end with the whole family in Lyon, was nice :)
[05:45] <pitti> didrocks: we went to visit some friends for three days, returned yesterday
[05:45] <pitti> too much beer and too little sleep, but we really enjoyed it :)
[07:38] <Sweetshark> moin.
[07:41] <pitti> hey Sweetshark, how are you?
[07:46] <Sweetshark> better than yesterday. had a circulatory collapse in the gym ....
[07:51] <pitti> urgh
[07:53] <RAOF> Oooh. Going too hard?
[08:00] <Sweetshark> yeah, likely just undersugared and underhydrated in a sultry warm climate.
[08:01] <Sweetshark> taking it slow today - the medics wanted to confiscate my bike so that I dont try to ride home ;)
[08:01] <RAOF> The sultry warm climate of northern Europe? What's going on up there?!
[08:02] <Sweetshark> RAOF: well, not climate -- weather.
[08:02] <chrisccoulson> good morning everyone
[08:02] <RAOF> Hey ho chrisccoulson
[08:03] <chrisccoulson> hi RAOF!
[08:03] <Sweetshark> RAOF: its all relative. We northern europeans are weenies wrt that ;)
[08:04] <didrocks> hey chrisccoulson, Sweetshark, RAOF :)
[08:04] <chrisccoulson> hey didrocks, how are you?
[08:04] <chrisccoulson> hi Sweetshark!
[08:04] <didrocks> I'm fine thanks chrisccoulson, yourself?
[08:05] <didrocks> already mostly setup my new laptop yesterday evening. Finishing the install to be up to work :)
[08:08] <Sweetshark> chrisccoulson: congrats to the 15 killed kilograms. arent you brits supposed to use funny units of measure?
[08:08] <chrisccoulson> Sweetshark, yeah, but 15kg is better than 33lb 1.2oz :)
[08:09] <Sweetshark> chrisccoulson: ;)
[08:11]  * Sweetshark updated his release devbuilder too over the weekend. now the quadcore i7 with 16 GB RAM has a 512GB SSD. Also makes the notebook lighter although you wouldnt notice before removing the power pack (which I usually do when not travelling).
[08:15] <chrisccoulson> i think my next machine is going to have to have 16GB of RAM
[08:21] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: oh btw, what was the option again to have a global thunderbird setting of "check in all imap folders"?
[08:33] <didrocks> I'm under the impression that it's not needed anymore, isn't it?
[08:33] <didrocks> or that it's on by default?
[08:37] <seb128> hey didrocks, what is not needed?
[08:42] <larsu> didrocks, it's mail.server.default.check_all_folders_for_new. it was off by default for me
[08:43] <larsu> it should really be on by default
[08:44] <seb128> is that the "actively refresh all subfolders"?
[08:44] <seb128> larsu, hey ;-)
[08:44] <larsu> seb128, hey!
[08:44] <larsu> yes, that's it
[08:45] <seb128> they were discussing making it default during the oneiric cycle I think, dunno if that happened
[08:52] <didrocks> hey seb128 ;)
[08:52] <didrocks> good morning larsu
[08:52] <larsu> hey didrocks, had a nice weekend?
[08:52] <didrocks> larsu: yeah, nice week-end with the family, thanks! Also got my new laptop so, finishing the setup I started yesterday evening :)
[08:53] <didrocks> seems I don't have notification on weechat yet ;)
[08:53] <larsu> didrocks, nice!
[08:53] <didrocks> larsu: and yourself?
[08:54] <larsu> didrocks, very nice also, went to a ropes course yesterday with friends. loads of fun
[08:54] <didrocks> great ;)
[08:56] <chrisccoulson> didrocks, will have a look in a bit. trying to get to the bottom of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754554 first ;)
[08:56] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 754554 in JavaScript Engine "Various JIT test failures related to FloatArrays when compiled with gcc 4.7" [Normal,New: ]
[08:56] <chrisccoulson> so i can play angry birds again!
[08:57] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: larsu gave me the url already :)
[08:58] <didrocks> weird, the boolean is set to false, but I get randomly some new emails in *some* folders without clicking on them
[08:58] <didrocks> the heuristic is weird
[09:12] <ritz> chrisccoulson, morning :)
[09:12] <ritz> good to hear about angry bird
[09:15] <ritz> chrisccoulson, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1000885 :(
[09:15] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000885 in firefox "ff crashes on xslt transformation when using oracle java plugin" [Critical,New]
[09:46] <seb128> pitti, bug #1004992 ... are you still interested in floppy mounting issues? :-)
[09:46] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1004992 in gvfs "Does not detect hotplugged storage device" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1004992
[09:46]  * seb128 hides
[09:46] <pitti> seb128: "still"? I have never been :)
[09:47] <seb128> hehe
[09:48] <seb128> pitti, it had been a while that we didn't get a bug about floppy, I though they finally stopped being used
[09:48] <seb128> pitti, but seems not totally yet ;-)
[09:48] <pitti> it might actually be slightly better with udisks2 now
[10:29] <seb128> pitti, speaking about udisk2, did you see bug #1005643
[10:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1005643 in policykit-desktop-privileges "Internal volumes are now requiring authenication to mount, or unmount " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1005643
[10:29] <pitti> seb128: ah, thanks; will fix
[10:29] <seb128> pitti, danke
[11:06] <tjaalton> i have a pdf file thunderbird thinks is a truetype font, but 'file' & nautilus both recognize as valid pdf
[11:08] <tjaalton> but since it's my paycheck I'd rather not share it :)
[11:09] <seb128> tjaalton, is it attached to an email?
[11:09] <tjaalton> seb128: yep
[11:10] <seb128> tjaalton, look at the email source? is there a mimetype in the source?
[11:11] <tjaalton> seb128: hah, good point. it's faulty
[11:11] <tjaalton> so, sender issue
[11:12] <tjaalton> this was an old email anyway, hasn't happened twice
[11:13] <seb128> tjaalton, ok
[12:43] <desrt> happy tuesday!
[12:43] <ogra_> heh
[12:43] <ogra_> to you too
[13:04] <bcurtiswx> good morning
[13:08] <mterry> pitti, where can I see submitted crash reports and make a bug out of them?  If I'm reading the code right, they get auto-sent to daisy.u.c now with the new apport.  I can't see my crash in errors.u.c.
[13:09] <pitti> mterry: good morning
[13:09] <mterry> pitti, (good morning! :))
[13:09] <pitti> mterry: that's a question for ev, but it should be visible on errors.u.c. somewhere
[13:09] <mterry> pitti, OK, thanks
[13:09] <pitti> mterry: you can also re-enable sending to LP in /etc/apport/crashdb.conf if you want
[13:10] <pitti> mterry: comment out the line with 'problem_types': ['Bug', 'Package'],
[13:11] <mterry> pitti, or add Crash, I believe
[13:11] <pitti> *nod*
[13:18] <larsduesing> Am I here right for questions with apport?
[13:18] <larsduesing> devel-questions
[13:20] <bcurtiswx> good morning kenvandine, gwibber issue (not sure if bug or feature request) but when I get new messages (shown on the unity launcher count) and click into the program, it doesn't get rid of the number, I have to click on either the envolope or the home icons to turn it off..
[13:22] <bcurtiswx> kenvandine, well i keep forgetting you have a channel for gwibber, so I'll continue over there :)
[13:23] <seb128> larsduesing, you can ask there or on #ubuntu-devel
[13:43] <ritz> chrisccoulson, ping
[13:56] <seb128> is anyone on precise using proposed who could ack that software-center 5.2.2.1 still works fine for them on bug #1002271?
[13:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1002271 in software-center "REGRESSION: crash in cell renderer" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1002271
[14:00] <desrt> seb128: any areas in particular to check?
[14:01] <seb128> desrt, not especiall, browse a bit around, maybe install something
[14:01] <desrt> ohhh.  software centre
[14:01]  * desrt read control centre
[14:02] <desrt> oo.  gparted.  that sounds nice!
[14:02]  * desrt installs
[14:02] <seb128> ;-)
[14:03] <seb128> desrt, hey btw, happy tuesday! ;-)
[14:03] <desrt> thanks :D
[14:03] <desrt> our categorisation in the software centre is some kind of a disaster
[14:04] <seb128> desrt, isn't what everyone says about any categorisation? :p
[14:04] <seb128> desrt, I was ready a bug from an user some days ago complaining about music categorization is a disaster as well :p
[14:06] <desrt> seb128: so i go to developer tools
[14:06] <desrt> one of the toplevel items is haskell
[14:06] <desrt> seems a bit weird, but whatever.. haskell is cool
[14:06] <desrt> i click on haskell and there is a single item in there
[14:06] <desrt> and it's not obviously related to haskell
[14:06] <desrt> 'threadscope'
[14:07] <seb128> yeah, "lisp" is the same
[14:08] <seb128> mpt, ^ hey, is that a known design issue?
[14:08] <seb128> "libraries" is the same, over 3k technical items hidden, 1 visible entry
[14:36] <mitya57> didrocks: hey, did you see https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/compizconfig-settings-manager/sync-with-debian/+merge/107786 ?
[14:36] <mitya57> (it's part of our efforts to get rid of python-central)
[14:37] <didrocks> mitya57: hey, in fact, all compiz packaging is changing as upstream is going with one source only
[14:37] <didrocks> mitya57: I already have some working package that I'm just finishing (adding distro patches back right now)
[14:37] <didrocks> mitya57: and it doesn't use python-central anymore
[14:38] <mitya57> didrocks: really? I heard only of compiz + compiz-core + compiz-plugins* merging
[14:38] <didrocks> mitya57: everything, with python-compizconfig and ccsm
[14:38] <didrocks> (look at lp:compiz, which is compiz upstream trunk)
[14:40] <mitya57> didrocks: ok, you may still grab some bits from my branch (like the manpage, working d/watch, etc)
[14:40] <didrocks> mitya57: do you want to contribute to it? I think you can cherry-pick some work and apply to the new branch?
[14:41] <didrocks> mitya57: the new branch should be ready in really just 30 minutes, I'm finishing building using trunk and applying latest distro patches. If you are interested, I can poke you then :)
[14:42] <mitya57> didrocks: my primary interest was python helper things and I don't use compiz myself so I don't think I'm interested in this
[14:42] <mitya57> :(
[14:43] <didrocks> mitya57: ok, sorry for that, you should have poke me first to ensure about what changes in the packaging (but it was a long week-end and I was way…). I'll see what I can pick from here. thanks!
[14:43] <didrocks> (rejecting the branch for now)
[14:44] <mitya57> didrocks: I've just deleted the mp
[14:44] <didrocks> mitya57: ah, and I was juts blaming launchpad ;)
[14:45] <mitya57> :)
[14:45] <didrocks> mitya57: it would have help me though to see if we can pick the manpage for instance
[14:45] <didrocks> I'll use the branch, no worry :)
[14:45] <mitya57> didrocks: thanks
[15:02] <mitya57> dobey: hi
[15:02] <dobey> hi?
[15:02] <mitya57> did you manage to port  python-oauth to py3k?
[15:02] <dobey> yes, somewhat
[15:03] <mitya57> are you going to provide a distro-patch for that or contact upstream?
[15:03] <dobey> there is no upstream, and i have provided a distro-patch for it, but it seems to still have a bug or 30
[15:04] <mitya57> can you please include a patch from http://code.google.com/p/oauth/issues/detail?id=64 if you'l' be going to perform a new upload?
[15:04] <mitya57> (I'm maintainer of python-gdata and it needs this patch)
[15:04] <dobey> i'm not performing an upoad of it
[15:04] <barry> dobey: i should get back to testing your branch in the next day or so
[15:05] <mitya57> barry, dobey: pygdata currently includes a bundled version of
[15:06] <mitya57> oauth with some fixes (http://paste.debian.net/171749/),
[15:06] <dobey> you shouldn't do that
[15:06] <mitya57> if at least the fix for upstream #64 will be merged, this will allow me to use the external version instead of the bundled one
[15:07] <mitya57> see also http://bugs.debian.org/619428
[15:07] <dobey> that patch looks very broken
[15:08] <mitya57> do you mean the changed class name?
[15:09] <seb128> chrisccoulson, was is "aurora" for firefox?
[15:09] <dobey> mitya57: i mean PLAINTEXT != RSA_SHA1
[15:10] <mitya57> hm, yes, it's quite broken
[15:11]  * mitya57 will now look at python-gdata's version and see what has been done there
[15:11] <dobey> so no, we won't ship that patch in debian
[15:12] <dobey> mitya57: you almost certainly don't want to use python-oauth if you can avoid it
[15:13] <mitya57> dobey: google ships an old and buggy version and doesn't worry about that :(
[15:14] <mitya57> dobey: ok, if it's all about debian patches, I can perform a team upload myself when I'll sort out how it should be fixed
[15:15] <dobey> google ships?
[15:15] <mitya57> python-gdata is a google's project :)
[15:18] <jbicha> kenvandine: could you do another light-themes release? there's some nice fixes for GNOME Classic in bzr
[15:20] <dobey> mitya57: you should get google to fix their code then
[15:21] <kenvandine> jbicha, i can look
[15:21] <mitya57> dobey: they don't like to respond to bugs/patches, unfortunately
[15:22] <mitya57> kenvandine, jbicha: it'll be also good to have this SRUed
[15:24] <dobey> mitya57: then there isn't much you can do. drop it from the archive maybe :)
[15:24] <dobey> mitya57: btw, their "CHANGES.txt" file lists a few "support for python 2.2" items, which is quite scary
[15:25] <mitya57> dobey: drop python-gdata? it has some 10 reverse dependencies
[15:25] <dobey> clean archive is a happy archive? :)
[15:26] <mitya57> dobey: ... and some 38009 users according to popcon :)
[15:26] <dobey> maybe they'd be happy to take it over from google then?
[15:27] <dobey> someone needs to fix it. and that someone is not me
[15:27] <mitya57> dobey: in the worst case I can leave it as is
[15:28] <mitya57> which is not bad at all
[15:30] <dobey> anyway, need to get food
[15:30] <seb128> re
[15:31] <seb128> didrocks, pitti, kenvandine, mterry, chrisccoulson, mlankhorst, Sweetshark, tkamppeter: it's meeting if anyone had an agenda or something to discuss
[15:31] <seb128> (seems not from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2012-05-29)
[15:31] <kenvandine> nothing from me
[15:31] <mterry> nothing from me
[15:31] <didrocks> nothing as well
[15:32] <seb128> Ursinha, Laney, cyphermox, whoever else I forget ;-) : ^
[15:32] <cyphermox> nothing to add ;)
[15:33] <mitya57> have to quit now
[15:43] <seb128> ok, seems no meeting then, thanks all ;-)
[15:44] <Laney> is this our last pitti meeting?
[15:44] <pitti> if we would have had one, yes :)
[15:44] <pitti> but I won't drop off IRC next week
[15:44]  * Laney gives you the goodbye bumps :-)
[15:44] <Laney> :P
[15:45] <pitti> thanks! *bow*
[15:45] <pitti> don't make seb128's life too hard!
[15:45] <seb128> ;-)
[15:46] <seb128> pitti, I will not say that we will miss you since you are not going anywhere far but still we will do miss you in some ways ;-)
[15:47] <mlankhorst> seb128: nothing for the agenda :)
[15:51]  * pitti hugs everyone
[15:58]  * bcurtiswx hugs pitti back
[15:58] <bcurtiswx> where you goin' ?
[15:59] <pitti> bcurtiswx: not that far, I'll move to the QA team to do upstream QA technology/test suites
[15:59] <pitti> bcurtiswx: http://www.piware.de/2012/05/to-boldly-go-where-no-test-has-gone-before/
[16:00] <bcurtiswx> pitti, good luck there :) you'll be missed
[16:04] <mlankhorst> pitty is putting the Q in QA *runs*
[16:07] <pitti> :)
[16:24] <aquarius> how do I create a launcher (that is, a .desktop file, not the Unity launcher :)) for a script, without typing it in by hand? Many moons ago you used to be able to right-click the desktop and say "create launcher", but that doesn't work any more (because nautilus doesn't run the desktop, and because the launcher creation tool is part of gnome-panel, which is not installed)
[16:25] <aquarius> the only ways I can find to do it are (a) create it by hand in gedit or (b) run the thing I want to launch, pin it to the Unity Launcher, then dig around in ~/.local/share/applications to find the desktop file and copy it somewhere else :)
[16:26] <seb128> aquarius, the idea was to use something like https://launchpad.net/unity-launcher-editor but I don't think that project is actively worked on or got anywhere, so either of the ways you listed are the current solutions
[16:27] <aquarius> seb128, ah, OK. Just wanted to check there wasn't some hugely obvious way that I was missing :)
[16:27] <seb128> aquarius, no, creating custom launcher is not something high on the design list, I guess most users don't do that, they just run things they install which provide a launcher
[16:28] <aquarius> seb128, oh, definitely. This is so I can run a bunch of scripts without getting the "this is an executable script; do you want to edit it, run it, or run it in the terminal" when I *know* it's an app I want to run
[16:28] <aquarius> not a massively common use case, so if it's not doable easily, I'm fine with that :)
[16:57] <pitti> good night everyone!
[16:57] <didrocks> have a good night pitti!
[16:57]  * didrocks will follow shortly
[17:06] <didrocks> time for exercising, see you tomorrow everyone!
[17:25] <mterry> tremolux, is there a way to make software-center think it's in a different distro release?  So that it will look at precise's paid-apps and such?
[17:26] <tremolux> mterry: heyo!! yes, there is, just use SOFTWARE_CENTER_DISTRO_CODENAME="precise" software-center
[17:26] <mterry> tremolux, fancy!
[17:26] <tremolux> mterry: that will get you the precise banners as well
[17:26] <tremolux> mterry: :D
[17:27] <mterry> tremolux, do you know that it seems to be broken in quantal about "set_data" errors?
[17:27] <mterry> tremolux, (software-center in general, not just with your trick you just showed me)
[17:27] <tremolux> mterry: give it a minute after startup for the caches to get updated (we have some delayed processes to optimize startup time)
[17:27] <tremolux> mterry: yes, that's bug 1000238, super-unfortunate
[17:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1000238 in software-center "Software-Center crashes on starting" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1000238
[17:28] <mterry> cool
[17:28] <tremolux> mterry: as it's just a one-liner that needs to be removed from an old workaround that's not needed anymore :/
[17:29] <tremolux> mterry: mvo is out today, but I have a note in that we need to get this released asap
[17:30] <florida->  if a  laptop has a battery runtime of 3 hours. what would be at sleep. roughly? and can anyone tell what parts are active at sleep mode?
[18:43] <tkamppeter> ronoc, hi
[19:29] <seb128> micahg, hey, how is the firefox 13 testing going? did you have time yet to do a test run on the current candidate?
[19:29] <seb128> jbicha, hey, just as a warning you might want to update your clutter SRU
[19:30] <seb128> jbicha, the mandate now the details listed on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates (impact, dev fix, regression potential etc)
[19:39] <jbicha> seb128: I don't really have a test case and I didn't think that all of that was needed for GNOME point releases
[19:40] <seb128> jbicha, well, they started being stricter on that
[19:40] <seb128> jbicha, also packaging changes are usually not very welcome in a SRU
[19:41] <seb128> jbicha, like that SRU is a merge on Debian which adds extra diff which is not required in precise
[19:41] <seb128> jbicha, that always carries extra chances to create issues
[19:41] <seb128> but let's see what they say about that, I'm not in the SRU team
[19:48] <dobey> seb128: what's with that new mandating btw? :-/
[21:09] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, i'm not going to be popular with jo tomorrow
[22:55] <jasoncwarner_> hey robert_ancell TheMuso bryceh and RAOF could you please update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2012-05-29 and make sure any agenda items are there?
[22:56] <robert_ancell> no items from me
[22:56] <TheMuso> Done, and no agenda items from me.
[22:56] <jasoncwarner_> thanks robert_ancell and TheMuso
[22:56] <jasoncwarner_> and, good morning
[22:56] <RAOF> Good morning!  No agenda items from me.
[22:59]  * bryceh waves
[22:59] <bryceh> none from me either