[16:00] <roaksoax> o/
[16:00] <arosales> hello
[16:00] <hallyn> o/
[16:01] <zul> heylo
[16:01] <lynxman> o/
[16:01] <smb> \o
[16:01] <jimbaker> hi
[16:01] <roaksoax> #startmeeting
[16:01] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue May 29 16:01:44 2012 UTC.  The chair is roaksoax. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:01] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[16:01] <Daviey> hey-ol-a
[16:02] <roaksoax> so let's get started
[16:02] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:02] <utlemming> o/
[16:02] <roaksoax> zul talk to arosales and jamespage offline about SRU tracker
[16:02] <zul> in progress
[16:02] <roaksoax> zul: any updates about the SRU tracker?
[16:02] <arosales> roaksoax: I am syncing up with zul and jamespage
[16:02] <arosales> deciding on which tool to use
[16:03] <arosales> zul or possibly Ursinha's
[16:03] <arosales> so in progress
[16:03] <roaksoax> arosales: awesome!
[16:03] <jamespage> o/
[16:03] <Ursinha> we're talking about it tomorrow :)
[16:03] <roaksoax> [ACTION] zul to sync up with arosales and jamespage.
[16:03] <meetingology> ACTION: zul to sync up with arosales and jamespage.
[16:03] <roaksoax> zul: zul to also pull Ursinha into SRU tracker talks --> I'm guessing that's stillk in progress too
[16:03] <arosales> roaksoax: correct :-)
[16:04] <zul> yay
[16:04] <roaksoax> alright, let'/s move on
[16:04] <roaksoax>  email arosales/Daviey if interested in ubuntu-mir membership
[16:04] <roaksoax> who's displayed their interes in becoming part of the ubuntu-mir team?
[16:04] <roaksoax> or should the question be, have all the interested people emailed arosales and/or Daviey ?
[16:04] <arosales>  I am also sync'ing up with Ursinha on blueprint management (ie tracking blueprint changes)
[16:05] <hallyn> ruh roh
[16:05] <arosales> I didn't receive any mails on interest for ubuntu-mir team
[16:05] <Daviey> me neider
[16:05] <roaksoax> alright, so people I believe you have a chance to offer yourselves and become part of the ubuntu-mir team
[16:06] <Daviey> lets defer it again.
[16:06] <roaksoax> moving on
[16:06] <arosales> roaksoax: can we give it one additional week for follow up and then close on it next week?
[16:06] <roaksoax> arosales: sure!
[16:06] <arosales> thanks
[16:06] <roaksoax> [ACTION] email arosales/Daviey if interested in ubuntu-mir membership
[16:06] <meetingology> ACTION: email arosales/Daviey if interested in ubuntu-mir membership
[16:06] <roaksoax> alright, moving on
[16:07] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Quantal Development
[16:07] <roaksoax> Release Bugs - http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server/release-bugs.html
[16:07] <roaksoax> bug #888123
[16:07] <roaksoax> jamespage: any updates?
[16:08] <jamespage> nope
[16:08] <jamespage> work on the underlying issue is on hold ATM
[16:08] <roaksoax> ok
[16:08] <roaksoax> bug 974584
[16:08] <jamespage> not mega urgent at this point in time unless someone wants to merge erlang
[16:08] <hallyn> working with debian maintainer
[16:09] <roaksoax> awesome!
[16:09] <roaksoax> bug #920197
[16:09] <roaksoax> zul: any updates?
[16:09] <zul> roaksoax: pending SRU team
[16:10] <roaksoax> awesome!
[16:10] <roaksoax> bug #1001846
[16:10] <roaksoax> we were waiting for more input, and we got it. It should be taken care of this week
[16:10] <Daviey> \o/
[16:11] <roaksoax> bug #880339
[16:11] <roaksoax> still incomplete
[16:11] <roaksoax> comments point to a might be related bug
[16:12] <roaksoax> bug #993291
[16:13] <roaksoax> jamespage: any updates ^^?
[16:13] <jamespage> yeah - I need to take a look at that still
[16:13] <jamespage> so no
[16:13] <roaksoax> alright!
[16:13] <roaksoax> so let's move on to blueprints
[16:13] <roaksoax> Blueprints - http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/ubuntu-server.html
[16:13] <arosales> how are folks doing with getting work items documented?
[16:14]  * rbasak hasn't started yet :-/
[16:14] <rbasak> It's on my todo list
[16:14]  * m_3 too
[16:14] <arosales> The release team would like to start setting topics and tread lines by tomorrow
[16:14] <roaksoax> we also need to update the above link as they quantal BP's are not yet listed
[16:14] <Daviey> So.. Started going through the ones with myself as approver... and they are taking good shape.
[16:14] <Daviey> Still needs a little more detail on some.
[16:14] <smoser> that url above should probably have been http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/ubuntu-server.html
[16:14] <hallyn> Daviey: note the user-ns and device-ns ones are not yet approved
[16:14] <roaksoax> ah daa
[16:14] <hallyn> (I marked them 'Review')
[16:15]  * roaksoax dumbd
[16:15] <arosales> The list I am looking at for q for server
[16:15] <arosales> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+specs?role=drafter
[16:15] <arosales> at least for blueprints we need to get work items on, prioritize, and approve for work this cycle
[16:15] <Daviey> The links i supplied in last weeks meeting are probably of use.
[16:16] <roaksoax> ok, so all of us should finish writing our BP's, make sure the WI are docmented so that they can get approved and we can start working on them
[16:16] <Daviey> http://ubuntuserver.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/server-team-20120522-meeting-minutes/
[16:16] <Daviey> Read Quantal Development
[16:16] <roaksoax> Specs currently under consideration are at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+specs?role=drafter. If a spec is missing, let Daviey know.
[16:17] <roaksoax> Blueprints which $user is responsible for driving to Approved state can be found at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~$user/+specs?searchtext=servercloud-q&role=assignee. Please set those which require review to Review state.
[16:17] <arosales> So is EOD wednesday too soon to have the blueprints ready for approval?
[16:17] <roaksoax> Yes from my part
[16:17] <roaksoax> s/part/side
[16:17] <m_3> yes
[16:17] <Daviey> Hmm
[16:17] <rbasak> Daviey: can we please get the typo fixed on ubuntuserver.wordpress.com? It's embarrassing. I don't want to be associated with that site!
[16:18] <Daviey> rbasak: Do you want to drive it's migration to ubuntuserver.org, canonical hosted?
[16:18] <Daviey> [ACTION] ^
[16:18] <meetingology> ACTION: ^
[16:18] <roaksoax> [ACTION] rbasak to drive migration to ubuntuserver.org
[16:18] <meetingology> ACTION: rbasak to drive migration to ubuntuserver.org
[16:18] <roaksoax> thank you rbasak :)
[16:18] <Daviey> thanks rbasak
[16:19] <Daviey> So.. Lets re-cap of the process...
[16:19] <arosales> Thursday an better for folks completing blueprint work item documentation?
[16:19] <Daviey> When you think your spec is ready for review, please mark them 'Review'
[16:20] <Daviey> arosales & myself with significant help from jamespage and smoser will either give feedback, or Approve
[16:20] <Daviey> So.. We can start that ASAP.. so please get your blueprints into a state where you can mark them Review ASAP, and we can start getting them rolled out
[16:20] <Daviey> Sound good?
[16:21] <roaksoax> [ACTION] To finish BP documentation and mark them Review
[16:21] <meetingology> ACTION: To finish BP documentation and mark them Review
[16:22] <Daviey> (ASAP :)
[16:22] <roaksoax> so I guess the silence means all of us agree
[16:22] <roaksoax> [ACTION] To finish BP documentation and mark them Review ASAP!
[16:22] <meetingology> ACTION: To finish BP documentation and mark them Review ASAP!
[16:22] <zul> suuuure :)
[16:22] <jamespage> +1
[16:22] <roaksoax> ok, let's move on
[16:22] <arosales> it would be nice for trend line setting, and tracking if we could have the bulk of work item documentation this competed by this week :-)
[16:22] <roaksoax> indeed!
[16:23] <roaksoax> alright, so we also have merges to take care of
[16:23] <roaksoax> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~davewalker/delta.html
[16:23] <roaksoax> LINK: http://people.canonical.com/~davewalker/delta.html
[16:23] <roaksoax> please take care of your merges, so go wild and have fun
[16:24] <roaksoax> anyone else has anything to discuss?
[16:24] <Daviey> Please feel free to open sync/merge bugs to track assignment. :)
[16:24] <Daviey> ^ optional
[16:24] <roaksoax> ok, so there doesn't seem to be anything else. Let's move on then
[16:24] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:25] <roaksoax> any event where we will be particupating that's coming soon?
[16:26] <roaksoax> I guess there isn't
[16:26] <roaksoax> moving on
[16:26] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:26] <roaksoax> hggdh: o/
[16:27] <roaksoax> uhmm it seems that hggdh is not around, so let;s come back t him later
[16:27] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:27] <roaksoax> smb: o/
[16:27] <smb> yessir! :)
[16:27] <smb> Beside of other pieces here and there, a quick test on the libvirt merge and most time spent on trying to reproduce bug 999755 without having a simple test case. This was unsuccessful but since someone posted exactly what was their reproducer I could confirm this to be no problem restricted to VMs. So now I can try out some variations locally.
[16:27] <smb> ..
[16:28] <roaksoax> awesome
[16:28] <roaksoax> smb: anything else you'd like us to be aware of?
[16:29] <Daviey> smb: Anything on the xen front?
[16:29] <smb> smoser, and utlemming are already away of -virtual going away
[16:29] <Daviey> going away?
[16:29] <smb> away -> aware
[16:29] <Daviey> Where is this documented ?
[16:29] <rbasak> It was mentioned at UDS IIRC
[16:30] <smb> Should be somewhere in the uds flavours track
[16:30] <smoser> we were aware.
[16:30] <Daviey> That should probably be documented somewhere more expressive
[16:30] <smoser> but that didn't stop it from breaking things./
[16:30] <smoser> smb spoke to me about it.
[16:30] <smb> Daviey, where would such a place be?
[16:31] <Daviey> smoser: so it's your fault i didn't know?  noted. :)
[16:31] <utlemming> On our side, it is being tracked as Bug #1005551
[16:31] <Daviey> smb: probably -server ML
[16:31] <smoser> well, probably -devel actually.
[16:31] <smoser> its not just -server
[16:31] <rbasak> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/hardware-q-kernel-version-and-flavors
[16:31] <smb> OK, I can check and send out a specific "warning" about that
[16:32] <utlemming> I'm working on cleaning up the fallout for the build process, but it will require packaing changes and build process changes.
[16:32] <Daviey> smb: thanks!
[16:32] <Daviey> utlemming: if it's significant, better track it on a blueprint :)
[16:33] <utlemming> Daviey: ack
[16:33] <roaksoax> alright, should that be all, let's move on
[16:34] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (rbasak)
[16:34] <roaksoax> rbasak: o/
[16:34] <rbasak> Nothing to report, although you may be interested in some ARM server news: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/29/dell_copper_arm_server/ . Any questions for me?
[16:35] <roaksoax> i guess there's not
[16:35] <zul> copper is shiney
[16:36] <roaksoax> anotherone hgere : http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dell-unveils-programs-to-enable-the-arm-based-server-ecosystem-and-accelerate-development-and-testing-of-arm-based-applications-and-solutions-2012-05-29
[16:36] <roaksoax> ok, so moving on
[16:36] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[16:36] <roaksoax> anyone has anything for us?
[16:37] <smoser> i've got one
[16:37] <roaksoax> I just want to publicly congratulate smoser :)
[16:37] <smoser> rbasak, and i would like to solicit bids for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/972077
[16:37] <Daviey> Yeah... So.
[16:37] <smoser> by solicit bids, i mean "any one interested in doing this ?"
[16:37] <zul> lol
[16:37] <Daviey> Smoser has been declared the Infrastructure team Tech Lead.  Three cheers for smoser
[16:37] <Daviey> o/
[16:37] <zul> yay!
[16:37] <jamespage> \o/
[16:37] <roaksoax> \o/
[16:37] <smb> \o/
[16:37] <Ursinha> :D
[16:37] <jamespage> congrats smoer
[16:37] <smoser> rbasak, is interested, but is time limited, and if someone else wants to take a whack at it, we have an idea of a proof of concept that we'd like to implement
[16:38] <lynxman> \o/
[16:38] <jamespage> or even smoser
[16:38] <Daviey> Now.. Any hard questions related to Infra, please feel free to tax smoser.
[16:38] <Ursinha> congrats smoser
[16:38] <arosales> congrats smoser
[16:38] <lynxman> smoser: you're da man
[16:38] <utlemming> all praise to smoser!
[16:38] <m_3> *\o/*
[16:38] <roaksoax> congrats Mr. Moser
[16:38] <smoser> (yes, thanks for the congrats, NOW BACK TO THE MEETING!)
[16:38] <smoser> :)
[16:38] <Ursinha> lol
[16:38] <SpamapS> hody
[16:38] <SpamapS> howdy even
[16:38] <roaksoax> smoser: Open Discussion :)
[16:38] <Daviey> SpamapS: just in time.
[16:38] <zul> congrats captain oh my captain...my sparkle in my eye
[16:38] <rbasak> congrats smoser!
[16:38] <smoser> so, if anyone would want to take a look at implementing the apt client side of our proposed fix, please feel free to ping me.
[16:39] <jamespage> o/
[16:39] <roaksoax> [ACTION]: Anyone interested in taking care of bug #972077 to ping smoser
[16:39] <meetingology> ACTION: : Anyone interested in taking care of bug #972077 to ping smoser
[16:39] <jamespage> Bug Triage Process - I sent an email to ubuntu-server last week
[16:39] <roaksoax> alright, no other subject to bring to the table?
[16:39] <jamespage> please could people have a read and provide feedback - thanks
[16:40] <rbasak> I think I need to follow the process that jamespage has documented and then make a note of any bugs I get stuck on and why
[16:40] <jamespage> rbasak, that is a fine way to debug it!
[16:40] <rbasak> jamespage: deubg? You want me to file bugs on the triage process? And how should we triage those bugs?
[16:41] <rbasak> :-)
[16:41] <jamespage> lol
[16:41] <roaksoax> lol
[16:41] <roaksoax> alright, if there's nothing more
[16:41] <roaksoax> I guess we can end this
[16:41] <roaksoax> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[16:41] <roaksoax> same time/place
[16:41] <roaksoax> (June 5th)
[16:42] <roaksoax> thank you all
[16:42] <roaksoax> #endmeeting
[16:42] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue May 29 16:42:05 2012 UTC.
[16:42] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-29-16.01.moin.txt
[16:42] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-29-16.01.html
[16:42] <arosales> roaksoax: thanks for chair'ing
[16:42] <roaksoax> my pleasure
[16:43] <jamespage> ttfn
[16:59] <bjf> o/
[16:59] <jsalisbury> #startmeeting
[16:59] <jsalisbury> ##
[16:59] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue May 29 16:59:44 2012 UTC.  The chair is jsalisbury. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:59] <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
[16:59] <jsalisbury> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[16:59] <jsalisbury> ##
[16:59] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[16:59] <jsalisbury> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Precise
[16:59] <jsalisbury> # Meeting Etiquette
[16:59] <jsalisbury> #
[16:59] <jsalisbury> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[16:59] <jsalisbury> #       'o/' indicates you have something to add (please wait until you are recognized)
[16:59] <jsalisbury> Roll Call for Ubuntu Kernel Weekly Status Meeting
[17:00] <ppisati> o/
[17:00] <cking> o/
[17:00] <arges> o/
[17:00] <henrix> o/
[17:00] <kamal> o/
[17:00] <sconklin> o/
[17:00]  * smb rushes in
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:00] <ppisati> Q/omap4: Ubuntu-3.4.0-201.3 is out, with hdmi and jack audio support. Some of the new features (like video and audio offloading to gpu/dsp) will have to wait until 3.5rcX hits master, since we need CMA and dma-map support (already present in linus vanilla).
[17:00] <sconklin> only fools rush in
[17:00] <ppisati> ..
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (jsalisbury)
[17:00] <jsalisbury> Release metrics and incoming bug data can be reviewed at the following link:
[17:00] <jsalisbury> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kt-meeting.txt
[17:01] <jsalisbury> ..
[17:01] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Milestone Targeted Work Items (ogasawara)
[17:02] <jsalisbury> We can come back to this topic.
[17:02] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: CVE's (sconklin)
[17:02] <sconklin> == 2012-05-29 (weekly) ==
[17:02] <sconklin> Currently we have 88 CVEs on our radar, with 2 new CVEs added this week.
[17:02] <sconklin> See the CVE matrix for the current list:
[17:02] <sconklin> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/ALL-linux.html
[17:02] <sconklin> Overall the backlog has increased slightly slightly this week:
[17:02] <sconklin> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/cve-metrics.txt
[17:02] <sconklin> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/cve/pkg/CVE-linux.txt
[17:02] <sconklin> ..
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Status: Stable, Security, and Bugfix Kernel Updates - Precise/Oneiric/Natty/Lucid/Hardy (bjf/herton/henrix)
[17:03] <bjf> Here is the status for the main kernels, until today (May  29):
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf>  * Hardy    - 2.6.24-31.101 - No change this cycle
[17:03] <bjf>  * Lucid    - 2.6.32-41.90  - Testing; Single CVE
[17:03] <bjf>  * Natty    - 2.6.38-15.60  - Testing: 7 CVEs
[17:03] <bjf>  * Oneiric  - 3.0.0-21.35   - Verification; 2 stable upstream releases (approx. 111 commits)
[17:03] <bjf>  * Precise  - 3.2.0-25.39   - Verification; 2 stable upstream releases (approx. 271 commits)
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> Current opened tracking bugs details:
[17:03] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/kernel-sru-workflow.html
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> For SRUs, SRU report is a good source of information:
[17:03] <bjf>  * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> Future stable cadence cycles:
[17:03] <bjf>  * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock
[17:03] <bjf>  
[17:03] <bjf> ..
[17:03] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions? Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:04] <kamal> o/
[17:04] <ogasawara> jsalisbury: o/
[17:04] <jsalisbury> kamal, go ahead
[17:04] <kamal> An old colleague of mine, Dave Taht, is a member of the http://www.bufferbloat.net/ group.  Some of their work will be landing in the 3.5 kernel (codel and fq_codel - a new active TCP queue management algo).
[17:04] <kamal> Dave would like to be in contact with someone on the Ubuntu kernel team to talk about configuration and usage issues for that stuff.  Shall I direct him to anyone in particular?  Is there a networking point-person?
[17:04] <kamal> ..
[17:05] <apw> kamal, i'd say just get him to send email to kernel-team@
[17:05] <tgardner> kamal, he can start with me or apw
[17:05] <tgardner> kernel-team@ works as well
[17:05] <kamal> ok, two names + the kernel-team@ list   :-)    that'll do  :-)  thanks.
[17:05] <tgardner> ..
[17:05] <jsalisbury> ogasawara, shall I move back to your topics?
[17:05] <ogasawara> jsalisbury: yes please
[17:06] <jsalisbury> [TOPIC] Milestone Targeted Work Items (ogasawara)
[17:06]  * ogasawara had a bit of a crisis
[17:06] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/canonical-kernel-distro-team-quantal-alpha-1.html
[17:06] <ogasawara> || apw         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 4 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 3 work items  ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 1 work item ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || smb         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || ppisati     || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || jk-         || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work items  ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || ogasawara   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 1 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 1 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || cking       || hardware-q-kernel-delta-review  || 3 work items  ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || jjohansen   || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 2 work item   ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> || kernel-team || hardware-q-kernel-config-review || 10 work items ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> ||             || hardware-q-kernel-versions-and-flavors || 2 work items ||
[17:06] <ogasawara> If your name is in the above table, please review your Alpha-1 work
[17:06] <ogasawara> items.  If anyone has a spare cycle, feel free to take one of the work
[17:06] <ogasawara> items assigned to the team.
[17:06] <ogasawara> ..
[17:06] <ogasawara> Last week we uploaded the 3.4.0-3.8 Quantal kernel.  This included an
[17:06] <ogasawara> updated AppArmor patch set and misc config updates and bug fixes.
[17:06] <ogasawara> Please note that Alpha-1 is next Thurs June 7.  I'll intend to upload a
[17:06] <ogasawara> final Alpha-1 kernel early next week, ie Monday.
[17:06] <ogasawara> We've also began providing the 12.10 kernel for 12.04.  We welcome any
[17:06] <ogasawara> early adopters to plaes install, test, and let us know your feedback.
[17:06] <ogasawara> It is available from the following PPA:
[17:06] <ogasawara> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport
[17:06] <ogasawara> Important upcoming dates:
[17:07] <ogasawara>  * Thurs Jun 7 - Alpha 1 (~2 weeks)
[17:07] <ogasawara> ..
[17:07] <ogasawara> s/~2 weeks/~1 week/
[17:07] <jsalisbury> Anything from anyone else?
[17:07] <jsalisbury> Thanks everyone
[17:07] <jsalisbury> #endmeeting
[17:07] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue May 29 17:07:51 2012 UTC.
[17:07] <meetingology> Minutes (wiki):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-29-16.59.moin.txt
[17:07] <meetingology> Minutes (html):        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-29-16.59.html
[17:07] <cking> thanks jsalisbury
[17:08] <kamal> thanks jsalisbury
[17:08] <herton> jsalisbury, thanks