[06:53] <dholbach> good morning
[06:57] <ajmitch> morning dholbach
[06:57] <dholbach> hi ajmitch
[07:07] <micahg> ajmitch: just kicked off the openclipart build
[07:10] <soren> Heh. Had to read that 3-4 times before realising it wasn't open-CLI-part, but open-clip-art :)
[07:10] <geser> good morning
[07:16] <ajmitch> micahg: thanks! :)
[11:37] <dupondje> Anyone knows how I can get Numlock state in GDK2?
[12:09] <dholbach> bigon, salut, ça va?
[12:10] <dholbach> bigon, do you think you could take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policycoreutils/+bug/1005398? the bug is fixed in Debian and quantal, but I'm not sure this SRU upload is the best way we can fix it in precise
[12:14] <bigon> dholbach: salut :)
[12:14] <bigon> let me look
[12:14] <dholbach> merci beaucoup mon ami
[12:32] <bigon> dholbach: you should probably remove the symlink from the runlevel only on purge
[12:32] <bigon> (on debian I actually made debhelper generate the stanza in the maintainer scripts)
[13:19] <dholbach> bigon, I just got across the bug when I was patch piloting and thought that somebody who had more knowledge about it might have a better idea
[13:21] <bigon> dholbach: the correct way IMHO is to use dh_installinit
[13:23] <bobweaver> anyone now where I can find a tutorial on packaging with cmake? I have been hacking this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-sUVVvRdKE    and am almost ready to package but I dont know if I am good enough at it yet so any tutorials would help a bunch thanks
[15:35] <Laney> geser: did you find anything out about ghc?
[16:12] <bdrung> tumbleweed: your dch distro check logic is broken
[16:13] <bdrung> tumbleweed: dch -D foobar-prop does not throw a warning
[17:21] <jtaylor> gaa! bug 1006026, how do they get past the bug pattern!
[17:53] <geser> Laney: sort of, infinity is looking at it. He suspects that because armel is now ARMv5 but GHC doesn't know about it.
[18:20] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all!
[20:58] <lfaraone> barry: oops. As you can tell, I copypasted from another welcome email, and customeised everything but the name :P
[20:58] <barry> lfaraone: yep, no worries :)
[20:59] <lfaraone> barry: also, I asked, and "discussing debian policy at a local pub" is not an acceptable way to pass you through the NM process.
[20:59] <lfaraone> that was my first plan.
[20:59] <barry> lfaraone: i knew i should have included dinner
[21:00] <lfaraone> barry: Hmm I'll get back to you on that.
[21:00]  * barry isn't above a bribe, especially if it's delicious
[21:04] <directhex> lfaraone, pretty sure that's how many debian developers got their DD status
[21:04] <directhex> lfaraone, cambridge is a fine place to do it, due to abnormally high DD concentration
[21:05] <lfaraone> Blame MIT and http://debathena.mit.edu/
[23:39] <psusi> if rev 121 is a merge, how do you get bzr to show the revisions that were merged in?
[23:40] <StevenK> bzr log -n 0