[07:52] <ochosi> morning everyone
[08:56] <ochosi> bluesabre, bluesabre-laptop : should we maybe tweak the application-filter to only show binaries and .desktop files instead of archives and isos etc. as well?
[15:37] <knome> woohoo! http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/group/topic-quantal-flavor-xubuntu.html works!
[15:38] <knome> looks like we have more items this time!
[15:38] <knome> or, we have just prepared better
[15:42] <astraljava> Do we also have more assignees? ;)
[15:43] <knome> 03:56  micahg: knome: in the blueprint for my assignment, please use [xubuntu-dev] (micahg)
[15:43] <knome> that! ^
[15:43] <knome> we don't want your US stuff :P
[15:49] <astraljava> meh
[15:49] <astraljava> It seems anyway that I'm going to be more active on Xubuntu than Studio this cycle.
[15:51] <knome> heh.
[15:51] <knome> :)
[15:52] <knome> crawlerz, any reason for two nicks?
[15:52] <knome> astraljava, i'm really waiting for friday so we can get some QA stuff done!
[15:52] <knome> unless we eat, drink and then are too tired to do anything else than play ps3 :D
[15:57] <astraljava> It might happen, but let's give it a try, still. :)
[18:35] <laite> one idea that came to mind: it would be really nice if 'appearance'-dialog showed when selected theme doesn't have gtk3-configs
[18:36] <laite> perhaps with a link to 'why are some of my applications so ugly'-topic in wiki =)
[18:51] <knome> laite, the wiki should be used for developer communication only, for user-communication the website is better
[18:55] <laite> knome: yeah, I didn't really mean any specific wiki, just some page (perhaps ubuntu-wiki) that would explain that FAQ ^
[18:56] <laite> but should these kind of things be done in upstream, not with xubuntu itself?
[18:56] <laite> as in: how strictly xubuntu sticks to upstream with things like this