[07:10] <dholbach> good morning
[07:12] <dholbach> I'm very pleased - we have our first contributors to the bug fixing initiative alread
[07:12] <dholbach> y
[07:12] <geser> good morning dholbach
[07:13] <dholbach> Sebastian Carneiro, Siddhanathan S. and Guruprasad
[07:13] <dholbach> hey geser
[07:15] <dholbach> I was particularly surprised to see somebody take on a package which was in Debian as well (my mistake, I wanted to pick just Ubuntu-only packages) and they sent a patch to Debian too
[07:27] <dholbach> and Bruno Ribeiro too
[07:27] <dholbach> nice
[09:06] <tumbleweed> bdrung: you synced devscripts \o/
[09:49] <tumbleweed> broder/backporters: re bug 1007042: I'm assuming we should update-maintainer backports?
[09:49] <bdrung> tumbleweed: finally. it was on my todo list for month
[09:50] <tumbleweed> it was on mine for the release, got to it early :)
[09:53] <Laney> "we should update-maintainer backports"?
[09:53] <tumbleweed> run update-maintainer on them
[09:54] <tumbleweed> oh, my comment hasn't landed yet
[09:54]  * tumbleweed blames the terrible internet in this welsh pub
[09:54] <Laney> maybe
[09:54] <Laney> or maybe dpkg-source's regexp or whatever it is should be fixed for this new schema
[09:54] <tumbleweed> anyway, the issue is that now backports contain "ubuntu" in their version
[09:54] <tumbleweed> and dpkg-source doesn't like it
[09:55] <tumbleweed> reading the source, we can trivially get around this by exporting @ubuntu.com in DEBEMAIL
[09:56] <Laney> isn't it the other way around?
[09:57] <tumbleweed> err yes
[12:34] <tumbleweed> jbicha: re bug 1007042, what's not clear in that changelog entry?
[12:40] <jbicha> why is ~ubuntu12.04.1 better than ~precise1? what makes it more "future-proof"?
[12:42] <Zhenech> jbicha, maybe people thing what will happen after ubuntu xx.yy Zetty Zoo :)
[12:43] <jbicha> oh ok
[12:43] <Zhenech> just guessing, though
[12:43] <tumbleweed> jbicha: yup, the z->a wrap aronud. Not that that's an issue for a while yet, but it will be eventually
[13:17] <geser> and ideally we switch to the ~ubuntuXX.YY scheme as long as ~$series < ~ubuntu
[14:36] <tumbleweed> oh, Laney: not going to be able to make the meeting. But I don't have anything to comment on, either
[14:38] <Laney> aye
[14:48] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all!
[17:54] <broder> tumbleweed: i'm not actually sure whether or not i think we should for no-change backports
[20:20] <TheFred> hello
[20:23] <TheFred> I wish to create a .deb package which will include an icon in the same way that dropbox and skype does, where can i find more information about doing this?
[20:24] <TheFred> By which i mean on the same panel as the the system displays the time/date/etc...
[20:36] <JanC> TheFred: http://developer.ubuntu.com/resources/technologies/application-indicators/
[20:39] <JanC> in some cases it's better to integrate with one of the existing indicators though (messages, sound, etc.)
[21:00] <TheFred> JanC, Thankyou very much
[22:36] <TheFred> How would I go about getting my program into the Ubuntu Software Center as a priced item? Do i have to contact Canonical?
[22:45] <micahg> TheFred: https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/
[22:47] <TheFred> micahg, thankyou