[01:29] <coder543> so I've been looking into this problem off and on for quite awhile and I'm stuck. Why is it so hard to get a bzr branch to automatically build into a ppa? This is the project that I've got ready, but I have no idea how to get the ppa to function: https://launchpad.net/procmon
[01:30] <coder543> it's literally just one .c file and one .h file, which produce one binary file. There are no dependencies on anything beyond the standard c library.
[13:47] <alkisg> Hi, by default, when I build a package in my PPA that build-depends on other packages, does it use the (newer) versions of them that I provide in my PPA?
[13:49] <geser> yes, it uses apt to install the build dependencies
[13:50] <alkisg> Thank you
[14:40] <paultag> Were source recipies removed? I can't figure out how to make a new one
[14:41] <paultag> I see there's a link under `code', but it's not showing a creation link
[14:44] <james_w> paultag, you are looking at a branch page>
[14:44] <james_w> ?
[14:44] <paultag> james_w: https://code.launchpad.net/~fluxbox-maintainers/+recipes
[14:44] <paultag> that's where I ended up
[14:44] <james_w> odd
[14:44] <paultag> but I would rather like a way to roll out a new recipie
[14:45] <james_w> go to the page of the branch that you want to be the base branch
[14:45] <paultag> james_w: https://code.launchpad.net/~fluxbox-maintainers/fluxbox/development ←
[14:45] <james_w> "Create packaging recipe"
[14:45] <paultag> james_w: totally missed that. Thanks! :)
[18:12] <imbrandon> short of filling a bug against launchpad its self, is there a way for logged in "trusted" users to reports/delete/mark replies like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/cloud-init/+bug/596993/comments/14 as SPAM ?
[18:13] <imbrandon> ( i know its sunday , so just *whenever* someone sees this, not urgent etc etc )
[18:18] <geser> during the week it seems to be sufficient to mention it here (as long as the help contact is present), during othertimes file a question
[18:20] <dobey> fwiw, that user had already been suspended. i've hidden that comment as well.
[18:21] <imbrandon> :) ty ty
[18:22] <imbrandon> just stumbled on it. suprisingly of 6 years using LP thats the first time i've come accross spam :)
[18:24] <imbrandon> would be a nice feature for people of certain teams and thus vetted to not be a bot most likely ( like ubuntu members or ubuntu-core-developers ) to flag items tooo , although like i said dosnt seem to be a big issue :)
[18:24] <imbrandon> enjoy the rest of the weekend ! cheers
[18:40] <hggdh> "You have reached your quota for directly contacting other Launchpad users. You can try again in 23 hours." <- I am sending an email on behalf of the membership Board. Can I get a waiver?
[18:43] <lifeless> hggdh: no, we have no facility for that.
[18:43] <hggdh> lifeless: thank you. I will keep on tomorrow, then
[18:43] <lifeless> imbrandon: http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad - better than a bug for such data hygiene issues
[18:44] <lifeless> hggdh: (sorry; you may want to look and see if there is a bug about this limitation)
[18:45] <hggdh> lifeless: in all this time with UBuntu and LP, this is the very first time I needed it. Frankly, I do not see the need for a bug (once in 6 years does not a need make)