| brokenfingers | VERIFY REGISTER brokenfingers dpgkncouoxye | 00:47 |
|---|---|---|
| brokenfingers | whoops! | 00:47 |
| penguin42 | oops | 00:52 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm | ||
| === schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm | ||
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| === vibhav is now known as Guest561234 | ||
| === Guest561234 is now known as vibhav | ||
| penguin42 | ubuntu-bug won't let me report a problem with adobe-flashplugin but that seems to be the partner way to install flash? Is the right thing to remove that, put flashplug-installer back in and try again? | 15:21 |
| penguin42 | right, looks like 11.2.202.0 flash is broke on that machine - bug 1008132 | 16:07 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1008132 in flashplugin-nonfree "11.2.202.0 fails every time (nothing displayed, but shows in about:plugins), 11_1r102_62_32bit_debug works" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1008132 | 16:07 |
| Ologn | Is it just my system, or does the "barrage" package not launch at all on 12.04? I should warn people beforehand, it also seems to mess up the display to where you have to go to displays and reset your screen size | 16:21 |
| Ologn | I reported a bug anyhow... | 16:21 |
| penguin42 | Ologn: Hmm, not happy for me either - I get a black screen witha light blue bit to the left | 16:27 |
| Ologn | penguin42: Are you x86-64 or x86? | 16:28 |
| Ologn | penguin42: And you're 12.04? | 16:28 |
| penguin42 | yep, kubuntu 12.04 | 16:29 |
| Ologn | x86-64? | 16:29 |
| Ologn | or x86? | 16:29 |
| penguin42 | 64 | 16:29 |
| penguin42 | what's your bug number? | 16:30 |
| Ologn | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/barrage/+bug/1008011 | 16:30 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1008011 in barrage "Barrage does not open - crashes with SIGABRT" [Undecided,New] | 16:30 |
| Ologn | I did the dbgsym for the sdl packages and barrage | 16:31 |
| * penguin42 has mediumised it for you | 16:32 | |
| Ologn | cool, thanks | 16:34 |
| brokenfingers | bug 813134 Has Anyone looked into this? It's pretty serious, but I don't know what to make of it or why there is relitively no activity | 18:36 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 813134 in ubiquity "[DATALOSS] ubiquity overwrites luks-formatted device without warning" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813134 | 18:36 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: Thing is I thought it was fixed - I remember a discussion from a few months about it | 18:37 |
| brokenfingers | Yah. I just looked and like 5 people (inexperienced) had fooled with the status | 18:38 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: The asignee assigned themselves the day they joined LP and just abandoned launchpad and people thought it was fixed :( | 18:40 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: Ah ok, so I see why I remember it, see bug 762636 that links to a thread I commented on and then to bug 420080 that has a fix released | 18:42 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 762636 in ubiquity "Ubuntu installer kills LUKS partitions without warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762636 | 18:42 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 420080 in partman-crypto "Configure encrypted volumes destroys existing data" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/420080 | 18:42 |
| brokenfingers | punguin42: Oh, the I'll take care of changing bug 813134 and bug 762636 to FixRel and mark as duplicates | 18:44 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 813134 in ubiquity "[DATALOSS] ubiquity overwrites luks-formatted device without warning" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/813134 | 18:44 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 762636 in ubiquity "Ubuntu installer kills LUKS partitions without warning" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762636 | 18:44 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: Yeh, I'd just dupe them to 420080 | 18:45 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Im on it | 18:45 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: actually, it might be worth checking.... | 18:46 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: how? | 18:46 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: I mean the fixes in 420080 were in partman-crypto that was what the alternate installer used, is that the case in the graphical installer - I don't think the graphical installer used to be able to do encrypted stuff? | 18:46 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Oh... I see what you mean. What should I do? Dupe them? | 18:47 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: I'd dupe 813134 and 762636 then add a comment that it looks like 420080 - but with a 'is it the same' - and add that comment to both your dupe and a comment on 420080 | 18:50 |
| brokenfingers | pengin42: K. What about the status? Leave in "New" in Ubiquity? | 18:51 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: It seems to me a confirmed since at least 2 people are suffering from it | 18:52 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Whitch One? 813134 and 762636 only affect 1. | 18:53 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: One each, and when you dupe them together they'll affect 2 | 18:53 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Oh yeah. That's right! Pffff | 18:54 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: 762636 I cant change The Status. | 18:55 |
| penguin42 | ah, because it's duped into 420080 | 18:56 |
| penguin42 | ah, it's all duped into 420080 | 18:56 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: You can't change status on a dupe | 18:57 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: I Un-duped it, but still can't cant change it? | 18:58 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Are you bug-control? | 18:58 |
| penguin42 | yep | 18:59 |
| brokenfingers | Oh? Can you chnge it? | 18:59 |
| * penguin42 scratches head - ok, so the intent is to dupe 762636 to 813134? | 18:59 | |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: No, can you change it to cofirmed and then I'll dupe it? | 19:00 |
| penguin42 | ok, try that - I took 813134 out of the dupe | 19:01 |
| penguin42 | and set 762636 to confirmed | 19:01 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Ahhh.. THank you! | 19:02 |
| penguin42 | np | 19:02 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: sometime in the future I should prabably join Bug-cont myself tho. | 19:02 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: Feel free to apply | 19:03 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: are you a member of bug-squad? | 19:03 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Yes. | 19:03 |
| penguin42 | ok | 19:03 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: am I experienced enogh? | 19:04 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: The criteria/knowledge is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl if you already can say yes to all those and feel experienced enough then apply | 19:06 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Ithink I can, I'll try applying | 19:08 |
| penguin42 | good luck! | 19:08 |
| brokenfingers | Thank you | 19:08 |
| Kus | hello | 20:00 |
| Kus | i have a bug reported, but need to follow instructions for details, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1007765 | 20:01 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1007765 in ubuntu "brightness adjusting crashes system" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 20:01 |
| Kus | what is the key combination? i do not know Sysrq+r e i s u b (reisub one letter at time) | 20:02 |
| Kus | what is Sysrq? | 20:02 |
| jtaylor | ctrl alt print | 20:32 |
| jtaylor | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key | 20:32 |
| jtaylor | reisub will reboot your system | 20:32 |
| jtaylor | (raising elephants is so utterly boring :) ) | 20:32 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: I'm writing my aplication now, I have a question, If I don't exactly have 5 AMAZINGLY SPECTACULARLY FABULOUS bugs, and I've never forwarded upstream(but I know how to), what do I do? | 21:02 |
| penguin42 | brokenfingers: They don't have to be amazingly spectacular - they just have to show you're applying the rules and making decisions appropriately | 21:04 |
| brokenfingers | penguin42: Mmmm, but do they have to see 1 thats forwarded upstream? (bugzilla.gnome.org is down right now) | 21:05 |
| === Adri2000 is now known as Guest33157 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!